Protei/PromucFlow_constructor
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
49a926e08f
PromucFlow_constructor/CODEOWNERS

207 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

chore: add codeowners file (#24317) ## Description Add codeowners file Some pictures with examples ![2023-06-09_17-14-54](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/8a43b8d9-8ac1-4177-a820-c72e455059ae) ![2023-06-09_17-14-33](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/6fc93aea-574d-41d9-8f87-5151c35f7522) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <melnikov.vv@greendatasoft.ru>
2023-06-14 06:44:20 +00:00
# This is a comment.
# Each line is a file pattern followed by one or more owners.
# https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners
chore: Update CODEOWNERS (#38514) ## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated CODEOWNERS file to clarify ownership patterns - Added new ownership entry for environment-related files - Removed outdated ownership entries for various server-side components <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-01-07 06:03:16 +00:00
# Followed Globstar paths in combination with wildcard paths. Reference https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/codeowners/reference.html#globstar-paths
chore: add codeowners file (#24317) ## Description Add codeowners file Some pictures with examples ![2023-06-09_17-14-54](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/8a43b8d9-8ac1-4177-a820-c72e455059ae) ![2023-06-09_17-14-33](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/6fc93aea-574d-41d9-8f87-5151c35f7522) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <melnikov.vv@greendatasoft.ru>
2023-06-14 06:44:20 +00:00
fix:codeowners file (#39447) ## Description **Github changes** - The **anvil-team** was deleted - **Anvil pod** renamed **AI Agents POD** - Created two child teams: [AI Agents BE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-be) [AI Agents FE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-fe) **PR changes** - Moved WDS widgets from `src/modules/ui-builder/ui/wds` to `src/widgets/wds` - Updated the paths in CODEOWNERS file - In CODEOWNERS `@appsmithorg/anvil-team` replaced with `@appsmithorg/ai-agents-pod`. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13542264374> > Commit: 9c5265b27751dfe339cbf9882fbc9db580c8b342 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13542264374&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:06:53 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal code ownership assignments to better reflect team responsibilities. - **Refactor** - Standardized and streamlined internal module imports across UI components and widgets. - Removed an outdated component export to optimize the code organization. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-02-26 12:21:36 +00:00
# Some paths highlighted as not existing. This may be due to the fact that we use same file for EE repo as well.
# Before deleting, make sure that the path does not really exist.
fix: codeowners file (#39962) ## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal maintenance responsibilities to streamline team management and ensure a more consistent support process. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-03-28 10:58:04 +00:00
app/client/.husky/** @riodeuno
app/client/.yarn/** @riodeuno
app/client/.editorconfig @riodeuno
app/client/.eslintrc.base.json @riodeuno
app/client/.eslintrc.js @riodeuno
app/client/.gitignore @riodeuno
app/client/.lintstagedrc.json @riodeuno
app/client/.nvmrc @riodeuno
app/client/.prettierignore @riodeuno
app/client/.prettierrc @riodeuno
app/client/.yarnrc.yml @riodeuno
app/client/jest.config.js @riodeuno
app/client/knip.json @riodeuno
app/client/package.json @riodeuno
app/client/tsconfig.json @riodeuno
app/client/tsconfig.path.json @riodeuno
app/client/packages/utils/** @riodeuno
app/client/packages/eslint-plugin/** @riodeuno
app/client/config/** @riodeuno
app/client/scripts/** @riodeuno
fix: add changes to codeowners file (#32251) ## Description Fix codeowners file <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated the `CODEOWNERS` file to reassign directory ownership for improved management. - Reassigned ownership to `wds-team` and `anvil-team`. - Updated file paths and corresponding owners for better ownership management. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-04-01 08:49:01 +00:00
chore: Add App viewer pod codeowners (#24613) > Pull Request Template > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Dhruvik Neharia <dhruvik@appsmith.com>
2023-06-21 07:50:21 +00:00
# App viewers pod
fix:codeowners file (#39447) ## Description **Github changes** - The **anvil-team** was deleted - **Anvil pod** renamed **AI Agents POD** - Created two child teams: [AI Agents BE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-be) [AI Agents FE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-fe) **PR changes** - Moved WDS widgets from `src/modules/ui-builder/ui/wds` to `src/widgets/wds` - Updated the paths in CODEOWNERS file - In CODEOWNERS `@appsmithorg/anvil-team` replaced with `@appsmithorg/ai-agents-pod`. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13542264374> > Commit: 9c5265b27751dfe339cbf9882fbc9db580c8b342 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13542264374&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:06:53 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal code ownership assignments to better reflect team responsibilities. - **Refactor** - Standardized and streamlined internal module imports across UI components and widgets. - Removed an outdated component export to optimize the code organization. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-02-26 12:21:36 +00:00
app/client/src/widgets/** @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/components/propertyControls/** @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
chore: Rename app-viewers to widgets-blocks (#37553) ![shot-2024-11-19-08-08-13](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae7ccd1f-bfe9-4b9e-bf63-c7885d055a68) ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated ownership assignments for various directories related to widget functionality, transferring responsibilities from `@appsmithorg/app-viewers` to `@appsmithorg/widgets-blocks`. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-11-20 05:03:01 +00:00
app/client/src/sagas/OneClickBindingSaga.ts @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
fix:codeowners file (#39447) ## Description **Github changes** - The **anvil-team** was deleted - **Anvil pod** renamed **AI Agents POD** - Created two child teams: [AI Agents BE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-be) [AI Agents FE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-fe) **PR changes** - Moved WDS widgets from `src/modules/ui-builder/ui/wds` to `src/widgets/wds` - Updated the paths in CODEOWNERS file - In CODEOWNERS `@appsmithorg/anvil-team` replaced with `@appsmithorg/ai-agents-pod`. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13542264374> > Commit: 9c5265b27751dfe339cbf9882fbc9db580c8b342 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13542264374&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:06:53 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal code ownership assignments to better reflect team responsibilities. - **Refactor** - Standardized and streamlined internal module imports across UI components and widgets. - Removed an outdated component export to optimize the code organization. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-02-26 12:21:36 +00:00
app/client/src/WidgetQueryGenerators/** @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/WidgetQueryGeneratorForm/** @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/** @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
# AI Agents POD
# AI Agents FE
fix: for codeowners file (#39453) ## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Revised internal team assignments to streamline responsibility management. These updates enhance clarity and alignment within project maintenance without affecting user-facing features. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-02-26 13:20:19 +00:00
app/client/src/widgets/wds/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/ee/widgets/wds/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/packages/carbon-connect/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
fix:codeowners file (#39447) ## Description **Github changes** - The **anvil-team** was deleted - **Anvil pod** renamed **AI Agents POD** - Created two child teams: [AI Agents BE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-be) [AI Agents FE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-fe) **PR changes** - Moved WDS widgets from `src/modules/ui-builder/ui/wds` to `src/widgets/wds` - Updated the paths in CODEOWNERS file - In CODEOWNERS `@appsmithorg/anvil-team` replaced with `@appsmithorg/ai-agents-pod`. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13542264374> > Commit: 9c5265b27751dfe339cbf9882fbc9db580c8b342 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13542264374&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:06:53 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal code ownership assignments to better reflect team responsibilities. - **Refactor** - Standardized and streamlined internal module imports across UI components and widgets. - Removed an outdated component export to optimize the code organization. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-02-26 12:21:36 +00:00
app/client/generators/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/actions/canvasSelectionActions.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/actions/reflowActions.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/actions/widgetSelectionActions.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/layoutSystems/anvil/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/pages/Editor/Canvas.tsx @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/pages/Editor/CanvasLayoutConversion/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/pages/Editor/PropertyPane/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/pages/Editor/WidgetsEditor/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/reducers/entityReducers/autoHeightReducers/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/reflow/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/CanvasSagas/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/ReplaySaga.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/SnapshotSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetAdditionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetBlueprintSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetDeletionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetOperationSagas.tsx @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetOperationUtils.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetSelectUtils.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetSelectionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/sagas/layoutConversionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/selectors/canvasSelectors.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/selectors/widgetSelectors.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useAllowEditorDragToSelect.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useClickToSelectWidget.tsx @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/utils/hooks/usePositionedContainerZIndex.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useReflow.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useWidgetSelection.ts @appsmithorg/ai-agents-fe
# # AI Agents BE
app/client/packages/rts/src/chat/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-be
app/server/**/appsmith-ai/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-be
app/server/**/ai/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-be
/app/server/appsmith-plugins/appsmithAiPlugin/** @appsmithorg/ai-agents-be
# WDS team is part of AI Agents POD and responsible for widget design system
app/client/packages/design-system/** @appsmithorg/wds-team
app/client/packages/storybook/** @appsmithorg/wds-team
app/client/packages/icons/** @appsmithorg/wds-team
feat: Flagsmith Integration (#24472) ## Description > This PR integrates Flagsmith feature flagging into the Appsmith codebase > It also sets some default traits such as instance_id, tenant_id and email/hashed email to the new and existing users #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #24037 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com>
2023-06-27 10:45:33 +00:00
# New Developers Pod
fix:codeowners file (#39447) ## Description **Github changes** - The **anvil-team** was deleted - **Anvil pod** renamed **AI Agents POD** - Created two child teams: [AI Agents BE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-be) [AI Agents FE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-fe) **PR changes** - Moved WDS widgets from `src/modules/ui-builder/ui/wds` to `src/widgets/wds` - Updated the paths in CODEOWNERS file - In CODEOWNERS `@appsmithorg/anvil-team` replaced with `@appsmithorg/ai-agents-pod`. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13542264374> > Commit: 9c5265b27751dfe339cbf9882fbc9db580c8b342 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13542264374&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:06:53 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal code ownership assignments to better reflect team responsibilities. - **Refactor** - Standardized and streamlined internal module imports across UI components and widgets. - Removed an outdated component export to optimize the code organization. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-02-26 12:21:36 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/featureflags/** @nilanshbansal
feat: Feature Flagging Default Traits (#25201) ## Description > This PR sets the default traits for the users in the same SDK call to get features. > This ensures the traits are present for all users and also the SDK calls are contained. Fixes #25159 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [x] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-09 18:43:25 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/UserIdentifierService.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/UserIdentifierServiceImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/UserIdentifierServiceCE.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/UserIdentifierServiceCEImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/UserIdentifierServiceCEImplTest.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/CacheableFeatureFlagHelper.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/CacheableFeatureFlagHelperImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/CacheableFeatureFlagHelperCE.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/CacheableFeatureFlagHelperCEImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/FeatureFlagServiceCE.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/FeatureFlagServiceCEImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/FeatureFlagService.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/FeatureFlagServiceImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/services/FeatureFlagServiceTest.java @nilanshbansal
chore: Adding UI builders code paths to codeowners (#25003) > Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description Adding UI builders code paths to codeowners. > > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-03 08:00:15 +00:00
chore: Add git pod to CODEOWNERS file (#25042)
2023-07-04 05:02:53 +00:00
# Git Pod
Update CODEOWNERS (#32807)
2024-04-19 08:09:00 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-git/ @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
Update CODEOWNERS (#32803)
2024-04-19 07:08:39 +00:00
app/server/**/git/** @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
app/server/**/import/** @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
app/server/**/export/** @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
app/server/**/*Git*.java @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
app/server/**/*Import*.java @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
app/server/**/*Export*.java @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
ci: Update Codeowners with data platform paths (#26217)
2023-08-11 05:30:08 +00:00
chore: Update CODEOWNERS (#38514) ## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated CODEOWNERS file to clarify ownership patterns - Added new ownership entry for environment-related files - Removed outdated ownership entries for various server-side components <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-01-07 06:03:16 +00:00
app/server/**/*Environment* @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers
Update CODEOWNERS (#32807)
2024-04-19 08:09:00 +00:00
app/client/src/pages/Editor/gitSync/ @appsmithorg/git-fe-reviewers
app/client/packages/dsl/ @appsmithorg/git-fe-reviewers
ci: Update Codeowners with data platform paths (#26217)
2023-08-11 05:30:08 +00:00
# Data Platform
chore: Updating CODEOWNERS file (#27599)
2023-09-26 03:30:05 +00:00
app/client/src/actions/datasourceActions.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/api/ActionAPI.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/ce/components/DSDataFilter/index.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/ce/constants/ReduxActionConstants.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/ce/sagas/ApplicationSagas.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/ce/selectors/environmentSelectors.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/ce/utils/Environments/index.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/components/BottomBar/index.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/form/fields/EmbeddedDatasourcePathField.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/components/formControls/utils.test.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/components/formControls/utils.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/entities/Datasource/index.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/entities/FeatureFlags.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/navigation/FocusEntity.ts @ayushpahwa
fix:codeowners file (#39447) ## Description **Github changes** - The **anvil-team** was deleted - **Anvil pod** renamed **AI Agents POD** - Created two child teams: [AI Agents BE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-be) [AI Agents FE](https://github.com/orgs/appsmithorg/teams/ai-agents-fe) **PR changes** - Moved WDS widgets from `src/modules/ui-builder/ui/wds` to `src/widgets/wds` - Updated the paths in CODEOWNERS file - In CODEOWNERS `@appsmithorg/anvil-team` replaced with `@appsmithorg/ai-agents-pod`. ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13542264374> > Commit: 9c5265b27751dfe339cbf9882fbc9db580c8b342 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13542264374&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.All` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:06:53 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal code ownership assignments to better reflect team responsibilities. - **Refactor** - Standardized and streamlined internal module imports across UI components and widgets. - Removed an outdated component export to optimize the code organization. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2025-02-26 12:21:36 +00:00
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/** @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/Editor/DataSourceEditor/** @ayushpahwa
chore: Updating CODEOWNERS file (#27599)
2023-09-26 03:30:05 +00:00
app/client/src/pages/Editor/IntegrationEditor/DatasourceCard.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/Editor/IntegrationEditor/IntegrationsHomeScreen.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/Editor/IntegrationEditor/NewApi.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/EditorJSONtoForm.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/Editor/SaaSEditor/DatasourceCard.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/Editor/SaaSEditor/DatasourceForm.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/Editor/gitSync/ReconnectDatasourceModal.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/pages/common/datasourceAuth/index.tsx @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/reducers/entityReducers/datasourceReducer.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/sagas/ActionExecution/PluginActionSaga.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/sagas/DatasourcesSagas.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/sagas/QueryPaneSagas.ts @ayushpahwa
app/client/src/transformers/RestAPIDatasourceFormTransformer.ts @ayushpahwa
ci: Update Codeowners with data platform paths (#26217)
2023-08-11 05:30:08 +00:00
chore: Adding CODEOWNERS file for Admin settings client-side files (#26413) ## Description Adding CODEOWNERS file for Admin settings client-side files #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
2023-08-17 10:17:38 +00:00
# Team Managers pod
chore: Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file (#26643) ## Description Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-08-25 06:27:10 +00:00
app/client/src/pages/Settings/**/* @ankitakinger
chore: Updating CODEOWNERS file (#27599)
2023-09-26 03:30:05 +00:00
app/client/src/pages/workspace/settings.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/pages/workspace/AppInviteUsersForm.tsx @ankitakinger
chore: Refactoring editor app name component for modules (#28055) ## Description Refactoring editor app name component for modules #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26163](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26163) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-16 09:07:39 +00:00
app/client/src/pages/workspace/WorkspaceInviteUsersForm.tsx @ankitakinger
chore: Updating CODEOWNERS file (#27599)
2023-09-26 03:30:05 +00:00
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/form/FormDialogComponent.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ce/pages/AdminSettings/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ee/pages/AdminSettings/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ce/pages/Applications/EmbedSnippetTab.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ee/pages/Applications/EmbedSnippetTab.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ce/pages/Applications/PrivateEmbedSettings.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ee/pages/Applications/PrivateEmbedSettings.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ce/pages/workspace/Members.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ee/pages/workspace/Members.tsx @ankitakinger
chore: Refactoring editor app name component for modules (#28055) ## Description Refactoring editor app name component for modules #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26163](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26163) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-16 09:07:39 +00:00
app/client/src/ce/pages/workspace/InviteUsersForm.tsx @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ee/pages/workspace/InviteUsersForm.tsx @ankitakinger
chore: Updating CODEOWNERS file (#27599)
2023-09-26 03:30:05 +00:00
app/client/src/ce/pages/Upgrade/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ee/pages/Auditlogs/**/* @ankitakinger
chore: Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file (#26643) ## Description Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-08-25 06:27:10 +00:00
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/Enterprise/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/EE/Enterprise/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/AdminSettings/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Google/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Github/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/FormLogin/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Auditlogs/**/* @ankitakinger
chore: added myself as owner to be notified for any change (#26917) Added myself as owner to be notified ant changes in evaluation flow #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-04 09:01:07 +00:00
feat: dsl migration with server (#28518) ## Description 1. Shifts DSL migration logic to @shared/dsl 2. Exposes /migrate/dsl endpoint on rts 3. Integrates RTS endpoint to backend for serving migrated pages 4. Introduces feature flag to switch between client-based and server-based on-demand migration #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #26783, #26784, #26980 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [x] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com>
2023-11-30 12:33:33 +00:00
# FE pod
chore: added myself as owner to be notified for any change (#26917) Added myself as owner to be notified ant changes in evaluation flow #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-04 09:01:07 +00:00
app/client/src/actions/evaluationActions.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/entities/DataTree/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/entities/DependencyMap/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/entities/workers/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/entities/DataTree* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/entities/workers/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/EvaluationsSaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/EvalWorkerActionSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/LintingSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/PostEvaluationSags.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/PostLintingSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/workers/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/JSLibrarySaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/ActionExecution/ActionExecutionSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/ActionExecution/ActionExecutionSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/JSFunctionExecutionSaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/JSFunctionExecutionSaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
chore: Adding DevOps to CODEOWNERS
2024-02-27 10:46:20 +00:00
chore: Add owner for migrations
2024-06-06 04:47:13 +00:00
# Enterprise Success
chore: update code owner for migrations (#36769) ## Description Add Anagh as code. owner for the migration module to keep track of mongo migrations ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated ownership assignments for specific project paths, adding new owners without removing existing ones. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-10-09 06:54:24 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/**/* @sharat87 @abhvsn @AnaghHegde
chore: Add owner for migrations
2024-06-06 04:47:13 +00:00
chore: Adding DevOps to CODEOWNERS
2024-02-27 10:46:20 +00:00
# DevOps & Shri
deploy/**/* @sharat87 @pratapaprasanna
chore: Add Code owner for workflows
2024-03-27 03:27:34 +00:00
.github/workflows/*.yml @sharat87
chore: Move appsmithctl to RTS (#37531) Move the `appsmithctl` code to RTS. RTS' own build system will build `appsmithctl` as well. We're adding two command scripts, `ctl` and `appsmithctl` to `/opt/bin`, which will be the entrypoints for this. The `appsmithctl` is now just an alias to the much shorter and non-redundancy-inducing `ctl`. We aren't migrating to TypeScript in this PR so we're ignoring the new `ctl` folder in both `tsconfig.json` and `.eslintrc`. That's temporary, the next PR will fix that. ## Automation /test sanity ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11930931528> > Commit: 90b5f97b801ac8d4b4b0126d85edff3dccc050bd > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11930931528&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:36:02 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced the `appsmithctl` command for easier command execution. - Updated build process to include additional entry points. - **Bug Fixes** - Streamlined Docker build process, enhancing efficiency and reducing complexity. - **Documentation** - Added a new section in the README for `appsmithctl` command description. - **Chores** - Updated dependencies in `package.json`. - Removed obsolete files and workflows to simplify project structure. - **Style** - Added a new ESLint configuration for specific project needs. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-11-20 15:28:38 +00:00
app/client/packages/ctl/**/* @sharat87 @pratapaprasanna
chore: Adding DevOps to CODEOWNERS
2024-02-27 10:46:20 +00:00
app/server/**/pom.xml @sharat87
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/repositories/ce/BaseAppsmithRepositoryCEImpl.java @sharat87
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/repositories/ce/params/QueryAllParams.java @sharat87
chore: Add owner for migrations
2024-06-06 04:47:13 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/bridge/**/* @sharat87
chore: added code owner for cypress (#34125) ## Description Adding myself as code owner for cypress to be notified on any change on cypress specs Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No
2024-06-10 07:59:05 +00:00
#Cypress
chore: Adding my name as codeowner (#34725) ## Description Adding CODEOWNER as myself Fixes #`34724` /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity" <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated file ownership for testing files to include `@sagar-qa007` alongside `@ApekshaBhosale`. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9803492102> > Commit: b4999a4e85649ef359d2abb465b6fed8c30c0049 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=9803492102&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > <hr>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 05:40:57 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
2024-07-05 11:35:12 +00:00
app/client/cypress/**/* @ApekshaBhosale @sagar-qa007
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink