replaced some external APIs with ted APIs
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed assertions for `offsetHeight` and `offsetWidth` in the test
case related to a fixed canvas size being visible when height is
selected as Fixed.
- Updated URL references in the test script from "https://randomuser.me"
to "http://host.docker.internal:8000" for image sources.
- Updated API endpoints for two requests in the `API_Bugs_Spec.js` file.
- Updated image URLs in JSON files for fixtures related to widgets in
the client application.
- **Tests**
- Updated API endpoint URLs in test scripts to enhance reliability and
internal consistency.
- Modified image source URLs in various test fixtures to align with
updated internal hosting.
- **Documentation**
- Updated source URLs in iframe configurations to reflect new internal
hosting paths.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
--><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> The provided command lacks proper tags. Please modify PR body,
specifying the tags you want to include or use `/ok-to-test
tags="@tag.All"` to run all specs.
> Explore the tags documentation
[here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Ok-to-test-With-Tags-7c0fc64d4efb4afebf53348cd6252918)
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> Pull Request Template
>
> Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request.
Delete all quotes before creating the pull request.
>
## Description
> Add a TL;DR when description is extra long (helps content team)
>
> Please include a summary of the changes and which issue has been
fixed. Please also include relevant motivation
> and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change
>
> Links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant
to the PR
>
>
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [x] Jest
- [x] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> One Click Binding -
https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/issues/2390
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
---------
Co-authored-by: Vemparala Surya Vamsi <vamsi@appsmith.com>
