Goutham Pratapa
3bfaf5a070
fix: vercel deploy previews ( #23221 )
2023-05-11 15:50:50 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
e8783eb672
Fix vercel builds ( #23219 )
2023-05-11 15:28:05 +05:30
Satish Gandham
e8f76a9db1
ci: Fix an incorrect artifact download path ( #23208 )
...
Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com>
2023-05-11 12:49:56 +05:30
Satish Gandham
83538ad74d
feat: Bundle optimization and first load improvements ( #21667 )
...
Co-authored-by: Ivan Akulov <mail@iamakulov.com>
Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Akulov <iamakulov@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
Co-authored-by: somangshu <somangshu.goswami1508@gmail.com>
2023-05-11 10:56:03 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
9b37810c7b
ci: add recreate option for dps ( #22091 )
...
fixes: [248](https://github.com/appsmithorg/cloud-deployment/issues/248 )
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ci/pull/14#issuecomment-1504569726
This doesnt delete the existing stacks
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ci/pull/14#issuecomment-1504842238
this deletes the stack, database in mongo and therefore creating a
complete new stack
2023-04-14 16:27:17 +05:30
Shrikant Sharat Kandula
64edd25a8b
ci: Use vars for DOCKER_HUB_ORGANIZATION ( #22177 )
...
GitHub's Variables, unlike Secrets, don't get masked in the output, and
are ideal for non-secret... _variables_. I'm switching on such secret
here, and depending on our experience with this, we'll look to moving
more.
Of course, goes without saying, do NOT use these variables for secrets.
When in doubt, use Secrets.
[Learn more about
Variables](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables ).
2023-04-10 14:23:12 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
47750db727
ci: add comments for vercel-deploy-preview ( #21349 )
...
**/build-deploy-preview env=release**
---------
Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
2023-03-16 17:32:32 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
891df1dc33
ci: build lite version of deploy preview ( #21078 )
...
**Case-1:**
**`/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true`**
**Client-jest skipped**
**Server Build taking less time**
**Case-2:**
**`/build-deploy-preview `**
**Case-3**
**`/build-deploy-preview env=release`**
**github-action**
**final-dp:**
2023-03-08 15:07:30 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
568544b5a3
ci: fix artifact names across the ci ( #20586 )
...
Fix: artifact names across CI
2023-02-13 14:45:02 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
afc5c94cf7
fix: failing ce deploy previews ( #20204 )
2023-01-30 13:37:55 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
a8689792dc
ci: make upgrades easy to deploy-previews ( #20198 )
...
Make upgrades easy for deploy previews.
2023-01-30 11:49:22 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
365afd2e94
ci: fix github-actions trigger sequence ( #20138 )
2023-01-27 15:34:58 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
506b0230d5
ci: add cosmetic changes to deploy-preview ci ( #20131 )
2023-01-27 11:31:55 +05:30
Goutham Pratapa
5ad64598ac
chore: Deploy preview of a PR ( #19988 )
...
Successful-run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ci/actions/runs/3986060223
Example: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ci/pull/2
### How to trigger the workflow
[Reference](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ci/pull/2#issuecomment-1400174700 )
go ahead and comment:
```
/build-deploy-preview
```
If the commit is fine then you should another comment from github-actions like below
```
Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ci/actions/runs/xxxxxx
Workflow: On demand build Image and deploy Deploy-Preview.
PR: #.
URL: #ce.appsmith.com
```
2023-01-26 14:05:11 +05:30
