d037ada51d
## Description With https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/27915 issue, we changed the profiling questions during new user onboarding. However, the subtexts to the options should be changed according to the new [design](https://www.figma.com/file/kbU9xPv44neCfv1FFo9Ndu/User-Activation?type=design&node-id=3134-18334&mode=design&t=m8UYj5Qkl3iBplFk-0). #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28159 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
89 lines
1.6 KiB
TypeScript
89 lines
1.6 KiB
TypeScript
export interface OptionType {
|
|
label?: string;
|
|
value?: string;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export const roleOptions: OptionType[] = [
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Frontend (HTML/JS/React)",
|
|
value: "frontend engineer",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Backend (APIs/Databases)",
|
|
value: "backend engineer",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Fullstack",
|
|
value: "fullstack engineer",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "SQL Queries & Basic Coding",
|
|
value: "business analyst",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Non Technical",
|
|
value: "non technical",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Other",
|
|
value: "other",
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
export const useCaseOptions: OptionType[] = [
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Just Exploring",
|
|
value: "just exploring",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Personal Project",
|
|
value: "personal project",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Work Project",
|
|
value: "work project",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Other",
|
|
value: "other",
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
type OptionTypeWithSubtext = OptionType & {
|
|
subtext?: string;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export const proficiencyOptions: OptionTypeWithSubtext[] = [
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Brand New",
|
|
subtext: "I've never written code before.",
|
|
value: "Brand New",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Novice",
|
|
subtext: "Learning the ropes. Basic understanding of coding concepts.",
|
|
value: "Novice",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Intermediate",
|
|
subtext: "Can tackle moderately complex projects.",
|
|
value: "Intermediate",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Advanced",
|
|
subtext: "Mastery in development. Experienced with complex coding tasks.",
|
|
value: "Advanced",
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
export const useCaseOptionsForNonSuperUser: OptionTypeWithSubtext[] = [
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Work Project",
|
|
value: "work project",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: "Personal Project",
|
|
value: "personal project",
|
|
},
|
|
];
|