Keyur Paralkar f47b1c896d fix: change to lodash wrapper (#24610) ... ## Description This issue is happening because we are getting lodash library as `undefined` when we pass it to` derived.value` function here. This is happening because of the following reason: * [Bundle optimisation PR](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/21667) introduces a new plugin called: `babel-plugin-lodash`. It helps in transforming the imports. * But this plugin doesn't work on the following pattern: `import _ from "lodash"`. Here it replaces `_` with `undefined` [ This file](3bc50d9632/app/client/src/workers/common/JSLibrary/lodash-wrapper.js (L1)) explains the exact scenario that we are facing. There is also [an open bug](https://github.com/lodash/babel-plugin-lodash/issues/235) for this issue on the `babel-plugin-lodash` repository. This PR imports lodash from the lodash-wrapper instead of directly importing as follows: `import _ from "lodash"` > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #23671 #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress - should check that value entered in currency field appears in the actual field > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed		2023-06-19 22:35:32 +05:30
..
client	fix: change to lodash wrapper (#24610)	2023-06-19 22:35:32 +05:30
server	feat: query creation dumb templates replaced with smart templates (#24234)	2023-06-19 15:23:34 +05:30
util	feat: [epic] appsmith design system version 2 deduplication (#22030)	2023-05-20 00:07:06 +05:30