72d39bbce7
12 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rudraprasad Das
|
71d67185c4
|
feat: dsl migration with server (#28518)
## Description 1. Shifts DSL migration logic to @shared/dsl 2. Exposes /migrate/dsl endpoint on rts 3. Integrates RTS endpoint to backend for serving migrated pages 4. Introduces feature flag to switch between client-based and server-based on-demand migration #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #26783, #26784, #26980 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [x] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com> |
||
|
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
|
d1f9b2456e
|
chore: Use version from info.json directly (#29108)
This will bring us one step closer to the `info.json` being the one source of truth for the version information. We shouldn't need the step to overwrite the contents of the `version.js` file during build in CI. |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
037d2fabb0
|
chore(deps): bump axios from 0.27.2 to 1.6.0 in /app/client (#28776)
Bumps [axios](https://github.com/axios/axios) from 0.27.2 to 1.6.0. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/axios/axios/releases">axios's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>Release v1.6.0</h2> <h2>Release notes:</h2> <h3>Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li><strong>CSRF:</strong> fixed CSRF vulnerability CVE-2023-45857 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/axios/axios/issues/6028">#6028</a>) (<a href=" |
||
|
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
|
83c6e65030
|
chore: Fix path to RTS server.js in start-server.sh | ||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
9eac55a380
|
chore: add consistent-type-definitions rule (#27907)
## Description Add consistent-type-definitions rule |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
fb12f6ad87
|
chore:add eslint rules (#27878)
Add eslint rules - promise-function-async - prefer-nullish-coalescing |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
22e10c6fdb
|
chore: add strict-boolean-expressions rule (#27852)
## Description Add `@typescript-eslint/strict-boolean-expressions` eslint rule for packages. |
||
|
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
|
14f4bae198
|
chore: Use separate specific esbuild for RTS (#27764)
Use separate specifici `esbuild` for building RTS, instead of reusing the one coming from storybook. As recommended in [this comment](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/27310#pullrequestreview-1652734575). |
||
|
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
|
164d2e6b65
|
ci: Use esbuild to build RTS (#27310)
This fixes RTS build to use `esbuild`. 1. This means the whole `node_modules` won't need to be copied over to the Docker image. There's unused insignifant _test_ files in there, that don't add any value, but are causing irrelevant CVEs to be reported on our Docker image. See example at https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/2349. 2. Much faster. Not that RTS build is our slow point, but still. Perhaps we can move client to `esbuild` too. 🙂 ## Why are we doing this? The current method of loading RTS into the Docker image means that _all_ contents of _all_ dependencies are copied over. The whole `node_modules`. But several of these packages include _test_ files too, that aren't needed at runtime at all. One of such test files is creating a false alert for a CVE on our Docker image. Has absolutely no relevance and impact, but it's there. To fix that, I [had to `rm -rf /opt/appsmith/rts/node_modules/*/test` in the Docker image](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/2349/files). This felt very hacky, and very dirty. It felt like we're introducing more debt and more duct tape around the current build process. So, `esbuild`. ## Where is `esbuild` coming from? We're using `esbuild` v0.18.20 only, while the latest is v0.19.3. We need to update `design-system`'s storybook dependency, I think, to get a more recent version of `esbuild`. I'm yet to figure this out and can use some help. 🙂 |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
abff60b6a2
|
chore: improve eslint rules (#26056)
## Description Make eslint rules stricter for packages #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [x] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <melnikov.vv@greendatasoft.ru> |
||
|
ChandanBalajiBP
|
ce01390f7e
|
chore: fix RTS start failure script (#24162)
## Description > RTS build is failing because start-server.sh is looking for `server.js` in` dist/rts/`, but `server.js` is located in `dist/` #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #24168 > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
9f607d250d
|
chore: move local dependency to packages (#23395)
## Description 1. Move everything related to client from app folder to client folder (`.yarn`, `yarn.lock`, package.json, .gitignore) 2. Move `ast` and `rst` to client packages 3. Fix running scripts in packages 4. Add running unit tests in packages in CI TODO: It is necessary to consider enabling the `nmHoistingLimits: workspaces` option, since now all packages are hoisted to the root, there may be issues with dependencies in workspaces. Also, there is a possibility of implicit use of packages. https://yarnpkg.com/configuration/yarnrc#nmHoistingLimits #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #23333 #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [x] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <melnikov.vv@greendatasoft.ru> |