Fixes#36073
Hi @NilanshBansal
**Issue :**
**Missing Logging Implementation :**
- Without a logging implementation (such as SLF4J Simple or Logback) in
the project's classpath, the logging statements in the plugins cannot be
executed.
- As a result, no log output is being printed to the terminal.
**Solution :**
The solution is to add a logging implementation to the plugins parent
pom. In this case, you can add the slf4j-simple dependency to your
pom.xml file. This will provide a simple logging implementation that
will output log statements to the console.
```
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
<version>1.7.36</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.36</version>
</dependency>
```
**Explanation:**
- slf4j-api provides the SLF4J API, which is the interface for logging.
provides the SLF4J API, which is the interface for logging.
- slf4j-simple provides a simple implementation of the SLF4J API, which
is responsible for actually printing the log messages to the console.
**Screenshots :**
Amazon S3 Plugin and Postgres Plugin
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced logging capabilities with the integration of SLF4J API and
SLF4J Simple implementations.
- **Improvements**
- Improved log management and output formatting for better monitoring
and debugging across various plugins, transitioning from standard output
to structured logging.
- Refined logging practices in multiple plugins to support better
maintainability and performance.
- Removed method for console logging from the Stopwatch class to
streamline logging practices.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Upgrade AWS lambda plugin config to new format using SECTION_V2,
SINGLE_COLUMN_ZONE, and DOUBLE_COLUMN_ZONE.
Fixes#35488
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10716532467>
> Commit: 7af86d65c8dabd006c5c2fabaeb3d0886aa3bdcd
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10716532467&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:39:20 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced user interface for the AWS Lambda plugin with updated control
types, improving layout and interaction.
- Introduced new input options, including a dedicated section for "Post
body."
- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated control types to reflect improved functionality and user
experience in the editor.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
This PR adds the spotless formatter and validator for the JSON files
present in the project. If there is any invalid JSON file, the formatter
fails and logs the file and the error LOC to be fixed.
Since Spotless is already added to the pre-commit hook it also makes it
necessary to fix the JSON and then commit the changes.
Screenshot of the errors displayed for Invalid JSONs
### Why is this Important?
All of our datasource forms appear on the UI from the JSON configuration
files in the plugins. If an Invalid JSON is added, it can break the
datasource usage experience for the users.
One such instance happened in the past, where due to a JSON formatting
error, the users could not use Smart Substitution feature on production.
[Reference](https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/C040LHZN03V/p1721124893238579)
Fixes#34969
## Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢🟢🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉🎉🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10243164292>
> Commit: 08bc87acd2e44c4a2677d3eed1bad002f991050a
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10243164292&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 05:50:07 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
## Description
#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes#10073
#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Testing
#### How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] Manual
- [x] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced AWS Lambda plugin for executing and managing AWS Lambda
functions.
- **Enhancements**
- Updated server configuration to support new plugins.
- **Documentation**
- Added constants for new plugins in the PluginConstants interface.
- **Tests**
- Added test cases for AWS Lambda plugin functionality.
- **Chores**
- Implemented migrations to add AWS Lambda plugin to existing
workspaces.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Trisha Anand <trisha@appsmith.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
