Protei/PromucFlow_constructor
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
16,480 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags 507 MiB
6a34f84bdf
Commit Graph

11856 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
albinAppsmith
6a34f84bdf
fix: settings pane overflowing when number of pages increase (#31180) 2024-02-20 10:35:16 +05:30
albinAppsmith
3757f3197f
fix: Module instance delete navigation (#31140) 
## Description

This PR addresses the below issues,
1. In App editor, deleting a package is not redirecting to add screen
2. In package Editor, deleting a js/query should fall back to the main
3. Icon not displaying for tabs of package instance

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/30894

#### Type of change

- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Added IDE type detection for enhanced redirection logic in code
editing workflows.
- Introduced customizable module icons in the Explorer view for better
visual differentiation.

- **Enhancements**
- Improved IDE tab management to support JavaScript and Query modules,
ensuring a smoother development experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-20 10:31:57 +05:30
Rhitottam
3508627835
fix: display of group option popup inside Form Widget Container (#30813) 
## Description
This fix uses React portal to render the group option popup outside the
component and position it based on the position of the grouped
components. This allows the popup to be shown without any z-index
issues.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (7358)https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/7358
#### Media
<img width="548" alt="Screenshot 2024-02-01 at 9 44 27 AM"
src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/4265002/97270668-08f3-4573-881d-1c493ffd07c0">
<img width="548" alt="Screenshot 2024-02-01 at 9 44 41 AM"
src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/4265002/613ac5f8-0835-4073-a3b0-cdf876dd84b8">

#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan

#### Issues raised during DP testing

## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
    - Enhanced state management for widget grouping.
    - Improved context menu rendering for performance and flexibility.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com>
 2024-02-20 09:32:10 +05:30
Rahul Barwal
1be0d061c4
fix: updates position of start from templates dialog. (#31194) 
## Description

Remove unused code and update imports in the
CreateNewAppFromTemplatesWrapper component.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **Refactor**
- Simplified the modal management for creating new applications from
templates by integrating direct prop usage for open/close actions.
- **Chores**
- Cleaned up and reordered imports across various files for better
organization.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Fixed modal close functionality to ensure a smoother user experience
when creating new applications from templates.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-20 01:43:33 +05:30
vadim
c8e818708a
chore: Refine WDS dimension tokens (#31158) 
Closes #30890 


![image](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/80973/6300d8c4-e826-4892-b35a-5cf754509891)


This is not a full refinement, because we set height/block-size
explicitly for some of our widgets with styles [such as
these](0d16dc0382/app/client/packages/design-system/widgets/src/components/Button/src/styles.module.css (L171)).
As such, changes to e.g. inner spacing only affect the horizontal/inline
size and not the vertical/block one since the block padding doesn't
affect an element that has block size set explicitly.
Ideally, we should switch to implicit sizing to fully embrace
multi-dimensional sizing and density theming control over the widget
dimensions (i.e. control it with padding that consumes the tokens of the
inner spacing scale). If that is not feasible I'd like to know why and
how we can closely tie together the sizing scale with inner spacing.
 2024-02-19 17:58:33 +03:00
Pawan Kumar
55fb2ce467
fix: Widget Sidebar Spec (#31196) 
In my last PR, I broke the widget_sidebar_spec, this PR fixes that.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **Refactor**
- Updated CSS selectors in test support files for improved consistency
and reliability.
- **Tests**
- Added the `@tag.Widget` tag to improve organization in Entity explorer
tests.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
 2024-02-19 15:49:57 +05:30
Rahul Barwal
e647dfc0db
fix: Add import for FEATURE_FLAG and update useFeatureFlag call (#31191) 
## Description
This pull request adds an import for FEATURE_FLAG and updates the
useFeatureFlag call in the CreateNewAppFromTemplatesWrapper component.

This change ensures that the correct feature flag is used for enabling
the create app from templates functionality.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Simplified the app creation process by removing the feature flag for
creating apps from templates, making it directly accessible to all
users.
- **Refactor**
	- Adjusted import order for better code organization and readability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-17 15:42:54 +05:30
Nirmal Sarswat
0dce1ee470
fix: Add missing policies field in Appsmith AI Default datasource (#31102) 
## Description
Add missing fields in Appsmith AI Default datasource

#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress

## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced tracking for creation and update times (`createdAt` and
`updatedAt`) for Actions and Datasources to enhance data management and
auditing capabilities.
- Enhanced the default Appsmith AI Datasources with necessary fields and
default permission groups to ensure seamless operation and access
control.
- **Refactor**
- Consolidated and refined migration scripts to add missing fields and
configurations to Appsmith AI Datasources, improving their functionality
and reliability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-16 21:07:13 +05:30
Vemparala Surya Vamsi
811ab1a6cc
chore: should not perform diff and clone operations on evalProps (#31161) 
## Description
We have to not perform diff and clone computations of evalProps in the
worker thread and subsequently ensure the application continues to work
the same. Through this step we should expect a significant improvement
in performance.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #31092

#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit



- **Refactor**
- Optimized data handling and evaluation processes across various
components.
- **New Features**
- Enhanced the `CodeEditor` component to support additional validation
scenarios for dynamic properties.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed unnecessary dependencies and streamlined data retrieval in
property controls.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-16 19:30:40 +05:30
Pawan Kumar
b0c6cd39b3
chore: Add new icons and thumbnails to WDS widgets (#31085) 
Fixes #30901 

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced feature flag checks to always enable specific features
without checking flag values.
- Introduced dynamic sizing for widget icons and thumbnails in the
editor, improving visual consistency.
- Implemented new styling for text input elements to better adapt to
various container sizes.
- Added unique identifiers to improve testability of the widget sidebar.
- Introduced new SVG properties for widget thumbnails and icons,
enriching widget customization options.

- **Refactor**
	- Adjusted gap spacing in the widget sidebar for a more compact layout.

- **Style**
- Updated text input styling to use flexible width for improved layout
responsiveness.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <valera@appsmith.com>
 2024-02-16 15:48:32 +03:00
Vemparala Surya Vamsi
5b18d35a52
chore: decouple evaluatedValues from evaluated window popup (#31127) 
## Description
Decouple evaluatedValues from the evaluated window popup, All property
pane evaluations will be decoupled from __evaluations_.evaluatedValues
segment of the dataTree.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #31129
#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [x] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Enhanced the efficiency of value retrieval in the `CodeEditor`,
`PrimaryColumnsControl`, and `PrimaryColumnsControlV2` components by
simplifying the path retrieval process.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-16 17:37:56 +05:30
Abhinav Jha
1ea5938cef
feat: Asymmetric padding in Anvil (#30964) 
## Description
To make the Anvil layout system capable of rendering dense layouts,
we're using asymmetric padding to remove paddings when not necessary. It
works as follows
- If a section doesn't have a background, it doesn't have a padding
- If all zones in a section don't have a background, they all don't have
vertical padding

Other changes:
- Moved the logic for clearing all selections on click of Canvas from
`AnvilCanvas` to `AnvilMainCanvas`, as it is only necessary in the
editor.
- Removed default `min-height` from widgets so that changes in padding
don't misalign widgets
- Changed the selection borders to use 2px borders instead of box
shadows.
- Removed borders around widget name component
- Removed elevation shadows from zones and sections
- Removed the zone widget from showing up in the widgets panel

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #31103

#### Media
![Screenshot 2024-02-13 at 10 37
23 PM](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/db1aa6bb-516d-48a8-aea9-c3af9c0d8d16)

#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress

## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new click event listener in `AnvilMainCanvas` for
clearing selections when clicking outside a widget.
    - Added a new constant `AnvilCanvasClassName` in `constants.ts`.

- **Refactor**
- Simplified `AnvilCanvas` component by using `React.forwardRef` and
updating event handling.
- Updated logic in `useClickToClearSelections.ts` for more dynamic click
event handling.
- Enhanced `AnvilMainCanvas` with improved event handling using hooks.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Addressed issues with widget selection and border styles for a better
user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-16 17:13:37 +05:30
Pawan Kumar
ec85d4cb53
chore: bug: adjust WDS caption text style (#31167) 
Fixes #30896

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
	- Reordered typography variants for improved consistency in design.
- **New Features**
- Enhanced feature flag checks to directly return `true` for specific
flags, improving feature toggling.
- **Style**
- Adjusted the order of style options in the widget property pane for
better usability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
 2024-02-16 14:39:51 +03:00
Rahul Barwal
d6fadc2dc2
fix: move create app from template flow logic from state to redux (#31177) 
## Description
This PR attempts to move logic from state to redux. 
For some reason state logic is not getting transferred to release and
prod sites.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new modal for creating applications from templates,
enhancing user experience.
- **Enhancements**
- Improved state management for the create app from templates modal
using Redux, ensuring smoother user interactions.
- **Refactor**
- Streamlined the application creation process from templates by
removing redundant code and utilizing Redux actions for better
maintainability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-16 16:04:35 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
712a28e059
fix: Signup error redirect to wrong path (#31179) 
On signup failure, we need to redirect the client to same signup page
they were on, for the error message to show up. So instead of
redirecting to the homepage, we get the path from the incoming request
and use that.
 2024-02-16 14:19:30 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
f939d20569
chore: Split routing for split screen (#31151) 2024-02-16 14:08:28 +05:30
balajisoundar
29d6422922
fix: [custom widget] height issue in auto layout (#31176) 
## Description
Adds condition to stop custom widget from growing continuously in auto
height

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/31170
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [x] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced dynamic layout handling in Custom Widgets to support auto
layout and fixed height configurations.
- **Tests**
- Added automated tests to verify custom widget height adjustment in
auto layout mode.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-16 13:53:14 +05:30
Rahul Barwal
b9e0adc454
fix: Refactor WorkspaceAction and add handleStartFromTemplate method to Applications (#31168) 
## Description
Start from templates is not workin on release and prod, this PR handles
class based components' callback differently.

This pull request includes the following changes:

- Refactor WorkspaceAction component

- Add handleStartFromTemplate method to Applications component

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Improved the structure and readability of the code related to the
"Start from Template" feature in the applications area for better
maintainability.
- **New Features**
- Enhanced the "Start from Template" functionality for a smoother user
experience.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-16 11:31:25 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
91fea4fbe0
chore: use repo method to update workspace (#30998) 
Reducing our use of `mongoTemplate` and kind-of undoing
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/22549.
 2024-02-16 10:08:21 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
1cb53c4e8e
chore: Introducing the Bridge API (#31147) 
The Bridge API is an alternative to building `Criteria` objects for
running operations on the database.

**Why do we need/want this?** The Bridge API will have the same
interface in Appsmith MongoDB, and in Appsmith Postgres. This means when
we write a function that uses the Bridge API to run a query, we enjoy
the guarantee that the function will work with both MongoDB and
Postgres.

**Why is that important?** As new features are being developed, and
changes made, the Postgres branch is having to play catch-up in porting
the queries to Postgres. But with this, that won't be necessary.
Besides, the diff between MongoDB and Postgres versions of Appsmith
would be significantly smaller with this.

**What conditions will be supported?** The Bridge API is intentionally
non-exhaustive. It is intended to replace the most commonly used
criteria definitions. For the rest, falling back to the way we used to
build Criteria is just fine. We're only changing the ladder used to get
to the ceiling. The hammers to break the ceiling to go further, is still
there.

**Can I start using it?** Yes please. I'm only adding one condition
here, but I have changes for ~4 more (`in`, `isNull`, etc.) that I'll be
pushing as PRs next up. I'm also only using it in one place in this PR.
I'll start moving more direct uses of Criteria API to the Bridge API in
future PRs.

**Why does Bridge have `.equal()` instead of `.where().is()`?** Two
reasons. One, an API like `.equal` is easier to implement, and since the
Bridge API is code that we will have to maintain, I voted for
simplicity. Two, once we move to Postgres, we'll be using the
`CriteriaBuilder` API, which uses the `.equal()` style, so might as well
get used it. 🙂
 2024-02-16 05:46:04 +05:30
Manish Kumar
2a1ba8083c
chore: aforce issue for multipart file upload (#30376) 
## Description
> small change to fix the issue of file uploads

Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/30451

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **New Features**
- Increased the maximum in-memory size for multipart requests to 150MB,
enhancing file upload capabilities.
- Added the ability to control the max size of multipart files in
request objects.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-15 21:25:40 +07:00
Nidhi
4dd9d77c8b
chore: Refactored importables to be artifact agnostic (#31123) 2024-02-15 19:42:35 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
7d55eaabfb
chore: Remove mongoOperations in updateById method (#31141) 2024-02-15 19:25:21 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
565dab4a62
fix: Request referer shouldn't influence redirect URL (#31155) 
The form signup API responds in a failure state, with a redirection URL.
That URL blindly uses the `Referer` header as passed-in. This shows up a
security issue in a few places, although it's not very exploitable.


![shot-2024-02-15-11-13-01](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/120119/9c4ea8b4-d028-4cbd-a348-f2483fad0f49)

Nonetheless, we don't need the host to show up in the redirection URL at
all. The signup success API is already using a redirect URL without
host, for example.


![shot-2024-02-15-11-11-41](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/120119/5eb62c42-cf09-4c1f-8269-775f26af2dce)

With the changes in this PR, the failure response also uses a host-less
redirect.


![shot-2024-02-15-11-14-04](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/120119/d0640ea2-f934-4f57-ade4-189964d6d11a)
 2024-02-15 19:24:34 +05:30
Preet Sidhu
ae396eb976
fix: clipping issue for excessive hug widgets in an alignment (#31053) 
## Description

1. Restores the original behaviour of grow and shrink for alignments,
that had regressed after introduction of sizing tokens.
2. Fix clipping issue in alignments. If an alignments width equals or
exceeds the width of the row on larger screens, enable flex wrap.

#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Testing

#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress

## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new style property for `AnvilFlexComponent` to enhance
layout sizing.
- Added a function to determine if default alignment styles need to be
overridden.
- Launched a new React component for dynamic alignment of widgets within
a row, adaptable to different viewport sizes.
- **Refactor**
- Simplified the rendering process in `AlignedWidgetRow` by improving
component organization.
- Enhanced logic and structure in rendering functions for better
alignment and layout management.
- **Bug Fixes**
	- Fixed incorrect import paths in test and utility files.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-15 17:02:26 +05:30
Pawan Kumar
d35006989a
chore: Removing Paragraph from suggested widget and add Button to suggested widgets (#31143) 
Fixes #30902

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced feature flag checks for "ab_wds_enabled" and
"release_anvil_enabled" to prioritize these flags.
- Updated the categorization of certain widgets to include them under
"Suggested Widgets" for better visibility and organization.

- **Refactor**
- Improved the handling of feature flags to ensure more reliable feature
toggling.
- Optimized widget tagging system for `WDSButtonWidget`,
`WDSHeadingWidget`, and `WDSParagraphWidget` to enhance widget
discoverability and categorization.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
 2024-02-15 11:48:27 +03:00
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
1278287609
chore: Remove mongoOperations in two more methods (#31136) 
It's doing exactly the same thing, but with a lot of the code
duplicated.
 2024-02-15 13:37:25 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
275c7f5394
test: Fix Graphql test for Datasource list check (#31120) 
## Description
Test Fix
Removes the reference of right pane Datasource List for Apis and Graphql
and uses the input url instead





<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **Refactor**
- Improved the naming and selection process in the Data Sources
management for enhanced usability.
- Updated functionality related to intercepting a POST request for
improved reliability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-15 11:51:25 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
596f84934c
fix: Debugger shows up with no tab selected (#31126) 
fixes: #31124 

Updates the debugger showing logic for Schema tab

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated the debugger to not render certain tabs (response, header, or
schema) when selected in the bottom bar, enhancing the interface's
usability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-15 11:47:56 +05:30
Nilansh Bansal
96ba97a1b2
fix: added escaping logic for html reserved characters (#31133) 
## Description
> This PR adds escaping logic for HTML reserved characters `&quot;` and
`&#34;`. Both of these characters were getting unescaped to double
quotes (") leading to a JSON parse error.
> I have updated the code to escape these with a backslash before
getting converted.

[ref](https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/C0341RERY4R/p1707900321201109?thread_ts=1707510761.277959&cid=C0341RERY4R)
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #31056 


#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [x] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced data handling to ensure JSON validity by escaping double
quotes in certain outputs.
- **Tests**
- Added test cases to verify the new escaping logic for JSON and HTML
characters.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-15 11:36:34 +05:30
Ashok Kumar M
f7d41891b8
fix: Anvil toggleable widgets not working when native callbacks are used for AnvilFlexComponent (#31125) 
> Pull Request Template
>
> Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request.
Delete all quotes before creating the pull request.
>
## Description

In last weeks effort of cleaning up Editor and Viewer parts of
AnvilFlexComponent I had changed synthetic React callbacks to native
ones #30780 .
This has resulted in regression of widget toggling of widgets like
Checkbox, Switch, etc.
so changing them back to synthetic events by passing callbacks and props
to the viewer part of AnvilFlexComponent.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new testing suite for validating widget interactions in
Anvil Layout Mode, focusing on switch and checkbox widgets.
- Added new functionalities for switch and checkbox widgets, including
selection toggling and state verification.
- Enhanced Anvil editor components to support custom click behaviors,
improving widget interaction in edit mode.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Addressed issues with native click callbacks interfering with widget
events.

- **Tests**
- Added comprehensive test cases for new widget functionalities and
interactions.

- **Refactor**
- Updated internal logic for widget selection and style adjustments
based on interaction states.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-15 11:00:57 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
5c879230fc
chore: Fluent API for update methods (#31104) 2024-02-15 10:25:24 +05:30
Manish Kumar
0d77289e9c
chore: added split for permission provider (#31111) 2024-02-14 14:43:14 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
d558ce0a29
fix: Datasource null check in QueryDebugger (#31115) 
Adds null check for datasources as sometimes they may not be available

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved reliability in accessing datasource properties within the
Query Debugger, ensuring safer operations and correcting the datasource
structure fetching process.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-14 14:22:04 +05:30
Nilesh Sarupriya
c267965090
chore: refactor curl import API to support context type (#30934) 
## Description

Support curl imports for different contexts. 

### Server changes

Previous API: 

`/api/v1/import?type=CURL&pageId={pageId}&name=Api2&workspaceId={workspaceId}`

New API: 
With context type, it will create for the specific context.

`/api/v1/import?type=CURL&contextId={contextId}&name=Api1&workspaceId={workspaceId}&contextType={contextType}`

Without context type, it will create for the page.

`/api/v1/import?type=CURL&contextId={contextId}&name=Api1&workspaceId={workspaceId}`

### Client changes
- Integrate api changes for curl import. Updated request params type and
interfaces for the saga functions
- Updated the form value types for the curl import editor



#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes [[Task]: Curl Import isn't
working.](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/30933)

#### Media
> N/A

#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual (using postman)
- [x] JUnit (existing test cases should work)

#### Test Plan
> N/A

#### Issues raised during DP testing
> None

## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced API import functionality with a new context-aware mechanism,
allowing for more flexible integration within different parts of the
application.
- Updated various components and services to support the new contextId
and contextType parameters for improved data handling and redirection
logic.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <20905988+nsarupr@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ayush Pahwa <ayushpahwa96@gmail.com>
 2024-02-14 12:18:30 +05:30
Apeksha Bhosale
c655aea15c
chore: Import debugger fixes (#31080) 
## Description
To add debugger error for import path for module instance on EE, this PR
enables code to be extended on EE


#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Updated import paths and references for `ENTITY_TYPE` to
`EntityTypeValue` across various components and utilities for improved
code consistency.
- Reorganized import statements related to `AppsmithConsole` utilities
and constants to enhance code maintainability.
- Adjusted usage of enums and types, specifically for entity and
platform error handling, to align with updated import paths.

- **New Features**
- Introduced utility functions for handling entity types and platform
errors in AppsmithConsole, including new constants and error retrieval
functions.
- Added a new enum value `MISSING_MODULE` to better categorize log types
in debugging scenarios.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Implemented changes to error logging and handling mechanisms,
including the addition of new case handling for
`LOG_TYPE.MISSING_MODULE` in debugger logs, to improve the debugging
experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-14 12:00:18 +05:30
albinAppsmith
ac0f67797e
fix: UI fixes pages section (#31098) 2024-02-14 10:03:52 +05:30
ashit-rath
e3f4fb49d4
chore: import export refactor for modules (#31086) 
## Description
PR refactors and adds the following to prepare for reusing of the app
import modal for package imports in EE
- Refactors import modal to take methods and messages from hooks to
extend in EE (useMessage and useMethods hooks serves that purpose)
- Opens import modal in workspace home page when `openImportModal` query
param is present
- Refactor settings page

#### PR fixes following issue(s)

#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new `ImportModal` component for improved application file
importing.
- Added custom hooks (`useMessages`, `useMethods`) to handle import
operations and messaging within the import modal.
- Implemented a notification system for missing modules in the editor
using `useMissingModuleNotification`.

- **Enhancements**
- Enhanced the import functionality across the application, streamlining
the process with updated component names and props.
- Refactored the `AppSettings` to use `EditorSettingsPaneContainer` for
better code readability and maintainability.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed unused imports and updated logic in `ImportModal` to fix
issues related to file uploading and import status tracking.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 17:39:07 +05:30
Aman Agarwal
7ae87dc061
chore: added new test cases for different plugins (#31068) 
## Description
Added test cases for start with data flow by default. The test cases are
added for :
- `Postgres` : It should redirect to ds page with schema preview
- `Mysql` : It should redirect to ds page with schema preview
- `S3` : It should redirect to ds page with config and we can create
query on top of it
- `Airtable` : It should redirect to ds page with config and we can
create query on top of it
- `REST API` : It should redirect to action page and the action creation
is successful

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30806 
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **Tests**
- Expanded and refined test descriptions and cases for the "Start with
data userflow," focusing on creating and saving data sources for
Postgres, MySql, S3, Airtable, and Rest API actions.

- **Refactor**
- Modified access level of a method in the `ApiPage` class to enhance
testability.

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new property in the `DataSources` class to improve data
handling capabilities.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 17:19:13 +05:30
Vemparala Surya Vamsi
33da769afb
chore: Removed sending redundant mode parameter in consolidated api (#31097) 
## Description
Removed sending redundant mode parameter in consolidated api.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #31096

#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Updated the initialization process by simplifying parameters,
enhancing error reporting.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 16:46:38 +05:30
sneha122
3b3b3b4476
fix: disabled feature walkthroughs behind a flag (#31007) 
## Description

This PR removes the feature walkthroughs that were added as part of one
of the activation experiments in Q3. Although these walkthroughs were
useful in guiding users, they were appearing in untimely and incorrect
fashion.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30339 
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


- **New Features**
- Introduced a feature flag to toggle the feature walkthrough on or off.
- Added the ability to force display the feature walkthrough regardless
of the feature flag setting.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
 2024-02-13 16:44:59 +05:30
Ashok Kumar M
92397c4559
feat: Anvil dnd enhancement of highlight info and highlight skipping. (#30927) 
> Pull Request Template
>
> Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request.
Delete all quotes before creating the pull request.
>
## Description
In this PR we are enhancing/changing a couple of things
- change skipping highlight logic.
- we skip showing vertical highlights when the only hug widget in a row
is dragged, now we show vertical highlights.
- instead of skipping the vertical highlight left to a widget which is
being dragged, we skip the highlight right to the widget so that
changing order of widgets is more intutive.
- adding new prop to highlight info to mark highlights of the existing
dragged widget so that such drops are not considered to update
widgets/layouts. This will make sure undo / redo works as expected.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enabled `ab_wds_enabled` and `release_anvil_enabled` feature flags for
all users.
- Enhanced the canvas interaction in the Anvil layout system by
introducing logic to better handle horizontal and vertical highlights,
improving the user experience during widget drag-and-drop operations.
- Modified the logic for determining overlay widgets, streamlining the
process for identifying modal and similar widgets.

- **Refactor**
- Updated feature flag selection logic to return default values more
accurately.
- Refined highlight generation logic in Anvil layout system to account
for dragged widgets and discarded layouts, offering a more intuitive
drag-and-drop experience.
- Adjusted the `getLayoutSystemType` selector to consistently return
`LayoutSystemTypes.ANVIL`, ensuring a unified layout system experience.

- **Tests**
- Enhanced test coverage for highlight selection algorithms in the Anvil
layout system, ensuring accurate highlight behavior based on mouse
position.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 15:47:28 +05:30
Manish Kumar
a5f3ff9ba0
chore: deleted import and export Application file (#31084) 2024-02-13 15:22:27 +05:30
albinAppsmith
bea3333ac7
fix: Modal Widget get hidden in split screen (#31015) 
## Description

This PR fixes modal widget getting hidden while opening split screen.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/31014


#### Media
Before


https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/87797149/6ef7d0e7-30f4-468a-a009-5d27c9b22ce1

After


https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/87797149/5b704ec0-4295-4ad0-a5d1-4aa66bb60883



#### Type of change

- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Simplified the modal overlay positioning for improved consistency and
reliability.
- **Style**
- Enhanced the layout stability of the Widgets Editor with new
containment settings.
- **New Features**
- Added the `getIsAutoLayout` function for improved layout control in
the App Viewer.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 15:10:38 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
fb0472d241
chore: show suggested widgets in response (#31008) 
## Description

Show the Suggested widgets panel in the response pane in the bottom
instead of the right side.

This will greatly simplify the Query and Api screens.

- Removes functionality of suggested widgets from the right pane context
- Only renders the right pane if `additionalSections` is passed
- Adds a new Bind Data button in the Response Pane 
- OnClick of button, a menu with suggested widget bindings show up



#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30968

#### Media




https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/12022471/20e239ad-dea4-4755-b199-4f0920ae1d46


#### Type of change


- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- This change requires a documentation update

## Testing

#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [x] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit


## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new `BindDataButton` component for easier data binding to
widgets in the visual editor.
- Updated UI elements and interactions in the API and Query editors for
improved usability.
- Added an import statement for `Widgets` from the `DataSources` module.
- Changed the method call from clicking on a suggested table widget to
adding a suggested widget of type `Table`.

- **Refactor**
- Simplified and streamlined the `ActionRightPane` component by removing
outdated functionalities.
- Adjusted UI components and layouts across various editor components
for better consistency and usability.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Fixed text inconsistency in the `CONNECT_EXISTING_WIDGET_LABEL`
constant.
- Removed unnecessary `useEffect` hook in the `EntityBottomTabs`
component to improve performance.

- **Chores**
- Removed deprecated code and unused imports across several files to
clean up the codebase.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 13:52:04 +05:30
Rahul Barwal
b380b28c42
feat: Add "Start with template" option and refactor template components (#30946) 
## Description
This pull request adds the "Start with template" option to the workspace
action menu and refactors several template components to improve code
organization and maintainability.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30860
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced the ability to create new applications from templates,
enhancing user experience with a selection of predefined options.
- Added a new feature flag to toggle the visibility of the "Create App
from Template" functionality, allowing for phased rollouts.
- **Enhancements**
	- Updated text constants for a more intuitive user interface.
- Streamlined the template selection and application creation process
with improved UI components and logic.
- **Refactor**
- Significant code organization and refactoring in template handling
components for better maintainability and readability.
- **Tests**
	- Adjusted unit tests to align with the new template creation flow.
- **Style**
- Adjusted styling for template views, ensuring a consistent and
appealing user interface.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 12:38:08 +05:30
albinAppsmith
49e8a7d4ed
fix: Add back canvas resize (#31058) 
## Description

Added back canvas resizing while switching to side by side.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/31057


#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Testing

#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Enhanced the `useDynamicAppLayout` hook for improved layout
calculations and control flow, removing dependencies on specific editor
states and modes.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 12:34:55 +05:30
Pawan Kumar
b7fa6425c8
fix: button group spec (#31075) 
Fixes button group spec that started failing because of #30439
 2024-02-13 12:17:15 +05:30
balajisoundar
0dc54668bc
fix: [Custom widget] update default dynamic height value (#31078) 
## Description
Add migration to set default value of custom widget dynamic height.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/31077
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [x] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Added a migration feature for custom widgets to support dynamic height
adjustments, ensuring widgets can now have a fixed height setting by
default.
- **Tests**
- Introduced test suites for validating the migration of custom widget
dynamic height settings.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
 2024-02-13 11:54:49 +05:30
Vemparala Surya Vamsi
10cf6cf962
chore: Removed dependency of evaluatedValues from Widgets and formEvaluationSaga (#31047) 2024-02-13 10:43:17 +05:30