feat: rest, graphql and curl fixed for onboarding (#29377)

## Description

This PR adds:
- functionality to REST, GraphQL and Curl import options when using
these during onboarding start with data flow. On clicking on any of
these options would take us inside application.

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #29303 
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [x] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Enhancements**
- Improved the onboarding process by integrating new application and
page identification logic within the data source creation workflow.

- **Refactor**
- Updated state management to enhance the user experience during the
onboarding phase.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
This commit is contained in:
sneha122 2023-12-07 16:12:22 +05:30 committed by GitHub
parent 6d73dcf873
commit e8b101baa3
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ import {
SAMPLE_DATASOURCES,
} from "@appsmith/constants/messages";
import { Divider } from "design-system";
import {
getApplicationByIdFromWorkspaces,
getCurrentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp,
} from "@appsmith/selectors/applicationSelectors";
const NewIntegrationsContainer = styled.div`
${thinScrollbar};
@ -312,7 +316,14 @@ class CreateNewDatasourceTab extends React.Component<
}
const mapStateToProps = (state: AppState) => {
const pageId = getCurrentPageId(state);
const onboardingAppId = getCurrentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp(state);
const onboardingApplication = getApplicationByIdFromWorkspaces(
state,
onboardingAppId || "",
);
const pageId = !!onboardingAppId
? onboardingApplication?.defaultPageId || ""
: getCurrentPageId(state);
const showDebugger = showDebuggerFlag(state);
const userWorkspacePermissions =
getCurrentAppWorkspace(state).userPermissions ?? [];