/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Snowflake"## Description
> [!TIP]
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13448661796>
> Commit: d4e4d31e4e5086fcf4d93e76a3f7346b1301e81f
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13448661796&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Snowflake`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:33:22 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Enhanced our automated testing configuration by including secure
integration credentials in the test workflows.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Signed-off-by: Laveena Enid <laveena@appsmith.com>
## Description
**Problem**: The Schedule TBP data for both Release and Airgap workflows
is currently identical in the database, making it difficult to
distinguish between them.
**Solution**: Added the workflow name to the commitMsg column, ensuring
a clear and accurate view of the data for each workflow.
Fixes #
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/qa-63316faf86bb2e170ed2e46b/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/39253
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.SignIn"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13309520198>
> Commit: 87d33db158fe9ded6261edd13cf7f89e5e643ab0
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13309520198&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.SignIn`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:28:44 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a customizable input to specify the number of test
iterations.
- Updated test commands to conditionally target specific test files
based on provided parameters.
- **Tests**
- Enhanced test reporting by appending workflow context to commit
messages.
- Improved workflow tracking with the addition of a variable reflecting
the active workflow name.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Problem: We see cypress retry happening for the only it block. Due to
this we see failed cases always as some cases are dependent.
Solution: Updated the workflow with library to retry only failed specs.
Fixes #
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/qa-63316faf86bb2e170ed2e46b/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/39211
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13285964571>
> Commit: 9c4fb375775839503a2800eb84bc87a6abc61ac9
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13285964571&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:31:18 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated a key dependency to incorporate backward-compatible
improvements.
- **Tests**
- Enhanced the automated testing process with improved error handling
and the ability to conditionally execute tests.
- Introduced configurable options for test repetition and snapshot
updates, ensuring more reliable reporting and feedback.
- Improved the logic for commenting on pull request statuses based on CI
test results.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
> [!TIP]
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.SignIn"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13175660228>
> Commit: 414bca851f9a05341b691277a9d2f99619062164
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13175660228&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.SignIn`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:38:32 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Improved testing workflow consistency by standardizing credential
naming conventions.
- **New Features**
- Added new test parameters to allow configurable run counts and
snapshot update options.
- Enhanced artifact handling and caching to better preserve logs and
results during test executions.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Adding env.
Fixes #
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/qa-63316faf86bb2e170ed2e46b/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/39030
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.SignIn"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13155682886>
> Commit: d3ca22a6cce58444e3ca3130c9c70b594c187ddc
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13155682886&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.SignIn`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 11:05:02 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Tests**
- Improved continuous integration workflows with new options for
configuring test runs, including setting run counts, toggling snapshot
updates, and choosing specific tests.
- Enhanced integration with an external data service to streamline test
data retrieval, ensuring more robust and reliable testing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Workflow failure :
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12804875642/job/35705873169
Fixes #
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/qa-63316faf86bb2e170ed2e46b/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/38698
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Settings"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> 🟣🟣🟣 Your tests are running.
> Tests running at:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12807366996>
> Commit: cc4baab222b9f0667cb9addb98ef3549b2650ecf
> Workflow: `PR Automation test suite`
> Tags: `@tag.Settings`
> Spec: ``
> <hr>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 10:54:57 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated GitHub Actions workflows to disable SSH socket service during
Docker container execution
- Ensures SSH service is stopped and prevented from automatically
restarting during CI tests
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Found that existing text file was not reading when no_data passed. Fixed
the problem by adding that condition.
Fixes #
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/qa-63316faf86bb2e170ed2e46b/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/38591
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12740786426>
> Commit: 7c4e5488fb4dfc564b9d34feaba0f2312277f54f
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12740786426&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.IDE`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:09:41 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated GitHub Actions workflow for improved test specification
handling
- Enhanced debug logging and error handling in CI test workflow
- Refined mechanism for processing test input sources
- Added more robust file checking and fallback logic
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Fix for command without spec.
Fixes #
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/stability-pod-6690c4814e31602e25cab7fd/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/38352
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12482462821>
> Commit: add048b0795ebf1f9a3fb6c2cfa1837fdb179ebd
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12482462821&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:11:18 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced flexibility in specifying test files with a new input
parameter `specs_to_run`.
- Default value for `specs_to_run` is now set to `'no_data'` when not
provided.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved error handling for cases where no specifications are
provided, including fallback to a specified file.
- **Documentation**
- Updated comments for clarity in workflow processes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Handle one minor edge case.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12431317027>
> Commit: 2095f54cc940d1bc5f0201985ff8d5b8959336b1
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12431317027&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:00:30 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a `run_count` parameter for enhanced control over Cypress
test execution.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved robustness in checking for null or empty values in the
`specs_to_run` input.
- **Chores**
- Refined logic for rerunning tests based on previous run results and
clarified handling of snapshot updates.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Adding workflow for updating snapshot with github CI.
Fixes #[`36419` ](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/36419)
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12426577557>
> Commit: 2660c07257f3d78f64371cedc2ee82f247f9d76d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12426577557&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 07:02:16 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced CI workflow with new input parameters for snapshot updates
and spec execution.
- Added steps for uploading existing and new snapshot data during
Cypress tests.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved artifact management and error handling in the CI process.
- **Documentation**
- Added comments for better understanding of workflow logic and input
parameters.
- **Refactor**
- Streamlined job execution logic and conditional checks for test
reruns.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Fix chrome version for snapshot testing.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12371605353>
> Commit: cc4ac1083ab6abf6bc0b37eaff74d491d197b0fc
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12371605353&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:35:17 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Added new input parameters (`ted_tag`, `run_count`,
`previous-workflow-run-id`) to enhance workflow flexibility.
- Introduced service containers for Redis and MongoDB in CI tests.
- Improved Slack notifications with dynamic messages based on test
outcomes.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced error handling and logging for better management of previous
run results.
- **Improvements**
- Updated Chrome installation method to a specific version
(129.0.6668.100) across all workflows.
- Refined job conditions to ensure proper execution under specific
scenarios.
- **Chores**
- Adjusted cron schedule for CI tests to run every weekday at 1:30 AM
UTC.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
The server should be the source of truth and owner for the current CS
URL, and the client having direct access to the CS URL is (almost) an
abstraction leak. We're using it on client for one purpose only, to
redirect to CS for Google sheets authorization. That's just as well
achieved with another redirect via the server.
This PR does that redirection and removes access to the CS URL to the
client code. Not used anywhere else, and shouldn't be needed.
## Automation
/test sanity datasource
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12029489682>
> Commit: 0a1937e7d5d492c7c6a98bde124a157663126ac1
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12029489682&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity, @tag.Datasource`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:21:11 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Release Notes
- **New Features**
- Enhanced CI workflow with improved error handling and logging.
- Added a new authorization redirection endpoint in the SaaS controller.
- **Improvements**
- Database URL validation step added to CI tests.
- Artifact management for test results has been clarified and improved.
- Removal of `cloudServicesBaseUrl` from various configurations to
streamline cloud service integration.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Refined logic for rerunning tests based on previous results.
These updates contribute to a more robust and efficient testing and
configuration environment.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
Fix :
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/security/advisories/GHSA-5f24-4j99-h3gc#event-330907
Use bash syntax to access the environment variable: $EVENT_COMMITS
Fixes #`36835`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> Tests have not run on the HEAD
18af8361443cfcdd98239fbc4af52c96aaadf501 yet
> <hr>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:55:10 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a `run_count` input parameter for specifying the number of
test repetitions.
- Added input parameters for manual triggering in the CI workflow.
- New environment variable `COMMIT_INFO_AUTHOR` captures the author name
for better context in commit messages.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced logic for handling commit messages and test run conditions.
- Improved caching mechanism for better tracking of test outcomes across
runs.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Reverting to previous version as this steps specifically run for
failure.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10848068018>
> Commit: d646576aa20499b099adbf6f0479ff3b8363e41c
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10848068018&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.ImportExport`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:26:38 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated workflow conditions to trim Cypress log files only on job
failures, improving log management for successful runs.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Added extra checks for better reporting
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10831607193>
> Commit: 2a5049d9cb17fc099c10e863b90a0694287c38fe
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10831607193&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.ImportExport`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:31:10 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced CI workflow to provide clearer test results through improved
commenting on pull requests based on test outcomes.
- Introduced a failure flag mechanism to explicitly record test
execution status.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved reliability of CI process by ensuring important logs and
results are preserved and uploaded even on test failures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem:** When running Cypress tests multiple times with the
cypress-repeat-pro --force option, we only see success messages. This is
because the `--force` option may override or mask failures, leading to
misleading results.
**Solution:** To address this, we have added a step to check for
specific failure indicators in the test summary file. If the summary
indicates that there were any failed tests (i.e., `Total Failed: 0` is
not present), the GitHub Action step will fail. This ensures that
failures are properly highlighted and reported in the PR comments.
Fixes #`36232`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10806403675>
> Commit: 3a04b01650a4f92967d6b489eead5d61e48cb89a
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10806403675&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:01:29 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced CI workflow to ensure GitHub Action fails if Cypress tests do
not pass, improving reliability.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Implemented a conditional check for test failures, providing clearer
feedback on test outcomes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Only command name update
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10592127455>
> Commit: 1e1fb070a89908cd6bf78d0ba966d04305632f51
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10592127455&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 07:44:22 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Improvements**
- Updated the CI workflow to utilize an enhanced version of Cypress for
running tests, potentially offering improved functionality and
performance.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Challenge**: In our existing process, when users performed a limited
run with a specified count, the results were recorded solely in the
logs. This approach introduced an additional step, requiring users to
manually navigate through each workflow to check the results, which was
both time-consuming and prone to oversight.
**Solution**: To address this inefficiency, I took the initiative to
develop a custom npm library specifically designed to enhance the user
experience. This library automates the generation of a summary file that
consolidates the run data into a single, easily accessible document.
Furthermore, I integrated this solution into our existing workflow by
updating the process to automatically post the contents of this summary
file as a comment on the relevant PR upon completion of the run.
This improvement not only streamlines the workflow by eliminating the
need for users to manually sift through logs, but it also ensures that
critical information is immediately available at a glance. By
centralizing the results in the PR comments, we’ve enhanced transparency
and efficiency, allowing for quicker decision-making and more effective
collaboration. This solution is a step forward in optimizing our
processes and reducing the manual effort required to track and assess
test outcomes.
**Looks like this:**
<img width="993" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 11 06 37 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/91a5966e-fef6-47b8-9fd8-9186012f2ab3">
Fixes #`35920`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10590991034>
> Commit: ef6ef69fb812ba43abba5d9d273623a914569c81
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10590991034&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:19:47 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a summary of Cypress test results in pull request comments
for improved visibility.
- Added functionality to upload Cypress summary logs, ensuring
availability regardless of previous test outcomes.
- **Dependency Updates**
- Updated the testing package from `cypress-repeat-updated` to
`cypress-repeat-pro`, potentially enhancing testing capabilities.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Having seen memory failure in EE repo for the yarn install. This same
steps works fine in CE.
Fixes #`35667`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10369580919>
> Commit: 29e0b8dbbd06ba6068af3484d466a57206e81c3d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10369580919&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:37:35 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Restored the Yarn cache during workflow execution in case of failure,
improving build efficiency.
- **Chores**
- Updated GitHub Actions workflow to enhance caching mechanism for
better performance in CI processes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
We’ve made significant progress and successfully ran a limited set of
test files by fixing parameters in the forked repository. I can able to
atleast trigger the workflow with slash command and passed right
parameter.
The ci-test-limited-with-count.yml workflow now supports running
specific test files. However, an issue was identified with one of the
parameters. To proceed with testing, the identified issue can be
resolved by merging this PR.
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10351114050>
> Commit: fd17177d71110bf714b5ec4eaf7d2ae683cbdc68
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10351114050&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:57:49 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Simplified access to the `run_count` variable in the GitHub Actions
workflow, improving readability and potentially enhancing performance.
- Updated syntax for referencing inputs in Cypress test workflows for
better clarity and consistency.
- Clarified default value handling for `run_count`, ensuring predictable
workflow behavior.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Testing the yaml with slash command.
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10316110580>
> Commit: 41a74c726e332c4d9adeef876d60766f0c09c33a
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10316110580&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:43:58 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Chores**
- Updated the GitHub Actions workflow to disable Yarn cache restoration,
which may affect build times.
- Modified Cypress test specifications to focus on the Fork application
instead of templates, refining test execution priorities.
- Enhanced the GitHub Actions workflow with a new input parameter,
`run_count`, improving configurability and responsiveness to events.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
It is for running a spec file with given run_count
Fixes #`34956`
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new GitHub Actions CI workflow for running limited tests,
enhancing the flexibility and management of the testing process.
- Added a new dependency for improved Cypress testing capabilities,
allowing for more efficient test execution.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced artifact management for test runs and results within the CI
workflow for a more robust development lifecycle.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
