chore: add QA checklist for PR's (#17947)

.github/pull_request_template.md

@@ -5,13 +5,19 @@
 ## Description
 
 > Please include a summary of the changes and which issue has been fixed. Please also include relevant motivation
-> and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.
+> and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change
+> Links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR
+
+> Add a TL;DR when description is extra long (helps content team)
 
 Fixes # (issue)
-
 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first
 
 
+Media
+> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
+
+
 ## Type of change
 
 > Please delete options that are not relevant.
@@ -23,7 +29,6 @@ Fixes # (issue)
 
 
 ## How Has This Been Tested?
-
 > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce.
 > Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
 > Delete anything that is not important
@@ -36,11 +41,11 @@ Fixes # (issue)
 > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
 
 ### Issues raised during DP testing
-> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
+> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
 
 
 ## Checklist:
-
+### Dev activity
 - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
 - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
 - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
@@ -48,3 +53,12 @@ Fixes # (issue)
 - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
 - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
 - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
+- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag
+
+
+### QA activity:
+- [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers
+- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA
+- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA
+- [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA
+- [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test