41445c7592
5 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sharanya-appsmith
|
d287940a7d
|
test: Cypress - Added Tags to test cases - @tag.GSheet, @tag.Datasource, @tag.JS, @tag.IDE, @tag.Settings, @tag.Binding (#29471)
## Description > Adding tags to the existing test cases Run GSheet test cases - `/ok-to-test tags="@tag.GSheet"` Run JS test cases - ` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.JS"` Run IDE test cases - ` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"` Run Binding test cases - ` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Binding"` Few datasource testcases (tags are added to few) using - ` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource"` To run both GSheet and Datasource tagged testcases -` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource,@tag.GSheet"` To run both Binding and IDE tagged testcases - ` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Binding,@tag.IDE"` To run both Binding, IDE, JS tagged testcases - ` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Binding,@tag.IDE,@tag.JS"` #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [x] Cypress #### Test Plan > ok to test with tags added ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced test suite categorization with the addition of metadata tags for improved filtering and organization. - **Refactor** - Reorganized test suite structures for clarity and maintainability. - Updated test descriptions and assertions for better test coverage. - **Bug Fixes** - Modified test cases to include additional validation steps for bug fix verification. - **Documentation** - Updated test suite descriptions with new tags to reflect changes in testing strategies. - **Chores** - Adjusted file paths for test specifications to align with the updated testing focus. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Saroj
|
347275e57a
|
test: Gsheet automation phase 2 (#27711)
## Description - Added tests for import gsheet apps for all the access levels - Added tests for app level import for gsheet apps for all the access levels - Added test to verify placeholder text for insert one/many cases - Fixed flakiness in Misc_spec.ts and WidgetBinging cases. - Excluded elastic search spec from the hosted cypress config file #### Type of change - Cypress tests - Cypress config file changes ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
Saroj
|
5312ee11f3
|
test: Fix gsheet tests (#27146)
## Description - Fix gsheet tests - Fix workflows to not upload the result file in case of success #### Type of change - spec file changes - Workflow file changes ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
sneha122
|
22cd648c7d
|
fix: gsheet cell range filter format issue fixed (#26827)
## Description This PR fixes the issue with filter format in gsheet query creation: The issue occurs when say the spreadsheet has data in the following format: <img width="258" alt="Screenshot 2023-08-31 at 3 09 03 PM" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/30018882/88f8fdae-4223-468a-b05d-04fd8e9841dc"> Now if we write a query with where clause to to fetch all records with Id < 3, it returns first two records as expected. Now if we change the filter format to cell range and define cell range as b2:b4, It should return `Name: test1 test2 test3`, but instead it throws error, because it first filters out data based on cell range provided, and post that it checks if the where conditions are defined in actionConfig and applies that on the result set to filter data. In above example result set would be `Name: test1 test2 test3` and it tries to apply the where clause condition of `Id < 2` In order to solve the issue, we need to apply where conditions only when filter format is `Where Clause`. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #25447 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [x] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [x] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [x] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [x] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> |
||
|
Saroj
|
d27078b54e
|
test: Gsheet Automation (#25255)
## Description - Automated below queries for gsheet 1. Fetch Details 2. Insert one 3. Insert many 4. Update one 5. Update many 6. Fetch many 7. Delete One - Added workflow to schedule run for gsheet automated tests on the hosted instance - Added a new cypress config file which will be used to run the gsheet tests - Added tests for folowing permission/scope options `All access`, `selected access`, `Read/write | All google sheets` and `Read | All google sheets` - Added negative scenarios - Added tests to verify widget binding for both suggested widget and drag n drop widget for both selected and all access permission/scope #### Type of change - Cypress ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Cypress > > ## Checklist: #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |