## Description
<ins>Root cause</ins>
This spec was failing because it was string comparing the values,
whereas the source was a JS Object. This sometimes caused spec to fail.
<ins>Solution</ins>
This pull request updates the `Inline_editing_3_spec.js` file to include
the expected JSON parsing. The changes ensure that the correct JSON
parsing is performed when editing a table cell and saving the changes.
Fixes#36720
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11211620961>
> Commit: 0cf810ba36f9947f9aff6c85c6c8d64bc7f1dbf3
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11211620961&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:27:17 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved validation for inline editing functionality in table widget
tests.
- Enhanced assertions for save/discard operations to ensure accuracy
after changes.
- Added checks for various column types in the `onsubmit` event tests.
- **Tests**
- Expanded end-to-end tests for inline editing, ensuring thorough
validation across scenarios.
- Incorporated additional checks for the display and retention of values
during editing operations.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
3ff67d31a6