Protei/PromucFlow_constructor
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
d5c368b4cc
PromucFlow_constructor/app/client/packages/dsl/package.json

32 lines
916 B
JSON
Raw Normal View History

feat: Shared Package for DSL based operations (#23894) ## Description Splitting DSL into different files when saving into git #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #23763 #### Media #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing Manual Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 06:55:55 +00:00
{
fix: Chromatic build issue (#26368) Fixes build issue that happened on the promotional PR: release v1.9.33 It happened due to our recent change in the node version. npm started behaving differently. ~This PR removes post install script in ast and dsl so that there is no conflict between package names between ast and ast/build.~
2023-08-16 09:49:21 +00:00
"name": "@shared/dsl",
"private": true,
"version": "1.0.0",
fix: remove redundant package builds (#27868) ## Description Remove redundant package builds
2023-10-09 11:50:26 +00:00
"main": "src/index.ts",
fix: Chromatic build issue (#26368) Fixes build issue that happened on the promotional PR: release v1.9.33 It happened due to our recent change in the node version. npm started behaving differently. ~This PR removes post install script in ast and dsl so that there is no conflict between package names between ast and ast/build.~
2023-08-16 09:49:21 +00:00
"scripts": {
"test:unit": "jest -b --colors --no-cache --silent --coverage --collectCoverage=true --coverageDirectory='./' --coverageReporters='json-summary'",
"test:jest": "jest --watch",
"lint": "yarn g:lint",
"prettier": "yarn g:prettier",
"start": "rollup -c",
fix: remove redundant package builds (#27868) ## Description Remove redundant package builds
2023-10-09 11:50:26 +00:00
"build": "rollup -c"
fix: Chromatic build issue (#26368) Fixes build issue that happened on the promotional PR: release v1.9.33 It happened due to our recent change in the node version. npm started behaving differently. ~This PR removes post install script in ast and dsl so that there is no conflict between package names between ast and ast/build.~
2023-08-16 09:49:21 +00:00
},
"dependencies": {
"@babel/runtime": "^7.21.0",
"@rollup/plugin-commonjs": "^22.0.0",
"@types/escodegen": "^0.0.7",
"@types/lodash": "^4.14.120",
"normalizr": "^3.6.2",
"rollup": "^2.77.0",
"rollup-plugin-generate-package-json": "^3.2.0",
"rollup-plugin-peer-deps-external": "^2.2.4",
"rollup-plugin-typescript2": "^0.32.0",
chore: upgrade typescript to 5.4 (#35181) ## Description Upgrade Typescript from 4.9.5 to 5.4 Upgrading to 5.5 is not possible until we upgrade colors.js lib. It will be done in separate PR More details here https://github.com/color-js/color.js/issues/560#issuecomment-2182819685 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10163124159> > Commit: 8d2e93f2e2913e715686ccb058d3efddd55aabc9 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10163124159&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:11:42 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Updated TypeScript dependency to the latest version (5.4), enhancing overall functionality with potential new features and improvements. - **Improvements** - Enhanced type safety by refining the `isString` function, allowing better type inference and preventing runtime errors. - Improved comments and annotations in the `indirectEval` function for better clarity on its usage and intent. - Corrected typographical errors in error handling logic across multiple controllers, improving reliability in error messaging. - Updated export style for `IconNames` to clarify its purpose as a type, enhancing developer experience. - **Configuration Changes** - Updated Jest configurations to better support ECMAScript Modules (ESM), improving compatibility and allowing for more flexible module handling. - Adjusted TypeScript configuration to enhance module handling and compatibility. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-07-30 14:15:48 +00:00
"typescript": "5.4"
fix: Chromatic build issue (#26368) Fixes build issue that happened on the promotional PR: release v1.9.33 It happened due to our recent change in the node version. npm started behaving differently. ~This PR removes post install script in ast and dsl so that there is no conflict between package names between ast and ast/build.~
2023-08-16 09:49:21 +00:00
},
"devDependencies": {
feat: dsl migration with server (#28518) ## Description 1. Shifts DSL migration logic to @shared/dsl 2. Exposes /migrate/dsl endpoint on rts 3. Integrates RTS endpoint to backend for serving migrated pages 4. Introduces feature flag to switch between client-based and server-based on-demand migration #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #26783, #26784, #26980 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [x] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com>
2023-11-30 12:33:33 +00:00
"@rollup/plugin-json": "^6.0.0",
fix: Chromatic build issue (#26368) Fixes build issue that happened on the promotional PR: release v1.9.33 It happened due to our recent change in the node version. npm started behaving differently. ~This PR removes post install script in ast and dsl so that there is no conflict between package names between ast and ast/build.~
2023-08-16 09:49:21 +00:00
"jest": "^29.5.0",
"ts-jest": "^29.1.0"
}
feat: Shared Package for DSL based operations (#23894) ## Description Splitting DSL into different files when saving into git #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #23763 #### Media #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing Manual Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 06:55:55 +00:00
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink