This PR cleans up the application creation API with stricter validations
on the input. We're also moving the `workspaceId` from the query
parameter into the body, so it can be validated togather and all input
data is in one place. Simplifies code both in client and server.
No additional changes for EE, and no conflicts either, and al unit and
Cypress tests pass.
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9130707553>
> Commit: 916b54c802a163910c738e3f8ceb203314a38a6c
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9130707553&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
Spec -
cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/PartialImportExport/PartialExport_Widgets_spec.ts
RCA:
Comparison of this file post export is failing this file needed change.
closeModal('Insert_Modal')) is changed to closeModal(Insert_Modal.name))
and
showModal('Delete_Modal')) to showModal(Delete_Modal.name))
Solution:
To overcome this issue of frequent updation of file we have come up with
a solution to validate the partial import post export in a different
way.
1. We are creating a separate page and importing the partially exported
file
2. We are doing widget validation based on the selection we did during
our export
3. We are checking the properties of the widgets in the process in the
new page
---------
Co-authored-by: Trisha Anand <trisha@appsmith.com>
**What's in this PR?**
- Added descriptions and png files for the new
`getPropertyPaneContentConfig` and `getPropertyPaneStyleConfig` APIs.
- Added descriptions for the `isDeprecated` property.
Fixes#22771
Thank you.
## Description
Fixed the error of async function like `Api.run` being `undefined` after
running `resetWidget`.
#### Context:-
we have 2 types of evaluation i.e., sync and async evaluation.
These are dependent on the field we are evaluating, for the data field
we use sync evaluation and for the trigger field, we use async
evaluation. In Async evaluation, we also define entity functions like
`Api.run`.
- In resetWidget code, internally we were switching to sync evaluation
and we forgot to add code to switch back to async and due to this code
that was after it was throwing an `undefined` error.
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/33601
### Steps to reproduce
1. Import user’s application ( shared on slack )
2. Go to JSObj_Main JSObject
3. Check the onClickCopySheetTemplate function
4. Comment the await Qry_C_CopySheetTemplate.run(); line and run the
function.
5. On release it will throw error for Qry_R_SheetTemplate.run(); not
being defined but will work fine on DP.
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.JS"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9170093222>
> Commit: f9e8893d12cedbd9d2368cd9609bda7b86816588
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9170093222&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
[](https://workerb.linearb.io/v2/badge/collaboration-page?magicLinkId=C6p2w9c)
## Description
In this PR we are making sure the evaluated values of
elevatedBackground(prop that indicates if a section or zone if elevated)
is used instead of the unevaluated value used so far.
For this we will need to refer to siblings as well, so fetching the data
tree state and iterating to find all siblings is going to be
underperformant.
Hence, creating a context for the editor alone which will collect all
sections and zones current evaluated elevated background.
This context will be accessed by `useAnvilDnDListenerStates` and
`useAnvilDnDCompensators` to decide compensators for a zone and section.
We have also enhanced space distribution UX.
- during explicit ditribution(distribution via the handler inbetween
zones on the canvas) all on canvas ui borders are not displayed except
for zones that have switched off visual separation and at the start of
the action we select the section widget.
- during implicit distribution(distribution via the handler in the
property pane)
- of section, the ux on the canvas remains the same, once the action is
done the section widget is still selected.
- of zone, the ux on the canvas remains the same, once the action is
done the zone widget remains selected.
Fixes#33369Fixes#33212
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Anvil"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9172567552>
> Commit: 40a6bcae2d45e9f7791730108b772b679ad610b0
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9172567552&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
[](https://workerb.linearb.io/v2/badge/collaboration-page?magicLinkId=DEipBn-)
## Description
In this PR, we are adding an enhancement to DnD of modal widgets.
DnD was implemented only for layouts so in the case of modal, the header
and footer are not layouts and DnD is not triggered when a widget is
being dragged on top of these components of a modal.
However for the user to be able to efficiently use the DnD of modal,
mouse events of the modal are also needed to be processed.
To enable this we have a new hook that wraps all detached widgets in
editor mode only, `useAnvilDetachedWidgetsDnD`
It makes sure mouse move events on the widget are dispatched to the dnd
listeners via custom event `DETACHED_WIDGET_MOUSE_MOVE_EVENT`
we aslo had to special handle mouse leave and enter utilities to
activate a canvas for DnD,
- for all widgets except modals these are handled on the
`useAnvilDnDEventCallbacks`
- for modal widgets these events are handled on the
`useAnvilDetachedWidgetsDnD`
Fixes#33318
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Anvil"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9171877023>
> Commit: 53925782d15c9998d993f39a0239bee64a7805fc
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9171877023&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
## Description
Looks like while replacing NGINX with Caddy, Heroku deployment usecase
was missed.
Updated Caddyfile generation to use `$PORT` if available.
Fixes#33555
Tested on Heroku Standard-2x Dyno.
The ADS compliance check relies on the condition
`github.pull_request.base.ref == 'true'`, but this variable just doesn't
exist. There's no `pull_request` under the `github` context, so this ADS
compliance check never worked.
If we want this check, we can add it later as part of the
`client-build.compliance.js` script. Here's a PoC for the record, based
on the intention I interpreted:
```javascript
function doADSCheck({core, github, context, affectedFiles}) {
const filesForADSCheck = affectedFiles.filter(f => (f.status === "added" || f.status === "modified") && f.filename.startsWith("app/client/src/"));
const violatedFiles = new Set();
for (const f of filesForADSCheck) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(f.filename, "utf8");
if (content.match(/(color|Color).*#|border.*#|(color|Color).*"/)) {
violatedFiles.add(f.filename);
}
}
if (violatedFiles.size === 0) {
return;
}
const body = [
"🔴 Below files are not compliant with ADS. Please fix and re-trigger ok-to-test",
...Array.from(violatedFiles).sort().map(f => "1. " + f),
].join("\n");
github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: prNumber,
body,
});
}
```
/test sanity
## Description
> [!TIP]
Adds the following cypress tests suite and cases for building blocks
drag and drop
**Building_Blocks.ts**
- Building blocks tag is visible and open by default
- If widgets are more than 9, see more button should be visible
- Should not show the 'See More' button if widgets are less than 9
- Clicking on 'See More' button should show all widgets, and 'See Less'
should show max 9 widgets
Fixes#32961
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9153757681>
> Commit: 07eaa5e8e92a2ac5fb740cd3646140d1b28ae468
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9153757681&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Tests**
- Introduced new tests for the Building Blocks explorer to ensure the
visibility of tags, the functionality of "See More" and "See Less"
buttons, and proper display behavior for widgets.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
We have a check when running Cypress tests to ensure that no new `.js`
files are added under Cypress folder. This PR moves this check to a
separate JS file. There's another check that does some ADS compliance,
which I'll port in a follow-up PR.
Why am I hitting on this? One, to move away from `umani/changed-files`
workflow, which has randomly failed for us in the past, and id doesn't
do so much special for us anyway. Two, this workflow is the last usage
of `APPSMITH_CI_TEST_PAT` secret, so I should be able to remove that
secret as well. One less secret.
## Description
This PR hides google sheets from most popular section of datasources
page for airgapped version of appsmith.
Note: jest unit test would be added as part of
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/33596Fixes#33590
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9158106089>
> Commit: a49094af46de1ba40ec27489a570a7723236d2e0
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9158106089&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
## Description
In this spec, on hover of lint error line of JS object, error was not
shown on the right line but instead was on the left corner at the top.
The hunch was the product flakiness but it's a spec problem.
Hover on an element used with realTouch is causing the problem. Tooltip
gets calculated from top most to the linted line but on CI it gets stuck
at top most area when done really fast if realTouch is used. RealTouch
is taking incorrect position as it is not finished calculating the
position of the tooltip to be displayed is causing the problem i think.
Link fore reference
https://github.com/dmtrKovalenko/cypress-real-events/pull/15/files
EE PR Runs - https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4204Fixes#33107
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
## Description
By default the value of overwrite is false. In previous versions of
upload-artifact, this setting was implicit and true. Making this change
to fix the error `Failed to CreateArtifact: Received non-retryable
error: Failed request: (409) Conflict: an artifact with this name
already exists on the workflow run` in Github actions.
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Description
Ensures the parents of lists in add pane are defined in height so that
the scrolling of lists can happen
Fixes#33585
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9157711114>
> Commit: d148c704866263ab5ceab6ca57c9414aeb2d1f09
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9157711114&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
## Description
On homepage create new application from template should not be available
to airgapped image.
Includes unit tests for `WorkspaceAction.test.tsx`
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Templates"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9156749330>
> Commit: c7461fd1a6c8dfbfd945ec552125f49e846ebd83
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9156749330&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Description
As partial import export feature flag has been GA for quite some time
now, we can remove this so that it can be accessed in airgapped image as
well.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9154364409>
> Commit: 1016ac1ec90e84247f9b15642e318757251aa4b8
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9154364409&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Adds support for a `/test` command, without breaking the existing
`/ok-to-test` habits.
This is a _sloppy_ version of `/ok-to-test`. Turns out humans are
sloppy. So let's embrace the human. 🤯
Example incantation:
```
/test sanity workflow
```
The sloppy parser at work:
Of course, if a PR body contains `/ok-to-test`, that takes precedence,
and any `/test` is ignored.
We're also moving the logic of parsing the tags to a separate Javascript
file. It's still not in a form that's easily testable, perhaps, but I
hope this is a start for us to get to a "unit-tested CI". ❤️
---------
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps com.amazon.redshift:redshift-jdbc42 from 2.1.0.9 to 2.1.0.28.
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the
[Security Alerts
page](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/network/alerts).
</details>
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource, @tag.Sanity"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9107004323>
> Commit: e46f58b2bf47823730d8dcc496bf43dc53f20fee
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9107004323&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps To Reproduce
go to edit mode of the application
In the entity explorer section click on UI tab
search for the widget name which is not present
The custom widget icon will be displayed but seems like broken as in
attached screenshot
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
Co-authored-by: mohdraza-onefinance <mohd.raza@1finance.co.in>
## Description
> [!TIP]
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
---------
Co-authored-by: yatinappsmith <84702014+yatinappsmith@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#33436
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"<!-- This is an auto-generated comment:
Cypress test results -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> 🟣🟣🟣 Your tests are running.
> Tests running at:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9127645273>
> Commit: adde25298de9b4a00c61e019ebee92f2d9a3b619
> Workflow: `PR Automation test suite`
> Tags: `@tag.IDE`
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
## Description
- Refactoring consolidated Api to replace autocommit trigger.
- Reduced # db-calls for new pages.
Fixes#33384
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Added methods for retrieving and constructing application pages based
on branch and mode.
- Improved logic and error handling for fetching application pages.
- Enhanced schema migration for Git-connected apps.
- **Refactor**
- Replaced method calls in `ConsolidatedAPIServiceImpl` for better
performance.
- Modified method in `ApplicationServiceCE` for finding applications by
default ID, branch name, and mode.
- **Tests**
- Updated test cases in `ConsolidatedAPIServiceImplTest` for method call
modifications.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
--><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: <!-- This is an
auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9126493633>
> Commit: 82285f6c2a4ab427857aa56269f5b1e38cd0edf3
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9126493633&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
The `update` method with `String, T, String` signature, is not used in
it's form anywhere. This is most likely owing to the implementation
being off. The criteria used to find the object to be updated, is not
the same as the criteria used to find the updated object to return to
the caller.
The query to update is `{value of key field} = id`.
The query to find is `{value of "id" field} = id`.
This discrepency is likely why this function is not used anywhere. The
`ApplicationServiceCE` alone has an overridden implementation for this
signature, but that's defined with different variable names, and treats
the third argument as the Git branch name, not `key`. That function is
indeed used, and is unaffected by this change.
All of above is verified on EE as well. No conflicts, no build failure.
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
## Description
- Added separator before add button when it reaches the end and tabs
starts scrolling.
- Changed tabs bottom border color.
- Fixed tabs jumping effect while switching.
Fixes#33521
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity, @tag.IDE"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9126293732>
> Commit: 8384629a70ce3b075d6aaff9a43d10041ddb5b98
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9126293732&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
The step to get the PR number when run manually has error in its code.
The `res=` line doesn't work, in that it'll mangle the JSON output from
the `curl` command, before setting it into the variable. It should've
been
```sh
res="$(curl ...)"
```
Considering we don't use this functionality today, and it doesn't work
either, we're removing it.
This workflow is only used with `repository_dispatch`, and we make that
explicit.
The `getById` method in `CrudService`/`BaseService` gets an item from
the DB without checking for permissions. But a few services
(`Application` and `Workspace`) have overridden this method to run the
query _with_ permission check. This gives the false impression that this
method has a permission check for _all_ services, which is not the case.
So we're renaming the base method to `getByIdWithoutPermissionCheck`,
and make the overridden versions as `getById`. This should make it a lot
more obvious where we're querying with permissions and where we're
ignoring them, and make an informed choice of when what is needed.
## Review tips
1. The new `getById` does a permission check. The new
`getByIdWithoutPermissionCheck` doesn't do a permission check.
2. Since only calls to `getById` for the application and workspace
service were using permission check, we need to ensure that:
1. All calls to `getById` on application service and workspace service,
are untouched.
2. All calls to `getById` on any other service are changed to
`getByIdWithoutPermissionCheck`. Any remaining call to `getById` would
throw a compile error since we removed it from `BaseService` anyway.
EE PR at https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4136.
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9111401344>
> Commit: 96df2feee613a0e3628f6ec9f91313c2c4b84360
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9111401344&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Description
This PR fix the buttons and text getting cut off when the zoom level is
changed for gsheet query.
Fixes#31381
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9111892238>
> Commit: d7f3c8c96417e5d134f9b6fa274029f1e9340aff
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9111892238&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
