From 69b1a60082904bb3b1802ec91a6fe8caa6c3eada Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ramsaptami <79509062+ramsaptami@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 20:38:21 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] chore: cleaned up formatting for the template (#22670)

## Description

Cleaned up template heading and section styles on PR template

- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

---------

Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetu@appsmith.com>
---
 .github/pull_request_template.md | 81 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.github/pull_request_template.md b/.github/pull_request_template.md
index 2afc59a5d2..65f7017a91 100644
--- a/.github/pull_request_template.md
+++ b/.github/pull_request_template.md
@@ -1,52 +1,56 @@
 > Pull Request Template
 >
 > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request.
-
+>
 ## Description
-
+> Add a TL;DR when description is extra long (helps content team)
+>
 > Please include a summary of the changes and which issue has been fixed. Please also include relevant motivation
 > and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change
+>
 > Links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR
-
-> Add a TL;DR when description is extra long (helps content team)
-
-Fixes # (issue)
+>
+>
+#### PR fixes following issue(s)
+Fixes # (issue number)
 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first
-
-
-Media
+>
+>
+#### Media
 > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
-
-
-## Type of change
-
+>
+>
+#### Type of change
 > Please delete options that are not relevant.
-
 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
 - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
 - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
 - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
 - This change requires a documentation update
-
-
-## How Has This Been Tested?
-> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce.
-> Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
-> Delete anything that is not important
-
-- Manual
-- Jest
-- Cypress
-
-### Test Plan
+>
+>
+>
+## Testing
+>
+#### How Has This Been Tested?
+> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
+> Delete anything that is not relevant
+- [ ] Manual
+- [ ] Jest
+- [ ] Cypress
+>
+>
+#### Test Plan
 > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
-
-### Issues raised during DP testing
+>
+>
+#### Issues raised during DP testing
 > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
-
-
+>
+>
+>
 ## Checklist:
-### Dev activity
+#### Dev activity
 - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
 - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
 - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
@@ -57,9 +61,12 @@ Media
 - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
 
 
-### QA activity:
-- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
-- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
-- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA
-- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA
-- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test
+#### QA activity:
+- [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered
+- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest)
+- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members
+- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
+- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2
+- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
+- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
+- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed