PromucFlow_constructor/app/client/src/plugins/Linting/utils
Apeksha Bhosale 4dc6df0013
chore: query module evaluation (#27660)
> Pull Request Template
>
> Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request.
Delete all quotes before creating the pull request.
>
## Description
There are multiple refactors and split for query module's creator flow
changes which involves module input -- it's a new entity introduced as
part of modules project

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
Part of
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/modules-pod-63e0d668a7fea03850c89c6f/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/27352

#### Type of change

- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
..
diffGenerator.ts
entityParser.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
getEntityDependencies.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
getEvaluationContext.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
getJSToLint.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
getLintingErrors.ts fix: setter mutation issue (#25886) 2023-08-08 19:42:07 +05:30
getLintSeverity.ts
groupDifferencesByType.ts
isEntityFunction.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
lintBindingPath.ts
lintJSObjectBody.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
lintJSObjectProperty.ts
lintJSProperty.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30
lintTriggerPath.ts
mergeMaps.ts
pathUtils.ts
sortDependencies.ts
sortLintingPathsByType.ts chore: query module evaluation (#27660) 2023-09-29 16:12:14 +05:30