Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Anand Srinivasan
5f12a77e10
chore: fix merge conflict (#22217)
Adding a class used for test cases in EE.


https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/1132/files#diff-2bf42f6d56d5e36ea2878cfbcc7adacf12443855ea03055e39f632402b8921fe

This created a conflict
[here](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/actions/runs/4656127341/jobs/8239454392).
2023-04-10 15:32:47 +05:30
Anand Srinivasan
86801d9ed2
feat: 5xx error message with links (#21917)
## Description

Updated error messages with link for 503 error page

https://www.figma.com/file/nVvIoLuCmTjvivejSnCML8/5XX-Error-states?node-id=2-179&t=Z6nt7OQB00EjeWt5-0

Fixes #21524

## Media

CE cloud hosted:
- Link opens a email to support@appsmith.com
https://www.loom.com/share/9f904f0b97844961b9be3235780095d5

CE self hosted:
- first link opens
[documentation](https://docs.appsmith.com/learning-and-resources/how-to-guides/how-to-get-container-logs)
- second link opens relative path `/supervisor/logtail/backend`
https://www.loom.com/share/d39070575ca943fda1e6b49368cde1d5

EE: (same as CE self hosted, but without appsmith label)
Addressed here: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/1245
https://www.loom.com/share/65568d09b76044309de2e42aac3cc0fe


## Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)


## How Has This Been Tested?

- Manual

### Test Plan
> Added Test cases
[links](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/issues/2368) that
relate to this PR

### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)


## Checklist:
### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


### QA activity:
- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or
manual QA
- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after
Round 1/2 of QA
- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test
2023-04-10 14:33:20 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
3e8ff46716
fix: Cannot navigate out of an error page (#22021)
## Description

When an error occurs, we take over the whole router and keep it the
error state till the errors are flushed. By default, we will flush out
the error state when a CTA on the page is clicked but in case the user
navigates via the browser buttons, this will ensure the errors are
flushed

> Clear out errors when using browser navigation buttons to avoid error
page persistence

Fixes #18564
Fixes #22068

Media


https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12022471/229461625-d4bfc72f-c551-4063-aad8-8ba8b97f2db5.mov


## Type of change

- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)


## How Has This Been Tested?

- Manual


### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR

### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)


## Checklist:
### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


### QA activity:
- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or
manual QA
- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after
Round 1/2 of QA
- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test
2023-04-06 11:50:35 +05:30
Hetu Nandu
7786c4215a Use generic error page by default 2023-03-30 16:50:26 +05:30
balajisoundar
44fa7dfbd5
chore: [code split] License issue landing page for non admin user (#19917)
## Description
Code split changes for License issue landing page from non admin user

related https://github.com/appsmithorg/cloud-services/issues/209

## Type of change

> Please delete options that are not relevant.

- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)


## How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions, so we can reproduce.
> Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not important

- Manual
- Jest
- Cypress

### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR

### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)


## Checklist:
### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


### QA activity:
- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or
manual QA
- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after
Round 1/2 of QA
- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test
2023-01-23 11:29:15 +05:30
albinAppsmith
110e6085b8
feat: Renamed design system package (#19854)
## Description

This PR includes changes for renaming design system package. Since we
are building new package for the refactored design system components,
the old package is renaming to design-system-old.

Fixes #19536 

## Type of change

- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)


## How Has This Been Tested?

- Manual
- Jest
- Cypress

### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR

### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)


## Checklist:
### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


### QA activity:
- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or
manual QA
- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after
Round 1/2 of QA
- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test
2023-01-23 09:20:47 +05:30
Pawan Kumar
5a1582eb7b
chore: Update upgrade button intercom message + Fix text color on error pages when background is dark (#18975)
This PR
- updates the upgrade button intercom message.
- Fixes text color on error pages when background is dark 

## Type of change
- Bug fix 


## How Has This Been Tested?
- Not needed.

## Checklist:
### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


### QA activity:
- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or
manual QA
- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after
Round 1/2 of QA
- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test
2022-12-30 16:27:10 +05:30
Pawan Kumar
d7e2c491e0
feat: Branding (#18717)
* add branding for ce

* add ce changes

* update colorpicker ux

* remove unsued flag

* Add new email templates

Signed-off-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>

* add local appsmith logo

* code review feedback fixes + qa fixes

* remove forward slash in url of favicon

* fix message

* Fix tests

Signed-off-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>

* update messages

* Fix tests (again)

Signed-off-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>

* update messages

* fix cypress tests

* skipping app layout test cases

* fix cypress tests

* remove it.only

* try moving test

* use stable DS version

* remove __diff

Signed-off-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-12-09 20:13:47 +05:30