Nikhil Nandagopal
b4362afddd
Updated Label Config
2024-03-20 11:29:54 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
725398a779
Updated Label Config
2024-03-20 11:29:42 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
303c601542
Updated Label Config
2024-03-20 11:27:08 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
0b27776d22
Updated Label Config
2024-03-20 11:23:58 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
4893716fad
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:06:58 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
758fc4a4e0
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:06:39 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
ed8bf629de
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:06:21 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
e52f5904a4
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:05:43 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
4c0a8d1a09
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:05:30 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
83972f1167
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:05:18 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
dfbb3c864a
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:05:01 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
6f615df81d
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:04:42 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
69ec4fcc87
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:04:24 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
4b3c437069
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:03:58 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
fb78be2b4f
Updated Label Config
2024-03-19 23:03:43 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
54832b6ac3
ci: Fix TED tag
2024-03-19 14:29:27 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
7f56d70fb9
ci: Make TED image tag configurable ( #31815 )
...
With this, we should be able to set the image tag (`latest` or `nightly`
for example), to be used for the TED run for Cypress tests.
Unless we already have a different method to run Cypress with nightly
TED, this should give us that flexibility.
2024-03-19 11:57:59 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
1121a839bc
Updated Label Config
2024-03-16 00:19:06 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
b33b4a88c3
Update config.json
2024-03-15 18:45:49 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
d8b0deb7d5
Updated Label Config
2024-03-15 17:09:08 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
e6660912a2
Updated Label Config
2024-03-13 13:13:11 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
fd79d76618
Updated Label Config
2024-03-12 13:48:52 +05:30
Nidhi
c5c3dc4caf
ci: Modified older ok-to-test job to redirect to the new one ( #31673 )
2024-03-12 10:01:44 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
c77e26967a
Updated Label Config
2024-03-11 22:11:42 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
54696c0ae8
Updated Label Config
2024-03-11 19:31:54 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
855d9c8377
Updated Label Config
2024-03-11 19:31:35 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
aa53262dee
Updated Label Config
2024-03-11 19:30:31 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
ab06d40e92
Updated Label Config
2024-03-11 15:24:53 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
5801b21030
Updated Label Config
2024-03-11 11:37:10 +05:30
Nidhi
3756e94d91
ci: Prettify and remove redundancies ( #31638 )
2024-03-09 17:48:13 +05:30
Nidhi
86f5e8617e
ci: Prettify and remove redundancies ( #31637 )
2024-03-09 13:46:56 +05:30
Nidhi
01954c15d6
ci: Prettify and remove redundancies ( #31635 )
2024-03-09 13:24:38 +05:30
Nidhi
96655ec988
ci: Prettify and remove redundancies ( #31634 )
2024-03-09 12:56:02 +05:30
Nidhi
fee21b5fd5
ci: Simplified PR template to align with ok-to-test ( #31633 )
2024-03-09 11:14:56 +05:30
Nidhi
3b10f233cd
ci: Make Cypress results show up in body as well ( #31631 )
2024-03-09 09:55:50 +05:30
Nidhi
cd8cefd965
ci: Inherit secrets in workflow call to integrations tests ( #31630 )
2024-03-09 09:08:47 +05:30
Nidhi
73a7e3e8e7
ci: Make sure target is release branch for new flow ( #31628 )
2024-03-09 02:37:45 +05:30
Nidhi
d948bb6e1f
ci: Added an alternate ok-to-test path ( #31626 )
2024-03-09 02:30:19 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
f09b7a197e
Update --bug-report.yaml
2024-03-08 15:54:23 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
d6456efced
Updated Label Config
2024-03-08 15:30:03 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
df1c20d865
Updated Label Config
2024-03-08 15:29:32 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
1159c73347
Update --bug-report.yaml
2024-03-08 14:17:12 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
b612a717f5
ci: Possible fix for Integration tests result update failures ( #31600 )
...
In testing we saw that updating `ci-test-result` has a chance of failing
if the correct check is not found.
When we are creating the `ci-test-result` check via the Github Api, it
successfully marked the PR check with the result. It did not seem to
have any issue even if a `ci-test-result` job already existed
By removing the logic of finding an existing check of the same name, and
always creating the check, we assume this will improve the PR check
updates
fixes : #31601
2024-03-08 11:17:00 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
6e8febd971
ci: Set rate limiting to high value in CI
2024-03-08 09:40:38 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
63cd84936d
Updated Label Config
2024-03-06 22:48:36 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
652fcb7136
Updated Label Config
2024-03-06 22:48:03 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
436bf1a63d
Updated Label Config
2024-03-06 21:37:16 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
4e13b04b0f
Updated Label Config
2024-03-06 21:35:49 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
b5860e24c3
Updated Label Config
2024-03-06 21:33:04 +05:30
Nikhil Nandagopal
184ac1aeb7
Updated Label Config
2024-03-06 21:09:21 +05:30
