2cfe0b0fac
183 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Anas Khafaga
|
2cfe0b0fac
|
fix(#16584): filterTableData source of truth (#36849)
## Description > **TL;DR**: This PR addresses is related to #16584 where editing a table row with applied filters becomes impossible without clearing the filters When a filter is applied to the table data, the current behavior results in filter updates without validating or saving the updated value of the row being edited. This leads to a situation where users are unable to save or discard changes until the filters are cleared. The proposed fix ensures that the original row is retrieved from the table data and used in filtering, allowing editing and filtering to work as expected. Here's a [screen record](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JuP_UN_B1vzz_oMeR1ojjPscF_mB3A4x/view?usp=sharing) for the solution ### Motivation: The problem arises in scenarios where table rows are editable and filters are applied. This change ensures that users can continue editing table rows without being forced to clear filters first. ### Context: This change is required to improve user experience and fix the broken editing functionality when filters are active. The change ensures that editable values in filtered rows are correctly handled and saved. Fixes https://www.loom.com/share/335d0c61817646a0903d581adf73064e ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="table-widget,filter,edit" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [x] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Improved filtering accuracy in the TableWidgetV2 by using original row data for evaluations. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced functionality to ensure that filtering conditions are evaluated correctly with original data. - **Tests** - Added new test cases to validate filtering functionality after edits in the TableWidgetV2. - Expanded test coverage for checkbox and switch interactions to ensure accurate filtering behavior, including new interactions with a discard button. - **Style** - Minor adjustments to comments and formatting for better readability. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
skjameela
|
c6cf919beb
|
fix:- added elipsis and tooltip to the button content in table widget component (#36865)
**Description** [ Bug issue ](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/10278) I have raised the pr inorder to adding a elipsis and tooltip for the button content in the table widget component to prevent the data hiding in overflow **Screenshot** **Before issue resolved**  **After issue resolved**  <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced table widget styling for improved responsiveness and interactivity. - Introduced tooltip functionality for buttons, displaying tooltips when text is truncated. - Added new styled components for better structure and visual appeal. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved hover effects and conditional styling for table cells. - **Tests** - Added unit tests for the `AutoToolTipComponent`, covering various tooltip scenarios and behavior. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
64f1342a40
|
feat: remove release_table_cell_label_value_enabled feature flag (#37110)
## Description Removes the `release_table_cell_label_value_enabled` feature flag from the codebase. This feature flag helped us launch the tables ability to show labels instead of values for select column types. It has been in production for over 2 months with no bug or unexpected behaviours reported, warranting a removal of the feature flag from the codebase. Fixes #37109 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Sanity, @tag.Select" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11550654098> > Commit: d225470d767c441c1b9e07d79e59e5f052339198 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11550654098&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Sanity, @tag.Select` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:57:21 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced the `SelectCell` component for improved label value determination. - **Bug Fixes** - Removed unnecessary complexity related to feature flag checks, resulting in a more reliable display of cell labels. - **Tests** - Updated test cases for table filtering and sorting functionalities, removing feature flag dependencies while maintaining core logic. - Enhanced test coverage for select column functionality, including dynamic bindings and server-side filtering checks. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
phennapa-saeliw
|
2ad374aa52
|
fix: Change the value of pageOffset when enabling server side pagination (#36056)
## Description Fixed issue #36022 where incorrect data is displayed when navigating to the previous page after reaching the last page with fewer items in the table during server-side pagination enabled by using `props.pageSize` instead of `props.tableData?.length`. Fix: Replaced `props.tableData?.length` with `props.pageSize` to ensure consistent data display when navigating between pages, especially when dealing with the last page that has fewer items than the pageSize. Fixes #36022 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table" ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Improved pagination logic for the table widget, simplifying the handling of page size. - **Bug Fixes** - Resolved potential inconsistencies in pagination when server-side data is utilized. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Phennapa Saeliw <psaeliw@gmail.com> |
||
|
Rahul Barwal
|
554ec58d40
|
feat: Update TableWidgetV2 to include customIsLoading property (#36857)
## Description <ins>Problem</ins> There are many problems with table loader logic, for which many users try to implement a modal for loader. These problems stem from dependency and delay on eval, discussed comprehensively in #12308 <ins>Solution</ins> This PR updates the TableWidgetV2 component to include a new property called `customIsLoading`. This property controls the loading state of the widget and is added to the TableWidgetProps interface. Additionally, the component's state is updated to include the `customIsLoading` property. The `contentConfig` file for the TableWidgetV2 is also modified to include the `customIsLoading` property with its corresponding label, control type, help text, and validation. These changes improve the flexibility and customization options of the TableWidgetV2 component. Fixes #12308 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11456273525> > Commit: 1c6f4f9caabc3aa45ec3916e5ccb465d946ab0a1 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11456273525&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:17:37 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new feature flag for custom loading states in the table widget. - Added properties for managing custom loading behavior in the `TableWidgetV2`. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced loading state management to ensure accurate representation based on new properties. - **Tests** - Added unit tests for loading behavior in the `TableWidgetV2` component, covering default and custom loading scenarios. - **Documentation** - Updated help text for properties related to loading states to improve clarity. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
d233d7e9c3
|
feat: Allow filtering of table select column label (#36755)
## Description **Problem** When filtering a table with a select column type, users expect to filter by the visible label values shown in each cell. Currently, however, filtering is applied to the underlying option values rather than the displayed labels, leading to unexpected filter results for end-users. **Root Cause** In a previous update ([PR #35124](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/35124)), the table cell display for select columns was changed to show labels instead of values. However, the filtering logic was not updated accordingly, so the table still filtered on the original option values, creating a mismatch between displayed and filtered content. **Solution** This PR modifies the displayedRow property within the table widget to use the label property instead of the value key when filtering or searching select column data. This ensures that table filtering and searching now align with the visible label values in the select columns, providing a more intuitive user experience. Fixes #36635 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity, @tag.Table, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11234735437> > Commit: fd6c179ffb2c61d23cb98fd749c8df49cebcfcdd > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11234735437&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity, @tag.Table, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:48:01 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new test case to verify filtering functionality for the "role" column in the Table Widget. - Enhanced filtering mechanism to support multiple label values for select columns. - **Bug Fixes** - Removed outdated search functionality to streamline user experience. - **Refactor** - Restructured existing test cases for improved clarity and flow. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Aman Agarwal
|
56e7f89402
|
chore: removed old flags for airgap instances (#36609)
## Description Removed all the occurrences of listed flags in the codebase: 1. ab_ds_binding_enabled 2. ab_ds_schema_enabled 3. ab_gsheet_schema_enabled 4. ab_learnability_discoverability_collapse_all_except_data_enabled 5. ab_learnability_ease_of_initial_use_enabled 6. ab_mock_mongo_schema_enabled 7. ab_start_with_data_default_enabled 8. rollout_js_enabled_one_click_binding_enabled Fixes #36256 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11177173738> > Commit: bfbf6bbe77b963c5d257c29cf5bac35139417a07 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11177173738&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:31:10 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced test coverage for the Community Issues page, focusing on pagination, search, filtering, and issue management. - Improved functionality for adding new rows to table widgets, including visibility controls and state validations. - **Bug Fixes** - Resolved issues related to the visibility of UI elements when adding new rows and ensured accurate data reflection in the table. - **Tests** - Expanded tests for pagination, row selection, search functionality, and filtering logic in table widgets. - Added comprehensive assertions for client-side search and filtering scenarios, including checks for modal visibility during issue management. - **Chores** - Removed obsolete feature flags and streamlined logic for managing feature flags across components. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
6f27959bce
|
fix: Invalid Date Display in Table Widget's Date Column When Using Unix Timestamp (ms) (#36455)
## Description **Problem** When populating a table widget with data that includes dates in Unix timestamp (milliseconds) format, setting the column type to "Date," the input format to "Unix timestamp (ms)," and selecting a display format leads to an issue during inline editing. While the date picker behaves correctly, selecting a new date results in the table cell showing an "Invalid Date" error. **Root Cause** The platform currently uses DateInputFormat.MILLISECONDS for Unix timestamp (ms) formatting. However, this value is not a valid option for the moment.format() function, which expects the input format to be 'x' for Unix timestamps in milliseconds. This mismatch leads to the "Invalid Date" error. **Solution** Modify the logic to map DateInputFormat.MILLISECONDS to the correct moment format string 'x'. Adjust the table's transformDataPureFn to correctly process and display dates in Unix timestamp (ms) format after inline edits, ensuring the moment library can handle the input properly. **Outcome** This fix ensures that when a user selects a date via the date picker in inline editing mode, the selected date is displayed correctly in the table without any errors. Fixes #35631, #25081 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table, @tag.Datepicker" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11101758400> > Commit: 6a3cae774f3824bd2ee126b501bfa4b6d71ae0c8 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11101758400&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table, @tag.Datepicker` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:54:58 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced date column editing in table widgets to accept Unix timestamps in milliseconds without errors. - Introduced a new enumeration for improved date formatting options. - Added mock data structures for testing various date formats and transformations in the table widget. - New method for generating formatted date strings for tomorrow in both verbose and ISO formats. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved validation logic for date inputs in the table, ensuring proper handling of different date formats. - **Tests** - Added new test cases to validate date handling and input formats in the table widget. - Introduced a new test suite for transforming table data based on specified column metadata. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
8fe96c9c20
|
fix: isRequired validation property for table select column (#36375)
## Description **Problem** The select column of the table widget does not have a validation property within its property pane to allow users add an isRequired validation to the table select column. **Solution** Added a Validation section to the table select column's property pane, which includes an isRequired toggle. When enabled, this feature will trigger a visual indication (error border colour) around the select widget if a required field is left unselected during "Add new row" or inline editing. Fixes #30091 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget, @tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity, @tag.Select" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10957896180> > Commit: d2597e6a26938f2b99f2f997fca7bc110e5c2091 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10957896180&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Widget, @tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity, @tag.Select` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:23:29 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced end-to-end tests for Select column validation in Table widgets. - Enhanced validation logic to support Select column types in the Table widget. - Added visual feedback for required Select fields during row addition and inline editing. - Improved locator for single-select widget button control to enhance UI interaction. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved error handling and visual representation for invalid editable Select cells. - **Documentation** - Updated validation configuration to include Select column types for better usability. - **Refactor** - Enhanced code clarity for styled components related to Select fields. - Modified method to improve versatility in handling table interactions. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Sai Charan <saicharan.chetpelly@zemosolabs.com> Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local> |
||
|
Rahul Barwal
|
6507f90e05
|
fix: Incorrect updation of selctedRowIndex when primary column is set. (#36393)
## Description <ins> Problem statement </ins> 1. Table should have a primary column set. 2. The table should be filtered(via search or client side filters) 3. there should be a selectedRow in table a. One way to ensure is add a text widget and bind it to table's `selectedRowIndex` property. If you now run a query that updates the data behind the table: the `selectedRow` is updated to (seemingly) random row and selectedRowIndex is updated as well <ins> Rootcause </ins> We have a mechanism of preserving `selectedRow` when data updates happen. Underlying logic gets the previous selected row and tries to find it in the new data using the primary key. * If it finds it, it updates the selectedRowIndex to the `__original_index__` of the found row i.e. its position in the original data before any filters were applied. <ins> Solution </ins> We update the selectedRowIndex to the index in the new filtered data. <ins> How to test </ins> 1. Create a table with a primary key 2. Add a text widget and bind it to table's `selectedRowIndex` property 3. Filter the table 4. Click on a row to select it 5. Run a query that updates the data behind the table 6. Assert that the selected row is the same and that the selectedRowIndex is updated to the new index Fixes #36080 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10953679202> > Commit: 1a2d64467e453229940b67b29da1ce9d0e9ac24d > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10953679202&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:30:08 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Improvements** - Enhanced the efficiency of the TableWidgetV2 by streamlining the method for retrieving the index of selected rows. - Improved code readability and maintainability without altering the overall functionality. - **New Features** - Introduced new test cases to validate filtering and searching functionalities within the Table Widget V2. - Added a JSON configuration for a data-driven table interface, supporting sorting, filtering, and dynamic data binding. - Introduced fixture data for testing, allowing for comprehensive validation of table behavior under various conditions. - Added a JavaScript object containing employee data to facilitate filtering and display in the table. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
c76e6c031c
|
chore:delete unused files (#36368)
## Description I used [knip](https://knip.dev/) to identify unused files. There will be a few more related PRs, after that I will add CI check for this. Fixes #35778 Related EE PR https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/5165 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10940962461> > Commit: 31749570e9a3f9e4cce250eedba4ec18aace23f9 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10940962461&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:55:41 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No |
||
|
Ilia
|
d6f249b42d
|
chore: add blank line eslint rule (#36369)
## Description Added ESLint rule to force blank lines between statements. Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > 🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed. > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10924926728> > Commit: 34f57714a1575ee04e94e03cbcaf95e57a96c86c > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10924926728&attempt=1&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: @tag.All > Spec: > The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR: <ol> > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/AnvilModal_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilCheckboxGroupWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilCurrencyInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilIconButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilInlineButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilParagraphWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilPhoneInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilStatsWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilSwitchGroupWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilSwitchWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilTableWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilToolbarButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilZoneSectionWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts</ol> > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master" target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>. > <hr>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:33:36 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No --------- Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <valera@appsmith.com> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
8a9af791e4
|
feat: Allow table search to include label and value for tables with select column type (#36061) | ||
|
Vemparala Surya Vamsi
|
7cdee526c9
|
chore: adding telemetry for klona (#35918)
## Description Klona operations are generally expensive, for that reason we will be tracking the performance of all klonas in the main thread. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10608431935> > Commit: cab2716f74f3747d3df64342f4d7f4972358a3e6 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10608431935&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 06:26:43 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced telemetry tracking for cloning operations across various components, enhancing performance monitoring and debugging capabilities. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved observability of cloning operations, aiding in identifying potential performance bottlenecks. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
28ac53bf6e
|
fix: Ensure Select Column Displays Data When Options Are Not Set (#35817)
## Description **Problem** When using a table widget, changing a column to the "Select" type causes the data in that column to disappear unless the options property is explicitly set. This creates a poor user experience, as it appears that the data has been lost or the widget is malfunctioning. **Solution** We have implemented a fallback mechanism to ensure a smoother user experience. If no options are set in the property pane, the label inside the select cell will now default to displaying the existing value. This ensures that the data remains visible, even in the absence of predefined options. Fixes #35807 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table, @tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10513374411> > Commit: 1e89468e8345f2fc351c100428dca76a7a455dbc > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10513374411&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Widget, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table, @tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 19:43:53 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced the select column in the table widget to return a default value when no options are available. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved robustness of the select cell component to prevent errors when the options array is empty. - **Tests** - Updated and reorganized test cases for the select column to improve clarity and specificity. - Introduced a new test case to validate default value behavior when no options are provided. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Rahul Barwal
|
6c8d4a9a66
|
fix: Fixes currentRow calculation logic in table(property pane) (#35390)
## Description <ins>Problem</ins> `currentRow` variable which is availabe in property pane of col settings - is not getting correct value during runtime if the table is sorted or filtered. <ins>Root cause</ins> * We are considering `processedTableData` to get the `currentRow`. * This property is not updated during filtering and sorting, another property `filteredTableData` is updated instead. * We CANNOT use `filteredTableData` as it depends on `primaryColumns` property which we intend to update as well - this is leading to cyclic dependency during evaluations. <ins>Solution</ins> Since the problem is related to edit cases and given the constraints around using `filteredTableData` directly, we fixed the problem by adding a new property to `editableCellValue` object called `__originalIndex__`. * This property stores the index of the row being edited in `processedTableData` * On top of this change, the PR adds a migration for updating the current row binding in TableWidgetV2, ensuring accurate current row calculation and improving the functionality of the widget. * We also added unit test for migration changes. * Additionally, This pull request refactors the DSLs for TableWidgetV2 migration test cases to update the DSLs to separate folder, drastically reducing the file size to its core logic, improving the readability of the code. * We also updated relevant test cases to account for this change. [Testing plan](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Issue-34346-currentRow-doesn-t-work-correctly-when-the-table-is-filtered-449225ae822c485493036599c2b19487) [Counter part EE pr](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4879) Fixes #34346 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10451549845> > Commit: d1d65c6898c223bf3f6dfbfe93b8e8de214fcc7d > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10451549845&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:15:04 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [x] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Updated DSL migration process to support version 90, enhancing compatibility and robustness. - Introduced new migration logic for table widget data bindings, improving inline editing capabilities. - Enhanced validation logic for editable cells in table widgets, allowing for more dynamic data handling. - Added a method to discard edits in specific table cells, improving user interaction. - Introduced a new message constant for required fields, enhancing user feedback. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved validation checks for table cells based on updated indices and values. - **Tests** - Added comprehensive tests to validate migration functions related to Table Widget, ensuring all aspects function correctly post-update. - Enhanced test specifications for improved validation logic and coverage in table widget functionalities. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: sneha122 <sneha@appsmith.com> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
6628635cf4
|
fix: mandatory date column enforcement (#35613)
## Description **Problem:** When the `isRequired` property is set for date columns in the table widget, the validation doesn't work as expected. Users can add new rows without filling in the date field, even though it is marked as required. This results in rows being added with missing date values, which can lead to incomplete or invalid data entries. **Root Cause:** The validation logic for the date column is currently handled within the DateCell component. However, the isRequired validation functionality was not implemented within this component. Additionally, the general validation logic in the `getEditableCellValidity` function, located in the derived.js file, does not account date cells in its isRequired validation. **Solution:** To fix this issue: **Enhance the `getEditableCellValidity` function:** Extend the existing validation logic in getEditableCellValidity to include the date cell in its validation, specifically checking for the isRequired property. **Integrate with DateCell validation:** Ensure that the isRequired validation is properly executed in conjunction with the existing date validations inside the DateCell component. This will enforce the requirement and prevent new rows from being added if the date field is left empty. **Test Plan** https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Test-Plan-Date-Column-Marked-as-Required-Doesn-t-Enforce-Mandatory-Entry-When-Adding-New-Table-Row-c73b764af60842a188cba056bdda6d79?pvs=4 Fixes #34258 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10453174231> > Commit: 40fe2eaf7d45024bef00f8031e971a5bac2a4e3e > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10453174231&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:17:23 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced validation for "Date" column types, ensuring that required fields are correctly enforced. - **Enhancements** - Improved validation logic for more accurate user feedback in date cells. - Expanded support for validating "date" columns in the table widget. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced error handling to ensure proper indication of cell validity based on new validation criteria. - Updated visual feedback for cell editor state in the UI. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Aman Agarwal
|
f0059fe894
|
fix: table save row button onclick function (#35412) | ||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
b7ec5dacd8
|
chore: rename old ADS package (#35517)
## Description Rename package `design-system-old` to `@appsmith/ads-old`. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > 🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed. > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10286195096> > Commit: c0d478694b12f35b88687b6dae6f252967fba540 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10286195096&attempt=1&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: @tag.All > Spec: > The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR: <ol> > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/BugTests/DatasourceSchema_spec.ts</ol> > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master" target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>. > <hr>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:26:02 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
c42e0317de
|
fix: change appsmith alias (#35349)
In order to unify package names, we decided to use `@appsmith` prefix as a marker to indicate that packages belong to our codebase and that these packages are developed internally. So that we can use this prefix, we need to rename the alias of the same name. But since `@appsmith` is currently being used as an alias for `ee` folder, we have to rename the alias as the first step. Related discussion https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/CPG2ZTXEY/p1722516279126329 EE PR — https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4801 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10267368821> > Commit: 2b00af2d257e4d4304db0a80072afef7513de6be > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10267368821&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 14:24:22 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
3b1c14a9f0
|
feat: add sortBy property to table select cell type (#35187)
## Description **Problem** The table widget now supports the Select column type, which allows the column to contain both a label and a value. This could be useful for currency fields, foreign keys, or any other case where you want to display a different version of the column value. However, there is a problem with sorting. The table always sorts using the value, and does not give the user an option to sort using the label, where it makes sense in specific cases. **Solution** This PR adds a Sort By property to the table select cell, allowing the users to choose which value is used for sorting without affecting any functionality of the label or value of the select cell. [Additional Technical Documentation](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Adding-sortBy-Property-to-Select-Columns-in-Table-Widget-V2-a5a41e6319a047378eb50a42be8c32ef?pvs=4) **Tested Cases** 1. Sort select column by default value Objective: Ensure that a newly added table with select column default sorts by the value **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., role) to select type. - Add selectOptions property - Verify that when sorted in ascending or descending order, the sorting is correct 2. Sort select column by label Objective: Ensure that a newly added table with select column and sortBy property set to label sorts correctly **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., role) to select type - Add selectOptions property - Set sortBy property to label - Verify that when sorted in ascending or descending order, the sorting is correct and based on the label value only 3. Verify that sorting of other table cells that are not select works as expected Objective: Ensure that every other cell type in the table sorts correctly **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., role) to select type - Add selectOptions property - Set sortBy property to label - Verify that when columns other that role are sorted, they are sorted correctly 4. Verify that sorting works as expected when table data is a binding Objective: Ensure that the sorting works for all columns while using data binding in table data **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget - Link a query binding to the table data property - Verify that all columns sort correctly 5. Verify that sorting works as expected when table data is a binding and select column sorting is set to label Objective: Ensure that the sorting works for all columns while using data binding in table data with a select column set to sort by the label **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget - Link a query binding to the table data property - Set a column (e.g., role) to select type - Add selectOptions property - Set sortBy property to label - Verify that all columns sort correctly 6. Verify that sortBy logic does not take effect or break user experience until the user adds selectOptions in select cell **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget - Link a query binding to the table data property or add raw data - Set a column (e.g., role) to select type - Do not add selectOptions - Set sortBy property to label - Verify that all other columns display and sort correctly 7. Verify that sorting by label and value works correctly in deployed mode **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget - Link a query binding to the table data property or add raw data - Set a column (e.g., role) to select type - Add selectOptions - Set sortBy property to label - Deploy application - Confirm that sorting works correctly for all columns Fixes #21993 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10165119164> > Commit: 8a4e8b238adc0d78726a811b54a209caa4990606 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10165119164&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:02:35 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [x] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a feature flag for dynamic table cell labeling. - Added a sorting option for select cells, allowing sort by value or label. - Enhanced user interface with new configuration options for select components. - Improved sorting functionality for select columns to sort by labels. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved sorting functionality in the table widget to ensure accurate data representation. - **Tests** - Expanded and clarified test cases for sorting functionality in the Table Widget V2. - Updated testing structure for better reliability and isolation of test scenarios. - Integrated dynamic testing capabilities based on feature flags. - **Documentation** - Added new locators for sorting controls to enhance UI interaction capabilities. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
a2bfe450b6
|
chore: enable no-explicit-any rule (#35321)
## Description - Enabled the rule `@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any` - Suppressed errors with comment ``` // TODO: Fix this the next time the file is edited // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any ``` Fixes #35308 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10181176984> > Commit: 7fc604e24fa234da7ab2ff56e0b1c715268796ee > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10181176984&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:00:45 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
2cded02983
|
feat: display label in table select cell (#35124)
## Description **Issue** In the table widget, the select column currently displays the value from the dropdown when a user makes a selection, rather than the label. This behaviour is inconsistent with the standalone select widget, which correctly renders the label upon selection. **Fix** This PR addresses the inconsistency by modifying the table widget's select column to display the label of the selected item, while maintaining the table cell value and ensuring alignment with the behaviour of the standalone select widget. **Tested Cases** Manual Test Cases for Table Select Widget Improvement 1. Default Value Display **Objective:** Ensure that a new table displays the correct default label key from the selectOptions in the cell. **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., gender) to select type. - Verify that the table cell displays the value from the label key of the `selectOptions` by default. 2. Binding Check for Selected Row **Objective:** Ensure that the table binding for the selected row reflects the correct value key from the selectOptions. **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., gender) to select type. - Select a row and verify that `Table1.selectedRow.gender` matches the value key from the `selectOptions`. 3. Updating Table Cell Content **Objective:** Verify that updating the table cell content via the dropdown updates the cell with the correct label key property. **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., gender) to select type. - Change the content of the table cell using the dropdown. - Confirm that the cell content updates accordingly with the value key property. 4. Add New Row Functionality **Objective:** Ensure that adding a new row works as expected with the enhanced functionality. **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., gender) to select type. - Add a new row to the table. - Verify that the new row uses the label key property from the `selectOptions` in the table display. 5. Deployed Mode Verification **Objective:** Verify that the display functionality works correctly in deployed mode. **Steps:** - Drop a new table widget. - Add sample data to the table. - Set a column (e.g., gender) to select type. - Change the displayAs property to both value and label. - Deploy the table. - Verify that the table displays correctly in both value and label modes in the deployed environment. Fixes #26188 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10080592979> > Commit: 78b268d2b566aa07ef23fec567ce05e8c5a6add4 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10080592979&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 17:17:06 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Improved display of selected options in table widgets by showing the corresponding label instead of the raw value. - Introduced a feature flag to toggle the table cell label value functionality. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced test cases to ensure accurate validation of select options behavior within the table widget. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
34f6e32d6d
|
revert: change value to label in onItemSelect inside SelectCell of table widget (#34872)
Reverts appsmithorg/appsmith#34743 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9888593641> > Commit: eec317589c3e8ec7fa68a85811f0fb4e7e632582 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9888593641&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:38:04 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Refactor** - Improved test cases for select options in the table widget for better clarity and organization. - Updated `SelectCell` component to use option values instead of labels for item selection. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
b7853a99b2
|
feat: change value to label in onItemSelect inside SelectCell of table widget (#34743)
## Description **Issue** In the table widget, the select column currently displays the value from the dropdown when a user makes a selection, rather than the label. This behaviour is inconsistent with the standalone select widget, which correctly renders the label upon selection. **Fix** This PR addresses the inconsistency by modifying the table widget's select column to display the label of the selected item, ensuring alignment with the behaviour of the standalone select widget. Fixes #26188 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Widget, @tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9843945454> > Commit: 330d0d3f82ea7a8769c350f7caa0714959838f12 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9843945454&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Widget, @tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 18:21:02 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Updated the `SelectCell` component to use the `option.label` instead of `option.value` for item selection. - **Tests** - Revised test descriptions and assertions for select options in Table Widget to reflect the new functionality of using labels as values in select cells. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
carinanfonseca
|
a2f2f795c8
|
chore: Turn off Allow filtering property on Table widget (#34593)
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/34591 ## Description Making _Allow filtering_ option false by default. <img width="798" alt="Allow filtering off" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/121817440/8ac64773-2385-433d-96fa-0a90080e2462"> Fixes #34591 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9795462304> > Commit: e0c1e8376b702f13b9640c880cf5606af070a420 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9795462304&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity` <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Filtering is now disabled by default for the `TableWidgetV2`. - **Tests** - Updated test scripts to enable filtering for `TableWidgetV2` in multiple scenarios. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Jacques Ikot <jacquesikot@gmail.com> |
||
|
Rahul Barwal
|
b693377e82
|
fix: Truncate title in tooltips in table cell if it exceeds 200 characters (#34507)
## Description Truncate the title in tooltips if it exceeds 1000 characters to improve readability. Fixes #23156 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9697818492> > Commit: a4007cb6372e7872b1c6472efdabee1a4932a83c > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9697818492&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Widget` <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Improved tooltip functionality to automatically truncate text that exceeds a set character limit, enhancing readability. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Saicharan Chetpelly
|
092208a1c1
|
fix: checkbox column misalignment on table widget (#34222)
Fixes #21790 _or_ Fixes [Issue URL](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/21790) Introduced a new prop called isFullWidth for the CheckboxComponent and pass this prop to this styled component CheckboxContainer. The isFullWidth is an optional boolean property whole default value would be true. Added screenshot for reference.  <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a full-width option for checkboxes to enable better styling flexibility. - **Tests** - Added new test cases to verify checkbox styling properties in tables. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
1d80c0694c
|
feat: update explorer widget icons (#34018)
## Description Update the explorer widget icons with the 16x16 px version for all widgets. Fixes #33907 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9446856870> > Commit: 9bf0b74f6cb09fa3faeb03b2bd59f46982a460c5 > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9446856870&attempt=1" target="_blank">Click here!</a> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No |
||
|
Pawan Kumar
|
eb0c13db79
|
fix: add customJS control for currency, notation and thousand separator (#33877)
Fixes #33858 /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table"<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!IMPORTANT] > 🟣 🟣 🟣 Your tests are running. > Tests running at: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9318008514> > Commit: 1ea0a6325c234a41c431c92329e3fa8e9d4fdf45 > Workflow: `PR Automation test suite` > Tags: `@tag.Table` <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> --------- Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local> |
||
|
Ankita Kinger
|
595e7daec3
|
fix: Reverting the previous fix for table scrollbar and hiding vertical scrollbar when needed (#33806)
## Description Reverting the previous fix for table scrollbar and hiding vertical scrollbar when needed, with a new fix. Fixes [#33774](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/33774) [#33557](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/33557) [#17857](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/17857) ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9287519606> > Commit: f4d3b4e3ef90cca02facbb5f829f64e79a0e4b54 > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9287519606&attempt=1" target="_blank">Click here!</a> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No |
||
|
Ankita Kinger
|
1e47486346
|
fix: Removing the scrollbar in table widget when the data count is less than the number of rows being shown (#33290)
## Description Removing the scrollbar in table widget when the data count is less than the number of rows being shown for better user experience. Fixes [#17857](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/17857) ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9003011050> > Commit: 98f05ae0e58a28e4dc6da625684e988f6c80fb5a > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9003011050&attempt=1" target="_blank">Click here!</a> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No |
||
|
Valera Melnikov
|
6d90ce8dc9
|
chore: update storybook (#32828)
## Description - Update Storybook and related dependencies - Delete the stories for old widget components - Rewrite stories for new widgets(mdx to tsx) Note: local chromatic doesn't work because of this https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/issues/22531 <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced new component stories across various packages to enhance design system documentation and user experience. - **Documentation** - Updated `.gitignore` files to optimize version control settings for Storybook and build logs. - **Refactor** - Modified UI element positioning in Storybook theming for improved layout management. - **Style** - Adjusted CSS properties for the `Select` component to ensure better visual presentation. - **Chores** - Updated dependencies and scripts in package configurations to maintain up-to-date development tools. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
balajisoundar
|
d2fc0af659
|
fix: [Table Widget] Remove unnecessary scrollbar when page size fits in available height (#32327)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/17857 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8645383412> > Commit: a0001d83d5826441c0e0dde59100b8eb5732974b > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8645383412&attempt=1" target="_blank">Click here!</a> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> |
||
|
Jacques Ikot
|
0a5130c568
|
feat: enhanced widget card (#32211)
## Description > [!TIP] To update the explorer widgets and icons to match the new Anvil design system **How** 1. Update all the icons and thumbnails svg for widgets in the explorer 2. Update the WidgetCard component to implement the new design 3. Test functionality of widgets manually Fixes #32330 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Visual, @tag.MainContainer, @tag.Widget" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!IMPORTANT] > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8598999945> > Commit: `47cf5a8e0e14e986da31e02ba8f630fd27ce310f` > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8598999945&attempt=1" target="_blank">Click here!</a> > All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉 <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new `UIEntityCard` component for representing widgets in the editor sidebar with enhanced drag-and-drop functionality and improved visual layout including widget details. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Rishabh Rathod
|
7ab236aa7e
|
chore: autoFocus widget search input on load (#32002)
## Description This PR included two paper cut fixes 1. Autofocus the search input after add widgets button click https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/23132741/3125c0a8-1104-4c1c-aecc-dacd01123f82 2. Remove the helper text for columns in Table widgets Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/32218 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!IMPORTANT] > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8521789054> > Commit: `cee8a960ddf92126eab419bb109fb44dbf02047e` > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8521789054&attempt=2" target="_blank">Click here!</a> > All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉 <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced search input focus control across the editor for an improved user experience. - **Refactor** - Updated components to support dynamic focus management on search inputs. - **Bug Fixes** - Removed mandatory help text validation for property controls, enhancing flexibility in widget configuration. - Eliminated the `helpText` requirement from widget configuration, simplifying setup. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
sneha122
|
65e0e7a274
|
feat: collapse all prop sections except data for table, json widgets (#32052) | ||
|
balajisoundar
|
b498c7e9c4
|
chore: Add config to widgets to ask for evaluations error and table widget optimisation (#31956)
## Description - Add `needsErrorInfo` to widget configuration - Replace usage of `fast-deep-equal` with referential check for tableData ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!IMPORTANT] > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8370220547> > Commit: `ded6b16333e1df5d5d55f22df0559ba378f33d9c` > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8370220547&attempt=1" target="_blank">Click here!</a> > All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉 <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a mechanism to display evaluation errors directly on widgets when necessary. - **Enhancements** - Simplified data comparison logic in `TableWidgetV2` to improve performance. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Nilansh Bansal
|
6763fa5abc
|
fix: Table and JSON Widgets columns max height adjusted (#31882)
## Description > This PR adjusts the maximum number of columns to be shown in Table and JSON Widgets to 4. <img width="842" alt="image" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/25542733/55f85f98-2fc9-4fa1-960b-fc685d74b0d8"> Fixes #31833 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8355362590> > Commit: `576e01175a9427bbe8e2a463ad31881fc2875123` > Cypress dashboard: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8355362590&attempt=1&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail" target="_blank"> Click here!</a> > The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR: <ol> > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/EmbedSettings/EmbedSettings_spec.js > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Others/IconButton_2_spec.ts > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Select/RTL_support.ts </ol> > To know the list of identified flaky tests - <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master" target="_blank">Refer here</a> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new property to enhance the layout consistency of draggable list controls. - **Refactor** - Updated the layout configuration for improved user interface consistency in list controls. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Hetu Nandu
|
e99cc39e47
|
chore: Block Selections when Canvas is in Side by Side mode (#31587)
## Description
This pull request aims to enhance the user experience within the
application by modifying the canvas behavior when it is displayed in
"Side by Side" mode alongside Queries or JavaScript sections. The key
change is the disabling of direct selections on the canvas, allowing
interactions with canvas elements only through cmd + click or by
clicking on the widget's name. This adjustment is intended to facilitate
a view-only mode for the canvas during Queries or JS editing, thereby
improving layout and user interaction.
Additionally, the PR introduces enhancements to the application's
testing framework, focusing on improving test reliability in scenarios
involving UI interaction and state changes. Notable updates include:
- Improved error tooltip handling in CurrencyInput_spec.js.
- Ensured page state saving before verifying element presence in
Listv2_BasicChildWidgetInteraction_spec.js.
- Replaced cy.wait("@updateLayout") with cy.assertPageSave() and
introduced a delay in Listv2_spec.js to accommodate functionality
changes.
- Implemented visibility checks in
TableV2_Button_Icon_validation_spec.js to prevent timing-related test
failures.
These technical updates collectively aim to bolster the application's
testing framework, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of automated
tests, especially in UI interaction and state change scenarios.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30864
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget"
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8259916944>
> Commit: `15e1cf937a9d15adaea68e16a55006d993a07cbf`
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8259916944&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
> All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Added new constants for widget selection and focus management.
- Introduced a new event type for tracking widget selections in code
mode.
- **Tests**
- Enhanced test assertions and interactions for better reliability and
error handling in various widgets.
- **Refactor**
- Improved widget selection logic and URL handling for a more intuitive
user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
|
||
|
Aman Agarwal
|
acf51cc91b
|
feat: js enabled by default for 1 click binding (#31162) | ||
|
Rishabh Rathod
|
739f7ea098
|
fix: Module Debugger error CE change and setter type fix (#30848)
## Description - Module Instance Debugger CE fixes - fix for setter method params type being incorrect example:- `RadioGrp1.setData(value:string)` instead of `RadioGrp1.setData(value:[?])` as we default to string when type was array. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #30872 #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced type conversion functionality to support more types, improving the development experience. - **Improvements** - Added an optional `entityName` field for better entity identification. - Updated error messages for plugin actions to be more descriptive. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed data type inconsistencies across various widgets to ensure uniformity in data handling. - **Refactor** - Refactored certain sagas for improved code maintainability and readability. - **Tests** - Adjusted widget tests to reflect the changes in data type handling. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
balajisoundar
|
fe9eafde16
|
fix: [Table widget] Date column with input format Unix timestamps should sort properly (#30662)
#### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/29800 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [x] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced table sorting logic to dynamically determine the input format for better accuracy in sorting, especially with date values. - **Tests** - Added new test cases to ensure table data is correctly sorted based on date columns in descending order. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
balajisoundar
|
ede1e4dd06
|
fix: Select / Multi select widget should retain the selection when the options are server side filtered (#30490)
We are removing the validation check that checks whether the given default value is present in the source data. This validation check creates a dependency which leads to issue mentioned in the attached github issue. We are showing a helper message under the input with a message as follow: `Make sure the default value(s) are present in the source data to have it selected by default in the UI.` #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/29222 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced user guidance with the addition of a helper text property in the MultiSelect widget. - Updated Select widget with a helper text property and extended dependencies for server-side filtering. - **Bug Fixes** - Resolved issue where MultiSelect widget selections were cleared during server-side filtering. - **Tests** - Added and modified test cases for MultiSelect and Select widgets to reflect new functionalities and ensure reliability. - **Style** - Improved tooltip display in TableWidgetV2 by increasing the max width and changing the position for better visibility and user experience. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
balajisoundar
|
6fa77b5795
|
chore: Hide hidden columns from table in preview mode (#30452)
#### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/15639 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced table column rendering to differentiate between preview and canvas modes. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
Favour Ohanekwu
|
fded594e36
|
fix: improve validation error message for Table widget (#29686)
## Description This PR changes the validation error message for Table widgets #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28729 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [ ] Manual > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Refactor** - Improved the error message for table data validation to provide more specific guidance to users about the expected input format. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: arunvjn <arunvjn10@gmail.com> |
||
|
balajisoundar
|
856d2ad812
|
feat: [Table Widget] Allow moment date formats in input and display d… (#28784)
#### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/18572 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
Preet Sidhu
|
cf764a9b40
|
chore: add configuration for large and small widgets (#28671)
## Description Use case - Widgets need to be distinguished as large or small in Anvil. 1. Add property ``isLargeWidget`` to ``AnvilConfig`` interface. 2. Update AnvilConfig for all widget. Especially, WDS widgets. #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
balajisoundar
|
5db417f58b
|
chore: Custom widget (alpha) (#27571)
The alpha version of the Custom widget that takes a user component and renders it on the app. Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/28601 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag `release_custom_widgets_enabled` #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |
||
|
balajisoundar
|
694b17062b
|
feat: Table widget currency column (#27819)
## Description Adds a new currency column type on the table widget. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #5632 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/issues/2447 > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed |