Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pawan Kumar
0cc104ed93
chore: update import of AppState to DefaultReduxState (#40494)
We were using the AppState incorrectly in our selectors. We should use
`DefaultRootState` from react-redux.

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Updated state parameter types in numerous selectors and hooks across
the application from a custom application state type to a standard Redux
root state type, enhancing type consistency and maintainability without
impacting functionality or user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/14771101257>
> Commit: 48aef24d9a54ee63d06943128f7545ba0d461172
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=14771101257&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 01 May 2025 07:16:33 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
2025-05-01 15:53:37 +05:30
Rudraprasad Das
9ce2598e76
chore: git mod - integration with applications (#38439)
## Description
- Git mod integration with applications behind feature flag

Fixes #37815 
Fixes #37816 
Fixes #37817 
Fixes #37818 
Fixes #37819 
Fixes #37820 

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12570655268>
> Commit: 7d2f1a7013bc2fc6c960699ee0b6e06800cd21f9
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12570655268&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 14:35:46 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
2025-01-05 11:21:23 +01:00
Rudraprasad Das
0eee667493
chore: revert - git mod - integration app (#38431) 2024-12-31 17:46:11 +05:30
Rudraprasad Das
692e394e73
chore: git mod - integration app (#38315)
## Description
- Git mod integration with applications behind feature flag

Fixes #37815 
Fixes #37816 
Fixes #37817 
Fixes #37818 
Fixes #37819 
Fixes #37820 


## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12526603607>
> Commit: 19f3ca0a35b16b25b2cff8700e2df4b2a497e7fe
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12526603607&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 15:57:13 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Release Notes

- **New Features**
- Introduced various new hooks for Git functionalities, including
`useGitModEnabled`, `useGitCurrentBranch`, `useGitProtectedMode`, and
`useGitConnected`.
	- Added a new component `DeployButton` to manage deployment actions.
- Integrated `ConnectSuccessModal` to enhance user feedback upon
successful Git connection.
	- Added `GitImportModal` for improved Git import functionality.
- Introduced `GlobalProfileView` for managing and displaying user
profile information.
	- Added a new icon, `CloudIconV2`, to the icon provider.
- Implemented `fetchGlobalSSHKey` and `gitImport` sagas for better state
management.

- **Improvements**
- Enhanced handling of Git-related states and actions across multiple
components and sagas.
- Streamlined selector usage for determining preview mode by replacing
`combinedPreviewModeSelector` with `selectCombinedPreviewMode`.
- Updated the `DeployPreview` component to manage success feedback and
handle commit operations more effectively.
- Improved the `StatusChangesView` component by adding a callout for
migration messages.
	- Added new transformers for application status handling.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated error handling and loading states across various actions and
components to improve reliability.

- **Refactor**
- Refactored action creators to use `createArtifactAction` instead of
`createSingleArtifactAction` for consistency and clarity.
- Consolidated Git import and connection logic to improve modularity and
maintainability.
- Modified the `Header` component to utilize
`GitApplicationContextProvider` for managing Git-related state.
- Updated various components to utilize the new
`selectCombinedPreviewMode` selector for improved state management.
- Refactored the `DeployPreview` component to enhance its functionality
and styling consistency.
- Enhanced the `applicationStatusTransformer` to handle multiple status
transformations.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-12-30 15:53:32 +05:30
Valera Melnikov
c42e0317de
fix: change appsmith alias (#35349)
In order to unify package names, we decided to use `@appsmith` prefix as
a marker to indicate that packages belong to our codebase and that these
packages are developed internally. So that we can use this prefix, we
need to rename the alias of the same name. But since `@appsmith` is
currently being used as an alias for `ee` folder, we have to rename the
alias as the first step.

Related discussion
https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/CPG2ZTXEY/p1722516279126329

EE PR — https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4801

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10267368821>
> Commit: 2b00af2d257e4d4304db0a80072afef7513de6be
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10267368821&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 14:24:22 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
2024-08-06 17:52:22 +03:00
Hetu Nandu
e99cc39e47
chore: Block Selections when Canvas is in Side by Side mode (#31587)
## Description

This pull request aims to enhance the user experience within the
application by modifying the canvas behavior when it is displayed in
"Side by Side" mode alongside Queries or JavaScript sections. The key
change is the disabling of direct selections on the canvas, allowing
interactions with canvas elements only through cmd + click or by
clicking on the widget's name. This adjustment is intended to facilitate
a view-only mode for the canvas during Queries or JS editing, thereby
improving layout and user interaction.

Additionally, the PR introduces enhancements to the application's
testing framework, focusing on improving test reliability in scenarios
involving UI interaction and state changes. Notable updates include:

- Improved error tooltip handling in CurrencyInput_spec.js.
- Ensured page state saving before verifying element presence in
Listv2_BasicChildWidgetInteraction_spec.js.
- Replaced cy.wait("@updateLayout") with cy.assertPageSave() and
introduced a delay in Listv2_spec.js to accommodate functionality
changes.
- Implemented visibility checks in
TableV2_Button_Icon_validation_spec.js to prevent timing-related test
failures.
These technical updates collectively aim to bolster the application's
testing framework, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of automated
tests, especially in UI interaction and state change scenarios.


#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30864

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!IMPORTANT]  
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8259916944>
> Commit: `15e1cf937a9d15adaea68e16a55006d993a07cbf`
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8259916944&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
> All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->





















<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
	- Added new constants for widget selection and focus management.
- Introduced a new event type for tracking widget selections in code
mode.
- **Tests**
- Enhanced test assertions and interactions for better reliability and
error handling in various widgets.
- **Refactor**
- Improved widget selection logic and URL handling for a more intuitive
user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-03-13 11:53:49 +05:30
Rudraprasad Das
cda27eb6f3
feat: branch protection (#28526)
## Description
- Adds server endpoints for getting and setting protected branches
- Adds protected canvas view for branch protection
- Adds default branch and protected branch in git modal settings

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #28434, #28056

#### Media
Protected View -
<img width="1728" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/8724051/4fb26450-61e1-4fc0-a66d-0ebaa28ff90c">

Branch Protection Settings -
<img width="1728" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/8724051/fb6d16b6-0a3c-42fd-be1a-9b3677048663">


#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed

---------

Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com>
2023-11-03 22:43:36 +05:30
rahulramesha
8a35e05923
chore: code changes for widget position observer and widget name on canvas (#27367)
## Description
The PR contains non integrated code changes for below new features, The
changes are not integrated to work but only contains the ground work
code changes that can be added to css based layout/ Anvil once that is
available in Release.

- **Widget Position observer-** Since we are moving to css based layout,
the positions of widgets will be unknown. To solve the issue we have
introduced the above feature that stores/updates position of widgets on
Redux state whenever a widget position updates. without manually
triggering any action
- **Widget Name on Canvas-** For the New Layout the existing widget name
is inconsistent as it would cut off or visually not visible. to solve
that the widget name will now be drawn on html canvas than it being a
dom node component

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #26945 
Fixes #26948 


#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)


## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest

#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR

#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed

---------

Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhinav Jha <abhinav@appsmith.com>
2023-10-06 15:37:43 +05:30