Protei/PromucFlow_constructor
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
52c97317a3
PromucFlow_constructor/app/client/src/ce/entities/FeatureFlag.ts

105 lines
4.8 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

feat: activation phase 1 (#25126) Feature implementations: - Schema in the Api Right Side Pane; - New Bindings UI, which is now a suggested widget; - Feature walkthrough for the aforementioned two units only if you are a new user. Only those users who have the flags `ab_ds_binding_enabled` and `ab_ds_schema_enabled` independently set to true can see the implementation described above. https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Activation-60c64894f42d4cdcb92220c1dbc73802
2023-07-12 06:42:16 +00:00
// Please follow naming convention : https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Using-Feature-Flags-in-Appsmith-d362fe7acc7d4ef0aa12e1f5f9b83b5f?pvs=4#f6d4242e56284e84af25cadef71b7aeb to create feature flags.
feat: Flagsmith Integration (#24472) ## Description > This PR integrates Flagsmith feature flagging into the Appsmith codebase > It also sets some default traits such as instance_id, tenant_id and email/hashed email to the new and existing users #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #24037 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com>
2023-06-27 10:45:33 +00:00
export const FEATURE_FLAG = {
TEST_FLAG: "TEST_FLAG",
chore: Renaming feature flags for ME to lower case (#25079)
2023-07-05 06:58:18 +00:00
release_datasource_environments_enabled:
"release_datasource_environments_enabled",
chore: Move app navigation logo upload to Flagsmith (#25545) ## Description Quite simply use replace `APP_NAVIGATION_LOGO_UPLOAD` flag on FF4J to `release_appnavigationlogoupload_enabled` on Flagsmith. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #25184 #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also, list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-21 08:43:36 +00:00
release_appnavigationlogoupload_enabled:
"release_appnavigationlogoupload_enabled",
chore: Refactors hide embed share setting flag. (#25284) ## Description As we are deprecating FF4J system in favour of flagsmith. This PR renames APP_EMBED_VIEW_HIDE_SHARE_SETTINGS_VISIBILITY to release_embed_hide_share_settings_enabled #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #25232 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-12 13:49:49 +00:00
release_embed_hide_share_settings_enabled:
"release_embed_hide_share_settings_enabled",
revert: "chore: Remove server side filtering flag (#27663)" (#27927) This reverts commit eb567c0af5c80711821630c11aa749d9bd1d7856. ## Description This PR moves the server-side filtering feature back to under a feature flag by reverting #27663. We feel that we are not ready to release this feature to the public yet. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-12 08:24:03 +00:00
release_table_serverside_filtering_enabled:
"release_table_serverside_filtering_enabled",
feat: one click code splitting - Branding, SSO (#25231) ## Description Adds Support to show different versions of the following pages based on the plan the user is subscribed to. -Branding -SSO #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/issues/1800 #### Media https://www.notion.so/appsmith/POC-Code-Splitting-1-Click-Upgrade-Downgrade-Frontend-4fe83a8de6c54224bad2bc43e8e4d34b #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing - [x] Manual - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-08-16 10:21:04 +00:00
license_branding_enabled: "license_branding_enabled",
feat: segregate SSO FF into SAML and OIDC (#26495)
2023-08-21 13:42:22 +00:00
license_sso_saml_enabled: "license_sso_saml_enabled",
license_sso_oidc_enabled: "license_sso_oidc_enabled",
chore: Private Embed Code split for 1-click upgrade downgrade (#27530)
2023-10-04 10:10:38 +00:00
license_private_embeds_enabled: "license_private_embeds_enabled",
feat: community templates UI (#27302) ## Description Community templates UI changes. Allow user to publish app to community portal #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #26343 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-25 06:27:23 +00:00
release_show_publish_app_to_community_enabled:
"release_show_publish_app_to_community_enabled",
feat: code split files based on feature flags (#27678) ## Description Add feature flag based logic for code splitted files #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #2237 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 20:42:56 +00:00
license_gac_enabled: "license_gac_enabled",
chore: Update DSL for Anvil (#27966) ## Description - If the Anvil feature flag is enabled, set the layout system type to "ANVIL" when creating an application - Refactor DSL transformers to pull the specific transformer based on the layout system type - Refactor code to move layout system specific transformers to the specific layout system type folders - Add new entry in the list of feature flags for Anvil Note: No changes are observed visually in the application, as we're defaulting to the Fixed layout system's widget flow until integrations for Anvil are complete. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #27007 Fixes #26971 #### Media #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - NA - [ ] Jest - PENDING - [ ] Cypress - NA #### Test Plan #### Issues raised during DP testing ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-19 15:20:17 +00:00
release_anvil_enabled: "release_anvil_enabled",
fix: git branch protection fixes (#28667) ## Description - Adds license flag for branch protection - Disables omni-bar and keyboard shortcuts for protected branches - Adds navigation for multiple pages - Hides preview on protected views - Adds feature flag for Git Connection Success #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28056 #### Media <img width="1728" alt="image" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/8724051/ddbad4d8-9852-439f-b46d-fd5d58dd883b"> #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-11-07 14:55:02 +00:00
license_git_branch_protection_enabled:
"license_git_branch_protection_enabled",
feat: adding continuous delivery tab in git settings (#30512) ## Description Part of continuous delivery with git feature. Includes CE UI elements for "Continuous delivery" tab. Utilizes feature flag `release_git_continuous_delivery_enabled` to hide the implementation from UI #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #30510 #### Media <img width="1728" alt="image" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/8724051/66dfca37-4bbd-4e27-a8a5-369b214af9b4"> #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)\ ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2024-01-24 07:55:58 +00:00
license_git_continuous_delivery_enabled:
"license_git_continuous_delivery_enabled",
feat: RTL support for input, select and multi-select widget (#28522) #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/28469 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-11-03 10:48:13 +00:00
license_widget_rtl_support_enabled: "license_widget_rtl_support_enabled",
chore: Experimental JS toggle based on feature flag (#29118) ## Description > Adds a larger JS toggle button in property pane based on feature flag > > Links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR > > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28918 > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - Experimental > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-11-27 09:30:20 +00:00
ab_one_click_learning_popover_enabled:
"ab_one_click_learning_popover_enabled",
feat: Appsmith AI as datasource plugin (#29794) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced Appsmith AI capabilities for enhanced data query functionalities. - Added a new "Appsmith AI Query" creation operation with a dedicated icon and description. - Implemented a new component for AI plugin datasource management. - Launched default configurations for the Appsmith AI feature integration. - **Enhancements** - Updated the query editor to conditionally render datasource selectors based on plugin type. - **Bug Fixes** - Removed the redundant `NO_DATASOURCE_FOR_QUERY` constant to streamline the user interface. - **Documentation** - Added detailed constants and service implementations for Appsmith AI plugin development. - **Refactor** - Improved code structure to accommodate AI features and data source checks across components. - **Style** - Integrated new styles for AI-related components and controls within the application. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: arunvjn <arunvjn10@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Diljit <diljit@appsmith.com>
2024-01-16 14:49:08 +00:00
ab_appsmith_ai_query: "ab_appsmith_ai_query",
fix: disabled feature walkthroughs behind a flag (#31007) ## Description This PR removes the feature walkthroughs that were added as part of one of the activation experiments in Q3. Although these walkthroughs were useful in guiding users, they were appearing in untimely and incorrect fashion. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #30339 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a feature flag to toggle the feature walkthrough on or off. - Added the ability to force display the feature walkthrough regardless of the feature flag setting. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2024-02-13 11:14:59 +00:00
rollout_remove_feature_walkthrough_enabled:
"rollout_remove_feature_walkthrough_enabled",
feat: feature flag for eslint migration (#36543) ## Description This PR introduces a feature flag to control the ESLint migration. Fixes #36542 ## Automation /test js sanity ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11795470649> > Commit: ac773e1ccb4a3e67159ac21e4abc757f5f959693 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11795470649&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.JS, @tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:58:31 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new feature flag, `rollout_eslint_enabled`, for managing ESLint functionality. - Added an enumeration for linter versions, including `"JSHINT"` and `"ESLINT"`. - Implemented a function to dynamically determine the linter version based on the feature flag. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced linting error handling by updating the linter version dynamically instead of using a hardcoded value. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-11-12 12:05:28 +00:00
rollout_eslint_enabled: "rollout_eslint_enabled",
feat: list building blocks in explorer (#31199) ## Description This is step 1 of completing the addition of building blocks within the canvas explorer. It adds building blocks to the explorer and hides the functionality behind a feature flag - release_drag_drop_building_blocks_enabled. 1. Create a new hook to manage explorer items - widgets and building blocks 2. Define the max items to display in the explorer for each tag 3. Define a utility function to return all explorer items alongside the maxNoToRender per tag 4. Rename WidgetSidebarWithTags to UIEntitySidebar and move into a new sidebar folder 5. Adjust newly renamed UIEntitySidebar to implement loading for building blocks, new listing of blocks and widgets and manage "See more" functionality for all items in explorer. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #31146 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced new constants and functions to optimize widget management and search functionality. - Added loading indicators and a "See More" button for better user interaction with widget cards. - Enhanced widget filtering and display based on user interactions and tag categories. - Implemented a custom hook for managing UI explorer items like widgets and building blocks. - **Refactor** - Updated import paths for better code organization and readability. - **Style** - Adjusted widget card rendering based on tags for an improved visual hierarchy and user experience. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Rahul Barwal <rahul.barwal@appsmith.com>
2024-03-08 09:05:02 +00:00
release_drag_drop_building_blocks_enabled:
"release_drag_drop_building_blocks_enabled",
feat: Move conversion flow under feature flag. (#32490) [![workerB](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fworkerb.linearb.io%2Fv2%2Fbadge%2Fprivate%2FU2FsdGVkX105sGkyMb3eywi17Q8zKGh7H7PVjvpTo%2Fcollaboration.svg%3FcacheSeconds%3D60)](https://workerb.linearb.io/v2/badge/collaboration-page?magicLinkId=8cXsNLR) ## Description Auto Layout System is being deprecated in favor of Anvil. So we will no longer update Auto Layout and hence we are removing conversion flow to make sure no new Auto Layout Apps are created. However we still want to be able to help users who really have mission critical use cases to convert. two ways to do this - ask Support and they will enable the feature flag to enable conversion.(for cloud users) - ask Support and they will reveal the global function(`overrideFeatureFlag({release_layout_conversion_enabled: true})`) to enable conversion.(for users not connected to internet) Implementation: - current feature flags are supplied from the consolidated api and widgets consume them via `selectFeatureFlags` selector. - to override these flags locally, we provide a global function(accessible from console) `overrideFeatureFlag` which can take an object of featureflags and save them to indexed db. - then we use these saved values to override feature flag values supplied by the consolidated api. - `selectFeatureFlags` is where the values are combined and consumed by all components. Fixes #32140 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8641988198> > Commit: de8e06778bd9fe1feab2f5d20adbaed90e542019 > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8641988198&attempt=2" target="_blank">Click here!</a> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
2024-04-11 11:51:14 +00:00
release_layout_conversion_enabled: "release_layout_conversion_enabled",
fix: Changes for Anvil Alpha release (#34211) ## Description This PR makes the following changes to prepare for the Anvil Alpha release - Add a toggle to the applications page header that allows us to toggle the Anvil feature flag from the UI. - Enable the above toggle if the toggle feature flag is enabled - When the toggle is enabled the following changes occur in the UX - Import application via Git is disabled and a callout is shown to the user - Git features are unavailable for users in Anvil applications - Copying and pasting widgets between two different layout systems is disabled and a warning message is shown to the user - Partial import export of widgets between two different layout systems is disabled and a warning message is shown to the user - CRUD page generation is disabled from datasources - Anvil applications and classic applications are separated into their own sections in the workspace. - In case any of the above sections are empty, an appropriate message is displayed in the empty section ### Screenshots ![Alpha Toggle](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/6bc887e7-eff6-41c2-98a9-ddd5826d4d1a) ![Import from Git Callout](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/42cd05c8-da90-4e2e-93be-f4038b1f21f3) ![Paste-callout](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/031ee732-4ad5-4a03-88bf-d02bab1d3faa) ![Screenshot from 2024-07-03 14-39-13](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/037585d0-1470-47f7-81b2-c0cf4c7901f9) ### Other details - Toggle feature flag - `release_anvil_toggle_enabled` - Anvil feature flag - `release_anvil_enabled` Fixes #34578 Fixes #34576 Fixes #34575 Fixes #33718 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > 🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed. > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9793128338> > Commit: 09401272c1d52c915aee3b68925406f2f5f962ba > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9793128338&attempt=2&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: @tag.All > The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR: <ol> > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/PartialImportExport/PartialExport_spec.ts</ol> > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master" target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Added Anvil toggle functionality to the page header. - Introduced layout compatibility checks for pasting widgets. - **Enhancements** - Updated widget paste action to verify layout system compatibility. - Improved handling and processing of user-uploaded JSON files for widget import. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-07-05 08:27:59 +00:00
release_anvil_toggle_enabled: "release_anvil_toggle_enabled",
feat: adding branch persistence (#36622) ## Description Persisting latest branch. Re-opening the branch opens it in the latest branch Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/30321 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11325191494> > Commit: 570c6fba8b85f59c8577efda5863d19049b0ebe1 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11325191494&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Git` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:27:07 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced Git branch management functionality in the ApplicationCard component. - New utility functions for storing and retrieving the latest Git branch. - Improved error handling and response management for Git operations. - Added user-specific tracking for Git branches in the AppEditorEngine. - Introduced a new feature flag for Git branch persistence. - New Cypress test suite to verify Git branch persistence after switching branches. - Added methods for asserting branch visibility and URL consistency in the GitSync class. - **Bug Fixes** - Refined error handling for various sagas, ensuring accurate error dispatching and user feedback. - **Documentation** - Updated function signatures and error handling descriptions in the initialization and Git synchronization processes. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-10-14 11:04:16 +00:00
release_git_persist_branch_enabled: "release_git_persist_branch_enabled",
chore: Transitions for IDE (#35714) ## Description Uses `AnimatedGridLayout` component to introduce transitions for the IDE. This is behind a feature flag Fixes #34538 Fixes #30863 Fixes #34544 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > 🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed. > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10737363879> > Commit: a912f5c52366abe48768727a1c605cd72b48752c > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10737363879&attempt=2&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: @tag.All > Spec: > The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR: <ol> > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/OnLoadTests/ExecuteAction_Spec.ts</ol> > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master" target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>. > <hr>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:32:30 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced two new layout components: `AnimatedLayout` and `UnanimatedLayout` for improved editor interface structuring. - Added TypeScript type definitions for the DOM View Transitions API to enhance type safety and developer experience. - Implemented custom hooks, `useGridLayoutTemplate` and `useEditorStateLeftPaneWidth`, for dynamic grid management and left pane width calculation in the IDE layout. - **Improvements** - Enhanced layout responsiveness with the addition of dynamic grid management. - Updated the `Editor` component to use a centralized constant for height calculations, improving maintainability and consistency. - Enhanced test accuracy by refining assertions in the Git Branch Protection test suite. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Sagar Khalasi <sagar@appsmith.com>
2024-09-09 10:55:50 +00:00
release_ide_animations_enabled: "release_ide_animations_enabled",
feat: Disabled datasource selector in query pages (#36940) ## Description This PR disable the datasource selector inside query editor. This change is behind feature flag to ensure that if this is needed, we can revert back using feature flag toggling. EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/5382 Fixes #35534 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11512255262> > Commit: ccdb5227464882e1d135a0eb42d1ed1b931a2680 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11512255262&attempt=3" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 07:24:38 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new feature flag: `release_ide_datasource_selector_enabled`, allowing for future enhancements to the `DatasourceSelector` component. - Conditional rendering of the `DatasourceSelector` in the `QueryEditorHeader` based on the new feature flag. - **Bug Fixes** - Disabled the test suite for the "Switch datasource" functionality as it is currently under a feature flag. These changes enhance the flexibility of the application and improve the user experience by controlling the visibility of features based on their activation status. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-10-25 16:22:41 +00:00
release_ide_datasource_selector_enabled:
"release_ide_datasource_selector_enabled",
feat: Custom Widget Editor integration with AI (#37257) ## Description Adds the AI widget builder integration inside the Custom Widget Editor. User can prompt the AI on the changes and the bot will update the code of the widget direclty. Fixes #37250 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!IMPORTANT] > 🟣 🟣 🟣 Your tests are running. > Tests running at: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11772460894> > Commit: cffb595675ade95c74601285627d59fd3f050b34 > Workflow: `PR Automation test suite` > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > Spec: `` > <hr>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 05:03:57 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [x] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a feature flag for a custom AI widget builder. - Added a new `ChatBot` component for enhanced interactivity within the editor. - **Improvements** - Simplified layout management by removing the `LayoutControls` component. - Enhanced the `TabsLayout` to conditionally display an AI tab based on the feature flag. - Updated the `Editor` component to include the AI tab dynamically. - **Bug Fixes** - Streamlined state management for layout selection in the custom widget builder context. These updates improve user experience by integrating AI capabilities and simplifying the interface. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-11-11 10:29:32 +00:00
release_custom_widget_ai_builder: "release_custom_widget_ai_builder",
feat: requesting new integration ui to accept users preferences about the new integrations (#38012)
2024-12-09 11:58:25 +00:00
ab_request_new_integration_enabled: "ab_request_new_integration_enabled",
chore: optimise first evaluation by adding worker scope cache (CE) (#38068) ## Description - Add evalContextCache to reduce the number of times the evalContext is created from the contextTree - remove resetWorkerGlobalScope execution before every evalSync - Instantiate the evalWorker in src/index.tsx Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12295048843> > Commit: 04b1e859b02282ba9efa96aea25acc9f20098061 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12295048843&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:21:04 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new property `actionNames` to enhance action tracking within JavaScript action entities. - Added a new feature flag `release_evaluation_scope_cache` for improved feature management. - Implemented a new function `isPropertyAnEntityAction` to identify action properties in JavaScript entities. - Enhanced the `loadAppEntities` method to improve JavaScript library loading processes. - Updated the evaluation context initialization process to utilize `getDataTreeContext`. - Expanded the `WIDGET_CONFIG_MAP` to include detailed configurations for various widget types. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced error handling for unsafe function calls in evaluation logic. - Improved error handling and logging for library installation and uninstallation processes. - **Tests** - Expanded test coverage for action bindings and dependencies in the `DataTreeEvaluator`. - Updated tests to validate the new `actionNames` property and its integration. - Modified tests to ensure correct functionality of the `evaluateSync` function. - Added new test cases to assess the behavior of the evaluator with widget updates. - **Chores** - Streamlined imports and initialization of worker instances across various files. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-12-13 04:14:19 +00:00
release_evaluation_scope_cache: "release_evaluation_scope_cache",
fix: gsheets all sheets option enabled behind a feature flag (#37942) ## Description This PR adds back all sheets option which had been removed in PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/36125 Fixes #38002 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource, @tag.Widget" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12311024852> > Commit: e177b648fd593b8ccc8af88c6d90c3958d7c9752 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12311024852&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Datasource, @tag.Widget` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:27:08 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Added new options for Google Sheets permissions, enhancing user selection capabilities. - Introduced a feature flag to control the visibility of new Google Sheets options. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved handling of feature flags in the datasource section rendering, ensuring correct visibility based on flags. - **Documentation** - Updated test specifications for Google Sheets datasource to include new dropdown options. - **Chores** - Enhanced the logic for setting default values in the RadioButtonControl component. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Alex Golovanov <alex@appsmith.com>
2024-12-13 08:39:53 +00:00
release_gs_all_sheets_options_enabled:
"release_gs_all_sheets_options_enabled",
chore: git mod - integration with applications (#38439) ## Description - Git mod integration with applications behind feature flag Fixes #37815 Fixes #37816 Fixes #37817 Fixes #37818 Fixes #37819 Fixes #37820 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12570655268> > Commit: 7d2f1a7013bc2fc6c960699ee0b6e06800cd21f9 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12570655268&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 14:35:46 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No
2025-01-05 10:21:23 +00:00
release_git_modularisation_enabled: "release_git_modularisation_enabled",
chore: git api - adding new apis (#38681) ## Description - Introduces new api contracts for git - Adds feature flag `release_git_api_contracts_enabled` Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/38500 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12810595516> > Commit: 8f05bbfb0b9259c3ee40464099416b75688a4bd1 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12810595516&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Git` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:05:20 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a new feature flag `release_git_api_contracts_enabled` - Added support for enhanced Git API contract handling - **Improvements** - Updated type definitions for Git-related operations - Refined request and response handling for Git artifacts - Improved type safety for Git references and branches - **Changes** - Modified several Git-related request and saga functions to support new API contracts - Updated artifact type enum values to use lowercase representations - Introduced new interfaces for Git references and branches - **Technical Updates** - Added conditional logic for feature flag-based request processing - Restructured type definitions across multiple Git-related modules <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-01-21 10:19:18 +00:00
release_git_api_contracts_enabled: "release_git_api_contracts_enabled",
chore: added premium tags datasources for knowing users request to add new integrations (#38110)
2024-12-19 14:30:09 +00:00
ab_premium_datasources_view_enabled: "ab_premium_datasources_view_enabled",
chore: Masking user data in mixpanel session recordings (#38267)
2024-12-20 13:32:02 +00:00
kill_session_recordings_enabled: "kill_session_recordings_enabled",
config_mask_session_recordings_enabled:
"config_mask_session_recordings_enabled",
config_user_session_recordings_enabled:
"config_user_session_recordings_enabled",
feat: ADS Entity List Tree (#38493) Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com>
2025-01-13 08:24:30 +00:00
release_ads_entity_item_enabled: "release_ads_entity_item_enabled",
chore: remove zendesk and salesforce from premium tag (#39072) ## Description This PR removes soon and premium tags from zendesk and salesforce as they will be released soon Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/38879 > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13177979345> > Commit: 5dd6b87b5f5f6f0f7b2cc3f83a0242bc952aba17 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13177979345&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Datasource` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 12:57:49 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new configuration toggle to control the availability of external integrations. - **Refactor** - Upgraded premium integration handling by switching from a static list to dynamic filtering. Integration options now adapt automatically based on the configurable setting, ensuring a more flexible experience for users. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2025-02-06 13:22:03 +00:00
release_external_saas_plugins_enabled:
"release_external_saas_plugins_enabled",
feat: Flagsmith Integration (#24472) ## Description > This PR integrates Flagsmith feature flagging into the Appsmith codebase > It also sets some default traits such as instance_id, tenant_id and email/hashed email to the new and existing users #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #24037 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com>
2023-06-27 10:45:33 +00:00
} as const;
export type FeatureFlag = keyof typeof FEATURE_FLAG;
export type FeatureFlags = Record<FeatureFlag, boolean>;
export const DEFAULT_FEATURE_FLAG_VALUE: FeatureFlags = {
TEST_FLAG: true,
chore: Renaming feature flags for ME to lower case (#25079)
2023-07-05 06:58:18 +00:00
release_datasource_environments_enabled: false,
chore: Move app navigation logo upload to Flagsmith (#25545) ## Description Quite simply use replace `APP_NAVIGATION_LOGO_UPLOAD` flag on FF4J to `release_appnavigationlogoupload_enabled` on Flagsmith. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #25184 #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also, list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-21 08:43:36 +00:00
release_appnavigationlogoupload_enabled: false,
chore: Refactors hide embed share setting flag. (#25284) ## Description As we are deprecating FF4J system in favour of flagsmith. This PR renames APP_EMBED_VIEW_HIDE_SHARE_SETTINGS_VISIBILITY to release_embed_hide_share_settings_enabled #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #25232 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-12 13:49:49 +00:00
release_embed_hide_share_settings_enabled: false,
revert: "chore: Remove server side filtering flag (#27663)" (#27927) This reverts commit eb567c0af5c80711821630c11aa749d9bd1d7856. ## Description This PR moves the server-side filtering feature back to under a feature flag by reverting #27663. We feel that we are not ready to release this feature to the public yet. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-12 08:24:03 +00:00
release_table_serverside_filtering_enabled: false,
feat: one click code splitting - Branding, SSO (#25231) ## Description Adds Support to show different versions of the following pages based on the plan the user is subscribed to. -Branding -SSO #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/issues/1800 #### Media https://www.notion.so/appsmith/POC-Code-Splitting-1-Click-Upgrade-Downgrade-Frontend-4fe83a8de6c54224bad2bc43e8e4d34b #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing - [x] Manual - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-08-16 10:21:04 +00:00
license_branding_enabled: false,
feat: segregate SSO FF into SAML and OIDC (#26495)
2023-08-21 13:42:22 +00:00
license_sso_saml_enabled: false,
license_sso_oidc_enabled: false,
chore: Private Embed Code split for 1-click upgrade downgrade (#27530)
2023-10-04 10:10:38 +00:00
license_private_embeds_enabled: false,
feat: community templates UI (#27302) ## Description Community templates UI changes. Allow user to publish app to community portal #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #26343 > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-25 06:27:23 +00:00
release_show_publish_app_to_community_enabled: false,
feat: code split files based on feature flags (#27678) ## Description Add feature flag based logic for code splitted files #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #2237 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 20:42:56 +00:00
license_gac_enabled: false,
chore: Update DSL for Anvil (#27966) ## Description - If the Anvil feature flag is enabled, set the layout system type to "ANVIL" when creating an application - Refactor DSL transformers to pull the specific transformer based on the layout system type - Refactor code to move layout system specific transformers to the specific layout system type folders - Add new entry in the list of feature flags for Anvil Note: No changes are observed visually in the application, as we're defaulting to the Fixed layout system's widget flow until integrations for Anvil are complete. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #27007 Fixes #26971 #### Media #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - NA - [ ] Jest - PENDING - [ ] Cypress - NA #### Test Plan #### Issues raised during DP testing ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-19 15:20:17 +00:00
release_anvil_enabled: false,
feat: list building blocks in explorer (#31199) ## Description This is step 1 of completing the addition of building blocks within the canvas explorer. It adds building blocks to the explorer and hides the functionality behind a feature flag - release_drag_drop_building_blocks_enabled. 1. Create a new hook to manage explorer items - widgets and building blocks 2. Define the max items to display in the explorer for each tag 3. Define a utility function to return all explorer items alongside the maxNoToRender per tag 4. Rename WidgetSidebarWithTags to UIEntitySidebar and move into a new sidebar folder 5. Adjust newly renamed UIEntitySidebar to implement loading for building blocks, new listing of blocks and widgets and manage "See more" functionality for all items in explorer. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #31146 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced new constants and functions to optimize widget management and search functionality. - Added loading indicators and a "See More" button for better user interaction with widget cards. - Enhanced widget filtering and display based on user interactions and tag categories. - Implemented a custom hook for managing UI explorer items like widgets and building blocks. - **Refactor** - Updated import paths for better code organization and readability. - **Style** - Adjusted widget card rendering based on tags for an improved visual hierarchy and user experience. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Rahul Barwal <rahul.barwal@appsmith.com>
2024-03-08 09:05:02 +00:00
release_drag_drop_building_blocks_enabled: false,
fix: git branch protection fixes (#28667) ## Description - Adds license flag for branch protection - Disables omni-bar and keyboard shortcuts for protected branches - Adds navigation for multiple pages - Hides preview on protected views - Adds feature flag for Git Connection Success #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28056 #### Media <img width="1728" alt="image" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/8724051/ddbad4d8-9852-439f-b46d-fd5d58dd883b"> #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-11-07 14:55:02 +00:00
license_git_branch_protection_enabled: false,
feat: adding continuous delivery tab in git settings (#30512) ## Description Part of continuous delivery with git feature. Includes CE UI elements for "Continuous delivery" tab. Utilizes feature flag `release_git_continuous_delivery_enabled` to hide the implementation from UI #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #30510 #### Media <img width="1728" alt="image" src="https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/8724051/66dfca37-4bbd-4e27-a8a5-369b214af9b4"> #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)\ ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2024-01-24 07:55:58 +00:00
license_git_continuous_delivery_enabled: false,
feat: RTL support for input, select and multi-select widget (#28522) #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/28469 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-11-03 10:48:13 +00:00
license_widget_rtl_support_enabled: false,
chore: Experimental JS toggle based on feature flag (#29118) ## Description > Adds a larger JS toggle button in property pane based on feature flag > > Links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR > > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28918 > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - Experimental > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-11-27 09:30:20 +00:00
ab_one_click_learning_popover_enabled: false,
feat: Appsmith AI as datasource plugin (#29794) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced Appsmith AI capabilities for enhanced data query functionalities. - Added a new "Appsmith AI Query" creation operation with a dedicated icon and description. - Implemented a new component for AI plugin datasource management. - Launched default configurations for the Appsmith AI feature integration. - **Enhancements** - Updated the query editor to conditionally render datasource selectors based on plugin type. - **Bug Fixes** - Removed the redundant `NO_DATASOURCE_FOR_QUERY` constant to streamline the user interface. - **Documentation** - Added detailed constants and service implementations for Appsmith AI plugin development. - **Refactor** - Improved code structure to accommodate AI features and data source checks across components. - **Style** - Integrated new styles for AI-related components and controls within the application. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: arunvjn <arunvjn10@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Diljit <diljit@appsmith.com>
2024-01-16 14:49:08 +00:00
ab_appsmith_ai_query: false,
fix: turned on learnability flags on by default (#33283) Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2024-05-13 10:18:11 +00:00
rollout_remove_feature_walkthrough_enabled: true,
feat: feature flag for eslint migration (#36543) ## Description This PR introduces a feature flag to control the ESLint migration. Fixes #36542 ## Automation /test js sanity ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11795470649> > Commit: ac773e1ccb4a3e67159ac21e4abc757f5f959693 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11795470649&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.JS, @tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:58:31 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new feature flag, `rollout_eslint_enabled`, for managing ESLint functionality. - Added an enumeration for linter versions, including `"JSHINT"` and `"ESLINT"`. - Implemented a function to dynamically determine the linter version based on the feature flag. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced linting error handling by updating the linter version dynamically instead of using a hardcoded value. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-11-12 12:05:28 +00:00
rollout_eslint_enabled: false,
feat: Move conversion flow under feature flag. (#32490) [![workerB](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fworkerb.linearb.io%2Fv2%2Fbadge%2Fprivate%2FU2FsdGVkX105sGkyMb3eywi17Q8zKGh7H7PVjvpTo%2Fcollaboration.svg%3FcacheSeconds%3D60)](https://workerb.linearb.io/v2/badge/collaboration-page?magicLinkId=8cXsNLR) ## Description Auto Layout System is being deprecated in favor of Anvil. So we will no longer update Auto Layout and hence we are removing conversion flow to make sure no new Auto Layout Apps are created. However we still want to be able to help users who really have mission critical use cases to convert. two ways to do this - ask Support and they will enable the feature flag to enable conversion.(for cloud users) - ask Support and they will reveal the global function(`overrideFeatureFlag({release_layout_conversion_enabled: true})`) to enable conversion.(for users not connected to internet) Implementation: - current feature flags are supplied from the consolidated api and widgets consume them via `selectFeatureFlags` selector. - to override these flags locally, we provide a global function(accessible from console) `overrideFeatureFlag` which can take an object of featureflags and save them to indexed db. - then we use these saved values to override feature flag values supplied by the consolidated api. - `selectFeatureFlags` is where the values are combined and consumed by all components. Fixes #32140 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8641988198> > Commit: de8e06778bd9fe1feab2f5d20adbaed90e542019 > Cypress dashboard url: <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=8641988198&attempt=2" target="_blank">Click here!</a> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
2024-04-11 11:51:14 +00:00
release_layout_conversion_enabled: false,
fix: Changes for Anvil Alpha release (#34211) ## Description This PR makes the following changes to prepare for the Anvil Alpha release - Add a toggle to the applications page header that allows us to toggle the Anvil feature flag from the UI. - Enable the above toggle if the toggle feature flag is enabled - When the toggle is enabled the following changes occur in the UX - Import application via Git is disabled and a callout is shown to the user - Git features are unavailable for users in Anvil applications - Copying and pasting widgets between two different layout systems is disabled and a warning message is shown to the user - Partial import export of widgets between two different layout systems is disabled and a warning message is shown to the user - CRUD page generation is disabled from datasources - Anvil applications and classic applications are separated into their own sections in the workspace. - In case any of the above sections are empty, an appropriate message is displayed in the empty section ### Screenshots ![Alpha Toggle](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/6bc887e7-eff6-41c2-98a9-ddd5826d4d1a) ![Import from Git Callout](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/42cd05c8-da90-4e2e-93be-f4038b1f21f3) ![Paste-callout](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/031ee732-4ad5-4a03-88bf-d02bab1d3faa) ![Screenshot from 2024-07-03 14-39-13](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/103687/037585d0-1470-47f7-81b2-c0cf4c7901f9) ### Other details - Toggle feature flag - `release_anvil_toggle_enabled` - Anvil feature flag - `release_anvil_enabled` Fixes #34578 Fixes #34576 Fixes #34575 Fixes #33718 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > 🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed. > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9793128338> > Commit: 09401272c1d52c915aee3b68925406f2f5f962ba > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9793128338&attempt=2&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: @tag.All > The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR: <ol> > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/PartialImportExport/PartialExport_spec.ts</ol> > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master" target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Added Anvil toggle functionality to the page header. - Introduced layout compatibility checks for pasting widgets. - **Enhancements** - Updated widget paste action to verify layout system compatibility. - Improved handling and processing of user-uploaded JSON files for widget import. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-07-05 08:27:59 +00:00
release_anvil_toggle_enabled: false,
feat: adding branch persistence (#36622) ## Description Persisting latest branch. Re-opening the branch opens it in the latest branch Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/30321 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11325191494> > Commit: 570c6fba8b85f59c8577efda5863d19049b0ebe1 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11325191494&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Git` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:27:07 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced Git branch management functionality in the ApplicationCard component. - New utility functions for storing and retrieving the latest Git branch. - Improved error handling and response management for Git operations. - Added user-specific tracking for Git branches in the AppEditorEngine. - Introduced a new feature flag for Git branch persistence. - New Cypress test suite to verify Git branch persistence after switching branches. - Added methods for asserting branch visibility and URL consistency in the GitSync class. - **Bug Fixes** - Refined error handling for various sagas, ensuring accurate error dispatching and user feedback. - **Documentation** - Updated function signatures and error handling descriptions in the initialization and Git synchronization processes. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-10-14 11:04:16 +00:00
release_git_persist_branch_enabled: false,
chore: Transitions for IDE (#35714) ## Description Uses `AnimatedGridLayout` component to introduce transitions for the IDE. This is behind a feature flag Fixes #34538 Fixes #30863 Fixes #34544 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > 🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed. > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10737363879> > Commit: a912f5c52366abe48768727a1c605cd72b48752c > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10737363879&attempt=2&selectiontype=test&testsstatus=failed&specsstatus=fail" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: @tag.All > Spec: > The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR: <ol> > <li>cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/OnLoadTests/ExecuteAction_Spec.ts</ol> > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/identified-flaky-tests-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee3?branch=master" target="_blank">List of identified flaky tests</a>. > <hr>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:32:30 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced two new layout components: `AnimatedLayout` and `UnanimatedLayout` for improved editor interface structuring. - Added TypeScript type definitions for the DOM View Transitions API to enhance type safety and developer experience. - Implemented custom hooks, `useGridLayoutTemplate` and `useEditorStateLeftPaneWidth`, for dynamic grid management and left pane width calculation in the IDE layout. - **Improvements** - Enhanced layout responsiveness with the addition of dynamic grid management. - Updated the `Editor` component to use a centralized constant for height calculations, improving maintainability and consistency. - Enhanced test accuracy by refining assertions in the Git Branch Protection test suite. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Sagar Khalasi <sagar@appsmith.com>
2024-09-09 10:55:50 +00:00
release_ide_animations_enabled: false,
feat: Disabled datasource selector in query pages (#36940) ## Description This PR disable the datasource selector inside query editor. This change is behind feature flag to ensure that if this is needed, we can revert back using feature flag toggling. EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/5382 Fixes #35534 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11512255262> > Commit: ccdb5227464882e1d135a0eb42d1ed1b931a2680 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11512255262&attempt=3" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 07:24:38 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new feature flag: `release_ide_datasource_selector_enabled`, allowing for future enhancements to the `DatasourceSelector` component. - Conditional rendering of the `DatasourceSelector` in the `QueryEditorHeader` based on the new feature flag. - **Bug Fixes** - Disabled the test suite for the "Switch datasource" functionality as it is currently under a feature flag. These changes enhance the flexibility of the application and improve the user experience by controlling the visibility of features based on their activation status. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-10-25 16:22:41 +00:00
release_ide_datasource_selector_enabled: false,
feat: Custom Widget Editor integration with AI (#37257) ## Description Adds the AI widget builder integration inside the Custom Widget Editor. User can prompt the AI on the changes and the bot will update the code of the widget direclty. Fixes #37250 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!IMPORTANT] > 🟣 🟣 🟣 Your tests are running. > Tests running at: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11772460894> > Commit: cffb595675ade95c74601285627d59fd3f050b34 > Workflow: `PR Automation test suite` > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > Spec: `` > <hr>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 05:03:57 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [x] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a feature flag for a custom AI widget builder. - Added a new `ChatBot` component for enhanced interactivity within the editor. - **Improvements** - Simplified layout management by removing the `LayoutControls` component. - Enhanced the `TabsLayout` to conditionally display an AI tab based on the feature flag. - Updated the `Editor` component to include the AI tab dynamically. - **Bug Fixes** - Streamlined state management for layout selection in the custom widget builder context. These updates improve user experience by integrating AI capabilities and simplifying the interface. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-11-11 10:29:32 +00:00
release_custom_widget_ai_builder: false,
feat: requesting new integration ui to accept users preferences about the new integrations (#38012)
2024-12-09 11:58:25 +00:00
ab_request_new_integration_enabled: false,
chore: optimise first evaluation by adding worker scope cache (CE) (#38068) ## Description - Add evalContextCache to reduce the number of times the evalContext is created from the contextTree - remove resetWorkerGlobalScope execution before every evalSync - Instantiate the evalWorker in src/index.tsx Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12295048843> > Commit: 04b1e859b02282ba9efa96aea25acc9f20098061 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12295048843&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:21:04 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new property `actionNames` to enhance action tracking within JavaScript action entities. - Added a new feature flag `release_evaluation_scope_cache` for improved feature management. - Implemented a new function `isPropertyAnEntityAction` to identify action properties in JavaScript entities. - Enhanced the `loadAppEntities` method to improve JavaScript library loading processes. - Updated the evaluation context initialization process to utilize `getDataTreeContext`. - Expanded the `WIDGET_CONFIG_MAP` to include detailed configurations for various widget types. - **Bug Fixes** - Enhanced error handling for unsafe function calls in evaluation logic. - Improved error handling and logging for library installation and uninstallation processes. - **Tests** - Expanded test coverage for action bindings and dependencies in the `DataTreeEvaluator`. - Updated tests to validate the new `actionNames` property and its integration. - Modified tests to ensure correct functionality of the `evaluateSync` function. - Added new test cases to assess the behavior of the evaluator with widget updates. - **Chores** - Streamlined imports and initialization of worker instances across various files. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-12-13 04:14:19 +00:00
release_evaluation_scope_cache: false,
fix: gsheets all sheets option enabled behind a feature flag (#37942) ## Description This PR adds back all sheets option which had been removed in PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/36125 Fixes #38002 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource, @tag.Widget" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12311024852> > Commit: e177b648fd593b8ccc8af88c6d90c3958d7c9752 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12311024852&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Datasource, @tag.Widget` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:27:08 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Added new options for Google Sheets permissions, enhancing user selection capabilities. - Introduced a feature flag to control the visibility of new Google Sheets options. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved handling of feature flags in the datasource section rendering, ensuring correct visibility based on flags. - **Documentation** - Updated test specifications for Google Sheets datasource to include new dropdown options. - **Chores** - Enhanced the logic for setting default values in the RadioButtonControl component. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Alex Golovanov <alex@appsmith.com>
2024-12-13 08:39:53 +00:00
release_gs_all_sheets_options_enabled: false,
chore: git mod - integration with applications (#38439) ## Description - Git mod integration with applications behind feature flag Fixes #37815 Fixes #37816 Fixes #37817 Fixes #37818 Fixes #37819 Fixes #37820 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12570655268> > Commit: 7d2f1a7013bc2fc6c960699ee0b6e06800cd21f9 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12570655268&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 14:35:46 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No
2025-01-05 10:21:23 +00:00
release_git_modularisation_enabled: false,
chore: git api - adding new apis (#38681) ## Description - Introduces new api contracts for git - Adds feature flag `release_git_api_contracts_enabled` Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/38500 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12810595516> > Commit: 8f05bbfb0b9259c3ee40464099416b75688a4bd1 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12810595516&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Git` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:05:20 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a new feature flag `release_git_api_contracts_enabled` - Added support for enhanced Git API contract handling - **Improvements** - Updated type definitions for Git-related operations - Refined request and response handling for Git artifacts - Improved type safety for Git references and branches - **Changes** - Modified several Git-related request and saga functions to support new API contracts - Updated artifact type enum values to use lowercase representations - Introduced new interfaces for Git references and branches - **Technical Updates** - Added conditional logic for feature flag-based request processing - Restructured type definitions across multiple Git-related modules <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-01-21 10:19:18 +00:00
release_git_api_contracts_enabled: false,
chore: added premium tags datasources for knowing users request to add new integrations (#38110)
2024-12-19 14:30:09 +00:00
ab_premium_datasources_view_enabled: false,
chore: Masking user data in mixpanel session recordings (#38267)
2024-12-20 13:32:02 +00:00
kill_session_recordings_enabled: false,
config_user_session_recordings_enabled: true,
config_mask_session_recordings_enabled: true,
feat: ADS Entity List Tree (#38493) Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com>
2025-01-13 08:24:30 +00:00
release_ads_entity_item_enabled: false,
chore: remove zendesk and salesforce from premium tag (#39072) ## Description This PR removes soon and premium tags from zendesk and salesforce as they will be released soon Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/38879 > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13177979345> > Commit: 5dd6b87b5f5f6f0f7b2cc3f83a0242bc952aba17 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13177979345&attempt=2" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Datasource` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 12:57:49 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new configuration toggle to control the availability of external integrations. - **Refactor** - Upgraded premium integration handling by switching from a static list to dynamic filtering. Integration options now adapt automatically based on the configurable setting, ensuring a more flexible experience for users. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2025-02-06 13:22:03 +00:00
release_external_saas_plugins_enabled: false,
feat: activation phase 1 (#25126) Feature implementations: - Schema in the Api Right Side Pane; - New Bindings UI, which is now a suggested widget; - Feature walkthrough for the aforementioned two units only if you are a new user. Only those users who have the flags `ab_ds_binding_enabled` and `ab_ds_schema_enabled` independently set to true can see the implementation described above. https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Activation-60c64894f42d4cdcb92220c1dbc73802
2023-07-12 06:42:16 +00:00
};
export const AB_TESTING_EVENT_KEYS = {
abTestingFlagLabel: "abTestingFlagLabel",
abTestingFlagValue: "abTestingFlagValue",
feat: Flagsmith Integration (#24472) ## Description > This PR integrates Flagsmith feature flagging into the Appsmith codebase > It also sets some default traits such as instance_id, tenant_id and email/hashed email to the new and existing users #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #24037 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com>
2023-06-27 10:45:33 +00:00
};
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink