## Description
Updating the copy in the action settings pane
Fixes [#37258](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/37258)
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11704084082>
> Commit: 723332f1a22047bbda149e5d77f9e4ddb0b84d3e
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11704084082&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:09:44 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Release Notes
- **New Features**
- Enhanced testing coverage for promise handling in the Cypress
environment, improving validation of asynchronous operations.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated labels in the settings tab of the query editor for clarity.
- Improved label consistency across various plugins and settings
configurations.
- **Documentation**
- Updated messaging in the `SettingsPopover` component for better user
guidance.
- **Chores**
- Standardized phrasing in multiple configuration files to enhance user
understanding across the application.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Moving action settings from editor form to toolbar to follow the new
designs under action redesign project.
Fixes [#35512](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/35512)
[#34670](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/34670)
[#35535](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/35535)
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11384449381>
> Commit: 027e2a33685e50c2cb16e513993fff62b0d62e08
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11384449381&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:40:29 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Release Notes
- **New Features**
- Introduced new components for managing API and query settings in the
Plugin Action Settings.
- Added functionality to open plugin action settings directly from the
toolbar.
- Implemented a settings popover interface for improved user
interaction.
- Added documentation links for QUERY_SETTINGS to enhance user guidance.
- **Improvements**
- Simplified rendering logic in the Plugin Action Form for better
performance.
- Updated form naming conventions for consistency across API and GraphQL
editors.
- Streamlined configuration settings by replacing `subtitle` with
`tooltipText` for clarity.
- Enhanced styling in Action Settings for better layout and user
experience.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Corrected the navigation logic to open plugin action settings instead
of debugger state.
These enhancements aim to improve user experience and streamline plugin
action management.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Fixes#36073
Hi @NilanshBansal
**Issue :**
**Missing Logging Implementation :**
- Without a logging implementation (such as SLF4J Simple or Logback) in
the project's classpath, the logging statements in the plugins cannot be
executed.
- As a result, no log output is being printed to the terminal.
**Solution :**
The solution is to add a logging implementation to the plugins parent
pom. In this case, you can add the slf4j-simple dependency to your
pom.xml file. This will provide a simple logging implementation that
will output log statements to the console.
```
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
<version>1.7.36</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.36</version>
</dependency>
```
**Explanation:**
- slf4j-api provides the SLF4J API, which is the interface for logging.
provides the SLF4J API, which is the interface for logging.
- slf4j-simple provides a simple implementation of the SLF4J API, which
is responsible for actually printing the log messages to the console.
**Screenshots :**
Amazon S3 Plugin and Postgres Plugin
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced logging capabilities with the integration of SLF4J API and
SLF4J Simple implementations.
- **Improvements**
- Improved log management and output formatting for better monitoring
and debugging across various plugins, transitioning from standard output
to structured logging.
- Refined logging practices in multiple plugins to support better
maintainability and performance.
- Removed method for console logging from the Stopwatch class to
streamline logging practices.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Action redesign: Updating the config for Google AI plugin to use
sections and zones format
Fixes [#35493](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/35493)
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10700147940>
> Commit: dda8cee018765fc2827d3bfed214057dda73c692
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10700147940&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 13:18:18 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced chat interface with improved control organization through the
introduction of `DOUBLE_COLUMN_ZONE` and `SINGLE_COLUMN_ZONE`.
- Upgraded section functionality with `SECTION_V2` for better usability
and clarity.
- More structured layout for dropdown controls, allowing for easier
navigation and interaction.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Resolved layout issues by restructuring child elements for improved
user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR adds the spotless formatter and validator for the JSON files
present in the project. If there is any invalid JSON file, the formatter
fails and logs the file and the error LOC to be fixed.
Since Spotless is already added to the pre-commit hook it also makes it
necessary to fix the JSON and then commit the changes.
Screenshot of the errors displayed for Invalid JSONs
### Why is this Important?
All of our datasource forms appear on the UI from the JSON configuration
files in the plugins. If an Invalid JSON is added, it can break the
datasource usage experience for the users.
One such instance happened in the past, where due to a JSON formatting
error, the users could not use Smart Substitution feature on production.
[Reference](https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/C040LHZN03V/p1721124893238579)
Fixes#34969
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10243164292>
> Commit: 08bc87acd2e44c4a2677d3eed1bad002f991050a
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10243164292&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 05:50:07 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
## Description
There was a misunderstanding between using data/componentData field in
`JS` enabled form fields. Now it's clear and we are using `data` key
value always.
#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Refactor**
- Improved the message retrieval process to enhance user experience in
chat features.
- Simplified the content generation logic for better performance and
reliability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Here's PR for adding Google AI Gemini model as a data source
integration.
Features:
1. Text generation based on text inputs
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/29621
#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual
- [x] JUnit
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Integrated Google AI plugin for advanced AI functionality.
- Added Google AI plugin to the available plugins.
- Implemented new commands and utilities for Google AI services.
- **Enhancements**
- Expanded plugin constants to include Google AI references.
- Developed a method strategy for Google AI plugin execution.
- **Documentation**
- Updated plugin properties to include Google AI plugin details.
- **Database Changes**
- Performed a database migration to add the Google AI plugin to existing
workspaces.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
