ba6262ffe6
24 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Valera Melnikov
|
ba6262ffe6
|
chore: widgets alignment (#31923)
## Description Plenty changes related to widgets alignment 1. Paragraph, button, inputs, single checkbox and switch widgets are aligned along the baseline of the text content 2. The icons in the buttons and the single checkbox and switch are now positioned absolutely so as not to affect the height of the components. The height of the components now depends on text content. 3. All unnecessary paddings and borders in the layout have been removed: - Canvas padding: `--outer-spacing-4` - Gap between sections and zones: `--outer-spacing-4` - Zone padding: `--outer-spacing-3` - Gap between widgets: `--outer-spacing-3` 4. In widget selection styles replace `border` with `outline`, since the `outline` one does not take space. 5. Add Changes to the flex-basis calculation method. Now the gap between the zones is taken into account there. 6. Add a lot of small fixes related to the changes described above. https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/b7c220eb-3e27-4039-9c15-6281bafe8008 Fixes #29364 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Anvil" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!IMPORTANT] > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8375537665> > Commit: `f85b63c0a49f30b9762379c2f8c3bd38c7a8355f` > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8375537665&attempt=2" target="_blank">Click here!</a> > All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉 <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Improved handling of CSS variable values in Flex components. - Enhanced styling and layout configurations for a better user experience. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed label positioning and styling issues in Checkbox and Switch components. - Adjusted padding, margin, and sizing for consistency and alignment. - **Refactor** - Enhanced flex layout handling and space distribution logic for improved layout flexibility. - **Style** - Updated component styles for refined user interface aesthetics. - **Chores** - Updated feature flags and configurations for widgets and components to enable new functionalities. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
c209b47671
|
chore: clean up space distribution feature in Anvil (#31468)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description This PR addresses two particular things with space distribution - Issue: Space distribution distributing more than max column limit space - Enhancement: Replace flew grow css for zones to flex basis to make sure column widths are even irresepective of number of zones in a section. Additional Fixes: - replaced test id of widgets editor to abide by repo standards. - disable crud app generation feature for Anvil. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enabled new feature flags to enhance application capabilities. - Introduced dynamic space redistribution for improved layout management. - Added "Generate App" functionality for users with specific feature access. - **Enhancements** - Updated UI selectors for better consistency and reliability. - Refined layout system logic to always utilize the Anvil layout system. - **Refactor** - Optimized feature flag selection logic for efficiency. - Improved flex property handling in layout components for more accurate space distribution. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
07279c070e
|
fix: improved widgets layout (#31471)
## Description - Fixed text input widget width - Increased size of the separator for toolbarButtons - Fixed widgets label - Fixed behaviour for Boolean widgets. Removed Checkbox and Radio labelPosition. Fixed width for these widgets #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) #29088 #31250 #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [x] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
d35ad5e842
|
fix: Anvil Bug fixes for R1 (#31066)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description This PR has multiple bug fixes - Widget boundary showing up in preview mode. - Widget flickering when space distribution changes. - highlights seem blurred near table widget - scrolling to widget when clicked from entity explorer. - Adding bindings for Zones and Sections on entity explorer. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced ease-in animation for flexgrow value changes in layout components. - Enhanced canvas dragging experience by updating z-index based on activation state. - **Improvements** - Optimized widget rendering by utilizing unique widget IDs. - Improved code maintainability with the introduction of a styled `canvas` component for better styling encapsulation. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Abhinav Jha
|
1ea5938cef
|
feat: Asymmetric padding in Anvil (#30964)
## Description To make the Anvil layout system capable of rendering dense layouts, we're using asymmetric padding to remove paddings when not necessary. It works as follows - If a section doesn't have a background, it doesn't have a padding - If all zones in a section don't have a background, they all don't have vertical padding Other changes: - Moved the logic for clearing all selections on click of Canvas from `AnvilCanvas` to `AnvilMainCanvas`, as it is only necessary in the editor. - Removed default `min-height` from widgets so that changes in padding don't misalign widgets - Changed the selection borders to use 2px borders instead of box shadows. - Removed borders around widget name component - Removed elevation shadows from zones and sections - Removed the zone widget from showing up in the widgets panel #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #31103 #### Media  #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new click event listener in `AnvilMainCanvas` for clearing selections when clicking outside a widget. - Added a new constant `AnvilCanvasClassName` in `constants.ts`. - **Refactor** - Simplified `AnvilCanvas` component by using `React.forwardRef` and updating event handling. - Updated logic in `useClickToClearSelections.ts` for more dynamic click event handling. - Enhanced `AnvilMainCanvas` with improved event handling using hooks. - **Bug Fixes** - Addressed issues with widget selection and border styles for a better user experience. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Preet Sidhu
|
ae396eb976
|
fix: clipping issue for excessive hug widgets in an alignment (#31053)
## Description 1. Restores the original behaviour of grow and shrink for alignments, that had regressed after introduction of sizing tokens. 2. Fix clipping issue in alignments. If an alignments width equals or exceeds the width of the row on larger screens, enable flex wrap. #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new style property for `AnvilFlexComponent` to enhance layout sizing. - Added a function to determine if default alignment styles need to be overridden. - Launched a new React component for dynamic alignment of widgets within a row, adaptable to different viewport sizes. - **Refactor** - Simplified the rendering process in `AlignedWidgetRow` by improving component organization. - Enhanced logic and structure in rendering functions for better alignment and layout management. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed incorrect import paths in test and utility files. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
f7d41891b8
|
fix: Anvil toggleable widgets not working when native callbacks are used for AnvilFlexComponent (#31125)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description In last weeks effort of cleaning up Editor and Viewer parts of AnvilFlexComponent I had changed synthetic React callbacks to native ones #30780 . This has resulted in regression of widget toggling of widgets like Checkbox, Switch, etc. so changing them back to synthetic events by passing callbacks and props to the viewer part of AnvilFlexComponent. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new testing suite for validating widget interactions in Anvil Layout Mode, focusing on switch and checkbox widgets. - Added new functionalities for switch and checkbox widgets, including selection toggling and state verification. - Enhanced Anvil editor components to support custom click behaviors, improving widget interaction in edit mode. - **Bug Fixes** - Addressed issues with native click callbacks interfering with widget events. - **Tests** - Added comprehensive test cases for new widget functionalities and interactions. - **Refactor** - Updated internal logic for widget selection and style adjustments based on interaction states. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
92397c4559
|
feat: Anvil dnd enhancement of highlight info and highlight skipping. (#30927)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description In this PR we are enhancing/changing a couple of things - change skipping highlight logic. - we skip showing vertical highlights when the only hug widget in a row is dragged, now we show vertical highlights. - instead of skipping the vertical highlight left to a widget which is being dragged, we skip the highlight right to the widget so that changing order of widgets is more intutive. - adding new prop to highlight info to mark highlights of the existing dragged widget so that such drops are not considered to update widgets/layouts. This will make sure undo / redo works as expected. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enabled `ab_wds_enabled` and `release_anvil_enabled` feature flags for all users. - Enhanced the canvas interaction in the Anvil layout system by introducing logic to better handle horizontal and vertical highlights, improving the user experience during widget drag-and-drop operations. - Modified the logic for determining overlay widgets, streamlining the process for identifying modal and similar widgets. - **Refactor** - Updated feature flag selection logic to return default values more accurately. - Refined highlight generation logic in Anvil layout system to account for dragged widgets and discarded layouts, offering a more intuitive drag-and-drop experience. - Adjusted the `getLayoutSystemType` selector to consistently return `LayoutSystemTypes.ANVIL`, ensuring a unified layout system experience. - **Tests** - Enhanced test coverage for highlight selection algorithms in the Anvil layout system, ensuring accurate highlight behavior based on mouse position. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
c37d0c283f
|
fix: Anvil Widgets not accessible when widget has no content. (#30780)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description In this PR, we are fixing a few issues and also destructuring AnvilFlexComponent for edit and view. Issues Fixed - Widgets without any content like a text widget without text are not hoverable - Modal once opened does not close when other widgets on the canvas are selected via the enitty explorer. Anvil Flex Component was common component inspired from PositionedContainer of Fixed layout. It had all features of Edit and View together in one place. This mean viewer was unnecessarily interpreting more code. Now AnvilFlexComponent has been broken into AnvilFlexComponent and AnvilEditorFlexComponent. AnvilEditorFlexComponent is a wrapper around AnvilFlexComponent with abilities needed for Edit Mode. Another issue addressed in the PR is removal of DraggableComponennt, which was just making dragging possible and providing a few styles like fading the widget when it is being dragged. With this PR all the above mentioned functions will be taken care of by AnvilEditorFlexComponent. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #30734 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced feature flag management with additional flags for better control over application features. - Introduced a new editor component for Anvil layout system, improving layout and behavior management in edit mode. - Added a custom hook for managing hover states on Anvil widgets, enhancing user interaction. - **Refactor** - Updated AnvilFlexComponent to use `forwardRef` for better ref management and optimized widget configuration and rendering logic. - Modified selector logic to simplify the retrieval of layout system type, enhancing code maintainability. - Adjusted test methodologies to improve reliability and accuracy. - **Bug Fixes** - Corrected assertions in Cypress end-to-end tests to accurately locate and interact with widgets in the Anvil canvas, ensuring test reliability. - **Chores** - Updated common locators and assertion methods in Cypress support files for consistency and clarity in test scripts. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Abhinav Jha
|
e67f6a8f89
|
feat: WDS - Anvil compatible Modal Widget (#30351)
## Description This PR primarily adds the modal widget to WDS. The following changes were made: 1. WidgetNameCanvas now listens to modal body scrolls to position widget name components correctly 2. Modal Widget is rendered as a detached widget that is outside of the layout flow of the main canvas 3. Main container resizer now has a higher z-index to show even if the modal is open in the preview mode 4. Widget selection flow in Anvil layout system has been modified to be handled in a central location (`AnvilMainCanvas`) 5. Modal widget's type in modal sagas are selected via a selector that checks for the feature flag. 6. Modal widget has its own preset that (at present) is similar to the Main container's layout preset #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28588 Fixes #28328 Fixes #27459 #### Media https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/bf350be4-2202-49f3-a860-3e38681ab32e #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - This change requires a documentation update ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced Modal components with additional styling and customization options. - Introduced a new event type for modal submission actions. - Added a `--on-canvas-ui-z-index` CSS variable for improved layering control. - Implemented a new method for widget focus management in the editor. - **Improvements** - Modal components now use context hooks for close actions. - Improved the handling of detached widgets in various layout systems. - Simplified the drag-and-drop state management for widgets. - Upgraded the visual presentation of the widget drop area. - Enhanced widget selection with new custom event dispatching. - Updated the modal widget configuration with default settings and property pane structure. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed an issue with modal scrolling to behave consistently with the main container. - Addressed a problem where the `id` was not found during layout element position updates. - **Style** - Adjusted modal overlay positioning and content width with new CSS standards. - Updated zIndex references to use CSS variables for consistent styling. - **Refactor** - Reorganized the `Widgets` array into categorized groups for better clarity. - Simplified the `modalPreset` function's parameters and layout declaration. - **Documentation** - Added default values for feature flags in the documentation. - **Chores** - Altered feature flags to enable new functionalities by default. - **Tests** - No visible changes to end-users in this category. - **Revert** - No visible changes to end-users in this category. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Preet Sidhu <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <valera@appsmith.com> |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
10a98f9563
|
fix: use wds tokens in sections and zones (#30479)
## Description - Added tokens to the anvil config - Removed redundant functions for calculating widget sizes - I cleaned the widget configs - Added a zero-state to the input component - Optimised the responsiveness of the action group component https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/e9e0513a-cf3f-42ef-b960-820bb4980858 #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #29507 #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced `MenuItem` display with additional text attribute for better accessibility. - Improved user interaction with `TextArea` and `TextInput` components through more effective handling of default and read-only states. - Extended `Flex` component to include click event handling capabilities. - Refined `ActionGroup` styling and dynamic sizing for a more polished UI experience. - **Enhancements** - Updated `Button` styling to ensure consistency across different screen sizes. - Optimized layout and styling of `Menu` items for improved visual hierarchy and responsiveness. - **Refactor** - Simplified `WidgetProvider` and `AnvilEditorWidget` configurations for more streamlined layout management. - Refined `ZoneColumn` rendering for better alignment with layout system principles. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed minimum width calculation in `useZoneMinWidth` hook to ensure correct layout behavior. - Corrected `AnvilDSLTransformer` padding value for consistent widget spacing. - **Documentation** - Removed redundant Storybook addon to streamline developer experience. - **Style** - Adjusted CSS for various components to align with updated design system standards. - **Tests** - Updated widget property pane configuration tests for better coverage and reliability. - **Chores** - Cleaned up unused imports and methods across multiple widget components for improved code maintenance. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
cdf2bc6cef
|
fix: Anvil widget borders (#29940)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description - fixed border design to match existing designs in fixed and auto. - Added crispness to canvas renders - fixed cropping of zone borders. - fixed issues with space distribution coz of overflow css Bug: Zone highlights cropped <img width="854" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 1 59 20 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/8523870e-a370-44e3-877b-1d0f402617b4"> Fixed: <img width="896" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 1 57 09 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/d575d6c1-13bb-414e-97c2-ed2642c0d03e"> Bug: Zone borders cropped <img width="409" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 2 00 27 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/9881ef3f-d482-461c-af0e-6e6af2f6ed86"> Fixed: <img width="434" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 2 00 44 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/9b7db171-4746-4349-8194-1ba4cdf67306"> Bug: Borders in Dark mode <img width="443" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 2 01 58 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/3a5e4578-0279-408b-9f6b-a59021ad94cb"> Fixed: <img width="437" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 2 01 38 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/d885e7f8-43ea-415d-b1a7-f49a0637d388"> Bug: Space distribution min width animation not happening https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/2c8ea694-5f5f-4d15-a5a1-6ef3d35e795c Fixed: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/1192a2a8-f7d1-42a0-90ca-1ea58072e287 Box shadow looks consistent: Before: <img width="784" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 2 08 25 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/30e7fc46-a541-422c-ba8a-58603c9d43cb"> After: <img width="838" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 2 09 32 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/93a98ae0-315a-4564-8f6b-7c3b0d42b5b5"> #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new constant to manage widget outline offset. - **Enhancements** - Improved visibility and styling of internal components with updated overflow handling. - Enhanced widget border styling by using shadow effects for better visual clarity. - Ensured consistent class naming in layout components with fail-safe defaults. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed canvas rendering issues by refining pixel ratio calculations and adjustments. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Abhinav Jha
|
e05313c943
|
feat: Anvil themeing and Anvil vertical alignment (#29907)
## Description This PR adds the features of proper vertical alignment and themeing to Anvil. - A separate `Container` component is created for Anvil, that is used as the layer on top of which the themeing tokens are applied. - A default `min-height` is set using tokens for all widgets in Anvil. - Anvil now stops considering any `min-height` configurations provided by the widgets. It is the widgets responsibility to take care of their own heights, and Anvil will accommodate them -- no matter the height. - Table widget's default height is now set to the min height that was configured for it earlier. - `AnvilFlexComponent` now has `overflow:visible` to allow the shadows for zones and sections to not be cut-off. - All widgets are aligned center vertically by default. This will apply if they're smaller than the set `min-height` - Zones and Sections have elevation styles applied suing the `Container` component mentioned above. - Zones and Sections don't have any styling property other than `Background`, we'll add more as we understand more about the product. > Conditional vertical margin applied to widgets. > If in a row of widgets (.aligned-widget-row), one of the widgets has a label ([data-field-label-wrapper]), then > all widgets (.anvil-widget-wrapper) in the row other than the widget with the label, will shift down using the > margin-block-start property. This is to ensure that the widgets are aligned vertically. > The value of the margin-block-start property is calculated based on the spacing tokens used by the labels in input > like components > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #29073 Fixes #28591 Fixes #28592 Fixes #28593 #### Media  #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress #### Test Plan #### Issues raised during DP testing ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced conditional vertical margins for widgets to ensure alignment within rows. - Added a new `Container` component for thematic elevation styles in Anvil widgets. - Implemented elevation style options and semantic background settings for Section and Zone widgets. - **Enhancements** - Improved visual layout and alignment of AnvilFlexComponent with updated styling properties. - Added `className` properties to various layout components for enhanced CSS targeting. - **Style** - Updated widget styles to accommodate new background and elevation features. - **Refactor** - Simplified padding logic in WDSParagraphWidget. - Streamlined dimensions calculation in WDSTableWidget. - **Documentation** - Renamed sections in property panes to better reflect background styling options. - **Chores** - Added `Elevations` enum to manage elevation values consistently across components. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
830ccaa692
|
feat: Anvil section space redistribution (#29632)
## Description Anvil Section Space distribution In this pr, we are adding a feature to sections to redistribute a sections space within its zones. you can find details of it over [here](https://www.notion.so/Sections-and-Zones-design-WIP-cbcb8b0ab2514aaf90d04aa3309ad56c) As part of it we have three parts of changes - UI components - Middleware(Redux and Sagas) - Space redistribution algorithm UI/UX: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/35134347/092ba31f-d2e5-400e-80d7-45878d75ff98 Middleware changes: - have added a new state in WidgetDragResizeState `anvil` and into it have added `isDistributingSpace` to capture when space distribution is active. - added `anvilSpaceDistributionSagas` to capture all sagas wrt space redistribution Space redistribution algorithm: - Have added algorithm for redistributing space, have noted down details about it [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Space-distribution-and-responsiveness-questions-517d140e83864c2287765c99dcd7c8da?pvs=4#9b33c84bcea24cfca63d7caef036f896). > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced widget resizing capabilities with space distribution handles in Anvil layout system. - Introduced preview mode support for widget size configuration. - **Enhancements** - Improved Anvil layout system with dynamic space distribution during resizing. - Added flexibility to widget size configuration by considering preview mode. - **Bug Fixes** - Corrected widget border styles to reflect space distribution and resizing states. - **Refactor** - Streamlined space distribution logic in Anvil layout sagas and selectors. - Updated `AnvilFlexComponent` to conditionally assign `flexGrow` property. - **Documentation** - Updated comments to clarify new space distribution behavior in Anvil layout. - **Style** - Adjusted styles for space distribution handles in section layouts. - **Chores** - Added new action types for Anvil space distribution process. - Enhanced Redux state structure for drag and resize operations. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Preet <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> |
||
|
Preet Sidhu
|
fa7bd6a543
|
feat: add layouts and widgets for sections and zones. (#29713)
## Description 1. Create Section Widget. 2. Create Zone Widget. 3. Create layouts and presets for Sections and zones. 4. Upate layout for Anvil Main Canvas. 5. Refactor BaseLayoutComponent. Separate renderer for edit and view modes. 6. Add childrenMap context to avoid prop drilling through all layouts. 7. Add Anvil Config for WDS widgets. #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress #### Test Plan ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new `Zone Stepper Control` component for UI interaction. - Added `AnvilCanvas` and `AnvilMainCanvas` components with improved performance and interaction features. - Implemented `LayoutProvider` and `useClickToClearSelections` for better layout management. - Launched `AnvilCanvasDraggingArena` and `AnvilHighlightingCanvas` components with enhanced drag-and-drop capabilities. - New `useZoneMinWidth` hook to calculate minimum zone width based on child widgets. - Added `SectionRow`, `Section`, `ZoneColumn`, and `Zone` components for advanced layout structuring. - New `WidgetRenderer` component for dynamic child widget rendering. - **Enhancements** - Improved canvas activation and deactivation logic with `useCanvasActivation` and `useCanvasActivationStates`. - Enhanced drag-and-drop experience with updated `useCanvasDragging` logic. - Streamlined `AnvilMainCanvas` integration with conditional rendering based on `renderMode`. - Optimized `FlexLayout` component to handle new `isContainer` and `layoutType` properties. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed issues with widget positioning and event handling in `WidgetNamesCanvas` components. - Corrected `PageView` width property type for consistent page rendering. - **Refactor** - Consolidated Anvil layout update management with `anvilSagas` and `anvilChecksSagas`. - Refined `SectionWidget` and `ZoneWidget` configuration for improved stability and performance. - Streamlined `LayoutElementPositionsObserver` with `layoutType` enhancements. - **Documentation** - Updated comments and added clarifications for better developer understanding of canvas-related hooks and components. - **Style** - Modified `.anvil-canvas` class styles for full-width and height presentation. - **Chores** - Cleaned up import statements and removed unused code across various components and utilities. - **Tests** - Enhanced Cypress tests with additional selectors and interaction commands for `AutoDimension` feature verification. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
ad256ed64a
|
feat: add readonly mode to input (#29778)
## Description Add readonly mode for input component and widgets #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #29145 #### Media https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/2d42a2bf-603b-4b30-a74c-6c1edd408216  #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a "Read-only" mode for input fields, enabling users to view data without the ability to modify it. - **Enhancements** - Improved input components to respect both disabled and read-only states. - Updated widget properties to include read-only configurations. - **Style Updates** - Standardized padding across various components to use spacing variables for consistency. - **Documentation** - Added "Read-only" property documentation to relevant component interfaces and configurations. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
d727ecf7c5
|
chore: register offset values as per parent drop target in Anvil (#28757)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description In this PR we are making changes to layout elements position observer to capture offset values of drag parents(layouts that can have widgets) relative to their own immediate dragparents. Why? once we have these offset values of each droptarget wrt to main canvas droptarget we can clearly detect offsetvalues of widgets, since each widget's positions that are captured already are wrt to main canvas, with the calculated offset from the above process we can calculated widget positions relative to their immediate parent as well. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28561 Fixes #28585 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
a6e0c54d72
|
fix: Anvil fixes and enhancements post R0 (#28711)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description In this PR we are fixing - suggested widgets feature in Anvil - implementing isVisible prop based rendering in Anvil - remove main canvas resizer in edit mode of Anvil - cleaning up sniping mode based changes for anvil since its only used via sign posting flow which is a fixed layout only feature right now. - adding buffer for main canvas DnD - fixing glitches in first time DnD #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28577 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
Ashok Kumar M
|
5cb06ee6e5
|
fix: Hacky fixes to make table work in Anvil Safari (#28417)
> Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description In this PR we are making few hacky changes to WDS Table widget to make it work in safari as well as function as expected in all browsers. Table widget current version is a copied version of Fixed layout so it expects dimensions to be set unlike other WDS widgets so adding dimensions in a hacky way. In safari simple bar css doesnt see to work well, they overflow and cover all other widgets. @jsartisan and I tried to understand the issue, but for now making the wrapper position: sticky for some reason works. so adding that as well. All these fixes are hacky so that we get a usable Anvil Edito, but they are safe coz WDS widgets are not used anywhere except Anvil and Anvil is under a feature flag. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
Preet Sidhu
|
159a26fb6e
|
chore: Add MutuationObserver to track changes in positions of widgets and layouts. (#28315) | ||
|
Preet Sidhu
|
69f4a412bf
|
chore: add highlight calculation logic for layouts. (#27980)
## Description 1. Add LayoutComponent functionality. 2. Create Basic LayoutComponents. 3. Create LayoutPresets needed for Container-like widgets. 4. Add highlight calculation logic for all basic Layout Components. 5. Create dragging sagas for Anvil. 6. Create DraggingArena associated functionality to handle DnD in Anvil. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #27004 #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [x] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <71900764+rahulramesha@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Abhinav Jha
|
7da8561339
|
fix: Misc. fixes for anvil (#28204)
## Description Fixes #28203 - Borders are added to widgets separately now, as there is no resizer in Anvil - Fix main container jump when hovering over the main container resizer - Add height 100% to themeprovider so that the layout preset for main canvas can render correctly - Stop widgets from focusing in preview mode - Prevent AutoHeight Sagas from running in Anvil - Prevent Auto Layout sagas from running in Anvil |
||
|
Abhinav Jha
|
fce5524aa8
|
chore: Add observer to LayoutElements (#27993)
## Description - Create a hook based on the `LayoutElementPositionsObserver` and use it in `AnvilFlexComponent` such that all widgets in Anvil have their positions registered in the `LayoutElementPositionsReducer` - Do the same for `layouts` in Anvil. Added in the `FlexLayout` component. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #26947 Fixes #27287 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) |
||
|
Preet Sidhu
|
46dcf3a8f0
|
chore: Create layout system structure for Anvil and AnvilFlexComponent. (#27178)
## Description
1. Add new ```appPositioningType``` : ANVIL.
2. Create new code path and folder structure for Anvil layout system.
3. Move common pieces of functionalities between autoLayout and anvil to
anvil folder structure (e.g. ```CanvasResizer```).
4. Create ```AnvilFlexComponent```.
5. Use WDS Flex component in AnvilFlexComponent.
6. Pass min max size props in a data structure that is supported by
container queries in the Flex component.
e.g. min-width: { base: "120px", "480px": "200px" }
7. Supply the following flex properties (flex-grow flex-shrink
flex-basis) to widgets depending on their ```responsiveBehvaiour```:
a) Fill: ```flex: 1 1 0%;```
b) Hug: ```flex: 0 0 auto;```
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
1. [#26987](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26987)
2. [#26609](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26609)
3. [#26611](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26611)
#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [x] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
---------
Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com>
Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <71900764+rahulramesha@users.noreply.github.com>
|