PromucFlow_constructor/app/client/src/entities/DataTree/dataTreeWidget.test.ts

620 lines
16 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import type { FlattenedWidgetProps } from "reducers/entityReducers/canvasWidgetsReducer";
feat: widget property setters (#23441) ## Description - This PR adds setter methods to update widget property programmatically. Example:- `Input1.setText("setter methods are cool!");` Docs link : https://docs.appsmith.com/reference/widgets For any selected widget check the `Methods` section #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [x] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/issues/2409 #### Issues raised during DP testing - [x] [Errors are not logged in the debugger](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1564017346) separate GitHub issue https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/24609 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1564155545 ( `setVisibility("false")` ) - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1580525843 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1576582825 - Blocker for testing - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1577956441 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1577930108 - Not a issue (lint error query) - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1593471791 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1591440488 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1586747864 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1596738201 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1598541537 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1611413076 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1612621567 - [ ] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1619654507 - [ ] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1621256722 > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [x] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [x] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Rishabh Rathod <rishabh.rathod@appsmith.com>
2023-07-08 14:07:26 +00:00
import {
generateDataTreeWidget,
getSetterConfig,
} from "entities/DataTree/dataTreeWidget";
import {
chore: query module evaluation (#27660) > Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description There are multiple refactors and split for query module's creator flow changes which involves module input -- it's a new entity introduced as part of modules project #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) Part of https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/modules-pod-63e0d668a7fea03850c89c6f/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/27352 #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 10:42:14 +00:00
ENTITY_TYPE_VALUE,
EvaluationSubstitutionType,
} from "entities/DataTree/dataTreeFactory";
chore: Move the widget config to widget class (#26073) ## Description - Remove the config objects from widget and config maps from the widget factory. - Introduce methods in widget development API to dynamically fetch this items. - freeze the widget configuration. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26008 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [x] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [x] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-06 12:15:04 +00:00
import WidgetFactory from "WidgetProvider/factory";
import { ValidationTypes } from "constants/WidgetValidation";
import { RenderModes } from "constants/WidgetConstants";
// const WidgetTypes = WidgetFactory.widgetTypes;
describe("generateDataTreeWidget", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
const getMetaProps = jest.spyOn(
WidgetFactory,
"getWidgetMetaPropertiesMap",
);
getMetaProps.mockReturnValueOnce({
text: undefined,
isDirty: false,
isFocused: false,
});
const getDerivedProps = jest.spyOn(
WidgetFactory,
"getWidgetDerivedPropertiesMap",
);
getDerivedProps.mockReturnValueOnce({
isValid: "{{true}}",
value: "{{this.text}}",
});
const getDefaultProps = jest.spyOn(
WidgetFactory,
"getWidgetDefaultPropertiesMap",
);
getDefaultProps.mockReturnValueOnce({
text: "defaultText",
});
const getPropertyConfig = jest.spyOn(
WidgetFactory,
"getWidgetPropertyPaneConfig",
);
getPropertyConfig.mockReturnValueOnce([
{
sectionName: "General",
children: [
{
propertyName: "inputType",
feat: [epic] appsmith design system version 2 deduplication (#22030) ## Description ### Fixes - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19383 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19384 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19385 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19386 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19387 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19388 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19389 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19390 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19391 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19392 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19393 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19394 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19395 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19396 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19397 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19398 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19399 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19400 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19401 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19402 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19403 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19404 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19405 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19406 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19407 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19408 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19409 Fixes # (issue) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video ## Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce. > Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not important - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: akash-codemonk <67054171+akash-codemonk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvi@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Arsalan <arsalanyaldram0211@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Aman Agarwal <aman@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Rohit Agarwal <rohit_agarwal@live.in> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <nilesh@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <20905988+nsarupr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvibhakta@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi Goswami <parthvigoswami@Parthvis-MacBook-Pro.local> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <vijetha@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi <80334441+Parthvi12@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Apple <nandan@thinkify.io> Co-authored-by: Saroj <43822041+sarojsarab@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sangeeth Sivan <74818788+berzerkeer@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Preet Sidhu <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <119562824+Vijetha-Kaja@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
2023-05-19 18:37:06 +00:00
label: "Data type",
controlType: "DROP_DOWN",
isBindProperty: false,
isTriggerProperty: false,
},
{
propertyName: "defaultText",
label: "Default Text",
controlType: "INPUT_TEXT",
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.TEXT },
},
{
propertyName: "placeholderText",
label: "Placeholder",
controlType: "INPUT_TEXT",
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.TEXT },
},
{
propertyName: "regex",
label: "Regex",
controlType: "INPUT_TEXT",
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.REGEX },
},
{
propertyName: "errorMessage",
feat: [epic] appsmith design system version 2 deduplication (#22030) ## Description ### Fixes - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19383 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19384 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19385 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19386 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19387 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19388 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19389 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19390 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19391 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19392 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19393 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19394 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19395 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19396 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19397 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19398 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19399 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19400 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19401 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19402 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19403 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19404 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19405 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19406 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19407 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19408 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19409 Fixes # (issue) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video ## Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce. > Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not important - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: akash-codemonk <67054171+akash-codemonk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvi@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Arsalan <arsalanyaldram0211@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Aman Agarwal <aman@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Rohit Agarwal <rohit_agarwal@live.in> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <nilesh@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <20905988+nsarupr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvibhakta@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi Goswami <parthvigoswami@Parthvis-MacBook-Pro.local> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <vijetha@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi <80334441+Parthvi12@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Apple <nandan@thinkify.io> Co-authored-by: Saroj <43822041+sarojsarab@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sangeeth Sivan <74818788+berzerkeer@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Preet Sidhu <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <119562824+Vijetha-Kaja@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
2023-05-19 18:37:06 +00:00
label: "Error message",
controlType: "INPUT_TEXT",
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.TEXT },
},
{
propertyName: "isRequired",
label: "Required",
controlType: "SWITCH",
isJSConvertible: true,
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
},
{
propertyName: "isVisible",
label: "Visible",
controlType: "SWITCH",
isJSConvertible: true,
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
},
{
propertyName: "isDisabled",
label: "Disabled",
controlType: "SWITCH",
isJSConvertible: true,
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
},
{
propertyName: "resetOnSubmit",
label: "Reset on submit",
controlType: "SWITCH",
isJSConvertible: true,
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: false,
validation: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
},
],
},
{
sectionName: "Events",
children: [
{
propertyName: "onTextChanged",
label: "onTextChanged",
controlType: "ACTION_SELECTOR",
isJSConvertible: true,
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: true,
},
{
propertyName: "onSubmit",
label: "onSubmit",
controlType: "ACTION_SELECTOR",
isJSConvertible: true,
isBindProperty: true,
isTriggerProperty: true,
},
],
},
]);
});
afterEach(() => {
jest.clearAllMocks();
});
it("generates enhanced widget with the right properties", () => {
const widget: FlattenedWidgetProps = {
bottomRow: 0,
isLoading: false,
leftColumn: 0,
parentColumnSpace: 0,
parentRowSpace: 0,
renderMode: RenderModes.CANVAS,
rightColumn: 0,
topRow: 0,
type: "INPUT_WIDGET_V2",
version: 0,
widgetId: "123",
widgetName: "Input1",
defaultText: "",
feat: JSON Form widget (#8472) * initial layout * updated parser to support nested array * array field rendering * changes * ts fix * minor revert FormWidget * modified schema structure * select and switch fields * added checkbox field * added RadioGroupField * partial DateField and defaults, typing refactoring * added label and field type change * minor ts changes * changes * modified widget/utils for nested panelConfig, modified schema to object approach * array/object label support * hide field configuration when children not present * added tooltip * field visibility option * disabled state * upgraded tslib, form initial values * custom field configuration - add/hide/edit * field configuration - label change * return input when field configuration reaches max depth * minor changes * form - scroll, fixedfooter, enitity defn and other minior changes * form title * unregister on unmount * fixes * zero state * fix field padding * patched updating form values, removed linting warnings * configured action buttons * minor fix * minor change * property pane - sort fields in field configuration * refactor include all properties * checkbox properties * date properties * refactor typings and radio group properties * switch, multselect, select, array, object properties * minor changes * default value * ts fixes * checkbox field properties implementation * date field prop implementation * switch field * select field and fix deep nested meta properties * multiselect implementation * minor change * input field implementation * fix position jump on field type change * initial accordian * field state property and auto-complete of JSONFormComputeControl * merge fixes * renamed FormBuilder to JSONForm * source data validation minor change * custom field default value fix * Editable keys for custom field * minor fixes * replaced useFieldArray with custom logic, added widget icon * array and object accordian with border/background styling * minor change * disabled states for array and objects * default value minor fix * form level styles * modified logic for isDisabled for array and object, added disabledWhenInvalid, exposed isValid to fieldState for text input, removed useDisableChildren * added isValid for all field types * fixed reset to default values * debounce form values update * minor change * minor change * fix crash - source data change multi-select to array, fix crash - change of options * fix positioning * detect date type in source data * fix crash - when object is passed to regex input field * fixed default sourceData path for fields * accodion keep children mounted on collapse * jest test for schemaParser * widget/helper and useRegisterFieldInvalid test * tests for property config helper and generatePanelPropertyConfig * fix input field validation not appearing * fix date field type detection * rename data -> formData * handle null/undefined field value change in sourceData * added null/undefined as valid values for defaultValue text field * auto detect email field * set formData default value on initial load * switch field inline positioning * field margin fix for row direction * select full width * fiex date field default value - out of range * fix any field type to array * array default value logic change * base cypress test changes * initial json form render cy test * key sanitization * fix fieldState update logic * required design, object/array background color, accordion changes, fix - add new custom field * minor change * cypress tests * fix date formatted value, field state cypress test * cypress - field properties test and fixes * rename test file * fix accessort change to blank value, cypress tests * fix array field default value for modified accessor * minor fix * added animate loading * fix empty state, add new custom field * test data fix * fix warnings * fix timePrecision visibility * button styling * ported input v2 * fix jest tests * fix cypress tests * perf changes * perf improvement * added comments * multiselect changes * input field perf refactor * array field, object field refactor performance * checkbox field refactor * refectored date, radio, select and switch * fixes * test fixes * fixes * minor fix * rename field renderer * remove tracked fieldRenderer field * cypress test fixes * cypress changes * array default value fixes * arrayfield passedDefaultValue * auto enabled JS mode for few properties, reverted swith and date property controls * cypress changes * added widget sniping mode and fixed object passedDefaultValue * multiselect v2 * select v2 * fix jest tests * test fixes * field limit * rename field type dropdown texts * field type changes fixes * jest fixes * loading state submit button * default source data for new widget * modify limit message * multiseelct default value changes and cypress fix * select default value * keep default value intact on field type change * TextTable cypress text fix * review changes * fixed footer changes * collapse styles section by default * fixed footer changes * form modes * custom field key rentention * fixed footer fix in view mode * non ascii characters * fix meta merge in dataTreeWidget * minor fixes * rename useRegisterFieldInvalid.ts -> useRegisterFieldValidity.ts * modified dependency injection into evaluated values * refactored fixedfooter logic * minor change * accessor update * minor change * fixes * QA fixes date field, scroll content * fix phone number field, removed visiblity option from array item * fix sourceData autocomplete * reset logic * fix multiselect reset * form values hydration on widget drag * code review changes * reverted order of merge dataTreeWidget * fixes * added button titles, fixed hydration issue * default value fixes * upgraded react hook form, modified array-level/field-level default value logic * fixed select validation * added icon entity explorer, modified icon align control * modify accessor validation for mongo db _id * update email field regex * review changes * explicitly handle empty source data validation
2022-03-24 07:13:25 +00:00
deepObj: {
level1: {
value: 10,
},
},
};
const widgetMetaProps: Record<string, unknown> = {
text: "Tester",
isDirty: true,
feat: JSON Form widget (#8472) * initial layout * updated parser to support nested array * array field rendering * changes * ts fix * minor revert FormWidget * modified schema structure * select and switch fields * added checkbox field * added RadioGroupField * partial DateField and defaults, typing refactoring * added label and field type change * minor ts changes * changes * modified widget/utils for nested panelConfig, modified schema to object approach * array/object label support * hide field configuration when children not present * added tooltip * field visibility option * disabled state * upgraded tslib, form initial values * custom field configuration - add/hide/edit * field configuration - label change * return input when field configuration reaches max depth * minor changes * form - scroll, fixedfooter, enitity defn and other minior changes * form title * unregister on unmount * fixes * zero state * fix field padding * patched updating form values, removed linting warnings * configured action buttons * minor fix * minor change * property pane - sort fields in field configuration * refactor include all properties * checkbox properties * date properties * refactor typings and radio group properties * switch, multselect, select, array, object properties * minor changes * default value * ts fixes * checkbox field properties implementation * date field prop implementation * switch field * select field and fix deep nested meta properties * multiselect implementation * minor change * input field implementation * fix position jump on field type change * initial accordian * field state property and auto-complete of JSONFormComputeControl * merge fixes * renamed FormBuilder to JSONForm * source data validation minor change * custom field default value fix * Editable keys for custom field * minor fixes * replaced useFieldArray with custom logic, added widget icon * array and object accordian with border/background styling * minor change * disabled states for array and objects * default value minor fix * form level styles * modified logic for isDisabled for array and object, added disabledWhenInvalid, exposed isValid to fieldState for text input, removed useDisableChildren * added isValid for all field types * fixed reset to default values * debounce form values update * minor change * minor change * fix crash - source data change multi-select to array, fix crash - change of options * fix positioning * detect date type in source data * fix crash - when object is passed to regex input field * fixed default sourceData path for fields * accodion keep children mounted on collapse * jest test for schemaParser * widget/helper and useRegisterFieldInvalid test * tests for property config helper and generatePanelPropertyConfig * fix input field validation not appearing * fix date field type detection * rename data -> formData * handle null/undefined field value change in sourceData * added null/undefined as valid values for defaultValue text field * auto detect email field * set formData default value on initial load * switch field inline positioning * field margin fix for row direction * select full width * fiex date field default value - out of range * fix any field type to array * array default value logic change * base cypress test changes * initial json form render cy test * key sanitization * fix fieldState update logic * required design, object/array background color, accordion changes, fix - add new custom field * minor change * cypress tests * fix date formatted value, field state cypress test * cypress - field properties test and fixes * rename test file * fix accessort change to blank value, cypress tests * fix array field default value for modified accessor * minor fix * added animate loading * fix empty state, add new custom field * test data fix * fix warnings * fix timePrecision visibility * button styling * ported input v2 * fix jest tests * fix cypress tests * perf changes * perf improvement * added comments * multiselect changes * input field perf refactor * array field, object field refactor performance * checkbox field refactor * refectored date, radio, select and switch * fixes * test fixes * fixes * minor fix * rename field renderer * remove tracked fieldRenderer field * cypress test fixes * cypress changes * array default value fixes * arrayfield passedDefaultValue * auto enabled JS mode for few properties, reverted swith and date property controls * cypress changes * added widget sniping mode and fixed object passedDefaultValue * multiselect v2 * select v2 * fix jest tests * test fixes * field limit * rename field type dropdown texts * field type changes fixes * jest fixes * loading state submit button * default source data for new widget * modify limit message * multiseelct default value changes and cypress fix * select default value * keep default value intact on field type change * TextTable cypress text fix * review changes * fixed footer changes * collapse styles section by default * fixed footer changes * form modes * custom field key rentention * fixed footer fix in view mode * non ascii characters * fix meta merge in dataTreeWidget * minor fixes * rename useRegisterFieldInvalid.ts -> useRegisterFieldValidity.ts * modified dependency injection into evaluated values * refactored fixedfooter logic * minor change * accessor update * minor change * fixes * QA fixes date field, scroll content * fix phone number field, removed visiblity option from array item * fix sourceData autocomplete * reset logic * fix multiselect reset * form values hydration on widget drag * code review changes * reverted order of merge dataTreeWidget * fixes * added button titles, fixed hydration issue * default value fixes * upgraded react hook form, modified array-level/field-level default value logic * fixed select validation * added icon entity explorer, modified icon align control * modify accessor validation for mongo db _id * update email field regex * review changes * explicitly handle empty source data validation
2022-03-24 07:13:25 +00:00
deepObj: {
level1: {
metaValue: 10,
},
},
};
const getMetaProps = jest.spyOn(
WidgetFactory,
"getWidgetMetaPropertiesMap",
);
getMetaProps.mockReturnValueOnce({
text: true,
isDirty: true,
});
const bindingPaths = {
defaultText: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
placeholderText: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
regex: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
resetOnSubmit: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
isVisible: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
isRequired: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
isDisabled: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
errorMessage: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
};
fix: Improving performance of JS evaluations by splitting the data tree (#21547) ## Description This is the second phase of the split data tree. In the previous version, we collected all config paths in each entity and put them in the `__config__` property. All those config properties do get inserted into final data tree which we don't need at all. As part of this change, we will be creating another tree i.e **'configTree'** which will contain all config of each entity. unEvalTree is split into 2 trees => 1. unEvalTree 2. configTree Example: previous unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1766" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215990868-0b095421-e7b8-44bc-89aa-065b35e237d6.png"> After this change unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1758" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991045-506fb10a-645a-4aad-8e77-0f3786a86977.png"> Note- above example doesn't have '__config__' property configTree Api1 content <img width="1760" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991169-a2e03443-5d6a-4ff1-97c5-a12593e46395.png"> ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - #11351 ## How Has This Been Tested? - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2023-03-20 11:04:02 +00:00
const expectedData = {
value: "{{Input1.text}}",
isDirty: true,
isFocused: false,
isValid: "{{true}}",
text: "Tester",
bottomRow: 0,
isLoading: false,
leftColumn: 0,
parentColumnSpace: 0,
parentRowSpace: 0,
rightColumn: 0,
renderMode: RenderModes.CANVAS,
version: 0,
topRow: 0,
widgetId: "123",
widgetName: "Input1",
chore: query module evaluation (#27660) > Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description There are multiple refactors and split for query module's creator flow changes which involves module input -- it's a new entity introduced as part of modules project #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) Part of https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/modules-pod-63e0d668a7fea03850c89c6f/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/27352 #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 10:42:14 +00:00
ENTITY_TYPE: ENTITY_TYPE_VALUE.WIDGET,
componentWidth: 0,
componentHeight: 0,
defaultText: "",
fix: Improving performance of JS evaluations by splitting the data tree (#21547) ## Description This is the second phase of the split data tree. In the previous version, we collected all config paths in each entity and put them in the `__config__` property. All those config properties do get inserted into final data tree which we don't need at all. As part of this change, we will be creating another tree i.e **'configTree'** which will contain all config of each entity. unEvalTree is split into 2 trees => 1. unEvalTree 2. configTree Example: previous unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1766" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215990868-0b095421-e7b8-44bc-89aa-065b35e237d6.png"> After this change unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1758" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991045-506fb10a-645a-4aad-8e77-0f3786a86977.png"> Note- above example doesn't have '__config__' property configTree Api1 content <img width="1760" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991169-a2e03443-5d6a-4ff1-97c5-a12593e46395.png"> ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - #11351 ## How Has This Been Tested? - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2023-03-20 11:04:02 +00:00
type: "INPUT_WIDGET_V2",
feat: JSON Form widget (#8472) * initial layout * updated parser to support nested array * array field rendering * changes * ts fix * minor revert FormWidget * modified schema structure * select and switch fields * added checkbox field * added RadioGroupField * partial DateField and defaults, typing refactoring * added label and field type change * minor ts changes * changes * modified widget/utils for nested panelConfig, modified schema to object approach * array/object label support * hide field configuration when children not present * added tooltip * field visibility option * disabled state * upgraded tslib, form initial values * custom field configuration - add/hide/edit * field configuration - label change * return input when field configuration reaches max depth * minor changes * form - scroll, fixedfooter, enitity defn and other minior changes * form title * unregister on unmount * fixes * zero state * fix field padding * patched updating form values, removed linting warnings * configured action buttons * minor fix * minor change * property pane - sort fields in field configuration * refactor include all properties * checkbox properties * date properties * refactor typings and radio group properties * switch, multselect, select, array, object properties * minor changes * default value * ts fixes * checkbox field properties implementation * date field prop implementation * switch field * select field and fix deep nested meta properties * multiselect implementation * minor change * input field implementation * fix position jump on field type change * initial accordian * field state property and auto-complete of JSONFormComputeControl * merge fixes * renamed FormBuilder to JSONForm * source data validation minor change * custom field default value fix * Editable keys for custom field * minor fixes * replaced useFieldArray with custom logic, added widget icon * array and object accordian with border/background styling * minor change * disabled states for array and objects * default value minor fix * form level styles * modified logic for isDisabled for array and object, added disabledWhenInvalid, exposed isValid to fieldState for text input, removed useDisableChildren * added isValid for all field types * fixed reset to default values * debounce form values update * minor change * minor change * fix crash - source data change multi-select to array, fix crash - change of options * fix positioning * detect date type in source data * fix crash - when object is passed to regex input field * fixed default sourceData path for fields * accodion keep children mounted on collapse * jest test for schemaParser * widget/helper and useRegisterFieldInvalid test * tests for property config helper and generatePanelPropertyConfig * fix input field validation not appearing * fix date field type detection * rename data -> formData * handle null/undefined field value change in sourceData * added null/undefined as valid values for defaultValue text field * auto detect email field * set formData default value on initial load * switch field inline positioning * field margin fix for row direction * select full width * fiex date field default value - out of range * fix any field type to array * array default value logic change * base cypress test changes * initial json form render cy test * key sanitization * fix fieldState update logic * required design, object/array background color, accordion changes, fix - add new custom field * minor change * cypress tests * fix date formatted value, field state cypress test * cypress - field properties test and fixes * rename test file * fix accessort change to blank value, cypress tests * fix array field default value for modified accessor * minor fix * added animate loading * fix empty state, add new custom field * test data fix * fix warnings * fix timePrecision visibility * button styling * ported input v2 * fix jest tests * fix cypress tests * perf changes * perf improvement * added comments * multiselect changes * input field perf refactor * array field, object field refactor performance * checkbox field refactor * refectored date, radio, select and switch * fixes * test fixes * fixes * minor fix * rename field renderer * remove tracked fieldRenderer field * cypress test fixes * cypress changes * array default value fixes * arrayfield passedDefaultValue * auto enabled JS mode for few properties, reverted swith and date property controls * cypress changes * added widget sniping mode and fixed object passedDefaultValue * multiselect v2 * select v2 * fix jest tests * test fixes * field limit * rename field type dropdown texts * field type changes fixes * jest fixes * loading state submit button * default source data for new widget * modify limit message * multiseelct default value changes and cypress fix * select default value * keep default value intact on field type change * TextTable cypress text fix * review changes * fixed footer changes * collapse styles section by default * fixed footer changes * form modes * custom field key rentention * fixed footer fix in view mode * non ascii characters * fix meta merge in dataTreeWidget * minor fixes * rename useRegisterFieldInvalid.ts -> useRegisterFieldValidity.ts * modified dependency injection into evaluated values * refactored fixedfooter logic * minor change * accessor update * minor change * fixes * QA fixes date field, scroll content * fix phone number field, removed visiblity option from array item * fix sourceData autocomplete * reset logic * fix multiselect reset * form values hydration on widget drag * code review changes * reverted order of merge dataTreeWidget * fixes * added button titles, fixed hydration issue * default value fixes * upgraded react hook form, modified array-level/field-level default value logic * fixed select validation * added icon entity explorer, modified icon align control * modify accessor validation for mongo db _id * update email field regex * review changes * explicitly handle empty source data validation
2022-03-24 07:13:25 +00:00
deepObj: {
level1: {
metaValue: 10,
},
},
meta: {
text: "Tester",
isDirty: true,
deepObj: {
level1: {
metaValue: 10,
},
},
},
};
fix: Improving performance of JS evaluations by splitting the data tree (#21547) ## Description This is the second phase of the split data tree. In the previous version, we collected all config paths in each entity and put them in the `__config__` property. All those config properties do get inserted into final data tree which we don't need at all. As part of this change, we will be creating another tree i.e **'configTree'** which will contain all config of each entity. unEvalTree is split into 2 trees => 1. unEvalTree 2. configTree Example: previous unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1766" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215990868-0b095421-e7b8-44bc-89aa-065b35e237d6.png"> After this change unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1758" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991045-506fb10a-645a-4aad-8e77-0f3786a86977.png"> Note- above example doesn't have '__config__' property configTree Api1 content <img width="1760" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991169-a2e03443-5d6a-4ff1-97c5-a12593e46395.png"> ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - #11351 ## How Has This Been Tested? - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2023-03-20 11:04:02 +00:00
const expectedConfig = {
chore: query module evaluation (#27660) > Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description There are multiple refactors and split for query module's creator flow changes which involves module input -- it's a new entity introduced as part of modules project #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) Part of https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/modules-pod-63e0d668a7fea03850c89c6f/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/27352 #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 10:42:14 +00:00
ENTITY_TYPE: ENTITY_TYPE_VALUE.WIDGET,
fix: Improving performance of JS evaluations by splitting the data tree (#21547) ## Description This is the second phase of the split data tree. In the previous version, we collected all config paths in each entity and put them in the `__config__` property. All those config properties do get inserted into final data tree which we don't need at all. As part of this change, we will be creating another tree i.e **'configTree'** which will contain all config of each entity. unEvalTree is split into 2 trees => 1. unEvalTree 2. configTree Example: previous unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1766" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215990868-0b095421-e7b8-44bc-89aa-065b35e237d6.png"> After this change unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1758" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991045-506fb10a-645a-4aad-8e77-0f3786a86977.png"> Note- above example doesn't have '__config__' property configTree Api1 content <img width="1760" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991169-a2e03443-5d6a-4ff1-97c5-a12593e46395.png"> ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - #11351 ## How Has This Been Tested? - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2023-03-20 11:04:02 +00:00
widgetId: "123",
bindingPaths,
reactivePaths: {
...bindingPaths,
isDirty: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
isFocused: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
isValid: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
text: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
value: EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
"meta.text": EvaluationSubstitutionType.TEMPLATE,
},
triggerPaths: {
onSubmit: true,
onTextChanged: true,
},
type: "INPUT_WIDGET_V2",
validationPaths: {
defaultText: { type: ValidationTypes.TEXT },
errorMessage: { type: ValidationTypes.TEXT },
isDisabled: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
isRequired: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
isVisible: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
placeholderText: { type: ValidationTypes.TEXT },
regex: { type: ValidationTypes.REGEX },
resetOnSubmit: { type: ValidationTypes.BOOLEAN },
},
dynamicBindingPathList: [
{
key: "isValid",
},
{
key: "value",
},
],
logBlackList: {
isValid: true,
value: true,
},
propertyOverrideDependency: {
text: {
DEFAULT: "defaultText",
META: "meta.text",
},
},
defaultMetaProps: ["text", "isDirty", "isFocused"],
defaultProps: {
text: "defaultText",
},
overridingPropertyPaths: {
defaultText: ["text", "meta.text"],
"meta.text": ["text"],
},
privateWidgets: {},
isMetaPropDirty: true,
};
feat: Update isLoading peoperty of widgets after API/Query execution (#27406) ## Description In this PR, we ensure that after API execution, data is available in the dataTree before setting widget isLoading to false. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #26935 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-18 18:45:44 +00:00
const result = generateDataTreeWidget(widget, widgetMetaProps, new Set());
fix: Improving performance of JS evaluations by splitting the data tree (#21547) ## Description This is the second phase of the split data tree. In the previous version, we collected all config paths in each entity and put them in the `__config__` property. All those config properties do get inserted into final data tree which we don't need at all. As part of this change, we will be creating another tree i.e **'configTree'** which will contain all config of each entity. unEvalTree is split into 2 trees => 1. unEvalTree 2. configTree Example: previous unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1766" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215990868-0b095421-e7b8-44bc-89aa-065b35e237d6.png"> After this change unEvalTree Api1 content <img width="1758" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991045-506fb10a-645a-4aad-8e77-0f3786a86977.png"> Note- above example doesn't have '__config__' property configTree Api1 content <img width="1760" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7846888/215991169-a2e03443-5d6a-4ff1-97c5-a12593e46395.png"> ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - #11351 ## How Has This Been Tested? - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2023-03-20 11:04:02 +00:00
expect(result.unEvalEntity).toStrictEqual(expectedData);
expect(result.configEntity).toStrictEqual(expectedConfig);
});
feat: widget property setters (#23441) ## Description - This PR adds setter methods to update widget property programmatically. Example:- `Input1.setText("setter methods are cool!");` Docs link : https://docs.appsmith.com/reference/widgets For any selected widget check the `Methods` section #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [x] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/issues/2409 #### Issues raised during DP testing - [x] [Errors are not logged in the debugger](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1564017346) separate GitHub issue https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/24609 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1564155545 ( `setVisibility("false")` ) - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1580525843 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1576582825 - Blocker for testing - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1577956441 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1577930108 - Not a issue (lint error query) - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1593471791 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1591440488 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1586747864 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1596738201 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1598541537 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1611413076 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1612621567 - [ ] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1619654507 - [ ] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23441#issuecomment-1621256722 > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [x] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [x] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Rishabh Rathod <rishabh.rathod@appsmith.com>
2023-07-08 14:07:26 +00:00
it("generates setterConfig with the dynamic data", () => {
// Input widget
const inputWidget: FlattenedWidgetProps = {
bottomRow: 0,
isLoading: false,
leftColumn: 0,
parentColumnSpace: 0,
parentRowSpace: 0,
renderMode: RenderModes.CANVAS,
rightColumn: 0,
topRow: 0,
type: "INPUT_WIDGET_V2",
version: 0,
widgetId: "123",
widgetName: "Input1",
defaultText: "",
deepObj: {
level1: {
value: 10,
},
},
};
const inputSetterConfig: Record<string, any> = {
__setters: {
setVisibility: {
path: "isVisible",
type: "boolean",
},
setDisabled: {
path: "isDisabled",
type: "boolean",
},
setRequired: {
path: "isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
setValue: {
path: "defaultText",
type: "string",
},
},
};
const expectedInputData = {
__setters: {
setVisibility: {
path: "Input1.isVisible",
type: "boolean",
},
setDisabled: {
path: "Input1.isDisabled",
type: "boolean",
},
setRequired: {
path: "Input1.isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
setValue: {
path: "Input1.defaultText",
type: "string",
},
},
};
const inputResult = getSetterConfig(inputSetterConfig, inputWidget);
expect(inputResult).toStrictEqual(expectedInputData);
//Json form widget
const jsonFormWidget: FlattenedWidgetProps = {
bottomRow: 0,
isLoading: false,
leftColumn: 0,
parentColumnSpace: 0,
parentRowSpace: 0,
renderMode: RenderModes.CANVAS,
rightColumn: 0,
topRow: 0,
type: "FORM_WIDGET",
version: 0,
widgetId: "123",
widgetName: "Form1",
defaultText: "",
deepObj: {
level1: {
value: 10,
},
},
};
const jsonFormSetterConfig: Record<string, any> = {
__setters: {
setVisibility: {
path: "isVisible",
type: "boolean",
},
setData: {
path: "sourceData",
type: "object",
},
},
};
const expectedJsonFormData = {
__setters: {
setVisibility: {
path: "Form1.isVisible",
type: "boolean",
},
setData: {
path: "Form1.sourceData",
type: "object",
},
},
};
const jsonFormResult = getSetterConfig(
jsonFormSetterConfig,
jsonFormWidget,
);
expect(jsonFormResult).toStrictEqual(expectedJsonFormData);
// Table widget
const tableWidget: FlattenedWidgetProps = {
bottomRow: 0,
isLoading: false,
leftColumn: 0,
parentColumnSpace: 0,
parentRowSpace: 0,
renderMode: RenderModes.CANVAS,
rightColumn: 0,
topRow: 0,
type: "TABLE_WIDGET",
version: 0,
widgetId: "123",
widgetName: "Table1",
defaultText: "",
deepObj: {
level1: {
value: 10,
},
},
primaryColumns: {
step: {
index: 0,
width: 150,
id: "step",
horizontalAlignment: "LEFT",
verticalAlignment: "CENTER",
columnType: "text",
textSize: "PARAGRAPH",
enableFilter: true,
enableSort: true,
isVisible: true,
isCellVisible: true,
isDerived: false,
label: "step",
computedValue:
"{{Table1.sanitizedTableData.map((currentRow) => ( currentRow.step))}}",
},
task: {
index: 1,
width: 150,
id: "task",
horizontalAlignment: "LEFT",
verticalAlignment: "CENTER",
columnType: "text",
textSize: "PARAGRAPH",
enableFilter: true,
enableSort: true,
isVisible: true,
isCellVisible: true,
isDerived: false,
label: "task",
computedValue:
"{{Table1.sanitizedTableData.map((currentRow) => ( currentRow.task))}}",
},
status: {
index: 2,
width: 150,
id: "status",
horizontalAlignment: "LEFT",
verticalAlignment: "CENTER",
columnType: "text",
textSize: "PARAGRAPH",
enableFilter: true,
enableSort: true,
isVisible: true,
isCellVisible: true,
isDerived: false,
label: "status",
computedValue:
"{{Table1.sanitizedTableData.map((currentRow) => ( currentRow.status))}}",
},
action: {
index: 3,
width: 150,
id: "action",
horizontalAlignment: "LEFT",
verticalAlignment: "CENTER",
columnType: "button",
textSize: "PARAGRAPH",
enableFilter: true,
enableSort: true,
isVisible: true,
isCellVisible: true,
isDisabled: false,
isDerived: false,
label: "action",
onClick:
"{{currentRow.step === '#1' ? showAlert('Done', 'success') : currentRow.step === '#2' ? navigateTo('https://docs.appsmith.com/core-concepts/connecting-to-data-sources/querying-a-database',undefined,'NEW_WINDOW') : navigateTo('https://docs.appsmith.com/core-concepts/displaying-data-read/display-data-tables',undefined,'NEW_WINDOW')}}",
computedValue:
"{{Table1.sanitizedTableData.map((currentRow) => ( currentRow.action))}}",
},
},
};
const tableSetterConfig: Record<string, any> = {
__setters: {
setVisibility: {
path: "isVisible",
type: "string",
},
setSelectedRowIndex: {
path: "defaultSelectedRowIndex",
type: "number",
disabled: "return options.entity.multiRowSelection",
},
setSelectedRowIndices: {
path: "defaultSelectedRowIndices",
type: "array",
disabled: "return !options.entity.multiRowSelection",
},
setData: {
path: "tableData",
type: "object",
},
},
text: {
__setters: {
setIsRequired: {
path: "primaryColumns.$columnId.isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
},
},
button: {
__setters: {
setIsRequired: {
path: "primaryColumns.$columnId.isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
},
},
pathToSetters: [
{ path: "primaryColumns.$columnId", property: "columnType" },
],
};
const expectedTableData = {
__setters: {
setVisibility: {
path: "Table1.isVisible",
type: "string",
},
setSelectedRowIndex: {
path: "Table1.defaultSelectedRowIndex",
type: "number",
disabled: "return options.entity.multiRowSelection",
},
setSelectedRowIndices: {
path: "Table1.defaultSelectedRowIndices",
type: "array",
disabled: "return !options.entity.multiRowSelection",
},
setData: {
path: "Table1.tableData",
type: "object",
},
"primaryColumns.action.setIsRequired": {
path: "Table1.primaryColumns.action.isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
"primaryColumns.status.setIsRequired": {
path: "Table1.primaryColumns.status.isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
"primaryColumns.step.setIsRequired": {
path: "Table1.primaryColumns.step.isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
"primaryColumns.task.setIsRequired": {
path: "Table1.primaryColumns.task.isRequired",
type: "boolean",
},
},
};
const tableResult = getSetterConfig(tableSetterConfig, tableWidget);
expect(tableResult).toStrictEqual(expectedTableData);
});
});