## Description
Remove specific cycle dependencies created because a file was both
importing and exporting items it does not modify.
By reducing cycle dependencies here, I am buying credits that allow
adding cycle dependencies in another PR but very hard to avoid
This PR reduces the deps by 4
EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/6214
PR which adds the cycle deps:
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/39100
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13324385763>
> Commit: 34a0f459b27963531adf851f198903cf0831b719
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13324385763&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 07:54:00 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a “Show More” option in the code editor’s command palette
for additional suggestions.
- Enabled default expansion for table widget panels to improve content
visibility.
- **Refactor**
- Consolidated entity and type management for a more consistent and
maintainable platform.
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced widget behavior with dynamic updates in dropdowns, file
pickers, and map styling for a smoother user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
- Adding `infiniteScrollEnabled` prop to TableWidgetProps
- Added feature flag: `release_tablev2_infinitescroll_enabled` to
control this.
Fixes#39079
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13305863325>
> Commit: 182c03d37644cc0b7f5563ed5c9e59c4c06667b6
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13305863325&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:35:05 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced an option to enable infinite scrolling in table views. When
activated, tables automatically adjust scrolling behavior and pagination
controls, enhancing data browsing.
- **Tests**
- Updated test cases to verify the new infinite scrolling functionality,
ensuring it is disabled by default.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
It has been a month since we have turned on the flag for table HTML
column type and we have not seen any issues.
This PR removes all the feature flags related code from the codebase.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13195811365>
> Commit: 7a0f810c1f6a271adad082fc5c8b630b427aea34
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13195811365&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 09:20:10 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- The HTML column type now appears as a consistently available option
when configuring table widgets.
- **Refactor**
- The table widget’s architecture has been streamlined for improved
modularity and state management, enhancing overall cell rendering.
- **Chore**
- Legacy conditional toggling for the HTML column type has been removed
to simplify configuration and standardize behavior.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
- Using mutative instead of immer, this has reduced the main thread
scripting by about 1 second.
- Removed a cloneDeep during table onMount which saves about 70ms in
main thread scripting.
- Bypassed mutative when applying the first tree to reduce the overhead
associated to mutative.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13164792224>
> Commit: 4cb821723d10198c9db70312a9604df5aa5f80c1
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13164792224&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 04:21:41 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Dependency**
- Integrated a new library to enhance overall state management.
- **Refactor**
- Updated state update mechanisms across interactive components and data
flows.
- Improved table widget processing for more consistent behavior.
- **Chore**
- Removed legacy development-only configuration settings.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem**
When a user uses the button column type in a table widget, the button is
automatically aligned to the left, and the style tab of the button
property pane does not allow the user change the vertical or horizontal
alignment of the button column.
**Solution**
We have added the Alignment property to the button column type for the
table widget, and added tests.
Fixes#38032
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12417408061>
> Commit: 07f2eb0795e04e37ed077a850bc9b87166ea549d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12417408061&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:44:06 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Added a test suite for validating button cell functionality in the
Table Widget V2.
- Introduced a method to generate CSS selectors for specific table
cells.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced visibility controls for alignment properties based on column
types, particularly for button cells.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR started with this goal:
- Deleted the unreadable `derived.test.js` (4668 lines) file and split
each suite to its file.
- Moved all `derived.js` related specs in widget folder to __tests__
folder
Later we found that `testRegex` in `jest.config` will treat anything
inside `__tests__` as runnable, so we modify this rule and are moving to
a consistent naming for our unit tests(any file ending with `.test.` or
`.spec.`
This refactor aims to improve maintainability and ensure that the table
widget's derived properties are thoroughly tested.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!WARNING]
> Tests have not run on the HEAD
b3168bb1a6d3070a910972d1d9a78d61a3aaee91 yet
> <hr>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:20:54 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Expanded properties for table widget configuration.
- Introduced sample data constants for column schemas and processed
table data.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved validation tests for editable cells and row selection
functions.
- **Tests**
- Added comprehensive test suites for various table widget
functionalities, including filtering, sorting, and row selection.
- Introduced tests for handling HTML content within table columns.
- Added tests for new functions related to row updates and indices.
- Enhanced test coverage for existing utility functions and table
properties.
- **Chores**
- Updated import paths to reflect a new directory structure across
various test files.
- Modified Jest configuration for improved readability and regex
adjustments.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Updating the settings icon throughout the product to use the below icon:
https://www.figma.com/design/8L9BXMzNTKboGWlHpdXyYP/Appsmith-IDE?node-id=33-3546&t=qpptzxhkWatrFIn1-4
Fixes [#37248](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/37248)
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11796204902>
> Commit: 0e57343a6c2b7543f37e37940f8447be10ccd9e9
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11796204902&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:12:33 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated icons for various settings-related components from
"settings-2-line" to "settings-v3" to enhance visual representation.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved handling of frame ancestor settings in the AdminSettings
configuration, ensuring better management of stored values.
- **Documentation**
- No changes to the documentation were made in this release.
- **Chores**
- Updated multiple components to reflect the new icon, maintaining
overall functionality without introducing new logic.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
> **TL;DR**: This PR addresses is related to #16584 where editing a
table row with applied filters becomes impossible without clearing the
filters
When a filter is applied to the table data, the current behavior results
in filter updates without validating or saving the updated value of the
row being edited. This leads to a situation where users are unable to
save or discard changes until the filters are cleared. The proposed fix
ensures that the original row is retrieved from the table data and used
in filtering, allowing editing and filtering to work as expected.
Here's a [screen
record](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JuP_UN_B1vzz_oMeR1ojjPscF_mB3A4x/view?usp=sharing)
for the solution
### Motivation:
The problem arises in scenarios where table rows are editable and
filters are applied. This change ensures that users can continue editing
table rows without being forced to clear filters first.
### Context:
This change is required to improve user experience and fix the broken
editing functionality when filters are active. The change ensures that
editable values in filtered rows are correctly handled and saved.
Fixes https://www.loom.com/share/335d0c61817646a0903d581adf73064e
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="table-widget,filter,edit"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt
the CI result for your PR.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Improved filtering accuracy in the TableWidgetV2 by using original row
data for evaluations.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced functionality to ensure that filtering conditions are
evaluated correctly with original data.
- **Tests**
- Added new test cases to validate filtering functionality after edits
in the TableWidgetV2.
- Expanded test coverage for checkbox and switch interactions to ensure
accurate filtering behavior, including new interactions with a discard
button.
- **Style**
- Minor adjustments to comments and formatting for better readability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Fixed issue #36022 where incorrect data is displayed when navigating to
the previous page after reaching the last page with fewer items in the
table during server-side pagination enabled by using `props.pageSize`
instead of `props.tableData?.length`.
Fix:
Replaced `props.tableData?.length` with `props.pageSize` to ensure
consistent data display when navigating between pages, especially when
dealing with the last page that has fewer items than the pageSize.
Fixes#36022
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table"
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Improved pagination logic for the table widget, simplifying the
handling of page size.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Resolved potential inconsistencies in pagination when server-side data
is utilized.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Phennapa Saeliw <psaeliw@gmail.com>
## Description
<ins>Problem</ins>
There are many problems with table loader logic, for which many users
try to implement a modal for loader. These problems stem from dependency
and delay on eval, discussed comprehensively in #12308
<ins>Solution</ins>
This PR updates the TableWidgetV2 component to include a new property
called `customIsLoading`. This property controls the loading state of
the widget and is added to the TableWidgetProps interface. Additionally,
the component's state is updated to include the `customIsLoading`
property.
The `contentConfig` file for the TableWidgetV2 is also modified to
include the `customIsLoading` property with its corresponding label,
control type, help text, and validation.
These changes improve the flexibility and customization options of the
TableWidgetV2 component.
Fixes#12308
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11456273525>
> Commit: 1c6f4f9caabc3aa45ec3916e5ccb465d946ab0a1
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11456273525&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:17:37 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new feature flag for custom loading states in the table
widget.
- Added properties for managing custom loading behavior in the
`TableWidgetV2`.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced loading state management to ensure accurate representation
based on new properties.
- **Tests**
- Added unit tests for loading behavior in the `TableWidgetV2`
component, covering default and custom loading scenarios.
- **Documentation**
- Updated help text for properties related to loading states to improve
clarity.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem**
When filtering a table with a select column type, users expect to filter
by the visible label values shown in each cell. Currently, however,
filtering is applied to the underlying option values rather than the
displayed labels, leading to unexpected filter results for end-users.
**Root Cause**
In a previous update ([PR
#35124](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/35124)), the table
cell display for select columns was changed to show labels instead of
values. However, the filtering logic was not updated accordingly, so the
table still filtered on the original option values, creating a mismatch
between displayed and filtered content.
**Solution**
This PR modifies the displayedRow property within the table widget to
use the label property instead of the value key when filtering or
searching select column data. This ensures that table filtering and
searching now align with the visible label values in the select columns,
providing a more intuitive user experience.
Fixes#36635
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity, @tag.Table, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11234735437>
> Commit: fd6c179ffb2c61d23cb98fd749c8df49cebcfcdd
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11234735437&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity, @tag.Table, @tag.Select, @tag.Binding`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:48:01 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new test case to verify filtering functionality for the
"role" column in the Table Widget.
- Enhanced filtering mechanism to support multiple label values for
select columns.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed outdated search functionality to streamline user experience.
- **Refactor**
- Restructured existing test cases for improved clarity and flow.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Removed all the occurrences of listed flags in the codebase:
1. ab_ds_binding_enabled
2. ab_ds_schema_enabled
3. ab_gsheet_schema_enabled
4. ab_learnability_discoverability_collapse_all_except_data_enabled
5. ab_learnability_ease_of_initial_use_enabled
6. ab_mock_mongo_schema_enabled
7. ab_start_with_data_default_enabled
8. rollout_js_enabled_one_click_binding_enabled
Fixes#36256
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11177173738>
> Commit: bfbf6bbe77b963c5d257c29cf5bac35139417a07
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11177173738&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:31:10 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced test coverage for the Community Issues page, focusing on
pagination, search, filtering, and issue management.
- Improved functionality for adding new rows to table widgets, including
visibility controls and state validations.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Resolved issues related to the visibility of UI elements when adding
new rows and ensured accurate data reflection in the table.
- **Tests**
- Expanded tests for pagination, row selection, search functionality,
and filtering logic in table widgets.
- Added comprehensive assertions for client-side search and filtering
scenarios, including checks for modal visibility during issue
management.
- **Chores**
- Removed obsolete feature flags and streamlined logic for managing
feature flags across components.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem**
When populating a table widget with data that includes dates in Unix
timestamp (milliseconds) format, setting the column type to "Date," the
input format to "Unix timestamp (ms)," and selecting a display format
leads to an issue during inline editing. While the date picker behaves
correctly, selecting a new date results in the table cell showing an
"Invalid Date" error.
**Root Cause**
The platform currently uses DateInputFormat.MILLISECONDS for Unix
timestamp (ms) formatting. However, this value is not a valid option for
the moment.format() function, which expects the input format to be 'x'
for Unix timestamps in milliseconds. This mismatch leads to the "Invalid
Date" error.
**Solution**
Modify the logic to map DateInputFormat.MILLISECONDS to the correct
moment format string 'x'.
Adjust the table's transformDataPureFn to correctly process and display
dates in Unix timestamp (ms) format after inline edits, ensuring the
moment library can handle the input properly.
**Outcome**
This fix ensures that when a user selects a date via the date picker in
inline editing mode, the selected date is displayed correctly in the
table without any errors.
Fixes#35631, #25081
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table,
@tag.Datepicker"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11101758400>
> Commit: 6a3cae774f3824bd2ee126b501bfa4b6d71ae0c8
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11101758400&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity, @tag.Binding, @tag.Table, @tag.Datepicker`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:54:58 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced date column editing in table widgets to accept Unix
timestamps in milliseconds without errors.
- Introduced a new enumeration for improved date formatting options.
- Added mock data structures for testing various date formats and
transformations in the table widget.
- New method for generating formatted date strings for tomorrow in both
verbose and ISO formats.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved validation logic for date inputs in the table, ensuring
proper handling of different date formats.
- **Tests**
- Added new test cases to validate date handling and input formats in
the table widget.
- Introduced a new test suite for transforming table data based on
specified column metadata.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem**
The select column of the table widget does not have a validation
property within its property pane to allow users add an isRequired
validation to the table select column.
**Solution**
Added a Validation section to the table select column's property pane,
which includes an isRequired toggle. When enabled, this feature will
trigger a visual indication (error border colour) around the select
widget if a required field is left unselected during "Add new row" or
inline editing.
Fixes#30091
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget, @tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity,
@tag.Select"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10957896180>
> Commit: d2597e6a26938f2b99f2f997fca7bc110e5c2091
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10957896180&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Widget, @tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity,
@tag.Select`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:23:29 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced end-to-end tests for Select column validation in Table
widgets.
- Enhanced validation logic to support Select column types in the Table
widget.
- Added visual feedback for required Select fields during row addition
and inline editing.
- Improved locator for single-select widget button control to enhance UI
interaction.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved error handling and visual representation for invalid editable
Select cells.
- **Documentation**
- Updated validation configuration to include Select column types for
better usability.
- **Refactor**
- Enhanced code clarity for styled components related to Select fields.
- Modified method to improve versatility in handling table interactions.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Sai Charan <saicharan.chetpelly@zemosolabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Pawan Kumar <pawankumar@Pawans-MacBook-Pro-2.local>
## Description
<ins> Problem statement </ins>
1. Table should have a primary column set.
2. The table should be filtered(via search or client side filters)
3. there should be a selectedRow in table
a. One way to ensure is add a text widget and bind it to table's
`selectedRowIndex` property.
If you now run a query that updates the data behind the table: the
`selectedRow` is updated to (seemingly) random row and selectedRowIndex
is updated as well
<ins> Rootcause </ins>
We have a mechanism of preserving `selectedRow` when data updates
happen.
Underlying logic gets the previous selected row and tries to find it in
the new data using the primary key.
* If it finds it, it updates the selectedRowIndex to the
`__original_index__` of the found row i.e. its position in the original
data before any filters were applied.
<ins> Solution </ins>
We update the selectedRowIndex to the index in the new filtered data.
<ins> How to test </ins>
1. Create a table with a primary key
2. Add a text widget and bind it to table's `selectedRowIndex` property
3. Filter the table
4. Click on a row to select it
5. Run a query that updates the data behind the table
6. Assert that the selected row is the same and that the
selectedRowIndex is updated to the new index
Fixes#36080
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10953679202>
> Commit: 1a2d64467e453229940b67b29da1ce9d0e9ac24d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10953679202&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:30:08 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Improvements**
- Enhanced the efficiency of the TableWidgetV2 by streamlining the
method for retrieving the index of selected rows.
- Improved code readability and maintainability without altering the
overall functionality.
- **New Features**
- Introduced new test cases to validate filtering and searching
functionalities within the Table Widget V2.
- Added a JSON configuration for a data-driven table interface,
supporting sorting, filtering, and dynamic data binding.
- Introduced fixture data for testing, allowing for comprehensive
validation of table behavior under various conditions.
- Added a JavaScript object containing employee data to facilitate
filtering and display in the table.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Added ESLint rule to force blank lines between statements.
Fixes #`Issue Number`
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!CAUTION]
> 🔴🔴🔴 Some tests have failed.
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10924926728>
> Commit: 34f57714a1575ee04e94e03cbcaf95e57a96c86c
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10924926728&attempt=1&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: @tag.All
> Spec:
> The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
<ol>
> <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/AnvilModal_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilCheckboxGroupWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilCurrencyInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilIconButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilInlineButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilParagraphWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilPhoneInputWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilStatsWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilSwitchGroupWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilSwitchWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilTableWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilToolbarButtonWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts
>
<li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets/AnvilZoneSectionWidgetSnapshot_spec.ts</ol>
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master"
target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>.
> <hr>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:33:36 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
---------
Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <valera@appsmith.com>
## Description
Klona operations are generally expensive, for that reason we will be
tracking the performance of all klonas in the main thread.
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10608431935>
> Commit: cab2716f74f3747d3df64342f4d7f4972358a3e6
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10608431935&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 06:26:43 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced telemetry tracking for cloning operations across various
components, enhancing performance monitoring and debugging capabilities.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved observability of cloning operations, aiding in identifying
potential performance bottlenecks.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
<ins>Problem</ins>
`currentRow` variable which is availabe in property pane of col settings
- is not getting correct value during runtime if the table is sorted or
filtered.
<ins>Root cause</ins>
* We are considering `processedTableData` to get the `currentRow`.
* This property is not updated during filtering and sorting, another
property `filteredTableData` is updated instead.
* We CANNOT use `filteredTableData` as it depends on `primaryColumns`
property which we intend to update as well - this is leading to cyclic
dependency during evaluations.
<ins>Solution</ins>
Since the problem is related to edit cases and given the constraints
around using `filteredTableData` directly, we fixed the problem by
adding a new property to `editableCellValue` object called
`__originalIndex__`.
* This property stores the index of the row being edited in
`processedTableData`
* On top of this change, the PR adds a migration for updating the
current row binding in TableWidgetV2, ensuring accurate current row
calculation and improving the functionality of the widget.
* We also added unit test for migration changes.
* Additionally, This pull request refactors the DSLs for TableWidgetV2
migration test cases to update the DSLs to separate folder, drastically
reducing the file size to its core logic, improving the readability of
the code.
* We also updated relevant test cases to account for this change.
[Testing
plan](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Issue-34346-currentRow-doesn-t-work-correctly-when-the-table-is-filtered-449225ae822c485493036599c2b19487)
[Counter part EE
pr](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4879)
Fixes#34346
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10451549845>
> Commit: d1d65c6898c223bf3f6dfbfe93b8e8de214fcc7d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10451549845&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:15:04 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated DSL migration process to support version 90, enhancing
compatibility and robustness.
- Introduced new migration logic for table widget data bindings,
improving inline editing capabilities.
- Enhanced validation logic for editable cells in table widgets,
allowing for more dynamic data handling.
- Added a method to discard edits in specific table cells, improving
user interaction.
- Introduced a new message constant for required fields, enhancing user
feedback.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved validation checks for table cells based on updated indices
and values.
- **Tests**
- Added comprehensive tests to validate migration functions related to
Table Widget, ensuring all aspects function correctly post-update.
- Enhanced test specifications for improved validation logic and
coverage in table widget functionalities.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: sneha122 <sneha@appsmith.com>
## Description
**Problem:**
When the `isRequired` property is set for date columns in the table
widget, the validation doesn't work as expected. Users can add new rows
without filling in the date field, even though it is marked as required.
This results in rows being added with missing date values, which can
lead to incomplete or invalid data entries.
**Root Cause:**
The validation logic for the date column is currently handled within the
DateCell component. However, the isRequired validation functionality was
not implemented within this component. Additionally, the general
validation logic in the `getEditableCellValidity` function, located in
the derived.js file, does not account date cells in its isRequired
validation.
**Solution:**
To fix this issue:
**Enhance the `getEditableCellValidity` function:** Extend the existing
validation logic in getEditableCellValidity to include the date cell in
its validation, specifically checking for the isRequired property.
**Integrate with DateCell validation:** Ensure that the isRequired
validation is properly executed in conjunction with the existing date
validations inside the DateCell component. This will enforce the
requirement and prevent new rows from being added if the date field is
left empty.
**Test Plan**
https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Test-Plan-Date-Column-Marked-as-Required-Doesn-t-Enforce-Mandatory-Entry-When-Adding-New-Table-Row-c73b764af60842a188cba056bdda6d79?pvs=4Fixes#34258
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10453174231>
> Commit: 40fe2eaf7d45024bef00f8031e971a5bac2a4e3e
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10453174231&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:17:23 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced validation for "Date" column types, ensuring that required
fields are correctly enforced.
- **Enhancements**
- Improved validation logic for more accurate user feedback in date
cells.
- Expanded support for validating "date" columns in the table widget.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced error handling to ensure proper indication of cell validity
based on new validation criteria.
- Updated visual feedback for cell editor state in the UI.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
**Problem**
The table widget now supports the Select column type, which allows the
column to contain both a label and a value. This could be useful for
currency fields, foreign keys, or any other case where you want to
display a different version of the column value. However, there is a
problem with sorting. The table always sorts using the value, and does
not give the user an option to sort using the label, where it makes
sense in specific cases.
**Solution**
This PR adds a Sort By property to the table select cell, allowing the
users to choose which value is used for sorting without affecting any
functionality of the label or value of the select cell.
[Additional Technical
Documentation](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Adding-sortBy-Property-to-Select-Columns-in-Table-Widget-V2-a5a41e6319a047378eb50a42be8c32ef?pvs=4)
**Tested Cases**
1. Sort select column by default value
Objective: Ensure that a newly added table with select column default
sorts by the value
**Steps:**
- Drop a new table widget.
- Add sample data to the table.
- Set a column (e.g., role) to select type.
- Add selectOptions property
- Verify that when sorted in ascending or descending order, the sorting
is correct
2. Sort select column by label
Objective: Ensure that a newly added table with select column and sortBy
property set to label sorts correctly
**Steps:**
- Drop a new table widget.
- Add sample data to the table.
- Set a column (e.g., role) to select type
- Add selectOptions property
- Set sortBy property to label
- Verify that when sorted in ascending or descending order, the sorting
is correct and based on the label value only
3. Verify that sorting of other table cells that are not select works as
expected
Objective: Ensure that every other cell type in the table sorts
correctly
**Steps:**
- Drop a new table widget.
- Add sample data to the table.
- Set a column (e.g., role) to select type
- Add selectOptions property
- Set sortBy property to label
- Verify that when columns other that role are sorted, they are sorted
correctly
4. Verify that sorting works as expected when table data is a binding
Objective: Ensure that the sorting works for all columns while using
data binding in table data
**Steps:**
- Drop a new table widget
- Link a query binding to the table data property
- Verify that all columns sort correctly
5. Verify that sorting works as expected when table data is a binding
and select column sorting is set to label
Objective: Ensure that the sorting works for all columns while using
data binding in table data with a select column set to sort by the label
**Steps:**
- Drop a new table widget
- Link a query binding to the table data property
- Set a column (e.g., role) to select type
- Add selectOptions property
- Set sortBy property to label
- Verify that all columns sort correctly
6. Verify that sortBy logic does not take effect or break user
experience until the user adds selectOptions in select cell
**Steps:**
- Drop a new table widget
- Link a query binding to the table data property or add raw data
- Set a column (e.g., role) to select type
- Do not add selectOptions
- Set sortBy property to label
- Verify that all other columns display and sort correctly
7. Verify that sorting by label and value works correctly in deployed
mode
**Steps:**
- Drop a new table widget
- Link a query binding to the table data property or add raw data
- Set a column (e.g., role) to select type
- Add selectOptions
- Set sortBy property to label
- Deploy application
- Confirm that sorting works correctly for all columns
Fixes#21993
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10165119164>
> Commit: 8a4e8b238adc0d78726a811b54a209caa4990606
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10165119164&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:02:35 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a feature flag for dynamic table cell labeling.
- Added a sorting option for select cells, allowing sort by value or
label.
- Enhanced user interface with new configuration options for select
components.
- Improved sorting functionality for select columns to sort by labels.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved sorting functionality in the table widget to ensure accurate
data representation.
- **Tests**
- Expanded and clarified test cases for sorting functionality in the
Table Widget V2.
- Updated testing structure for better reliability and isolation of test
scenarios.
- Integrated dynamic testing capabilities based on feature flags.
- **Documentation**
- Added new locators for sorting controls to enhance UI interaction
capabilities.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
- Enabled the rule `@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any`
- Suppressed errors with comment
```
// TODO: Fix this the next time the file is edited
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
```
Fixes#35308
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10181176984>
> Commit: 7fc604e24fa234da7ab2ff56e0b1c715268796ee
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10181176984&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:00:45 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/34591
## Description
Making _Allow filtering_ option false by default.
<img width="798" alt="Allow filtering off"
src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/121817440/8ac64773-2385-433d-96fa-0a90080e2462">
Fixes#34591
_or_
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Table, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9795462304>
> Commit: e0c1e8376b702f13b9640c880cf5606af070a420
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9795462304&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Table, @tag.Widget, @tag.Binding, @tag.Sanity`
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Filtering is now disabled by default for the `TableWidgetV2`.
- **Tests**
- Updated test scripts to enable filtering for `TableWidgetV2` in
multiple scenarios.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacques Ikot <jacquesikot@gmail.com>
## Description
- Update Storybook and related dependencies
- Delete the stories for old widget components
- Rewrite stories for new widgets(mdx to tsx)
Note: local chromatic doesn't work because of this
https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/issues/22531
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced new component stories across various packages to enhance
design system documentation and user experience.
- **Documentation**
- Updated `.gitignore` files to optimize version control settings for
Storybook and build logs.
- **Refactor**
- Modified UI element positioning in Storybook theming for improved
layout management.
- **Style**
- Adjusted CSS properties for the `Select` component to ensure better
visual presentation.
- **Chores**
- Updated dependencies and scripts in package configurations to maintain
up-to-date development tools.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
> [!TIP]
To update the explorer widgets and icons to match the new Anvil design
system
**How**
1. Update all the icons and thumbnails svg for widgets in the explorer
2. Update the WidgetCard component to implement the new design
3. Test functionality of widgets manually
Fixes#32330
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Visual, @tag.MainContainer, @tag.Widget"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8598999945>
> Commit: `47cf5a8e0e14e986da31e02ba8f630fd27ce310f`
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8598999945&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
> All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new `UIEntityCard` component for representing widgets in
the editor sidebar with enhanced drag-and-drop functionality and
improved visual layout including widget details.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR included two paper cut fixes
1. Autofocus the search input after add widgets button click
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/23132741/3125c0a8-1104-4c1c-aecc-dacd01123f82
2. Remove the helper text for columns in Table widgets
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/32218
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8521789054>
> Commit: `cee8a960ddf92126eab419bb109fb44dbf02047e`
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8521789054&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
> All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced search input focus control across the editor for an improved
user experience.
- **Refactor**
- Updated components to support dynamic focus management on search
inputs.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Removed mandatory help text validation for property controls,
enhancing flexibility in widget configuration.
- Eliminated the `helpText` requirement from widget configuration,
simplifying setup.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
- Add `needsErrorInfo` to widget configuration
- Replace usage of `fast-deep-equal` with referential check for
tableData
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Widget"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8370220547>
> Commit: `ded6b16333e1df5d5d55f22df0559ba378f33d9c`
> Cypress dashboard url: <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8370220547&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Click here!</a>
> All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a mechanism to display evaluation errors directly on
widgets when necessary.
- **Enhancements**
- Simplified data comparison logic in `TableWidgetV2` to improve
performance.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
- Module Instance Debugger CE fixes
- fix for setter method params type being incorrect example:-
`RadioGrp1.setData(value:string)` instead of
`RadioGrp1.setData(value:[?])` as we default to string when type was
array.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes#30872
#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced type conversion functionality to support more types,
improving the development experience.
- **Improvements**
- Added an optional `entityName` field for better entity identification.
- Updated error messages for plugin actions to be more descriptive.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Fixed data type inconsistencies across various widgets to ensure
uniformity in data handling.
- **Refactor**
- Refactored certain sagas for improved code maintainability and
readability.
- **Tests**
- Adjusted widget tests to reflect the changes in data type handling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/29800
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [x] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced table sorting logic to dynamically determine the input format
for better accuracy in sorting, especially with date values.
- **Tests**
- Added new test cases to ensure table data is correctly sorted based on
date columns in descending order.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/15639
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced table column rendering to differentiate between preview and
canvas modes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR changes the validation error message for Table widgets
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes#28729
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [ ] Manual
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Refactor**
- Improved the error message for table data validation to provide more
specific guidance to users about the expected input format.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: arunvjn <arunvjn10@gmail.com>
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/18572
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
## Description
Use case - Widgets need to be distinguished as large or small in Anvil.
1. Add property ``isLargeWidget`` to ``AnvilConfig`` interface.
2. Update AnvilConfig for all widget. Especially, WDS widgets.
#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
---------
Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com>
The alpha version of the Custom widget that takes a user component and
renders it on the app.
Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/28601
#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [x] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag
`release_custom_widgets_enabled`
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
## Description
Adds a new currency column type on the table widget.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes#5632
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [x] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/issues/2447
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
## Description
1. Add LayoutComponent functionality.
2. Create Basic LayoutComponents.
3. Create LayoutPresets needed for Container-like widgets.
4. Add highlight calculation logic for all basic Layout Components.
5. Create dragging sagas for Anvil.
6. Create DraggingArena associated functionality to handle DnD in Anvil.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes#27004
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [x] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
---------
Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com>
Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <71900764+rahulramesha@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit eb567c0af5.
## Description
This PR moves the server-side filtering feature back to under a feature
flag by reverting #27663. We feel that we are not ready to release this
feature to the public yet.
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes # (issue number)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
