PromucFlow_constructor/app/client/src/plugins/Linting/globalData.ts
Apeksha Bhosale 0f393a2423
chore: separated tree type into common file to be extended on EE (#27812)
## Description
UnEvalTree, dataTree and configTree's entities needs to be extended on
EE to accommodate module inputs and different types of modules hence the
separation.
I have added few more sanity checks in the existing code which were
throwing errors/warning on EE.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)

#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-10 18:02:17 +05:30

56 lines
1.6 KiB
TypeScript

import type { ConfigTree, DataTree } from "entities/DataTree/dataTreeTypes";
import { isEmpty } from "lodash";
import type { EvalContext } from "workers/Evaluation/evaluate";
import { getEvaluationContext } from "./utils/getEvaluationContext";
class GlobalData {
globalDataWithFunctions: EvalContext = {};
globalDataWithoutFunctions: EvalContext = {};
unevalTree: DataTree = {};
configTree: ConfigTree = {};
cloudHosting = false;
initialize(
unevalTree: DataTree,
configTree: ConfigTree,
cloudHosting: boolean,
) {
this.globalDataWithFunctions = {};
this.globalDataWithoutFunctions = {};
this.unevalTree = unevalTree;
this.configTree = configTree;
this.cloudHosting = cloudHosting;
}
getGlobalData(withFunctions: boolean) {
// Our goal is to create global data (with or without functions) only once during a linting cycle
if (withFunctions) {
if (isEmpty(this.globalDataWithFunctions)) {
this.globalDataWithFunctions = getEvaluationContext(
this.unevalTree,
this.configTree,
this.cloudHosting,
{
withFunctions: true,
},
);
}
return this.globalDataWithFunctions;
} else {
if (isEmpty(this.globalDataWithoutFunctions)) {
this.globalDataWithoutFunctions = getEvaluationContext(
this.unevalTree,
this.configTree,
this.cloudHosting,
{
withFunctions: false,
},
);
}
return this.globalDataWithoutFunctions;
}
}
}
export const globalData = new GlobalData();