Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hetu Nandu
1194bd5a57
fix: Api pane and settings responsiveness (#33297)
## Description

Various style and layout changes for side by side responsiveness

Fixes #33249 

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9006852734>
> Commit: de02d207d06524e3aace37647821ffd45ee17e64
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9006852734&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->






## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
2024-05-09 17:02:48 +05:30
Aman Agarwal
d8b07c4ce1
fix: commands title changed to command for each datasource query editor forms (#32526) 2024-04-10 17:05:01 +05:30
Nirmal Sarswat
9b1f38350a
fix: using data key for messages in AI plugins (#29639)
## Description
There was a misunderstanding between using data/componentData field in
`JS` enabled form fields. Now it's clear and we are using `data` key
value always.

#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual

## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Refactor**
- Improved the message retrieval process to enhance user experience in
chat features.
- Simplified the content generation logic for better performance and
reliability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2023-12-15 13:44:43 +05:30
Nirmal Sarswat
b4441969d0
feat: Google AI integration (#29620)
## Description
Here's PR for adding Google AI Gemini model as a data source
integration.
Features:
1. Text generation based on text inputs

Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/29621

#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## Testing

#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual
- [x] JUnit

## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
	- Integrated Google AI plugin for advanced AI functionality.
	- Added Google AI plugin to the available plugins.
	- Implemented new commands and utilities for Google AI services.

- **Enhancements**
	- Expanded plugin constants to include Google AI references.
	- Developed a method strategy for Google AI plugin execution.

- **Documentation**
	- Updated plugin properties to include Google AI plugin details.

- **Database Changes**
- Performed a database migration to add the Google AI plugin to existing
workspaces.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2023-12-14 23:26:46 +05:30