32e8224120
## Description When a user wants to develop in an instance and deploy in another, the only way to update an app is via Git. In scenarios where this is not possible (either in Airgapped scenarios or due to the user's choice), the user cannot update the deployed app. This PR allows a user to update an existing app via JSON import. The original references will be maintained where applicable > TL;DR: Provide a way to update the existing application via JSON import in situations where Git sync is not an option. Fixes #22075 ### How to test? 1. Create a new workspace `WS1` 2. Create new app 3. Generate CRUD page 4. Export the application 5. Create new workspace lets's call this as `WS2` and import the exported app from step 4 6. Create another page `pageCreatedInWS2` in imported application in `WS2` 7. Export the updated application from `WS2` 8. Update existing application created in step 2 in `WS1` by importing the application which is exported from `WS2` in step 7 9. Updated application should have `pageCreatedInWS2` page ``` Curl for ref: curl --location '{{base_url}}/api/v1/applications/import/{{workspaceId}}?applicationId={{applicationId}}' \ --header 'Cookie: SESSION={{cookieSessionId}}' \ --header 'X-Requested-By: Appsmith' \ --form 'file=@{{JSON_FILE_TO_IMPORT}}' ``` ## Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? - Manual - JUnit ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| auth-notes | ||
| pom.xml | ||