ci: added event_name schedule in client-build, rts-build, ci-test-custom-script to run them in scheduled run as well (#29724)
## Description > added event_name schedule in client-build and rts-build to run them in scheduled run as well #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) > > ## Testing > running TBP workflow to ensure nothing is impacted. #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] TBP Run ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated build workflows to trigger on scheduled events. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
This commit is contained in:
parent
1fbfb28abf
commit
8d5b389f38
3
.github/workflows/build-docker-image.yml
vendored
3
.github/workflows/build-docker-image.yml
vendored
|
|
@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ jobs:
|
|||
github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'push' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch'
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'schedule'
|
||||
defaults:
|
||||
run:
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
3
.github/workflows/ci-test-custom-script.yml
vendored
3
.github/workflows/ci-test-custom-script.yml
vendored
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ jobs:
|
|||
github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'push' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch'
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'schedule'
|
||||
defaults:
|
||||
run:
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
3
.github/workflows/client-build.yml
vendored
3
.github/workflows/client-build.yml
vendored
|
|
@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ jobs:
|
|||
github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'push' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch'
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'schedule'
|
||||
defaults:
|
||||
run:
|
||||
working-directory: app/client
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
3
.github/workflows/rts-build.yml
vendored
3
.github/workflows/rts-build.yml
vendored
|
|
@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ jobs:
|
|||
github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'push' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch'
|
||||
github.event_name == 'repository_dispatch' ||
|
||||
github.event_name == 'schedule'
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
# The checkout steps MUST happen first because the default directory is set according to the code base.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user