PromucFlow_constructor/app/client/test/testMockedWidgets.tsx
rahulramesha 0fd3345163
chore: Rename and cleanup of editor components (#26944)
## Description
This PR is aimed at Renaming and cleanup of editor components. The
changes include,
- Rename Editor components to reflect more of it's function as an editor
component
- Rename all references of the container to wrapper so as to avoid
confusion with Actual containers and canvases
- Pass down few instances of selected properties to children instead of
reselecting the same in the children
- Remove all instances of `isAutolayout`, instead use
`useLayoutSystemFeatures` to check if the particular feature is enabled
in the particular layout type.

P.S. please feel free to suggest better names that define the function
of the components.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #26571

#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed

---------

Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-12 19:44:02 +05:30

29 lines
897 B
TypeScript

import { APP_MODE } from "entities/App";
import AppViewerPageContainer from "pages/AppViewer/AppViewerPageContainer";
import Canvas from "pages/Editor/Canvas";
import WidgetsEditorWrapper from "pages/Editor/WidgetsEditorWrapper";
import React from "react";
import { useSelector } from "react-redux";
import { getCanvasWidgetsStructure } from "@appsmith/selectors/entitiesSelector";
import { useMockDsl } from "./testCommon";
export function MockCanvas() {
const canvasWidgetsStructure = useSelector(getCanvasWidgetsStructure);
return (
<Canvas
widgetsStructure={canvasWidgetsStructure}
pageId=""
canvasWidth={0}
/>
);
}
export function UpdateAppViewer({ dsl }: any) {
useMockDsl(dsl, APP_MODE.PUBLISHED);
return <AppViewerPageContainer />;
}
export function UpdatedEditor({ dsl }: any) {
useMockDsl(dsl, APP_MODE.EDIT);
return <WidgetsEditorWrapper />;
}