From 5a98e8f4bae0eb6e83eba77ba63a6f32d4419a0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Favour Ohanekwu <fohanekwu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 11:39:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix: EE client-build failure (#19411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

## Description

Import Appstate from "@appsmith/ " instead of "ce/"

Fixes # (issue)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first


Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video


## Type of change

> Please delete options that are not relevant.

- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- This change requires a documentation update


## How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions, so we can reproduce.
> Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not important

- Manual
- Jest
- Cypress

### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR

### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)


## Checklist:
### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


### QA activity:
- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or
manual QA
- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after
Round 1/2 of QA
- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test

Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com>
---
 app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/JSObject/utils.ts | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/JSObject/utils.ts b/app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/JSObject/utils.ts
index 1db35c0abf..7be11c15cb 100644
--- a/app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/JSObject/utils.ts
+++ b/app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/JSObject/utils.ts
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { ParsedBody, ParsedJSSubAction } from "utils/JSPaneUtils";
 import { unset, set, get } from "lodash";
 import { BatchedJSExecutionData } from "reducers/entityReducers/jsActionsReducer";
 import { select } from "redux-saga/effects";
-import { AppState } from "ce/reducers";
+import { AppState } from "@appsmith/reducers";
 import { JSAction } from "entities/JSCollection";
 import { getJSFunctionFromName } from "selectors/entitiesSelector";
 import { isJSAction } from "@appsmith/workers/Evaluation/evaluationUtils";
@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ export function* sortJSExecutionDataByCollectionId(
     const jsAction: JSAction | undefined = yield select((state: AppState) =>
       getJSFunctionFromName(state, jsfuncFullName),
     );
+
     if (jsAction && jsAction.collectionId) {
       if (sortedData[jsAction.collectionId]) {
         sortedData[jsAction.collectionId].push({