## Description
PR to make the release tag adaptable to work with both MongoDB and
PostgreSQL uris.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new script to automate the preparation of server
artifacts, improving the build process.
- Added SQL files to the indentation configuration for consistent code
formatting.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced error handling in the Docker build process to ensure
essential files are present before execution.
- Updated service configuration logic to prevent misconfiguration based
on the environment.
- Added a new job step in the build workflow to prepare server artifacts
after the build process.
- Implemented conditional logic in the run script to dynamically adapt
to different database configurations.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Adjusted the initialization process to focus on MongoDB, improving
reliability in various environments.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
/test Sanity
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10940528231>
> Commit: 32731e8a93a25e5c9456eb89daca2d8bf327c012
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10940528231&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:21:54 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Description
As we are referring to the same Postgres version on both the pg and
release branches we can just reuse the same base image for both release
and pg tag. This PR removes the requirement to maintain separate base
tag for the pg branch.
/test Sanity
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10869515341>
> Commit: 1c7051ad4cd41927db2f79aa076a9b40d1c01482
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10869515341&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 08:47:43 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Streamlined the logic for determining the base tag in the build
process, simplifying the conditions for setting the `base_tag` variable.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Reverting to previous version as this steps specifically run for
failure.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10848068018>
> Commit: d646576aa20499b099adbf6f0479ff3b8363e41c
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10848068018&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.ImportExport`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:26:38 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated workflow conditions to trim Cypress log files only on job
failures, improving log management for successful runs.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Fix the issue as flag value was interchange.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10846876122>
> Commit: aa17588ae04bf60d668512b262e9e742814d3ffc
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10846876122&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.ImportExport`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:01:50 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Adjusted the logic for adding comments on pull requests based on CI
test results, improving clarity of feedback.
- Enhanced conditions for commenting on new CI failures and successful
jobs to provide more accurate notifications.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Added extra checks for better reporting
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10831607193>
> Commit: 2a5049d9cb17fc099c10e863b90a0694287c38fe
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10831607193&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.ImportExport`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:31:10 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced CI workflow to provide clearer test results through improved
commenting on pull requests based on test outcomes.
- Introduced a failure flag mechanism to explicitly record test
execution status.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved reliability of CI process by ensuring important logs and
results are preserved and uploaded even on test failures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem:** When running Cypress tests multiple times with the
cypress-repeat-pro --force option, we only see success messages. This is
because the `--force` option may override or mask failures, leading to
misleading results.
**Solution:** To address this, we have added a step to check for
specific failure indicators in the test summary file. If the summary
indicates that there were any failed tests (i.e., `Total Failed: 0` is
not present), the GitHub Action step will fail. This ensures that
failures are properly highlighted and reported in the PR comments.
Fixes #`36232`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10806403675>
> Commit: 3a04b01650a4f92967d6b489eead5d61e48cb89a
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10806403675&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:01:29 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced CI workflow to ensure GitHub Action fails if Cypress tests do
not pass, improving reliability.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Implemented a conditional check for test failures, providing clearer
feedback on test outcomes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Expanded GitHub Actions workflow to trigger on both `master` and `pg`
branches.
- Introduced a new job for managing server artifacts.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced workflow responsiveness to changes in multiple branches.
- Updated Docker image tagging to dynamically include branch names for
better versioning.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Workflow Improvements**
- Enhanced GitHub Actions workflow for syncing releases, improving Git
operations and conflict management.
- Introduced a step to set Git configuration for better commit
attribution.
- Added a new step to specify the Node.js version for consistent
environment setup.
- Simplified the merging process with a new `git merge` command that
accommodates unrelated histories.
- Adjusted conflict handling strategy, emphasizing manual intervention
when conflicts occur.
- Updated Slack notification message formatting for clarity.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> Tests have not run on the HEAD
f30933c3d2da9b90ed631f89fc270834505a3873 yet
> <hr>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 04:18:19 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Description
Run the CI test limit in PG branch
Fixes #`36085`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10683137823>
> Commit: 288bb1aa7f920c67ccb7755bdea8292c8bc17fbc
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10683137823&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 13:03:06 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new output variable `is-pg-build` to enhance build
handling based on pull request base branches.
- Improved workflow logic to conditionally manage builds depending on
the pull request context.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Only command name update
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10592127455>
> Commit: 1e1fb070a89908cd6bf78d0ba966d04305632f51
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10592127455&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 07:44:22 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Improvements**
- Updated the CI workflow to utilize an enhanced version of Cypress for
running tests, potentially offering improved functionality and
performance.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Challenge**: In our existing process, when users performed a limited
run with a specified count, the results were recorded solely in the
logs. This approach introduced an additional step, requiring users to
manually navigate through each workflow to check the results, which was
both time-consuming and prone to oversight.
**Solution**: To address this inefficiency, I took the initiative to
develop a custom npm library specifically designed to enhance the user
experience. This library automates the generation of a summary file that
consolidates the run data into a single, easily accessible document.
Furthermore, I integrated this solution into our existing workflow by
updating the process to automatically post the contents of this summary
file as a comment on the relevant PR upon completion of the run.
This improvement not only streamlines the workflow by eliminating the
need for users to manually sift through logs, but it also ensures that
critical information is immediately available at a glance. By
centralizing the results in the PR comments, we’ve enhanced transparency
and efficiency, allowing for quicker decision-making and more effective
collaboration. This solution is a step forward in optimizing our
processes and reducing the manual effort required to track and assess
test outcomes.
**Looks like this:**
<img width="993" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 11 06 37 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/91a5966e-fef6-47b8-9fd8-9186012f2ab3">
Fixes #`35920`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10590991034>
> Commit: ef6ef69fb812ba43abba5d9d273623a914569c81
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10590991034&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:19:47 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a summary of Cypress test results in pull request comments
for improved visibility.
- Added functionality to upload Cypress summary logs, ensuring
availability regardless of previous test outcomes.
- **Dependency Updates**
- Updated the testing package from `cypress-repeat-updated` to
`cypress-repeat-pro`, potentially enhancing testing capabilities.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
git merge over cherry-pick with loop by comparing head.
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> Tests have not run on the HEAD
087dfe23f63ea4e4dc472c1c048009086976f3d1 yet
> <hr>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:22:10 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Streamlined workflow for synchronizing releases to the `pg` branch,
enhancing efficiency.
- Directly merges the `release` branch into the `pg` branch, simplifying
the process.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved handling of merge conflicts with clearer notifications and
tracking.
- **Chores**
- Refined the conditions for pushing changes, ensuring operations only
occur on successful merges.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
> [!TIP]
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Expanded automation capabilities by allowing the CI/CD workflow to
trigger on pull requests targeting the `master` branch, in addition to
the existing `release` and `pg` branches.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
> [!TIP]
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
## Description
Adding server logs
Fixes #`35895`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced CI workflow with new steps for collecting and uploading
Docker logs to improve debugging capabilities during failures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Change the boolean flag for the ci job to capture success or failure
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10572876956>
> Commit: 4f3986f053850edb0298934b6f59c398a8708416
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10572876956&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 06:45:49 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced notification system for GitHub Actions to alert on any job
failures, improving awareness of issues during workflows.
- **Refactor**
- Modified conditions in the workflow to broaden the criteria for
triggering notifications, ensuring timely alerts for various failure
scenarios.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This CI job is responsible for syncing changes from the release branch
to the pg branch. This happens for every commit merged to release
branch, similar to `Sync Community Workflow`
Fixes #`Issue Number`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10571814611>
> Commit: 9bc44fc0cc762d52854da3b4e2f8c3e995909ccd
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10571814611&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 05:00:52 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced an automated workflow for merging changes from the release
branch to the pg branch, enhancing integration and development
efficiency.
- Added notifications for merge conflicts to improve communication and
resolution tracking.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Adds a new exception on the stale check workflow. If the PR has the flag
of "User Testing", it will not mark it as stale.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> Tests have not run on the HEAD
f27d4ceaf7b36227481c8a11a882c5d5c9fe07ea yet
> <hr>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:34:31 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Added the `User Testing` label to the list of exempt labels,
preventing pull requests in user testing from being closed due to
inactivity. This enhances workflow management for extended reviews or
testing periods.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Added screenshot archival for cypress failure
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Added a new step in the CI workflow to upload screenshots as artifacts
when Cypress tests fail, enhancing debugging capabilities.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved the overall functionality of the CI process by providing
immediate access to visual evidence of test failures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Having seen memory failure in EE repo for the yarn install. This same
steps works fine in CE.
Fixes #`35667`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10369580919>
> Commit: 29e0b8dbbd06ba6068af3484d466a57206e81c3d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10369580919&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:37:35 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Restored the Yarn cache during workflow execution in case of failure,
improving build efficiency.
- **Chores**
- Updated GitHub Actions workflow to enhance caching mechanism for
better performance in CI processes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
We’ve made significant progress and successfully ran a limited set of
test files by fixing parameters in the forked repository. I can able to
atleast trigger the workflow with slash command and passed right
parameter.
The ci-test-limited-with-count.yml workflow now supports running
specific test files. However, an issue was identified with one of the
parameters. To proceed with testing, the identified issue can be
resolved by merging this PR.
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10351114050>
> Commit: fd17177d71110bf714b5ec4eaf7d2ae683cbdc68
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10351114050&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:57:49 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Simplified access to the `run_count` variable in the GitHub Actions
workflow, improving readability and potentially enhancing performance.
- Updated syntax for referencing inputs in Cypress test workflows for
better clarity and consistency.
- Clarified default value handling for `run_count`, ensuring predictable
workflow behavior.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
By changing the workflow trigger and the way to check for correct
labels, we are trying to allow the PR integrations tests to run every
time the PR is updated. That means, if you push changes, and the PR
already has ok-to-test label, it will rerun the tests based on new
changes
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10296910575>
> Commit: c59583ba28c8cdff35a12422b8c73838c6efdc85
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10296910575&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 06:32:48 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new job, `checkTestLabel`, to verify the presence of the
"ok-to-test" label on pull requests.
- Added a new job, `mark-stale`, to mark the Cypress status as stale
when the label is absent.
- **Improvements**
- Updated the `parse-tags` job to run only after the `checkTestLabel`
job, enhancing workflow control.
- Modified the conditions for executing the `parse-tags` job based on
the output of the `checkTestLabel` job.
- **Style**
- Minor formatting adjustments for job dependencies in the workflow.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Example of a successful pass:
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10321826794/job/28575617540
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Streamlined GitHub Actions workflow for testing Storybook by
consolidating Playwright installation and removing redundant steps.
- Enhanced clarity and efficiency of the testing process.
- **Style**
- Updated button component styles by disabling rounded corners,
reflecting a potential shift in design strategy.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Testing the yaml with slash command.
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10316110580>
> Commit: 41a74c726e332c4d9adeef876d60766f0c09c33a
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10316110580&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:43:58 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated the GitHub Actions workflow to disable Yarn cache restoration,
which may affect build times.
- Modified Cypress test specifications to focus on the Fork application
instead of templates, refining test execution priorities.
- Enhanced the GitHub Actions workflow with a new input parameter,
`run_count`, improving configurability and responsiveness to events.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
commented files changed step. It is a notification step
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Modified the GitHub Actions workflow to simplify job flow by
commenting out the command execution for changes in the client folder,
effectively disabling that functionality.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
It is for running a spec file with given run_count
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10260756232>
> Commit: 0d4867a9068a353614cfc71374efeb8bc737fcfd
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10260756232&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 05:40:57 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated the event type for the GitHub Actions workflow to enhance
clarity and specificity in triggering associated jobs. Users will now
need to use the new event type `ci-test-limit-count-command` for
interactions.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
It is for running a spec file with given run_count with PR comment.
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10250647978>
> Commit: 69556d529719ff00d6d0b6961edb83a2a6112541
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10250647978&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 14:49:54 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a CI/CD workflow to manage client and server builds with
Cypress testing.
- Added a job to enforce TypeScript file checks, providing feedback for
corrections on pull requests.
- Expanded testing capabilities with a new job for managing testing
limits.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced logging for better visibility into test execution attempts.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Reverted client profiled build script, we will instead generate a docker
custom image.
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/35184
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10177617441>
> Commit: 3ff5d304aacb08cabb529b6553b2319d688000ff
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10177617441&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 09:52:14 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed the dependency on the `APPSMITH_CLOUD_HOSTING` environment
variable during the build process, streamlining the workflow and build
script.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
The `APPSMITH_CLOUD_HOSTING` env value is not accessible within the
client build script, we are fixing it by injecting it in the client
build workflow.
Fixes#35184
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10161480342>
> Commit: 443c4ab7a6a08332efec5b7fd91927eeaf4e9707
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10161480342&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:57:03 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Enhanced visibility of environment variables during the build process
with a debug echo statement.
- Introduced the `APPSMITH_CLOUD_HOSTING` environment variable in the
GitHub Actions workflow, improving configurability for various
deployment scenarios.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
It is for running a spec file with given run_count
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new GitHub Actions CI workflow for running limited tests,
enhancing the flexibility and management of the testing process.
- Added a new dependency for improved Cypress testing capabilities,
allowing for more efficient test execution.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced artifact management for test runs and results within the CI
workflow for a more robust development lifecycle.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR fixes failure in the CI build workflow. The workflow was failing
in `Put release build in cache` job. The workflow was failing because
while installing git lfs, there was a conflict with the newly added pre
push hook. git lfs also contains its pre push hooks which was
conflicting with our hooks. In this PR, I have configured the workflow
for git lfs pre push hooks to override appsmith pre push commit since
appsmith git hooks are not required during workflows.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a pre-push hook to ensure integrity by preventing
inadvertent pushes of certain files to the repository.
- **Improvements**
- Updated GitHub Actions workflow to enhance management of large files,
ensuring the latest configurations are applied before builds.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
- Move [ADS](https://github.com/appsmithorg/design-system) to local
packages
- Fix ADS stories according of Storybook 8
- Fix type errors
- Update Storybook to latest version to be able to run `test-storybook`
- Remove unused files(components, tests, stories) from
ADS-old(design-system-old)
Following steps:
- Merge `ads-old` and `widgets-old`, only 1 package should remain
- Rename packages https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/27658
- Use `importSvg` `importRemixIcon` from ADS remove this functionality
from `ads-old`
Fixes#34252
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10114839347>
> Commit: 64cdfec4d2acd45ca955cc0d19c3cb582e1ac0ad
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10114839347&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:49:25 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Attached the attempt and changed the workflow name in order to trigger
slack workflow
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Improved automation for analyzing Cypress test runs with refined
conditional logic.
- Enhanced data sent in analysis requests, including a new attempt
number field for better traceability.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Ensured the automated analysis workflow only triggers under specific
conditions, preventing unnecessary executions.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: Laveena Enid <laveena@appsmith.com>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated Docker Hub credentials for improved security.
- Enhanced Docker Buildx setup for cross-platform compatibility.
- Upgraded Docker build-push action to version 6 to leverage latest
features.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
This is so DPs on `pg` branch continue to work.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Added a workflow step to check and execute server artifact preparation
script during the on-demand build process.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Specify the specs we want to run, in a plain code fence, where the first
line has to exactly be `/test`. The remaining lines have to be one spec
file per line.
Like this:
```
/test
cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Fork/ForkApplication_spec.ts
cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/JSLibrary/Library_spec.ts
```
1. It's not possible to run with tags and specs and the same time. This
will need a slightly larger effort. But we'll get there.
2. The status message shows spec files like they are space-separated,
and isn't very easy to read. Don't take it too seriously yet, we'll
improve.
3. Globs _should_ also work fine. The `spec` content, _almost_ directly
lands into the `--spec` argument of Cypress. See docs at
https://docs.cypress.io/guides/guides/command-line#cypress-run-spec-lt-spec-gt.
4. Multiple runners is disabled for this, have to solve it separately.
The `ci-test-limited.yml` also doesn't do multiple runners either.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9803353429>
> Commit: e99ae387c9a239ae51155af45977c285474cfbaf
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9803353429&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags:
> Spec: cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Fork/ForkApplication_spec.ts
> cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/JSLibrary/Library_spec.ts
>
> It seems like **no tests ran** 😔. We are not able to recognize it,
please check <a
href="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9803353429"
target="_blank">workflow here</a>.
> <hr>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 05:20:23 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Enhanced GitHub Actions workflows to improve test specification
handling and reporting.
- Refactored tag parsing logic in scripts for more accurate and
informative outputs.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Saving the Docker image to disk is failing on EE `pg` because of lack of
disk space. So we clean up all the unused Docker images just before
doing this.
This PR doesn't have any real affect. It makes the `spec` parameter to
the Cypress action, open to being set. In a following PR, we'll make
this configurable via an extended `/test` command syntax, from
`pr-automation.yml`, coming up.
The `spec` parameter to the Cypress action will be the empty string
here, since we aren't setting it to anything anywhere. The action is
coded to handle empty string here. As evident in this function:
1967c2d49b/index.js (L340).
This is what `ci-test-limited.yml` uses, but is not very convenient
since we have to make another commit to revert the changes in the file
after we're done. Instead, we want to extend the `/test` command's
syntax to be able to inline the spec list in the PR description itself.
🤞
**/test rating**
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9797382840>
> Commit: 701bd3b70a25f3554aac143fdbd4cf1b44d258b9
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9797382840&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Rating`
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated CI workflow to allow specifying spec files for Cypress tests.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Snapshots are added to understand why snapshot comparing tests have been
failing on CI.
Conversation link -
https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/C0134BAVDB4/p1719481924157319
Tried here-
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9776708332
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9777496574>
> Commit: 23e22d0a71afe415e76d19115c59629c539332f0
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9777496574&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated CI workflow to upload Cypress snapshots in case of test
failures, improving debugging capabilities for test failures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
