Fixes#35175
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Anvil"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10845022776>
> Commit: 9224955b35c1083a6135afd956ba9026c91683c1
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10845022776&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Anvil`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:02:36 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Simplified theme management by removing icon style options from the
user interface.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced clarity in theme handling by refining type usage in various
components.
- **Chores**
- Removed deprecated icon style properties and constants to streamline
code and improve maintainability.
- Deleted a test case related to icon styles to focus testing efforts
elsewhere.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
## Description
Excluding test case
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10846188820>
> Commit: 169260dd225113124f40f17898c59c5c0a770bba
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10846188820&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.ImportExport`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:22:22 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated the "Git Autocommit" test suite to include a new tag for
exclusion in airgap environments, enhancing test execution strategy for
isolated systems.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
In the spec, feature flag intercept is interfering with navigating back
to editor flow.
Since we need FF in the editor, this PR rearranges these steps.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> 🟣🟣🟣 Your tests are running.
> Tests running at:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10845920958>
> Commit: c7de064cd6c262f969270be226a135371985646e
> Workflow: `PR Automation test suite`
> Tags: `@tag.Table`
> Spec: ``
> <hr>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:40:08 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved test flow for the Table V2 component by repositioning
navigation actions, enhancing clarity and context.
- **Chores**
- Updated the configuration for limited tests to focus on the Table V2
widget's filtering functionality instead of template-related tests.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced new hooks for icon management: `useIconDensity` and
`useIconSizing`.
- **Improvements**
- Refactored hooks to enhance performance by using `useMemo` instead of
state management, leading to more efficient calculations for icon size,
density, spacing, and typography.
- Streamlined theme management by consolidating logic and removing
unnecessary properties, improving clarity and maintainability.
- Optimized CSS class name management within the `useCssTokens` hook for
better performance.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed `fontFamily` property from various components, which may
affect text rendering but simplifies font management.
- **Documentation**
- Updated comments and documentation to reflect changes in typography
and theme handling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10786030048>
> Commit: a0d12586c130252d4164305c5293c1b6fb67b5eb
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10786030048&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:00:30 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
## Description
> [!TIP]
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10815637874>
> Commit: 54937a7a64e755959e3420a0a20abcc30ee10d78
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10815637874&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:30:00 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Added support for visual regression testing through new tagging in
various test suites.
- Integrated a new image snapshot plugin to enhance testing
capabilities.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed outdated image snapshot assertions to streamline testing
processes.
- **Documentation**
- Updated tags in multiple test suites to improve organization and
clarity regarding visual testing.
- **Chores**
- Upgraded Node.js version in the Cypress Dockerfile for improved
performance and compatibility.
- Simplified Cypress plugin configuration by removing unnecessary
functions and enhancing browser compatibility.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
## Description
**Root Cause Analysis (RCA):**
The test case in `BugTests/Bug29566_Spec.ts` has become flaky due to its
dependency on a third-party API call `(https://api.jsonbin.io/v3/b/)`.
As experienced automation engineers, we understand that relying on
third-party services can introduce instability and lead to frequent test
failures. In this particular case, the dependency was tightly coupled
with the test logic, and updating the data was not a viable solution.
**Solution:**
Upon assessing the situation, I determined that refactoring the existing
test would take significantly longer than rewriting it from scratch.
Therefore, I chose the rewriting approach to prioritize time efficiency.
The test flow has been updated while maintaining the same assertions for
data validation. Additionally, I have incorporated an extra assertion to
verify the data after a page reload to further enhance the robustness of
the test.
Fixes #`36259`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10816309843>
> Commit: 2be906c50572425b31d84db8387e8e07b92314fb
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10816309843&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:34:50 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced testing for the list widget to ensure it populates correctly
on page load, addressing Bug 29566.
- Introduced dynamic data sourcing for more accurate test scenarios.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated test cases to reflect changes in functionality and validate
correct data display.
- **Documentation**
- Renamed test case for clarity regarding the specific bug being
addressed.
- **Chores**
- Updated the limited tests configuration to focus on the new bug test
instead of a template test.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR updates the save datasource text to "Save" and edit datasource
text to "Edit". Also, updated the save datasource icon to better
represent datasource.
Fixes#35503
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10807660093>
> Commit: fda9c7479d4626aa7178e74f310586264724471c
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10807660093&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:43:42 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Simplified user interface messages for editing and saving data sources
to "Edit" and "Save."
- Updated the icon for the save button to better represent the action
when saving a datasource.
- Introduced a new locator for the save datasource button to enhance
testing capabilities.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved adherence to coding standards by modifying ESLint rules
related to function props.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced test functionality by adding a check for page save errors in
the "Select1" test, improving error handling before executing further
actions.
- **Chores**
- Updated testing priorities by commenting out the "Fork Template" test
and activating the "Select1" test in the limited tests configuration.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> Tests have not run on the HEAD
d248530e0b95d34947fef3ffc2ba08e71e81dad7 yet
> <hr>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:37:57 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
## Description
This PR temporarily removes the unauthorised Google Sheets method to
ensure users are only shown methods that would work and avoid causing
confusion.
- The feature flag wasn't used here as the form JSON config's method
field does not support hidden fields using feature flag and we avoided
writing a logic specifically to remove the field from JSON before
sending it as once the other methods get authorised again, we won't need
the feature flag again
Fixes#35523
## Automation
/test gsheet
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10789501829>
> Commit: 040643a4d4ed4f2467a0af5733f4015a92d74e26
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10789501829&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.GSheet`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:37:24 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Simplified authorization options for Google Sheets integration, now
limited to read and write access for selected sheets only.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated integration tests to reflect the removal of outdated Google
Sheets permission options, ensuring tests align with current
authorization constraints.
- **Tests**
- Temporarily skipped multiple test suites related to Google Sheets
functionality to streamline testing and focus on relevant tests.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Root Cause Analysis (RCA):
The issue stemmed from the use of hardcoded templates in our tests,
which introduced inherent flakiness. This approach caused intermittent
failures, particularly when the hardcoded template was not available or
had changed.
Solution:
I have resolved this by implementing dynamic locators that select the
first available template during the test execution. This ensures greater
stability and reduces flakiness. The only scenario where this approach
could fail is if no templates are available, which would be a
product-level blocker rather than a test issue.
Fixes #`36199`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Templates"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10775279036>
> Commit: be8fc879c21fa90b7083e52d4cde52439f8f5546
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10775279036&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Templates`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 14:51:58 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved reliability of the template forking test by updating element
selectors and streamlining navigation steps.
- Enhanced test coverage by adding a step for generating a page with
data.
- **Chores**
- Renamed test specification file to better reflect its focus on
application-level testing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Uses `AnimatedGridLayout` component to introduce transitions for the
IDE. This is behind a feature flag
Fixes#34538Fixes#30863Fixes#34544
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> 🔴🔴🔴 Some tests have failed.
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10737363879>
> Commit: a912f5c52366abe48768727a1c605cd72b48752c
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10737363879&attempt=2&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: @tag.All
> Spec:
> The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
<ol>
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/OnLoadTests/ExecuteAction_Spec.ts</ol>
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master"
target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>.
> <hr>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:32:30 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced two new layout components: `AnimatedLayout` and
`UnanimatedLayout` for improved editor interface structuring.
- Added TypeScript type definitions for the DOM View Transitions API to
enhance type safety and developer experience.
- Implemented custom hooks, `useGridLayoutTemplate` and
`useEditorStateLeftPaneWidth`, for dynamic grid management and left pane
width calculation in the IDE layout.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced layout responsiveness with the addition of dynamic grid
management.
- Updated the `Editor` component to use a centralized constant for
height calculations, improving maintainability and consistency.
- Enhanced test accuracy by refining assertions in the Git Branch
Protection test suite.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Sagar Khalasi <sagar@appsmith.com>
## Description
RCA: We are using youtube url for `Verify Basic Functionality of Video
Widget - muted`. Which leads to flakiness. Also this case needs a human
intervention to fulfilled the actual user case.
Solution: Deleted this test as it can be part of manual testing.
Fixes #`36164`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10766784105>
> Commit: 11d8d952f5e24cc49056532b15da190eefe8ba41
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10766784105&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 05:41:15 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed a test case for the muted functionality of the Video Widget,
streamlining the test suite.
- **Chores**
- Updated the test path in the limited-tests file to prioritize video
widget testing over template testing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
The spec MemberRoles started failing on PG branch(both ce and ee)
recently. In this spec the last step, which asserts the user with view
permission leaving workspace was failing. `the
_.homePage.LeaveWorkspace(workspaceId);` internally calls for
`_.homePage.SelectWorkspace(workspaceId);`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Workspace"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10736154328>
> Commit: c9203b7da718cd2b718cf0fc990c4e4375cf5435
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10736154328&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Workspace`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 10:04:45 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated the test flow for workspace member roles to ensure accurate
simulation of user behavior when leaving a workspace.
- **Chores**
- Modified the limited tests configuration to focus on member roles,
removing the previous test for template for improved testing relevance.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR introduces a couple of improvements to the actions part of the
consolidated view API.
- With current implementation, we call consolidated view API only once
during page load and fetch all of the resources at once. This can be a
problem for a heavy app which has more than 500 actions, in this case
fetching all published actions takes a sizeable amount of time. This PR
introduces an improvement where we don't fetch all actions of an
application at once, instead we fetch all actions of the current page
and whenever user switches to different page, we call the consolidated
view API again to fetch actions of the switched page. This way we can
reduce the time taken by consolidated view API's action part performant
by 5-10x.
- With this new implementation, we use the basePageId passed to the
consolidated view API and use that to fetch actions belonging to a page,
there are two possibilities here:
- If the app is not connected, basePageId can be used directly to fetch
actions of a page
- If app is git connected, first we need to fetch the pageId based on
basePageId and branchName, then use that pageId to fetch actions
belonging to the current page and branch name.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10722112357>
> Commit: a725de6d3b82c6aaf8094e8962109635e7cb2a2b
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10722112357&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:19:53 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced functionality to fetch actions specifically for pages,
enhancing action management.
- Improved action retrieval logic to focus on page-specific actions,
streamlining user experience.
- Added a new saga for fetching published page resources, enhancing data
management capabilities.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced error handling for action fetching to ensure better user
feedback during failures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
Fixes#15007
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Theme"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10733545727>
> Commit: dec21477152095d034f63a7e08d2719cb0687b12
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10733545727&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Theme`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 06:48:00 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced theme validation for the multi-select widget, improving the
robustness of theme-related tests.
- Added new locators for featured themes to enhance testing
capabilities.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Reactivated a previously skipped test case to validate font
consistency across the application.
- **Refactor**
- Optimized color change handling in the ColorPicker component for
better performance and reliability.
- Refactored theme color control logic for improved maintainability and
clarity.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced type safety in theme properties to prevent misconfigurations.
- Improved testability of the ThemeCard and ThemeSelector components
with new attributes for automated testing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
## Description
RCA: Toggle button from log tab is not open always. Due to this next
element was not visible.
Fix: Have gone through the test case and found unnecessary steps for
verifying successful log. Update the only required code and fixed the
test case.
Fixes #`36082`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10714184973>
> Commit: bd850ca5d80f39c544b6953c85cddc43a3e723d0
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10714184973&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Datasource`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 05:42:15 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced API testing capabilities with updated test cases for various
HTTP methods.
- Introduced new properties for improved API debugging in the UI.
- Added a method to check the visibility of specific elements in tests.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved the `validateRequest` command to handle multiple API log
entries more effectively.
- **Chores**
- Updated the test specifications to focus on server-side API tests,
replacing outdated client-side entries.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Adds cypress test for checking auto-commit functionality
Fixes#33964
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10715693875>
> Commit: 3dda8362544b4bc7b977e780f7d1140b1343c93f
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10715693875&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Git`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:45:36 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced an end-to-end test suite for the Git autocommit feature,
validating UI and backend interactions.
- Added a new property to track the autocommit status bar in the GitSync
class.
- Enhanced the AutocommitStatusbar component for better testability with
a new identifier.
- **Improvements**
- Made auto-commit eligibility checks always available by removing
feature flag gating.
- Improved logging visibility for auto-commit operations by adjusting
log levels.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Streamlined tests by removing unnecessary checks related to the
auto-commit eligibility feature flag.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: sondermanish <sonder.manish@gmail.com>
## Description
Fix the flaky test case with latest update.
**Problem :** Whenever the Mock DBs are getting corrupted, we see flaky
behaviours.
As per the solution, we are running reset script every day. We can not
increase the frequency as in a day time lot of testing pipelines are
running it. Most of the time we see failure at two places,
1. Query from Mock Mongo DB
2. Failure in afterEach run.
**Solution:** We need to remove flaky test cases part.
1. For mongo DB case, test till here so we can test connection at least
as mentioned by one of developer.
`dataSources.ValidateNSelectDropdown("Command", "Find document(s)");`.
2. Remove afterEach code as it is actually no required as we use new
setup for each new run.
**Relevant threads:**
1.
https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/C0134BAVDB4/p1724317643564089?thread_ts=1724216243.067959&cid=C0134BAVDB4
2.
https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/C02GAUE9P5H/p1712038530288709?thread_ts=1712020398.128169&cid=C02GAUE9P5H
Fixes #`35136`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10633737589>
> Commit: 660b710bde7ca5c2d3998d86ce15753ac7c4c2bf
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10633737589&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:07:14 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Streamlined test cases for mock database validations, improving
performance and efficiency.
- Removed unnecessary cleanup operations post-test execution,
simplifying the testing process.
- **Chores**
- Updated the test specification path to prioritize sanity testing of
mock databases over regression testing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
RCA:
Toggle state of the property was going to wrong state, hence with retry
test was passing as it would bring back the application to required
statee.
Solution:
Updated toggle state in the flaky test to avoid this issue
EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4997
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10633979760>
> Commit: b63e5716203e0865ad493b1bc0ab8e952aaa7301
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10633979760&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:27:24 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced inline editing functionality for table widgets, improving
interaction and validation in tests.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated limited tests configuration to prioritize inline editing tests
over previous specifications.
- **Tests**
- Improved test coverage for inline editing by adding interactions with
dropdowns and property state toggling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem**
When deleting a List widget in the EE environment, the widget is
successfully removed, but errors are displayed in the in-app debugger.
These errors disappear upon refreshing the page, leaving users confused
as to why the errors appeared in the first place, despite the widget
being deleted correctly.
**Root Cause**
- The issue arises from the sequence in which widgets and their
associated meta widgets are deleted.
- When deleting a widget with meta widgets (e.g., a List widget):
- The main widget is removed first via the deleteWidget saga.
- Meta widgets are then deleted later during the componentWillUnmount
lifecycle method.
- The lint evaluation runs between these two processes, detecting meta
widgets still present in the state without a parent widget.
- This mismatch triggers errors in the in-app debugger, which disappear
once the page is refreshed, as the meta widgets have already been
deleted by then.
**Solution**
- We have modified the deletion process to ensure that both the main
widget and its associated meta widgets are removed within the same
action.
- Instead of handling meta widget deletion in the general deleteSaga:
- We now check for widgets with the hasMetaWidgets flag within the
deleteWidget saga.
- If such widgets are found, their meta widgets are deleted before the
main widget is removed from the layout.
- This adjustment ensures that the lint evaluation occurs after both the
main widget and its meta widgets have been removed, preventing errors in
the debugger.
Fixes#35628
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget, @tag.List, @tag.IDE, @tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10629216245>
> Commit: 56a4c85076d574cc2ebfef12d3b9f998ee1a4ece
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10629216245&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Widget, @tag.List, @tag.IDE, @tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:25:02 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced testing for the list widget to include verification of the
drag, drop, and delete functionalities.
- Improved widget deletion process by ensuring related meta widgets are
also addressed during deletion.
- Updated test descriptions for better clarity and scope, specifically
focusing on deletion functionality.
- Introduced a factory for creating instances of version 2 list widgets,
streamlining widget generation.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Expanded test coverage for potential issues in widget behavior,
particularly concerning deletion.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
RCA:
Test was failing after removing retry, the issue was it was clicking on
a checkbox which was not required.
the retry actually was bringing back the system to right state by
clicking again.
Solution:
We removed the step that was unnecessary in this case which resolved the
issue
EE: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4992
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10616697878>
> Commit: e599c6d0149814c38049aaba7828465361d8f43b
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10616697878&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:33:59 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
---------
Co-authored-by: karthik <thinkify@karthiks-MacBook-Pro.local>
## Description
EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4954
This spec relied on retries and was asserting on wrong table cols
Fixes#35877
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10594838499>
> Commit: 93d0502c49b6e6b714236b8ea693f5ade0eacdb5
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10594838499&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:48:41 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed a previously skipped test for inserting binary type records to
ensure accurate functionality checks.
- **Refactor**
- Improved readability and maintainability of test cases by replacing
hardcoded row indices with dynamic variables.
- Cleaned up the test suite by removing commented-out code and adjusting
sleep durations.
- **Documentation**
- Updated assertions to reflect changes in expected values and the
sequence of operations in the tests.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Hi @rohan-arthur, @somangshu , @contributor-support
**Fixes** #34262
**What's in this pr :**
- Added isRequired prop for select widget components to control the
logic for the remove button.
- Added two test cases to verify clear button rendering when isRequired
is set to true and false.
**Screenshots :**
Please let me know if any changes are required.
Thank you.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced an `isRequired` property to the `SelectButton`,
`SelectComponent`, and `SelectWidget`, allowing users to indicate
whether a selection is mandatory.
- Enhanced rendering logic in the `SelectButton` to conditionally
display the cancel button based on the `isRequired` state.
- Improved styling and behavior options in `SelectComponent` for better
integration into forms.
- **Tests**
- Added new test cases for the `SelectButton` to ensure correct
rendering behavior of the cancel button based on the `isRequired` prop.
- Streamlined Cypress tests to focus on the non-existence of the clear
button, reflecting updated component behavior.
- Updated locator configurations to improve test coverage for user
interactions involving clearing selections.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10589609542>
> Commit: 27a55649d9f3cb398053fd68bfcecbbc96f6a694
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10589609542&attempt=3"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 05:53:34 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced user interface functionality by ensuring the application
waits for the button spinner to disappear before proceeding with
visibility assertions and onboarding.
- **Improvements**
- Improved user experience by reducing potential inconsistencies or
errors during the onboarding process.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: NandanAnantharamu <nandan@normalyze.ai>
## Description
**Problem**
When the Select widget's labelKey or valueKey properties are switched to
JS mode, passing a function that returns a string as the key causes the
dropdown options to break. Instead of correctly mapping the labels and
values, the options are incorrectly returned as an array of the key
itself.
**Root Cause**
The issue lies in the `getOptions` function in derived.js. The logic
that computes the select options based on the labelKey and valueKey was
not handling cases where these properties are functions that return
arrays. Instead of mapping through the source data and returning the
corresponding values for each key, the function was mistakenly returning
the entire array.
**Solution**
The `getOptions` function in derived.js has been updated to correctly
handle cases where labelKey or valueKey are arrays. The function now
maps through the sourceData and computes the correct labels and values
based on the provided properties, ensuring that the dropdown options are
displayed as expected.
Fixes#35269
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity, @tag.Select, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10560970428>
> Commit: 118badee07c47fe72f727f8ab248c29685f6f7a1
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10560970428&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity, @tag.Select, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:24:26 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced test coverage for the Select widget by adding new test cases
to validate the correct functioning of JavaScript functions in the label
and value keys.
- Improved processing of `optionLabel` and `optionValue` properties for
the Select widget, ensuring accurate mapping to `sourceData`.
- Introduced a new helper function to streamline the validation of label
and value keys in the Select widget tests.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Corrected the handling of multiple options in the Select widget to
enhance data mapping accuracy and functionality.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem**
When using a table widget, changing a column to the "Select" type causes
the data in that column to disappear unless the options property is
explicitly set. This creates a poor user experience, as it appears that
the data has been lost or the widget is malfunctioning.
**Solution**
We have implemented a fallback mechanism to ensure a smoother user
experience. If no options are set in the property pane, the label inside
the select cell will now default to displaying the existing value. This
ensures that the data remains visible, even in the absence of predefined
options.
Fixes#35807
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table,
@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10513374411>
> Commit: 1e89468e8345f2fc351c100428dca76a7a455dbc
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10513374411&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Widget, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table,
@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 19:43:53 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced the select column in the table widget to return a default
value when no options are available.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved robustness of the select cell component to prevent errors
when the options array is empty.
- **Tests**
- Updated and reorganized test cases for the select column to improve
clarity and specificity.
- Introduced a new test case to validate default value behavior when no
options are provided.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
- Moved Section and Zone widgets to wds folder
Fixes#35810
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10511698329>
> Commit: 67868d550cebe7b2393803c805132b548c6f1046
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10511698329&attempt=3"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:06:57 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced new `WDSSectionWidget` and `WDSZoneWidget` components,
reflecting a new namespace for widget organization.
- Added new constants and an enumeration for widget configuration in the
`wds/constants` module.
- **Improvements**
- Updated import paths for various constants and components to
streamline the codebase organization.
- **Collaboration Enhancements**
- Updated ownership in the `CODEOWNERS` file to include both the
`@appsmithorg/wds-team` and `@appsmithorg/anvil-team` for better
collaboration on widget development.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Fixes#35231
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Anvil"
Before:
After:
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Improved widget border style handling by simplifying parameters and
logic.
- Enhanced visual consistency by removing the `elevatedBackground`
consideration from various components.
- Refined test logic to focus on section properties during space
distribution.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Addressed potential inconsistencies in widget appearance related to
background elevation settings.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> 🔴🔴🔴 Some tests have failed.
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10503394684>
> Commit: 574aab588e35fc90e59720010e2b8a249bf824ed
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10503394684&attempt=1&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: @tag.Anvil
> Spec:
> The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
<ol>
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilCheckboxGroupWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilCheckboxWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilCurrencyInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilHeadingWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilIconButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilInlineButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilParagraphWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilPhoneInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts</ol>
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master"
target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>.
> <hr>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:30:08 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
## Description
> [!TIP]
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new method `latestDeployPreview` to enhance Cypress
testing capabilities, enabling users to interact with the latest
deployment preview seamlessly.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
<ins>Problem</ins>
`currentRow` variable which is availabe in property pane of col settings
- is not getting correct value during runtime if the table is sorted or
filtered.
<ins>Root cause</ins>
* We are considering `processedTableData` to get the `currentRow`.
* This property is not updated during filtering and sorting, another
property `filteredTableData` is updated instead.
* We CANNOT use `filteredTableData` as it depends on `primaryColumns`
property which we intend to update as well - this is leading to cyclic
dependency during evaluations.
<ins>Solution</ins>
Since the problem is related to edit cases and given the constraints
around using `filteredTableData` directly, we fixed the problem by
adding a new property to `editableCellValue` object called
`__originalIndex__`.
* This property stores the index of the row being edited in
`processedTableData`
* On top of this change, the PR adds a migration for updating the
current row binding in TableWidgetV2, ensuring accurate current row
calculation and improving the functionality of the widget.
* We also added unit test for migration changes.
* Additionally, This pull request refactors the DSLs for TableWidgetV2
migration test cases to update the DSLs to separate folder, drastically
reducing the file size to its core logic, improving the readability of
the code.
* We also updated relevant test cases to account for this change.
[Testing
plan](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Issue-34346-currentRow-doesn-t-work-correctly-when-the-table-is-filtered-449225ae822c485493036599c2b19487)
[Counter part EE
pr](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4879)
Fixes#34346
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10451549845>
> Commit: d1d65c6898c223bf3f6dfbfe93b8e8de214fcc7d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10451549845&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:15:04 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated DSL migration process to support version 90, enhancing
compatibility and robustness.
- Introduced new migration logic for table widget data bindings,
improving inline editing capabilities.
- Enhanced validation logic for editable cells in table widgets,
allowing for more dynamic data handling.
- Added a method to discard edits in specific table cells, improving
user interaction.
- Introduced a new message constant for required fields, enhancing user
feedback.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved validation checks for table cells based on updated indices
and values.
- **Tests**
- Added comprehensive tests to validate migration functions related to
Table Widget, ensuring all aspects function correctly post-update.
- Enhanced test specifications for improved validation logic and
coverage in table widget functionalities.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: sneha122 <sneha@appsmith.com>
## Description
**Problem:**
When the `isRequired` property is set for date columns in the table
widget, the validation doesn't work as expected. Users can add new rows
without filling in the date field, even though it is marked as required.
This results in rows being added with missing date values, which can
lead to incomplete or invalid data entries.
**Root Cause:**
The validation logic for the date column is currently handled within the
DateCell component. However, the isRequired validation functionality was
not implemented within this component. Additionally, the general
validation logic in the `getEditableCellValidity` function, located in
the derived.js file, does not account date cells in its isRequired
validation.
**Solution:**
To fix this issue:
**Enhance the `getEditableCellValidity` function:** Extend the existing
validation logic in getEditableCellValidity to include the date cell in
its validation, specifically checking for the isRequired property.
**Integrate with DateCell validation:** Ensure that the isRequired
validation is properly executed in conjunction with the existing date
validations inside the DateCell component. This will enforce the
requirement and prevent new rows from being added if the date field is
left empty.
**Test Plan**
https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Test-Plan-Date-Column-Marked-as-Required-Doesn-t-Enforce-Mandatory-Entry-When-Adding-New-Table-Row-c73b764af60842a188cba056bdda6d79?pvs=4Fixes#34258
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10453174231>
> Commit: 40fe2eaf7d45024bef00f8031e971a5bac2a4e3e
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10453174231&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:17:23 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced validation for "Date" column types, ensuring that required
fields are correctly enforced.
- **Enhancements**
- Improved validation logic for more accurate user feedback in date
cells.
- Expanded support for validating "date" columns in the table widget.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced error handling to ensure proper indication of cell validity
based on new validation criteria.
- Updated visual feedback for cell editor state in the UI.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Remove the duplicate file name with different cases as well.
Fixes #`34939`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10370869517>
> Commit: 242ca07a87991f5786bd8a33aeefaf046e2a29e0
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10370869517&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 14:36:34 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Description
In the past we attempted to remove the `DatePickerV2_spec` from flaky
list after successful `/ci-limit-test` runs ([EE PR with
runs](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4736)).
But the very next day it had to be added back to the flaky list. There
was certainly a problem which was not getting caught on local and
`ci-limit-test` runs.
Upon observing the [last known failure run of this
spec](https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/run-details-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10096251875&attempt=5&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail),
this error got highlighted:
> CypressError: Timed out retrying after 100000ms: `cy.wait()` timed out
waiting `100000ms` for the 5th response to the route: `updateLayout`. No
response ever occurred.
Upon further debugging and a loooot of local runs I noticed that even
though we were changing the `Max date` at the end of this spec does not
do anything(on the product UI) and more importantly had no impact on the
test run.
So we removed it. The good thing is that in current [EE
PR](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4907) as well there
are no failures.
> PS: I would still be on alert after merging to notice any more
failures and add it back to flaky, if it troubles other team members.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datepicker, @tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10446454718>
> Commit: b0348f4f13c6b36cb35b0a5fd596513d42ab7837
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10446454718&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Datepicker, @tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:36:10 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Adjusted the DatePicker component's test to remove the maximum date
constraint, allowing for a broader range of valid dates during testing.
- Revised conditions for tooltip assertions related to date range
validation.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Why did this PR appear? I wanted to replace the icons from `ads-old`
with the icons from `ads`. After that, I had to fix some affected
components in `ads-old` and in the main app. In the process, I
discovered that a large amount of code is simply not being used.
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10419944222>
> Commit: 86491f43aff37e34468fb7dc32722b9ef2ec60c9
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10419944222&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:28:03 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Improved precision in UI element targeting for enhanced test
reliability.
- Broadened icon options within the FilePickerComponent for greater
flexibility.
- **Improvements**
- Shifted component imports to a centralized design system for better
consistency.
- Simplified prop structures for the Button component to enhance
clarity.
- Enhanced validation utilities available for form handling and input
validation.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced robustness of element locators, reducing potential UI
interaction issues.
- **Refactor**
- Adjusted component properties to align with updated design guidelines,
promoting semantic usage.
- Consolidated exports to emphasize type definitions and utility
functions for better maintainability.
- **Chores**
- Cleaned up imports and updated code structure for improved
maintainability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Context:**
This cypress test is asserting the fixes made for
[bug](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/16702)
Bug recording:
https://www.loom.com/share/ccf9fccc89064ee7b4230aaf5bf3cc52
Basically bug was that when using bindings inside query of graphQL API,
autocomplete menu shows up for first binding, but not for second
binding. This test case asserts that autocomplete menu shows up every
time inside binding for query
EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4856
This PR fixes the skipped test of spec file:
cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/BugTests/GraphQL_Binding_Bug16702_Spec.ts
Fixes#35147
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10383572807>
> Commit: 0a655d760eeb23ac2aaf3251bb26d5cb848ec58f
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10383572807&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Datasource`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:15:08 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated the test for a GraphQL binding issue, now actively validating
the resolution of a formatting bug that affected autocomplete
functionality.
- Enhanced test clarity by removing redundant code and optimizing the
test flow for improved execution efficiency.
- **Chores**
- Changed the focus of the limited test scenario to prioritize
addressing the GraphQL binding bug over template-related
functionalities.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
## Description
### Unit
`index.test.tsx` - (Main connected component that uses floating ui)
- [x] Test rendering of widget name component (floating-ui) based on
"select", "focus" and "none" states from redux selector
- [x] Test rendering of widget name component (floating-ui) based on
error count from redux selector
`AnvilWidgetNameComponent.test.tsx` (Standalone component that renders
content for floating ui to use)
- [x] Test rendering of standalone widget name component based on props.
- [x] Test calling of `onDragStart` callback from the standalone widget
name component.
`SplitButton.test.tsx` (Low level UI component - child of
`AnvilWidgetNameComponent`)
- [x] Test left and right toggle click triggers
- [x] Test if component handles props correctly
### E2E
- [x] Test Dragging via widget name component
- [x] Test widget name component when multiple widgets are selected
- [x] Test Hover and Selection to show widget name component
Fixes#33979
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10349986042>
> Commit: 8c9e6b933fc63306ca4b9322d2cc109909df879d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10349986042&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:13:52 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a comprehensive suite of end-to-end tests for the Anvil
editor's UI in canvas layout mode.
- Enhanced flexibility in widget manipulation on the canvas with an
updated method.
- Expanded selectors for more precise targeting of UI components.
- Added unit tests for the `AnvilWidgetNameComponent` and `SplitButton`
components to ensure expected functionality.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved responsiveness of the `AnvilWidgetName` component to state
changes.
- **Documentation**
- Updated comments and structure for clarity in test scenarios and
component functionality.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Fix flaky test - `Inline_editing_2_spec.js`
Related EE PR for fix -
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4819
**Problems**
Previous change made to remove the editable checkbox from the columns
list on the table property pane made the `table.EnableEditableOfColumn`
obsolete as a method for enabling edit mode on specific columns. There
is a newly introduced method `toggleColumnEditableViaColSettingsPane`
was swapped only in some cases, not implemented correctly, and in some
other cases, the `table.EnableEditableOfColumn` still existed, causing
the test to fail.
**Solution**
1. Fix the implementation of the
`table.toggleColumnEditableViaColSettingsPane` in all instances in the
test suit
2. Replace `table.EnableEditableOfColumn` with
`table.toggleColumnEditableViaColSettingsPane` in tests
3. Move standalone values into consts for readability
4. Remove unused const
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10352974239>
> Commit: 83116d9c64f95946ab0ba7399c7e1c491f2d2851
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10352974239&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:08:51 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved reliability of inline editing tests for the table widget,
ensuring consistent behavior when editing columns.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced clarity of test case descriptions regarding cell column
height behavior with text wrapping.
- Updated height assertions to use constants for better readability and
maintainability.
- **Chores**
- Changed focus of limited tests from template-related tests to inline
editing functionality tests.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
AirGap test for CE
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4726
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Improvements**
- Streamlined logic for handling air-gapped scenarios, enhancing clarity
and performance.
- Removed unnecessary checks related to workspace validation for a more
efficient process.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10352641842>
> Commit: c09ed041420b1a64bb67f120116043e6d555e75a
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10352641842&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:28:39 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
Co-authored-by: NandanAnantharamu <=>
## Description
This pull request fixes an issue where the error count was not being
properly checked when a list widget was dropped.
* Reverts a previous commit(#35221).
* Include changes to the test file and the widget creation functions to
ensure that the error count is correctly checked when a list widget is
dragged and dropped.
Fixes#35578
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10350318730>
> Commit: 07f3abcff845eb4d350fc9af235d6ed076257264
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10350318730&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:35:20 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Improved drag-and-drop functionality for list widgets.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced clarity and organization of test cases for better logical
flow.
- **Chores**
- Simplified widget ID generation across several components, improving
consistency in the application.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Fix case with adding one more assertion with wait.
RCA:
The issue was not with the function itself but rather with the flaky
behavior of the Cypress code. The modal was opening, and our code was
attempting to click the “Skip to Application” button too quickly. The
actual validation was only for SkipToAppBtn, but in the application, the
modal was still loading, causing Cypress to perform the action
prematurely, which led to failures. To address this, I added an
additional wait for another element, and this resolved the issue.
Fixes #`35375`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Fork"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10279433214>
> Commit: 748f4f7cf960355a957e59f3956a47880494da93
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10279433214&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Fork`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 07:08:45 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced test robustness for the ForkApplication component by
implementing a prerequisite check for the presence of a critical UI
element linked to data sources.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved control flow in tests to ensure that necessary elements are
available before proceeding with actions, reducing the likelihood of
test failures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
It is for running a spec file with given run_count with PR comment.
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10250647978>
> Commit: 69556d529719ff00d6d0b6961edb83a2a6112541
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10250647978&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 14:49:54 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a CI/CD workflow to manage client and server builds with
Cypress testing.
- Added a job to enforce TypeScript file checks, providing feedback for
corrections on pull requests.
- Expanded testing capabilities with a new job for managing testing
limits.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced logging for better visibility into test execution attempts.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
