Part of #33724.
We have a lot of fixture files in our Cypress tests with DSLs of various
kinds. They are used to update the DSL using the
`/api/v1/layouts/{layoutId}/pages/{pageId}?applicationId={applicationId}`.
This API, is [in this line in
`LayoutControllerCE`](c4e5d5e6c8/app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/controllers/ce/LayoutControllerCE.java (L71)),
and the request body is parsed as [objects of `LayoutUpdateDTO`
record](71bc84fc76/app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/dtos/LayoutUpdateDTO.java (L6)).
This `record`, accepts _only_ the `dsl` field, and nothing else.
List of potential files that have this problem was identified with this
command:
```sh
cd app/client/cypress
rg -Io 'AddDsl\(".+?\)' \
| cut -d\" -f2 \
| sort -u \
| while read line; do
if rg -q '"(layoutOnLoadActions|layoutOnLoadActionErrors|userPermissions|new)":' fixtures/"$line".json; then
echo $line
fi
done
```
(For reference, and to use on EE repo, after this is merged).
**/test all**
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> 🔴🔴🔴 Some tests have failed.
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9633990737>
> Commit: 9e848f1ed0c3332177d2e6c4a75e2483f045395f
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9633990737&attempt=1&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: ``
> The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
<ol>
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/RTE/RichTextEditor3_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/RTE/RichTextEditor_1_spec.js
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/RTE/RichTextEditor_2_spec.js
</ol>
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master"
target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Corrected the file path for loading DSL configuration in the nested
list widget scenario.
- **Chores**
- Streamlined multiple JSON files by removing deprecated
`layoutOnLoadActions` arrays and other obsolete fields, resulting in
cleaner and more manageable configurations.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This change is a refactor of widget selection logic. It consolidates all
the business logic to make it easy to maintain. It also improves the
performance a bit.
It touched a lot of features as we heavily rely on this
```
Select one
Select multiple with drag
Select multiple with shift
Select multiple with cmd/ctrl
Selections should be on the same level of hierarchy
Unselect all by clicking on the canvas
Unselect all by pressing esc
Select all with cmd + a
Paste in main container
Paste in another container
Undo
Redo
Modal Selection
Modal child selection
Context switching
cmd click
snipping mode
new widget suggestion
onboarding
```
> Refactor widget selection logic
Fixes#19570
## Type of change
- Refactor
## How Has This Been Tested?
All existing tests should pass
### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
### Issues raised during DP testing
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/19643#issuecomment-1383570810https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/19643#issuecomment-1383607820https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/19643#issuecomment-1385095478
[Bug bash
issues](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/610aa302f3e146a7b090b7dc6bc63ef9?v=0d277a9b07bf4aac9d717bcaf138c33a)
## Checklist:
### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
### QA activity:
- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or
manual QA
- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after
Round 1/2 of QA
- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test
* fix: Select widget accept string and object
* fix: JSON object case
* Fix: make Multiselect Defaukt option Array of strings
* fix: Select and Multiselect
* fixes and test cases
* comments
* fix: Select option value
* fix: mutiselect and test case
* fix: failing test
* fix: reset select widget
* fix: PR issues
* fix: Select widget Reset
* fix: failing Test
* fix: test
* fix: tests
* FIX: EVALUATION TESTS
* fix: getting Select Value in form
* fix: Test cases
* fix: add more test cases
Co-authored-by: balajisoundar <balaji@appsmith.com>
