PromucFlow_constructor/app/client/src/sagas/ApiPaneSagas.ts

817 lines
25 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
/**
* Handles the Api pane ui state. It looks into the routing based on actions too
* */
import get from "lodash/get";
import omit from "lodash/omit";
import { all, call, put, select, take, takeEvery } from "redux-saga/effects";
import * as Sentry from "@sentry/react";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import type {
feat: start with data 2nd step added (#29078) ## Description This PR adds second step of datasource creation during onboarding start with data initiative. With this PR, when we select start with data path, we can see list of plugins, if we select a plugin, we will be shown datasource form, which we can fill and save, after saving it we will be redirected inside the application on the datasource review page. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28808 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-11-27 16:50:05 +00:00
ApplicationPayload,
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
ReduxAction,
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
ReduxActionWithMeta,
} from "ee/constants/ReduxActionConstants";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import {
2020-06-18 14:16:49 +00:00
ReduxActionErrorTypes,
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
ReduxActionTypes,
ReduxFormActionTypes,
} from "ee/constants/ReduxActionConstants";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import type { GetFormData } from "selectors/formSelectors";
import { getFormData } from "selectors/formSelectors";
import {
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
QUERY_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
} from "ee/constants/forms";
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
import {
CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
EMPTY_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS,
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
HTTP_METHOD,
POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS,
POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS_ARRAY,
} from "constants/ApiEditorConstants/CommonApiConstants";
import { DEFAULT_CREATE_API_CONFIG } from "constants/ApiEditorConstants/ApiEditorConstants";
import { DEFAULT_CREATE_GRAPHQL_CONFIG } from "constants/ApiEditorConstants/GraphQLEditorConstants";
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
import history from "utils/history";
import { initialize, autofill, change, reset } from "redux-form";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import type { Property } from "api/ActionAPI";
2022-08-04 05:40:44 +00:00
import { getQueryParams } from "utils/URLUtils";
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
import { getPluginIdOfPackageName } from "sagas/selectors";
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
import {
getAction,
getActionByBaseId,
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
getDatasourceActionRouteInfo,
getPlugin,
} from "ee/selectors/entitiesSelector";
import {
createActionRequest,
setActionProperty,
} from "actions/pluginActionActions";
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
import type {
Action,
ApiAction,
CreateApiActionDefaultsParams,
} from "entities/Action";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import { PluginPackageName, PluginType } from "entities/Action";
import { getCurrentWorkspaceId } from "ee/selectors/selectedWorkspaceSelectors";
import log from "loglevel";
import type { EventLocation } from "ee/utils/analyticsUtilTypes";
import { createMessage, ERROR_ACTION_RENAME_FAIL } from "ee/constants/messages";
import {
getContentTypeHeaderValue,
parseUrlForQueryParams,
queryParamsRegEx,
} from "utils/ApiPaneUtils";
2021-12-07 09:45:18 +00:00
import { updateReplayEntity } from "actions/pageActions";
import { ENTITY_TYPE } from "ee/entities/AppsmithConsole/utils";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import type { Plugin } from "api/PluginApi";
import { getDisplayFormat } from "selectors/apiPaneSelectors";
import { apiEditorIdURL, datasourcesEditorIdURL } from "ee/RouteBuilder";
import { getCurrentBasePageId } from "selectors/editorSelectors";
import { validateResponse } from "./ErrorSagas";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import type { CreateDatasourceSuccessAction } from "actions/datasourceActions";
import { removeTempDatasource } from "actions/datasourceActions";
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
import { klona } from "klona/lite";
import { toast } from "@appsmith/ads";
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
import type { AutoGeneratedHeader } from "pages/Editor/APIEditor/helpers";
import { deriveAutoGeneratedHeaderState } from "pages/Editor/APIEditor/helpers";
feat: [epic] appsmith design system version 2 deduplication (#22030) ## Description ### Fixes - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19383 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19384 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19385 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19386 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19387 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19388 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19389 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19390 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19391 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19392 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19393 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19394 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19395 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19396 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19397 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19398 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19399 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19400 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19401 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19402 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19403 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19404 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19405 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19406 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19407 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19408 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19409 Fixes # (issue) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video ## Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce. > Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not important - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: akash-codemonk <67054171+akash-codemonk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvi@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Arsalan <arsalanyaldram0211@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Aman Agarwal <aman@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Rohit Agarwal <rohit_agarwal@live.in> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <nilesh@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <20905988+nsarupr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvibhakta@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi Goswami <parthvigoswami@Parthvis-MacBook-Pro.local> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <vijetha@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi <80334441+Parthvi12@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Apple <nandan@thinkify.io> Co-authored-by: Saroj <43822041+sarojsarab@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sangeeth Sivan <74818788+berzerkeer@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Preet Sidhu <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <119562824+Vijetha-Kaja@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
2023-05-19 18:37:06 +00:00
import { TEMP_DATASOURCE_ID } from "constants/Datasource";
import type { FeatureFlags } from "ee/entities/FeatureFlag";
import { selectFeatureFlags } from "ee/selectors/featureFlagsSelectors";
import { isGACEnabled } from "ee/utils/planHelpers";
import { getHasManageActionPermission } from "ee/utils/BusinessFeatures/permissionPageHelpers";
feat: start with data 2nd step added (#29078) ## Description This PR adds second step of datasource creation during onboarding start with data initiative. With this PR, when we select start with data path, we can see list of plugins, if we select a plugin, we will be shown datasource form, which we can fill and save, after saving it we will be redirected inside the application on the datasource review page. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28808 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-11-27 16:50:05 +00:00
import {
getApplicationByIdFromWorkspaces,
getCurrentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp,
} from "ee/selectors/applicationSelectors";
import { DEFAULT_CREATE_APPSMITH_AI_CONFIG } from "constants/ApiEditorConstants/AppsmithAIEditorConstants";
import { checkAndGetPluginFormConfigsSaga } from "./PluginSagas";
import { convertToBasePageIdSelector } from "selectors/pageListSelectors";
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
2019-12-23 12:12:58 +00:00
function* syncApiParamsSaga(
actionPayload: ReduxActionWithMeta<string, { field: string }>,
actionId: string,
2019-12-23 12:12:58 +00:00
) {
const field = actionPayload.meta.field;
//Payload here contains the path and query params of a typical url like https://{domain}/{path}?{query_params}
const value = actionPayload.payload;
// Regular expression to find the query params group
2019-12-23 12:12:58 +00:00
if (field === "actionConfiguration.path") {
const params = parseUrlForQueryParams(value);
fix: api url dynamic bindings (#23696) Currently we batch update actions, which can asynchronously update the action state. As a result, when a new set action property is called, it can cause a selection of the old action state values (which in this case is the dynamicBindingsPathList). In order to mitigate this, we wait for all the batch updates to be successful, before allowing new action properties to be set. Fixes : https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Evaluation-is-not-working-cce345f9ce564b3483f18dbc3e4a6249 Copying description from [PR 23552 ](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/23552) #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Rohit Agarwal <rohit_agarwal@live.in> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com>
2023-05-26 10:13:18 +00:00
// before updating the query parameters make sure the path field changes have been successfully updated first
yield take(ReduxActionTypes.BATCH_UPDATES_SUCCESS);
yield put(
autofill(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.queryParameters",
params,
),
);
yield put(
setActionProperty({
actionId: actionId,
propertyName: "actionConfiguration.queryParameters",
value: params,
}),
);
2019-12-23 12:12:58 +00:00
} else if (field.includes("actionConfiguration.queryParameters")) {
const { values } = yield select(getFormData, API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME);
2019-12-30 13:05:37 +00:00
const path = values.actionConfiguration.path || "";
const matchGroups = path.match(queryParamsRegEx) || [];
const currentPath = matchGroups[1] || "";
2019-12-23 12:12:58 +00:00
const paramsString = values.actionConfiguration.queryParameters
.filter((p: Property) => p.key)
.map(
(p: Property, i: number) => `${i === 0 ? "?" : "&"}${p.key}=${p.value}`,
)
.join("");
yield put(
autofill(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.path",
`${currentPath}${paramsString}`,
),
);
}
}
function* handleUpdateBodyContentType(
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
action: ReduxAction<{ title: string; apiId: string }>,
) {
const { apiId, title } = action.payload;
const { values } = yield select(getFormData, API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME);
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
const displayFormatValue = POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS_ARRAY.find(
(el) => el === title,
);
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
if (!displayFormatValue) {
log.error("Display format not supported", title);
return;
}
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
// we want apiContentType to always match the current body tab the user is on.
yield put(
change(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.formData.apiContentType",
displayFormatValue,
),
);
// get headers
fix: Fix sentry errors for api content type (#23412) This PR fixes undefined headers value when user triggers an update to the API body type (specifically to the NONE tab.) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22950 Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22952 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-05-24 20:26:23 +00:00
const headers = klona(values?.actionConfiguration?.headers);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
// set autoGeneratedHeaders
const autoGeneratedHeaders: AutoGeneratedHeader[] = [];
// Set an auto generated content type header for all post body format options except none.
// also if we wish to add more auto genrated content-type the code goes inside here.
if (displayFormatValue !== POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.NONE) {
fix: Fix sentry errors for api content type (#23412) This PR fixes undefined headers value when user triggers an update to the API body type (specifically to the NONE tab.) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22950 Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22952 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-05-24 20:26:23 +00:00
// get content type header index
const contentTypeHeaderIndex = headers.findIndex(
(element: { key: string; value: string }) =>
element &&
element.key &&
element.key.trim().toLowerCase() === CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
// if theres content type
if (contentTypeHeaderIndex !== -1) {
autoGeneratedHeaders.push({
key: CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
value: displayFormatValue,
isInvalid: true,
});
} else {
autoGeneratedHeaders.push({
key: CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
value: displayFormatValue,
isInvalid: false,
});
// Example of setting extra auto generated header.
// autoGeneratedHeaders.push({
// key: "content-length",
// value: "0",
// isInvalid: false,
// });
}
}
// change the autoGeneratedHeader value.
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
yield put(
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
change(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.autoGeneratedHeaders",
autoGeneratedHeaders,
),
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
);
// Quick Context: The extra formadata action is responsible for updating the current multi switch mode you see on api editor body tab
// whenever a user selects a new content type through the tab e.g application/json, this action is dispatched to update that value, which is then read in the PostDataBody file
// to show the appropriate content type section.
yield put({
type: ReduxActionTypes.SET_EXTRA_FORMDATA,
payload: {
id: apiId,
values: {
displayFormat: {
label: title,
value: title,
},
},
},
});
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
// help to prevent cyclic dependency error in case the bodyFormData is empty.
fix: Fix sentry errors for api content type (#23412) This PR fixes undefined headers value when user triggers an update to the API body type (specifically to the NONE tab.) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22950 Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22952 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-05-24 20:26:23 +00:00
const bodyFormData = klona(values?.actionConfiguration?.bodyFormData);
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
if (
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
displayFormatValue === POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.FORM_URLENCODED ||
displayFormatValue === POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.MULTIPART_FORM_DATA
) {
fix: Fix sentry errors for api content type (#23412) This PR fixes undefined headers value when user triggers an update to the API body type (specifically to the NONE tab.) Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22950 Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/22952 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Test-plan-implementation#speedbreaker-features-to-consider-for-every-change) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans/_edit#areas-of-interest) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-05-24 20:26:23 +00:00
if (!bodyFormData || bodyFormData?.length === 0) {
yield put(
change(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.bodyFormData",
EMPTY_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS.slice(),
),
);
}
}
}
function* updateExtraFormDataSaga() {
const formData: GetFormData = yield select(getFormData, API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME);
const { values } = formData;
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
// when initializing, check if theres a display format present.
const extraFormData: GetFormData = yield select(getDisplayFormat, values.id);
const headers: Array<{ key: string; value: string }> =
get(values, "actionConfiguration.headers") || [];
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
const autoGeneratedHeaders: AutoGeneratedHeader[] =
get(values, "actionConfiguration.autoGeneratedHeaders") || [];
const contentTypeValue: string = getContentTypeHeaderValue(headers);
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
const contentTypeAutoGeneratedHeaderValue: string =
getContentTypeHeaderValue(autoGeneratedHeaders);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
let rawApiContentType = "";
if (!extraFormData) {
/*
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
* if there is no user specified content type value or autogenerated content type value, we default to raw
* if there is no user specified content type value and there is a autogenerated content type value, we default to its value
* if there is a user specified content type value and no autogenerated content type value, we default to the user content type value
* if there is a user specified content type value and a autogenerated content type value, we default to the user content type value
*/
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
if (!contentTypeValue && !contentTypeAutoGeneratedHeaderValue) {
rawApiContentType = POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.NONE;
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
} else if (!contentTypeValue && contentTypeAutoGeneratedHeaderValue) {
rawApiContentType = contentTypeAutoGeneratedHeaderValue;
} else if (
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
(contentTypeValue && !contentTypeAutoGeneratedHeaderValue) ||
(contentTypeValue && contentTypeAutoGeneratedHeaderValue)
) {
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
rawApiContentType = contentTypeValue;
}
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
yield call(setApiBodyTabHeaderFormat, values.id, rawApiContentType);
}
}
function* changeApiSaga(
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
actionPayload: ReduxAction<{
id: string;
isSaas: boolean;
action?: Action;
}>,
) {
const { id, isSaas } = actionPayload.payload;
2021-12-07 09:45:18 +00:00
let { action } = actionPayload.payload;
if (!action) action = yield select(getAction, id);
if (!action) return;
if (isSaas) {
yield put(initialize(QUERY_EDITOR_FORM_NAME, action));
} else {
yield put(initialize(API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME, action));
yield call(updateExtraFormDataSaga);
if (
action.actionConfiguration &&
action.actionConfiguration.queryParameters?.length
) {
// Sync the api params my mocking a change action
yield call(
syncApiParamsSaga,
{
type: ReduxFormActionTypes.ARRAY_REMOVE,
payload: action.actionConfiguration.queryParameters,
meta: {
field: "actionConfiguration.queryParameters",
},
},
id,
);
}
2019-12-30 13:05:37 +00:00
}
2021-12-07 09:45:18 +00:00
//Retrieve form data with synced query params to start tracking change history.
const { values: actionPostProcess } = yield select(
getFormData,
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
);
yield put(updateReplayEntity(id, actionPostProcess, ENTITY_TYPE.ACTION));
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
}
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
function* setApiBodyTabHeaderFormat(apiId: string, apiContentType?: string) {
let displayFormat;
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
if (apiContentType) {
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
if (Object.values(POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS).includes(apiContentType)) {
displayFormat = {
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
label: apiContentType,
value: apiContentType,
};
} else {
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
displayFormat = {
label: POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.RAW,
value: POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.RAW,
};
}
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
} else {
displayFormat = {
label: POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.NONE,
value: POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.NONE,
};
}
yield put({
type: ReduxActionTypes.SET_EXTRA_FORMDATA,
payload: {
id: apiId,
values: {
displayFormat,
},
},
});
}
function* formValueChangeSaga(
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
actionPayload: ReduxActionWithMeta<
string,
{ field: string; form: string; index?: number }
>,
2020-06-04 13:49:22 +00:00
) {
try {
const { field, form } = actionPayload.meta;
if (form !== API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME) return;
if (field === "dynamicBindingPathList" || field === "name") return;
const { values } = yield select(getFormData, API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME);
feat: code split files based on feature flags (#27678) ## Description Add feature flag based logic for code splitted files #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #2237 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 20:42:56 +00:00
const featureFlags: FeatureFlags = yield select(selectFeatureFlags);
const isFeatureEnabled = isGACEnabled(featureFlags);
if (!values.id) return;
feat: code split files based on feature flags (#27678) ## Description Add feature flag based logic for code splitted files #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #2237 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-29 20:42:56 +00:00
if (
!getHasManageActionPermission(isFeatureEnabled, values.userPermissions)
) {
yield validateResponse({
status: 403,
resourceType: values?.pluginType,
resourceId: values.id,
});
}
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
const contentTypeHeaderIndex =
values?.actionConfiguration?.headers?.findIndex(
(header: { key: string; value: string }) =>
header?.key?.trim().toLowerCase() === CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
const autoGeneratedContentTypeHeaderIndex =
values?.actionConfiguration?.autoGeneratedHeaders?.findIndex(
(header: { key: string; value: string }) =>
header?.key?.trim().toLowerCase() === CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
const autoGeneratedHeaders =
get(values, "actionConfiguration.autoGeneratedHeaders") || [];
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
if (
actionPayload.type === ReduxFormActionTypes.ARRAY_REMOVE ||
actionPayload.type === ReduxFormActionTypes.ARRAY_PUSH
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
) {
const value = get(values, field);
yield put(
setActionProperty({
actionId: values.id,
propertyName: field,
value,
}),
);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
// if the user triggers a delete operation on any headers field
if (field === `actionConfiguration.headers`) {
// we get the updated auto generated header state based on the user specified content-type.
chore: upgrade to prettier v2 + enforce import types (#21013)Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com> ## Description This PR upgrades Prettier to v2 + enforces TypeScript’s [`import type`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html#type-only-imports-and-export) syntax where applicable. It’s submitted as a separate PR so we can merge it easily. As a part of this PR, we reformat the codebase heavily: - add `import type` everywhere where it’s required, and - re-format the code to account for Prettier 2’s breaking changes: https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html#breaking-changes This PR is submitted against `release` to make sure all new code by team members will adhere to new formatting standards, and we’ll have fewer conflicts when merging `bundle-optimizations` into `release`. (I’ll merge `release` back into `bundle-optimizations` once this PR is merged.) ### Why is this needed? This PR is needed because, for the Lodash optimization from https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/commit/7cbb12af886621256224be0c93e6a465dd710ad3, we need to use `import type`. Otherwise, `babel-plugin-lodash` complains that `LoDashStatic` is not a lodash function. However, just using `import type` in the current codebase will give you this: <img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 17 45 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2953267/223775744-407afa0c-e8b9-44a1-90f9-b879348da57f.png"> That’s because Prettier 1 can’t parse `import type` at all. To parse it, we need to upgrade to Prettier 2. ### Why enforce `import type`? Apart from just enabling `import type` support, this PR enforces specifying `import type` everywhere it’s needed. (Developers will get immediate TypeScript and ESLint errors when they forget to do so.) I’m doing this because I believe `import type` improves DX and makes refactorings easier. Let’s say you had a few imports like below. Can you tell which of these imports will increase the bundle size? (Tip: it’s not all of them!) ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import { Position } from "codemirror"; import { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` It’s pretty hard, right? What about now? ```ts // app/client/src/workers/Linting/utils.ts import type { Position } from "codemirror"; import type { LintError as JSHintError, LintOptions } from "jshint"; import { get, isEmpty, isNumber, keys, last, set } from "lodash"; ``` Now, it’s clear that only `lodash` will be bundled. This helps developers to see which imports are problematic, but it _also_ helps with refactorings. Now, if you want to see where `codemirror` is bundled, you can just grep for `import \{.*\} from "codemirror"` – and you won’t get any type-only imports. This also helps (some) bundlers. Upon transpiling, TypeScript erases type-only imports completely. In some environment (not ours), this makes the bundle smaller, as the bundler doesn’t need to bundle type-only imports anymore. ## Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## How Has This Been Tested? This was tested to not break the build. ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <hello@satishgandham.com> Co-authored-by: Satish Gandham <satish.iitg@gmail.com>
2023-03-16 11:41:47 +00:00
const newAutoGeneratedHeaderState: AutoGeneratedHeader[] =
deriveAutoGeneratedHeaderState(
values?.actionConfiguration?.headers,
autoGeneratedHeaders,
);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
// update the autogenerated headers with the new autogenerated headers state.
yield put(
change(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.autoGeneratedHeaders",
newAutoGeneratedHeaderState,
),
);
}
} else {
yield put(
setActionProperty({
actionId: values.id,
propertyName: field,
value: actionPayload.payload,
}),
);
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
if (field.includes("actionConfiguration.headers")) {
// if user is changing the header keys and if autoGenerated headers exist, derive new state based on the header value.
if (
field.includes(".key") &&
autoGeneratedHeaders &&
autoGeneratedHeaders.length > 0
) {
const newAutoGeneratedHeaderState = deriveAutoGeneratedHeaderState(
values?.actionConfiguration?.headers || [],
autoGeneratedHeaders,
);
yield put(
change(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.autoGeneratedHeaders",
newAutoGeneratedHeaderState,
),
);
}
}
// when the httpMethod is changed
if (field === "actionConfiguration.httpMethod") {
const value = actionPayload.payload;
// if the user is switching to any other type of httpMethod apart from GET we add an autogenerated content type.
if (value !== HTTP_METHOD.GET) {
// if the autoGenerated header does not have any key-values or if there's no content type in the headers
// we add a default content-type of application/json and set the body tab appropriately.
if (
autoGeneratedHeaders.length < 1 ||
autoGeneratedContentTypeHeaderIndex === -1
) {
const newAutoGeneratedHeaders: AutoGeneratedHeader[] = [
...autoGeneratedHeaders,
];
if (contentTypeHeaderIndex !== -1) {
newAutoGeneratedHeaders.push({
key: CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
value: POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.JSON,
isInvalid: true,
});
} else {
newAutoGeneratedHeaders.push({
key: CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER_KEY,
value: POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.JSON,
isInvalid: false,
});
}
// change the autoGeneratedHeader value.
yield put(
change(
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
"actionConfiguration.autoGeneratedHeaders",
newAutoGeneratedHeaders,
),
);
// set the body tab.
yield call(
setApiBodyTabHeaderFormat,
values.id,
POST_BODY_FORMAT_OPTIONS.JSON,
);
}
}
}
feat: Support body in GET API requests (#7127) * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * WIP * Refactoring HTTP Method & Content Type to be objects instead of arrays TODO: 1. Set the default content-type for Get request to "None". Currently, it's raw 2. For None content-type, don't send the body field in the API request * Almost working implementation for the None type Currently, the body still gets sent in non-GET requests even if the None tab is selected. * Adding object.freeze to prevent any modifications to HTTP_METHOD_ENUM * WIP: Using enum & const for ts autocomplete * working implementation for NONE type, apiContentType prop added to API actions * adds apiContentType to actionConfiguration.formData object * Handling apiContentType property in Rest API formData * change apiContentType when user types content-type value and switches http method * makes api editor as similar as possible to postman, project postman. * Correcting the import in ApiEditorConstants * Resolved all merge conflicts * replay DSL functtionality * removes unneccessary files from worker * Fixes type declarations, naming e.t.c. * fix server side merge conflicts * fix client side merge conflicts * fix failing cypress tests Co-authored-by: Irongade <adeoluayangade@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ayangade Adeoluwa <37867493+Irongade@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-15 11:13:48 +00:00
}
fix: Auto-generated header Refactor (#19873) API content type refactor flow. More information can be found [here](https://www.notion.so/appsmith/API-Content-type-Header-Refactor-07f2f944e13f43148210c2461cf3fcda?d=339958cf1d374fefadfa437f86d95627) Fixes #18473 - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: PiyushPushkar02 <118709669+PiyushPushkar02@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sumit Kumar <sumit@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-24 12:18:48 +00:00
yield all([call(syncApiParamsSaga, actionPayload, values.id)]);
// We need to refetch form values here since syncApuParams saga and updateFormFields directly update reform form values.
const { values: formValuesPostProcess } = yield select(
getFormData,
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME,
);
2021-12-07 09:45:18 +00:00
yield put(
updateReplayEntity(
formValuesPostProcess.id,
formValuesPostProcess,
ENTITY_TYPE.ACTION,
),
);
} catch (error) {
yield put({
type: ReduxActionErrorTypes.SAVE_PAGE_ERROR,
payload: {
error,
},
});
yield put(reset(API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME));
}
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
}
2019-12-23 12:12:58 +00:00
function* handleActionCreatedSaga(actionPayload: ReduxAction<Action>) {
const {
applicationId,
baseId: baseActionId,
pageId,
pluginType,
} = actionPayload.payload;
const action: Action | undefined = yield select(
getActionByBaseId,
baseActionId,
);
const data = action ? { ...action } : {};
Introducing Google Sheets Plugin (#3517) * cherry pick -make new * revert to enable fix from release * attempt to hook into existing datasource editor * gSheets plugin skeleton from Rest API * Changes for database migration * fix for auth code * separate it out * action page loads! * add to explorer * create action from datasource * Editor JSON WIP * working query form * Editor JSON WIP * import to * fix toast message * redirect from datasource and editor pages * fix onboarding * fix imports and constants * refactor form out * refactor queryForm * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * initial values from settings, editor and form * Check * remove dangling code around lightTheme * Safety net * remove class * try mouseover solve * force click * changes from review * fix action form name on import * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * minor cleanup * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * WIP * Google sheets changes * Merge conflicts * Merging and fixes, needs refactoring * Check * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixed tests * Add cloud services env variable * Clean up saga * Clean up * Refactoring * Deleted svg file * Minor fixes * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods (#3486) * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods * Review changes * Removed sysout * Added handling of edge cases with table data * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixes * Fixes * Added validations * Improved tests * Removed extraneous injected bean * Review changes * Fixed bug with method * Changes to Google sheets plugin's request and response structures (#3692) * Method changes * Removed logging * Renaming options * Reverting pom version * Modified type of collection variables, fixed errors * Converted row offset field to one that supports dynamic bindings * Review changes * List SAAS plugin type actions under lightning menu apis (#3820) * list saas plugin type actions under lightning menu apis * combine saas plugin type actions in the other sub menu of lightning menu Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> * Fix merge issues * Prettified query editor and a few fixes w/ ux * Test fixes * Reformatting request * code for REST added (#3876) Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> * Renamed body to row object * Renamed placeholder for range * Renamed range heading * Modifications to handle range semantics * Use spreadsheet Url instead of id * Ordering of methods * Removed logging * Add tests for Dynamic text controls * Add tests for url helpers * Fix coverage config * Nevermind * Interface changes * There is no body here * Yay to hints * Delete row field is separately handled as row index * placeholder support (#4001) * Fixed tests, typos and creating new sheets with random rows * Switched to using 'rowIndex' throughout * binding path added for query input field (#4016) * - Fixed QA bugs (#4032) - Split delete sheet into two - Removed dynamic query input types from hidden keys * Proper exceptions * Removed extra logging * Throw exception if update method does not match any of the columns * Same for bulk update * Zero-indexed delete row * I'm a space bound rocket ship * Logic to register installations with cs (#4062) * Logic to register installations with cs * Clean up * Casting to string * Checking to see if this makes the test pass * Added an extra null check Co-authored-by: Piyush <piyush@codeitout.com> Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Apeksha Bhosale <7846888+ApekshaBhosale@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-04-22 03:30:09 +00:00
if (pluginType === PluginType.API) {
yield put(initialize(API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME, omit(data, "name")));
let basePageId: string = yield select(convertToBasePageIdSelector, pageId);
if (!basePageId) {
const application: ApplicationPayload = yield select(
getApplicationByIdFromWorkspaces,
applicationId,
);
if (application && Array.isArray(application.pages)) {
basePageId =
application.pages.find((page) => page.id === pageId)?.baseId || "";
}
}
history.push(
feat: adding slug names in urls (#10957) * Init commit clean urls * Changes to builder route * Refactored URLs * Remove default params from url builder functions. * Fixed more urls * Changed selector name * Minor url correction * Type fixes * Jest fixes * Fixed routing for old published apps * Fixed url slug replace * page-1 -> page1 as default page slug name * Remove application id from init editor calls * Use default page slug * Added comments and placeholder values for slug names * variable rename * Removed redirection and added back the old routes * Prevent page slug name recompute * Fixed home page load in view mode * Added null checks * Fixed jest test * Fixed jest test * Update URL slugs when app/page name changes * Added unit tests and updates types * Removed unused code * * Removed duplication fetch page call. * Fixes #11354 * Fixed sign up flow * Refactored initializeEditorSaga * Fixed warnings * Fixed integrations screen URL bugs * Cypress fixes * Fixed slug names in copy/move operations and pages screen * Minor refactor * Fixed page highlight bug in published apps * Added new url factory and middleware to store url params * Changed store to default export and fix unit tests * Fixed slugs unit test * Minor fixes * Fixes #11379 * Fixed set as home page feature * Updated types * app id adjustments for cypress * Fixed bad merge * Refactored routes to functional component * * Fixed EE active entity highlight. * Remove unused code in editor router. * jest fix * Mock history to prevent security errors * constant rename * Removed console logs * Fixed page id regex * Do not check for /pages in url * Fixed missing pageId on quick edit/deploy clicks * Missed files from previous commit * Fixed warnings * Fixed jest test * New api integration * feat: Add applicationVersion property to Application (#11626) Added a new property to Application object - applicationVersion. This property can be used to identity when there is a breaking change and can not be solved with migration. FE will use this property to detect such conditions. Another API is added to migrate the applicationVersion to latest version when user migrates the breaking changes. * Added manual upgrade modal. * Test fix * Fixed jest test * function rename * Fix deploy error * Added null check * Changes to persist URL search params when redirecting * Added updates tooltip * More unit test cases * Fixed git url redirection * Fix warning * Fixed evaluation on upgrade * Fixed warnings * File rename * Added cypress for clean urls * Fixed import/export/fork cypress * Cypress api server fixes * Fixed mongo spec * Fixed replay spec * Fixed comments spec * More cypress fixes * Fixed tooltip in update btn * Text size changes * Minor fixes * Jest test fix * Fixed type error * Fixed warnings * Fixed todo comments * Moved description to constants file * Fixed cypress CI run crash * Fixes git cypress failures * Import/Export cypress test fixes * Import export fork cypress fixes * Explorer test fix * Switch branch test fix * Added applicationVersion in export app json * Calls plugin forms in parallel * Fixed warnings * Fixed warning * Import export CI fixes * Reverts previous changes * Fixes import export * Fixed import export cypress URL verification * Pass applicationVersion when duplicating application * Cypress fix * Dummy commit Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com>
2022-03-25 10:43:26 +00:00
apiEditorIdURL({
basePageId,
baseApiId: baseActionId,
feat: adding slug names in urls (#10957) * Init commit clean urls * Changes to builder route * Refactored URLs * Remove default params from url builder functions. * Fixed more urls * Changed selector name * Minor url correction * Type fixes * Jest fixes * Fixed routing for old published apps * Fixed url slug replace * page-1 -> page1 as default page slug name * Remove application id from init editor calls * Use default page slug * Added comments and placeholder values for slug names * variable rename * Removed redirection and added back the old routes * Prevent page slug name recompute * Fixed home page load in view mode * Added null checks * Fixed jest test * Fixed jest test * Update URL slugs when app/page name changes * Added unit tests and updates types * Removed unused code * * Removed duplication fetch page call. * Fixes #11354 * Fixed sign up flow * Refactored initializeEditorSaga * Fixed warnings * Fixed integrations screen URL bugs * Cypress fixes * Fixed slug names in copy/move operations and pages screen * Minor refactor * Fixed page highlight bug in published apps * Added new url factory and middleware to store url params * Changed store to default export and fix unit tests * Fixed slugs unit test * Minor fixes * Fixes #11379 * Fixed set as home page feature * Updated types * app id adjustments for cypress * Fixed bad merge * Refactored routes to functional component * * Fixed EE active entity highlight. * Remove unused code in editor router. * jest fix * Mock history to prevent security errors * constant rename * Removed console logs * Fixed page id regex * Do not check for /pages in url * Fixed missing pageId on quick edit/deploy clicks * Missed files from previous commit * Fixed warnings * Fixed jest test * New api integration * feat: Add applicationVersion property to Application (#11626) Added a new property to Application object - applicationVersion. This property can be used to identity when there is a breaking change and can not be solved with migration. FE will use this property to detect such conditions. Another API is added to migrate the applicationVersion to latest version when user migrates the breaking changes. * Added manual upgrade modal. * Test fix * Fixed jest test * function rename * Fix deploy error * Added null check * Changes to persist URL search params when redirecting * Added updates tooltip * More unit test cases * Fixed git url redirection * Fix warning * Fixed evaluation on upgrade * Fixed warnings * File rename * Added cypress for clean urls * Fixed import/export/fork cypress * Cypress api server fixes * Fixed mongo spec * Fixed replay spec * Fixed comments spec * More cypress fixes * Fixed tooltip in update btn * Text size changes * Minor fixes * Jest test fix * Fixed type error * Fixed warnings * Fixed todo comments * Moved description to constants file * Fixed cypress CI run crash * Fixes git cypress failures * Import/Export cypress test fixes * Import export fork cypress fixes * Explorer test fix * Switch branch test fix * Added applicationVersion in export app json * Calls plugin forms in parallel * Fixed warnings * Fixed warning * Import export CI fixes * Reverts previous changes * Fixes import export * Fixed import export cypress URL verification * Pass applicationVersion when duplicating application * Cypress fix * Dummy commit Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com>
2022-03-25 10:43:26 +00:00
params: {
editName: "true",
from: "datasources",
},
}),
);
}
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
}
fix: auto redirect from datasource page to module editor (#35164) ## Description When create datasource is initiated from the API editor by clicking "Save as datasource", it fixes the redirection back to the API editor when `Save` is clicked for modules in package editor. This PR also refactors the usage of typing of `actionRouteInfo` and introduces `parentEntityId` instead of using `pageId`, `moduleId`, `workflowId` separately. This fix also verifies the sanity of 1. API in apps 2. API in workflows Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/31506 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource,@tag.Sanity" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10093685845> > Commit: 785cbe3a0a42fad2f2ca1d7fb76010eb00505343 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10093685845&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Datasource,@tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:39:50 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new function to retrieve the current module ID, enhancing state management. - Added support for handling `parentEntityId` in various data source sagas. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved type safety for action handling in sagas. - **Tests** - Added a new test suite for the `handleDatasourceCreatedSaga` to validate its behavior upon datasource creation. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-07-25 13:21:20 +00:00
export function* handleDatasourceCreatedSaga(
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
actionPayload: CreateDatasourceSuccessAction,
) {
feat: start with data flow for gsheets added (#29143) ## Description This PR adds start with data flow for gsheets as well. Figma designs: https://www.figma.com/file/kbU9xPv44neCfv1FFo9Ndu/User-Activation?type=design&node-id=2155-41716&mode=design&t=34vEaKPCbbo3skG3-0 Specifications: https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Introduce-form-of-datasources-2nd-step-for-the-flow-SaaS-plugins-f99d051d9aec4be4a5964adc43474092?pvs=4 #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28809 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-11-30 11:27:40 +00:00
const plugin: Plugin | undefined = yield select(
getPlugin,
actionPayload.payload.pluginId,
);
// Only look at API plugins
if (plugin && plugin.type !== PluginType.API) return;
feat: start with data 2nd step added (#29078) ## Description This PR adds second step of datasource creation during onboarding start with data initiative. With this PR, when we select start with data path, we can see list of plugins, if we select a plugin, we will be shown datasource form, which we can fill and save, after saving it we will be redirected inside the application on the datasource review page. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #28808 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”>
2023-11-27 16:50:05 +00:00
const currentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp: string | undefined = yield select(
getCurrentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp,
);
const application: ApplicationPayload | undefined = yield select(
getApplicationByIdFromWorkspaces,
currentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp || "",
);
Introducing Google Sheets Plugin (#3517) * cherry pick -make new * revert to enable fix from release * attempt to hook into existing datasource editor * gSheets plugin skeleton from Rest API * Changes for database migration * fix for auth code * separate it out * action page loads! * add to explorer * create action from datasource * Editor JSON WIP * working query form * Editor JSON WIP * import to * fix toast message * redirect from datasource and editor pages * fix onboarding * fix imports and constants * refactor form out * refactor queryForm * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * initial values from settings, editor and form * Check * remove dangling code around lightTheme * Safety net * remove class * try mouseover solve * force click * changes from review * fix action form name on import * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * minor cleanup * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * WIP * Google sheets changes * Merge conflicts * Merging and fixes, needs refactoring * Check * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixed tests * Add cloud services env variable * Clean up saga * Clean up * Refactoring * Deleted svg file * Minor fixes * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods (#3486) * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods * Review changes * Removed sysout * Added handling of edge cases with table data * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixes * Fixes * Added validations * Improved tests * Removed extraneous injected bean * Review changes * Fixed bug with method * Changes to Google sheets plugin's request and response structures (#3692) * Method changes * Removed logging * Renaming options * Reverting pom version * Modified type of collection variables, fixed errors * Converted row offset field to one that supports dynamic bindings * Review changes * List SAAS plugin type actions under lightning menu apis (#3820) * list saas plugin type actions under lightning menu apis * combine saas plugin type actions in the other sub menu of lightning menu Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> * Fix merge issues * Prettified query editor and a few fixes w/ ux * Test fixes * Reformatting request * code for REST added (#3876) Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> * Renamed body to row object * Renamed placeholder for range * Renamed range heading * Modifications to handle range semantics * Use spreadsheet Url instead of id * Ordering of methods * Removed logging * Add tests for Dynamic text controls * Add tests for url helpers * Fix coverage config * Nevermind * Interface changes * There is no body here * Yay to hints * Delete row field is separately handled as row index * placeholder support (#4001) * Fixed tests, typos and creating new sheets with random rows * Switched to using 'rowIndex' throughout * binding path added for query input field (#4016) * - Fixed QA bugs (#4032) - Split delete sheet into two - Removed dynamic query input types from hidden keys * Proper exceptions * Removed extra logging * Throw exception if update method does not match any of the columns * Same for bulk update * Zero-indexed delete row * I'm a space bound rocket ship * Logic to register installations with cs (#4062) * Logic to register installations with cs * Clean up * Casting to string * Checking to see if this makes the test pass * Added an extra null check Co-authored-by: Piyush <piyush@codeitout.com> Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Apeksha Bhosale <7846888+ApekshaBhosale@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-04-22 03:30:09 +00:00
fix: auto redirect from datasource page to module editor (#35164) ## Description When create datasource is initiated from the API editor by clicking "Save as datasource", it fixes the redirection back to the API editor when `Save` is clicked for modules in package editor. This PR also refactors the usage of typing of `actionRouteInfo` and introduces `parentEntityId` instead of using `pageId`, `moduleId`, `workflowId` separately. This fix also verifies the sanity of 1. API in apps 2. API in workflows Fixes https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/31506 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Datasource,@tag.Sanity" ### :mag: Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10093685845> > Commit: 785cbe3a0a42fad2f2ca1d7fb76010eb00505343 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10093685845&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Datasource,@tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:39:50 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new function to retrieve the current module ID, enhancing state management. - Added support for handling `parentEntityId` in various data source sagas. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved type safety for action handling in sagas. - **Tests** - Added a new test suite for the `handleDatasourceCreatedSaga` to validate its behavior upon datasource creation. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2024-07-25 13:21:20 +00:00
const actionRouteInfo: ReturnType<typeof getDatasourceActionRouteInfo> =
yield select(getDatasourceActionRouteInfo);
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
// This will ensure that API if saved as datasource, will get attached with datasource
// once the datasource is saved
feat: [epic] appsmith design system version 2 deduplication (#22030) ## Description ### Fixes - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19383 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19384 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19385 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19386 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19387 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19388 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19389 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19390 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19391 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19392 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19393 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19394 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19395 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19396 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19397 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19398 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19399 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19400 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19401 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19402 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19403 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19404 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19405 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19406 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19407 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19408 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19409 Fixes # (issue) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video ## Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce. > Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not important - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: akash-codemonk <67054171+akash-codemonk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvi@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Arsalan <arsalanyaldram0211@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Aman Agarwal <aman@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Rohit Agarwal <rohit_agarwal@live.in> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <nilesh@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <20905988+nsarupr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvibhakta@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi Goswami <parthvigoswami@Parthvis-MacBook-Pro.local> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <vijetha@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi <80334441+Parthvi12@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Apple <nandan@thinkify.io> Co-authored-by: Saroj <43822041+sarojsarab@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sangeeth Sivan <74818788+berzerkeer@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Preet Sidhu <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <119562824+Vijetha-Kaja@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
2023-05-19 18:37:06 +00:00
if (
!!actionRouteInfo.baseApiId &&
feat: [epic] appsmith design system version 2 deduplication (#22030) ## Description ### Fixes - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19383 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19384 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19385 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19386 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19387 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19388 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19389 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19390 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19391 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19392 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19393 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19394 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19395 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19396 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19397 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19398 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19399 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19400 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19401 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19402 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19403 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19404 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19405 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19406 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19407 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19408 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19409 Fixes # (issue) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video ## Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce. > Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not important - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: akash-codemonk <67054171+akash-codemonk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvi@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Arsalan <arsalanyaldram0211@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Aman Agarwal <aman@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Rohit Agarwal <rohit_agarwal@live.in> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <nilesh@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <20905988+nsarupr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvibhakta@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi Goswami <parthvigoswami@Parthvis-MacBook-Pro.local> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <vijetha@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi <80334441+Parthvi12@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Apple <nandan@thinkify.io> Co-authored-by: Saroj <43822041+sarojsarab@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sangeeth Sivan <74818788+berzerkeer@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Preet Sidhu <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <119562824+Vijetha-Kaja@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
2023-05-19 18:37:06 +00:00
actionPayload.payload?.id !== TEMP_DATASOURCE_ID
) {
const action: Action = yield select(
getActionByBaseId,
actionRouteInfo.baseApiId,
);
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
yield put(
setActionProperty({
actionId: action?.id,
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
propertyName: "datasource",
value: actionPayload.payload,
}),
);
// we need to wait for action to be updated with respective datasource,
// before redirecting back to action page, hence added take operator to
// wait for update action to be complete.
yield take(ReduxActionTypes.UPDATE_ACTION_SUCCESS);
yield put({
type: ReduxActionTypes.STORE_AS_DATASOURCE_COMPLETE,
});
// temp datasource data is deleted here, because we need temp data before
// redirecting to api page, otherwise it will lead to invalid url page
yield put(removeTempDatasource());
}
const { redirect } = actionPayload;
// redirect back to api page
if (actionRouteInfo && redirect) {
history.push(
apiEditorIdURL({
baseParentEntityId: actionRouteInfo?.baseParentEntityId ?? "",
baseApiId: actionRouteInfo.baseApiId ?? "",
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
}),
);
} else if (
!currentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp ||
(!!currentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp &&
actionPayload.payload.id !== TEMP_DATASOURCE_ID)
) {
const basePageId: string = !!currentApplicationIdForCreateNewApp
? application?.defaultBasePageId
: yield select(getCurrentBasePageId);
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
history.push(
datasourcesEditorIdURL({
basePageId,
feat: Datasource autosave improvements (#17649) * Datasource autosave improvements WIP * authenticated API and ds name updates * popup updates, api to datasource updates * issue fixes for new ds in new workspace * formatter issue fixed * console warning issue fixed * refresh edge case handled for temp ds * DS creation cypress update * datasource improvements issue fixes * CreateDS flow change cypress update * reconnect issue fixed * added space * Create Ds related script updates * SaveDs changes updated * DatasourceForm_spec.js fix * GoogleSheetsQuery_spec.js - still spec will fail * GoogleSheetsStub_spec.ts fix * MongoDatasource_spec.js fix * ElasticSearchDatasource_spec.js fix * AuthenticatedApiDatasource_spec.js * RestApiDatasource_spec.js - will stil fail * RedshiftDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * issue fixes for datasource autosave * save as datasource issue fixed * SKipped - Bug 18035 * MySQL spec fix * PostgresDatasource_spec.js fix * MySQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * MsSQLDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * Bug16702_Spec.ts fix * SwitchDatasource_spec.js fix * ArangoDataSourceStub_spec.js fix * code review changes, save and authorise issue fixed * cypress test issue and cypress tests fixed * client build failure issue fixed * test failure fixes * ReconnectDatasource_spec.js fix * Entity_Explorer_CopyQuery_RenameDatasource_spec.js fix * GitImport_spec.js fix * Index add * undo redo test issue fixed * fixed cypress tests of rest api ds * globalsearch_spec.js fixed * code review changes * code review comments addressed * ds schema cypress issue fixed * cypress test updates * fix updateDatasource path * rest api cypress test fixed * cypress code review changes * Removing few random .only's * replay editor fix * indexed * adding .skip Co-authored-by: “sneha122” <“sneha@appsmith.com”> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com>
2022-11-30 05:59:45 +00:00
datasourceId: actionPayload.payload.id,
params: {
from: "datasources",
...getQueryParams(),
pluginId: plugin?.id,
},
}),
);
}
Introducing Google Sheets Plugin (#3517) * cherry pick -make new * revert to enable fix from release * attempt to hook into existing datasource editor * gSheets plugin skeleton from Rest API * Changes for database migration * fix for auth code * separate it out * action page loads! * add to explorer * create action from datasource * Editor JSON WIP * working query form * Editor JSON WIP * import to * fix toast message * redirect from datasource and editor pages * fix onboarding * fix imports and constants * refactor form out * refactor queryForm * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * initial values from settings, editor and form * Check * remove dangling code around lightTheme * Safety net * remove class * try mouseover solve * force click * changes from review * fix action form name on import * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * minor cleanup * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * WIP * Google sheets changes * Merge conflicts * Merging and fixes, needs refactoring * Check * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixed tests * Add cloud services env variable * Clean up saga * Clean up * Refactoring * Deleted svg file * Minor fixes * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods (#3486) * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods * Review changes * Removed sysout * Added handling of edge cases with table data * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixes * Fixes * Added validations * Improved tests * Removed extraneous injected bean * Review changes * Fixed bug with method * Changes to Google sheets plugin's request and response structures (#3692) * Method changes * Removed logging * Renaming options * Reverting pom version * Modified type of collection variables, fixed errors * Converted row offset field to one that supports dynamic bindings * Review changes * List SAAS plugin type actions under lightning menu apis (#3820) * list saas plugin type actions under lightning menu apis * combine saas plugin type actions in the other sub menu of lightning menu Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> * Fix merge issues * Prettified query editor and a few fixes w/ ux * Test fixes * Reformatting request * code for REST added (#3876) Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> * Renamed body to row object * Renamed placeholder for range * Renamed range heading * Modifications to handle range semantics * Use spreadsheet Url instead of id * Ordering of methods * Removed logging * Add tests for Dynamic text controls * Add tests for url helpers * Fix coverage config * Nevermind * Interface changes * There is no body here * Yay to hints * Delete row field is separately handled as row index * placeholder support (#4001) * Fixed tests, typos and creating new sheets with random rows * Switched to using 'rowIndex' throughout * binding path added for query input field (#4016) * - Fixed QA bugs (#4032) - Split delete sheet into two - Removed dynamic query input types from hidden keys * Proper exceptions * Removed extra logging * Throw exception if update method does not match any of the columns * Same for bulk update * Zero-indexed delete row * I'm a space bound rocket ship * Logic to register installations with cs (#4062) * Logic to register installations with cs * Clean up * Casting to string * Checking to see if this makes the test pass * Added an extra null check Co-authored-by: Piyush <piyush@codeitout.com> Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Apeksha Bhosale <7846888+ApekshaBhosale@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-04-22 03:30:09 +00:00
}
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
export function* createDefaultApiActionPayload(
props: CreateApiActionDefaultsParams,
) {
const workspaceId: string = yield select(getCurrentWorkspaceId);
const { apiType, from, newActionName } = props;
const pluginId: string = yield select(getPluginIdOfPackageName, apiType);
// Default Config is Rest Api Plugin Config
// TODO: Fix this the next time the file is edited
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
let defaultConfig: any = DEFAULT_CREATE_API_CONFIG;
let pluginType: PluginType = PluginType.API;
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
if (apiType === PluginPackageName.GRAPHQL) {
defaultConfig = DEFAULT_CREATE_GRAPHQL_CONFIG;
}
if (apiType === PluginPackageName.APPSMITH_AI) {
defaultConfig = DEFAULT_CREATE_APPSMITH_AI_CONFIG;
pluginType = PluginType.AI;
yield call(checkAndGetPluginFormConfigsSaga, pluginId);
}
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
return {
actionConfiguration: defaultConfig.config,
name: newActionName,
datasource: {
name: defaultConfig.datasource.name,
pluginId,
workspaceId,
datasourceConfiguration: defaultConfig.datasource.datasourceConfiguration,
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
},
pluginType,
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
eventData: {
actionType: defaultConfig.eventData.actionType,
from: from,
},
};
}
/**
* Creates an API with datasource as DEFAULT_REST_DATASOURCE (No user created datasource)
* @param action
*/
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
function* handleCreateNewApiActionSaga(
action: ReduxAction<{
pageId: string;
from: EventLocation;
apiType?: string;
}>,
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
) {
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
const { apiType = PluginPackageName.REST_API, from, pageId } = action.payload;
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
if (pageId) {
// Note: Do NOT send pluginId on top level here.
// It breaks embedded rest datasource flow.
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
const createApiActionPayload: Partial<ApiAction> = yield call(
createDefaultApiActionPayload,
{
apiType,
from,
},
);
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
yield put(
createActionRequest({
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
...createApiActionPayload,
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
pageId,
chore: Refactor the create action logic to support module actions (#28404) ## Description Refactoring the create action logic to support module actions #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#26051](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/26051) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-10-27 06:36:57 +00:00
}), // We don't have recursive partial in typescript for now.
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
);
}
}
function* handleApiNameChangeSaga(
action: ReduxAction<{ id: string; name: string }>,
) {
2020-06-18 14:16:49 +00:00
yield put(change(API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME, "name", action.payload.name));
}
function* handleApiNameChangeSuccessSaga(
action: ReduxAction<{ actionId: string }>,
) {
const { actionId } = action.payload;
const actionObj: Action | undefined = yield select(getAction, actionId);
yield take(ReduxActionTypes.FETCH_ACTIONS_FOR_PAGE_SUCCESS);
if (!actionObj) {
// Error case, log to sentry
feat: [epic] appsmith design system version 2 deduplication (#22030) ## Description ### Fixes - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19383 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19384 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19385 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19386 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19387 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19388 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19389 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19390 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19391 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19392 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19393 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19394 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19395 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19396 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19397 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19398 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19399 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19400 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19401 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19402 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19403 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19404 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19405 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19406 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19407 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19408 - [x] https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/19409 Fixes # (issue) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video ## Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce. > Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not important - Manual - Jest - Cypress ### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR ### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) ## Checklist: ### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag ### QA activity: - [ ] Test plan has been approved by relevant developers - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by QA - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by either SDET or manual QA - [ ] Organized project review call with relevant stakeholders after Round 1/2 of QA - [ ] Added Test Plan Approved label after reveiwing all Cypress test --------- Co-authored-by: Ankita Kinger <ankita@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: akash-codemonk <67054171+akash-codemonk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvi@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Arsalan <arsalanyaldram0211@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Aman Agarwal <aman@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Rohit Agarwal <rohit_agarwal@live.in> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <nilesh@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Nilesh Sarupriya <20905988+nsarupr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tanvi Bhakta <tanvibhakta@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya UR <aishwarya@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi Goswami <parthvigoswami@Parthvis-MacBook-Pro.local> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <vijetha@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Parthvi <80334441+Parthvi12@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Apple <nandan@thinkify.io> Co-authored-by: Saroj <43822041+sarojsarab@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sangeeth Sivan <74818788+berzerkeer@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar M <35134347+marks0351@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aishwarya-U-R <91450662+Aishwarya-U-R@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rahulramesha <rahul@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Aswath K <aswath.sana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Preet Sidhu <preetsidhu.bits@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vijetha-Kaja <119562824+Vijetha-Kaja@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shrikant Sharat Kandula <shrikant@appsmith.com>
2023-05-19 18:37:06 +00:00
toast.show(createMessage(ERROR_ACTION_RENAME_FAIL, ""), {
kind: "error",
});
Sentry.captureException(
new Error(createMessage(ERROR_ACTION_RENAME_FAIL, "")),
{
extra: {
actionId: actionId,
},
},
);
return;
}
Introducing Google Sheets Plugin (#3517) * cherry pick -make new * revert to enable fix from release * attempt to hook into existing datasource editor * gSheets plugin skeleton from Rest API * Changes for database migration * fix for auth code * separate it out * action page loads! * add to explorer * create action from datasource * Editor JSON WIP * working query form * Editor JSON WIP * import to * fix toast message * redirect from datasource and editor pages * fix onboarding * fix imports and constants * refactor form out * refactor queryForm * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * initial values from settings, editor and form * Check * remove dangling code around lightTheme * Safety net * remove class * try mouseover solve * force click * changes from review * fix action form name on import * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * minor cleanup * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * WIP * Google sheets changes * Merge conflicts * Merging and fixes, needs refactoring * Check * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixed tests * Add cloud services env variable * Clean up saga * Clean up * Refactoring * Deleted svg file * Minor fixes * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods (#3486) * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods * Review changes * Removed sysout * Added handling of edge cases with table data * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixes * Fixes * Added validations * Improved tests * Removed extraneous injected bean * Review changes * Fixed bug with method * Changes to Google sheets plugin's request and response structures (#3692) * Method changes * Removed logging * Renaming options * Reverting pom version * Modified type of collection variables, fixed errors * Converted row offset field to one that supports dynamic bindings * Review changes * List SAAS plugin type actions under lightning menu apis (#3820) * list saas plugin type actions under lightning menu apis * combine saas plugin type actions in the other sub menu of lightning menu Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> * Fix merge issues * Prettified query editor and a few fixes w/ ux * Test fixes * Reformatting request * code for REST added (#3876) Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> * Renamed body to row object * Renamed placeholder for range * Renamed range heading * Modifications to handle range semantics * Use spreadsheet Url instead of id * Ordering of methods * Removed logging * Add tests for Dynamic text controls * Add tests for url helpers * Fix coverage config * Nevermind * Interface changes * There is no body here * Yay to hints * Delete row field is separately handled as row index * placeholder support (#4001) * Fixed tests, typos and creating new sheets with random rows * Switched to using 'rowIndex' throughout * binding path added for query input field (#4016) * - Fixed QA bugs (#4032) - Split delete sheet into two - Removed dynamic query input types from hidden keys * Proper exceptions * Removed extra logging * Throw exception if update method does not match any of the columns * Same for bulk update * Zero-indexed delete row * I'm a space bound rocket ship * Logic to register installations with cs (#4062) * Logic to register installations with cs * Clean up * Casting to string * Checking to see if this makes the test pass * Added an extra null check Co-authored-by: Piyush <piyush@codeitout.com> Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Apeksha Bhosale <7846888+ApekshaBhosale@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-04-22 03:30:09 +00:00
if (actionObj.pluginType === PluginType.API) {
const params = getQueryParams();
if (params.editName) {
params.editName = "false";
}
const basePageId: string = yield select(
convertToBasePageIdSelector,
actionObj.pageId,
);
feat: adding slug names in urls (#10957) * Init commit clean urls * Changes to builder route * Refactored URLs * Remove default params from url builder functions. * Fixed more urls * Changed selector name * Minor url correction * Type fixes * Jest fixes * Fixed routing for old published apps * Fixed url slug replace * page-1 -> page1 as default page slug name * Remove application id from init editor calls * Use default page slug * Added comments and placeholder values for slug names * variable rename * Removed redirection and added back the old routes * Prevent page slug name recompute * Fixed home page load in view mode * Added null checks * Fixed jest test * Fixed jest test * Update URL slugs when app/page name changes * Added unit tests and updates types * Removed unused code * * Removed duplication fetch page call. * Fixes #11354 * Fixed sign up flow * Refactored initializeEditorSaga * Fixed warnings * Fixed integrations screen URL bugs * Cypress fixes * Fixed slug names in copy/move operations and pages screen * Minor refactor * Fixed page highlight bug in published apps * Added new url factory and middleware to store url params * Changed store to default export and fix unit tests * Fixed slugs unit test * Minor fixes * Fixes #11379 * Fixed set as home page feature * Updated types * app id adjustments for cypress * Fixed bad merge * Refactored routes to functional component * * Fixed EE active entity highlight. * Remove unused code in editor router. * jest fix * Mock history to prevent security errors * constant rename * Removed console logs * Fixed page id regex * Do not check for /pages in url * Fixed missing pageId on quick edit/deploy clicks * Missed files from previous commit * Fixed warnings * Fixed jest test * New api integration * feat: Add applicationVersion property to Application (#11626) Added a new property to Application object - applicationVersion. This property can be used to identity when there is a breaking change and can not be solved with migration. FE will use this property to detect such conditions. Another API is added to migrate the applicationVersion to latest version when user migrates the breaking changes. * Added manual upgrade modal. * Test fix * Fixed jest test * function rename * Fix deploy error * Added null check * Changes to persist URL search params when redirecting * Added updates tooltip * More unit test cases * Fixed git url redirection * Fix warning * Fixed evaluation on upgrade * Fixed warnings * File rename * Added cypress for clean urls * Fixed import/export/fork cypress * Cypress api server fixes * Fixed mongo spec * Fixed replay spec * Fixed comments spec * More cypress fixes * Fixed tooltip in update btn * Text size changes * Minor fixes * Jest test fix * Fixed type error * Fixed warnings * Fixed todo comments * Moved description to constants file * Fixed cypress CI run crash * Fixes git cypress failures * Import/Export cypress test fixes * Import export fork cypress fixes * Explorer test fix * Switch branch test fix * Added applicationVersion in export app json * Calls plugin forms in parallel * Fixed warnings * Fixed warning * Import export CI fixes * Reverts previous changes * Fixes import export * Fixed import export cypress URL verification * Pass applicationVersion when duplicating application * Cypress fix * Dummy commit Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com>
2022-03-25 10:43:26 +00:00
history.push(
apiEditorIdURL({
basePageId,
baseApiId: actionObj.baseId,
feat: adding slug names in urls (#10957) * Init commit clean urls * Changes to builder route * Refactored URLs * Remove default params from url builder functions. * Fixed more urls * Changed selector name * Minor url correction * Type fixes * Jest fixes * Fixed routing for old published apps * Fixed url slug replace * page-1 -> page1 as default page slug name * Remove application id from init editor calls * Use default page slug * Added comments and placeholder values for slug names * variable rename * Removed redirection and added back the old routes * Prevent page slug name recompute * Fixed home page load in view mode * Added null checks * Fixed jest test * Fixed jest test * Update URL slugs when app/page name changes * Added unit tests and updates types * Removed unused code * * Removed duplication fetch page call. * Fixes #11354 * Fixed sign up flow * Refactored initializeEditorSaga * Fixed warnings * Fixed integrations screen URL bugs * Cypress fixes * Fixed slug names in copy/move operations and pages screen * Minor refactor * Fixed page highlight bug in published apps * Added new url factory and middleware to store url params * Changed store to default export and fix unit tests * Fixed slugs unit test * Minor fixes * Fixes #11379 * Fixed set as home page feature * Updated types * app id adjustments for cypress * Fixed bad merge * Refactored routes to functional component * * Fixed EE active entity highlight. * Remove unused code in editor router. * jest fix * Mock history to prevent security errors * constant rename * Removed console logs * Fixed page id regex * Do not check for /pages in url * Fixed missing pageId on quick edit/deploy clicks * Missed files from previous commit * Fixed warnings * Fixed jest test * New api integration * feat: Add applicationVersion property to Application (#11626) Added a new property to Application object - applicationVersion. This property can be used to identity when there is a breaking change and can not be solved with migration. FE will use this property to detect such conditions. Another API is added to migrate the applicationVersion to latest version when user migrates the breaking changes. * Added manual upgrade modal. * Test fix * Fixed jest test * function rename * Fix deploy error * Added null check * Changes to persist URL search params when redirecting * Added updates tooltip * More unit test cases * Fixed git url redirection * Fix warning * Fixed evaluation on upgrade * Fixed warnings * File rename * Added cypress for clean urls * Fixed import/export/fork cypress * Cypress api server fixes * Fixed mongo spec * Fixed replay spec * Fixed comments spec * More cypress fixes * Fixed tooltip in update btn * Text size changes * Minor fixes * Jest test fix * Fixed type error * Fixed warnings * Fixed todo comments * Moved description to constants file * Fixed cypress CI run crash * Fixes git cypress failures * Import/Export cypress test fixes * Import export fork cypress fixes * Explorer test fix * Switch branch test fix * Added applicationVersion in export app json * Calls plugin forms in parallel * Fixed warnings * Fixed warning * Import export CI fixes * Reverts previous changes * Fixes import export * Fixed import export cypress URL verification * Pass applicationVersion when duplicating application * Cypress fix * Dummy commit Co-authored-by: Nayan <nayan@appsmith.com>
2022-03-25 10:43:26 +00:00
params,
}),
);
Introducing Google Sheets Plugin (#3517) * cherry pick -make new * revert to enable fix from release * attempt to hook into existing datasource editor * gSheets plugin skeleton from Rest API * Changes for database migration * fix for auth code * separate it out * action page loads! * add to explorer * create action from datasource * Editor JSON WIP * working query form * Editor JSON WIP * import to * fix toast message * redirect from datasource and editor pages * fix onboarding * fix imports and constants * refactor form out * refactor queryForm * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * initial values from settings, editor and form * Check * remove dangling code around lightTheme * Safety net * remove class * try mouseover solve * force click * changes from review * fix action form name on import * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * minor cleanup * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * WIP * Google sheets changes * Merge conflicts * Merging and fixes, needs refactoring * Check * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixed tests * Add cloud services env variable * Clean up saga * Clean up * Refactoring * Deleted svg file * Minor fixes * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods (#3486) * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods * Review changes * Removed sysout * Added handling of edge cases with table data * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixes * Fixes * Added validations * Improved tests * Removed extraneous injected bean * Review changes * Fixed bug with method * Changes to Google sheets plugin's request and response structures (#3692) * Method changes * Removed logging * Renaming options * Reverting pom version * Modified type of collection variables, fixed errors * Converted row offset field to one that supports dynamic bindings * Review changes * List SAAS plugin type actions under lightning menu apis (#3820) * list saas plugin type actions under lightning menu apis * combine saas plugin type actions in the other sub menu of lightning menu Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> * Fix merge issues * Prettified query editor and a few fixes w/ ux * Test fixes * Reformatting request * code for REST added (#3876) Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> * Renamed body to row object * Renamed placeholder for range * Renamed range heading * Modifications to handle range semantics * Use spreadsheet Url instead of id * Ordering of methods * Removed logging * Add tests for Dynamic text controls * Add tests for url helpers * Fix coverage config * Nevermind * Interface changes * There is no body here * Yay to hints * Delete row field is separately handled as row index * placeholder support (#4001) * Fixed tests, typos and creating new sheets with random rows * Switched to using 'rowIndex' throughout * binding path added for query input field (#4016) * - Fixed QA bugs (#4032) - Split delete sheet into two - Removed dynamic query input types from hidden keys * Proper exceptions * Removed extra logging * Throw exception if update method does not match any of the columns * Same for bulk update * Zero-indexed delete row * I'm a space bound rocket ship * Logic to register installations with cs (#4062) * Logic to register installations with cs * Clean up * Casting to string * Checking to see if this makes the test pass * Added an extra null check Co-authored-by: Piyush <piyush@codeitout.com> Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Apeksha Bhosale <7846888+ApekshaBhosale@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-04-22 03:30:09 +00:00
}
}
2020-06-18 14:16:49 +00:00
function* handleApiNameChangeFailureSaga(
action: ReduxAction<{ oldName: string }>,
) {
yield put(change(API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME, "name", action.payload.oldName));
}
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
export default function* root() {
yield all([
takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.API_PANE_CHANGE_API, changeApiSaga),
takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.CREATE_ACTION_SUCCESS, handleActionCreatedSaga),
Introducing Google Sheets Plugin (#3517) * cherry pick -make new * revert to enable fix from release * attempt to hook into existing datasource editor * gSheets plugin skeleton from Rest API * Changes for database migration * fix for auth code * separate it out * action page loads! * add to explorer * create action from datasource * Editor JSON WIP * working query form * Editor JSON WIP * import to * fix toast message * redirect from datasource and editor pages * fix onboarding * fix imports and constants * refactor form out * refactor queryForm * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * initial values from settings, editor and form * Check * remove dangling code around lightTheme * Safety net * remove class * try mouseover solve * force click * changes from review * fix action form name on import * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * minor cleanup * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * WIP * Google sheets changes * Merge conflicts * Merging and fixes, needs refactoring * Check * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixed tests * Add cloud services env variable * Clean up saga * Clean up * Refactoring * Deleted svg file * Minor fixes * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods (#3486) * Modified design to allow behaviour in google sheets methods * Review changes * Removed sysout * Added handling of edge cases with table data * Merge branch 'release' into feature/google-sheets * Fixes * Fixes * Added validations * Improved tests * Removed extraneous injected bean * Review changes * Fixed bug with method * Changes to Google sheets plugin's request and response structures (#3692) * Method changes * Removed logging * Renaming options * Reverting pom version * Modified type of collection variables, fixed errors * Converted row offset field to one that supports dynamic bindings * Review changes * List SAAS plugin type actions under lightning menu apis (#3820) * list saas plugin type actions under lightning menu apis * combine saas plugin type actions in the other sub menu of lightning menu Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> * Fix merge issues * Prettified query editor and a few fixes w/ ux * Test fixes * Reformatting request * code for REST added (#3876) Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> * Renamed body to row object * Renamed placeholder for range * Renamed range heading * Modifications to handle range semantics * Use spreadsheet Url instead of id * Ordering of methods * Removed logging * Add tests for Dynamic text controls * Add tests for url helpers * Fix coverage config * Nevermind * Interface changes * There is no body here * Yay to hints * Delete row field is separately handled as row index * placeholder support (#4001) * Fixed tests, typos and creating new sheets with random rows * Switched to using 'rowIndex' throughout * binding path added for query input field (#4016) * - Fixed QA bugs (#4032) - Split delete sheet into two - Removed dynamic query input types from hidden keys * Proper exceptions * Removed extra logging * Throw exception if update method does not match any of the columns * Same for bulk update * Zero-indexed delete row * I'm a space bound rocket ship * Logic to register installations with cs (#4062) * Logic to register installations with cs * Clean up * Casting to string * Checking to see if this makes the test pass * Added an extra null check Co-authored-by: Piyush <piyush@codeitout.com> Co-authored-by: hetunandu <hetu@appsmith.com> Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Apeksha Bhosale <7846888+ApekshaBhosale@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-04-22 03:30:09 +00:00
takeEvery(
ReduxActionTypes.CREATE_DATASOURCE_SUCCESS,
handleDatasourceCreatedSaga,
),
takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.SAVE_ACTION_NAME_INIT, handleApiNameChangeSaga),
takeEvery(
ReduxActionTypes.SAVE_ACTION_NAME_SUCCESS,
handleApiNameChangeSuccessSaga,
),
2020-06-18 14:16:49 +00:00
takeEvery(
ReduxActionErrorTypes.SAVE_ACTION_NAME_ERROR,
2020-06-18 14:16:49 +00:00
handleApiNameChangeFailureSaga,
),
2020-04-20 08:26:19 +00:00
takeEvery(
ReduxActionTypes.CREATE_NEW_API_ACTION,
handleCreateNewApiActionSaga,
),
takeEvery(
ReduxActionTypes.UPDATE_API_ACTION_BODY_CONTENT_TYPE,
handleUpdateBodyContentType,
),
2019-12-23 12:12:58 +00:00
takeEvery(ReduxFormActionTypes.VALUE_CHANGE, formValueChangeSaga),
takeEvery(ReduxFormActionTypes.ARRAY_REMOVE, formValueChangeSaga),
takeEvery(ReduxFormActionTypes.ARRAY_PUSH, formValueChangeSaga),
2019-11-25 09:15:11 +00:00
]);
}