Protei/PromucFlow_constructor
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
09de1316b5
PromucFlow_constructor/CODEOWNERS

239 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

chore: add codeowners file (#24317) ## Description Add codeowners file Some pictures with examples ![2023-06-09_17-14-54](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/8a43b8d9-8ac1-4177-a820-c72e455059ae) ![2023-06-09_17-14-33](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/assets/11555074/6fc93aea-574d-41d9-8f87-5151c35f7522) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) Co-authored-by: Valera Melnikov <melnikov.vv@greendatasoft.ru>
2023-06-14 06:44:20 +00:00
# This is a comment.
# Each line is a file pattern followed by one or more owners.
# https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners
# WDS team
app/client/packages/design-system/* @appsmithorg/wds
app/client/packages/storybook/* @appsmithorg/wds
app/client/.husky @KelvinOm
app/client/.yarn @KelvinOm
app/client/.editorconfig @KelvinOm
app/client/.eslintrc.base.json @KelvinOm
app/client/.eslintrc.js @KelvinOm
app/client/.gitignore @KelvinOm
app/client/.lintstagedrc @KelvinOm
app/client/.nvmrc @KelvinOm
app/client/.prettierignore @KelvinOm
app/client/.prettierrc @KelvinOm
app/client/.yarnrc.yml @KelvinOm
app/client/jest.config.js @KelvinOm
app/client/package.json @KelvinOm
app/client/tsconfig.json @KelvinOm
app/client/tsconfig.path.json @KelvinOm
chore: Add App viewer pod codeowners (#24613) > Pull Request Template > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Dhruvik Neharia <dhruvik@appsmith.com>
2023-06-21 07:50:21 +00:00
# App viewers pod
chore: Keep Rajat as codeowner for only cypress tests of widgets (#27082) Keep @rajatagrawal as code owner for only cypress tests of widgets.
2023-09-11 06:01:16 +00:00
app/client/src/widgets/* @appsmithorg/app-viewers
chore: Add Rajat to codeowners for app viewers cypress tests code review (#26117) This PR adds @rajatagrawal to reviews for cypress tests for app viewers code. The purpose is to review cypress test code and explore possibilities to convert into UI Unit Tests using React Testing Library if possible.
2023-08-08 06:35:46 +00:00
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/* @rajatagrawal
chore: Add App viewer pod codeowners (#24613) > Pull Request Template > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Dhruvik Neharia <dhruvik@appsmith.com>
2023-06-21 07:50:21 +00:00
app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* @appsmithorg/app-viewers
app/client/src/sagas/OneClickBindingSaga.ts @sbalaji1192 @berzerkeer
app/client/src/WidgetQueryGenerators/* @sbalaji1192 @berzerkeer
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/WidgetQueryGeneratorForm/* @sbalaji1192 @berzerkeer
app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/* @appsmithorg/app-viewers
app/client/src/pages/Editor/AppSettingsPane/AppSettings/NavigationSettings/* @dhruvikn
app/client/src/ce/pages/AppViewer/NavigationLogo.tsx @dhruvikn
app/client/src/ce/pages/Editor/NavigationSettings/LogoInput.tsx @dhruvikn
app/client/src/ee/pages/AppViewer/NavigationLogo.tsx @dhruvikn
feat: Flagsmith Integration (#24472) ## Description > This PR integrates Flagsmith feature flagging into the Appsmith codebase > It also sets some default traits such as instance_id, tenant_id and email/hashed email to the new and existing users #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #24037 #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed --------- Co-authored-by: Hetu Nandu <hetunandu@gmail.com>
2023-06-27 10:45:33 +00:00
app/client/src/ee/pages/Editor/NavigationSettings/LogoInput.tsx @dhruvikn
# New Developers Pod
app/client/src/ce/entities/FeatureFlag.ts @hetunandu
chore: Adding UI builders code paths to codeowners (#25003) > Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description Adding UI builders code paths to codeowners. > > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-03 08:00:15 +00:00
app/client/src/ee/entities/FeatureFlag.ts @hetunandu
chore: Stub /features call in tests (#25104) This change will stub the call to `users/features` to get the feature flags. By default it will return an empty list and rely on the client default flag list to enable/disable features
2023-07-05 14:09:04 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/resources/features/init-flags.xml @hetunandu
feat: Feature Flagging Default Traits (#25201) ## Description > This PR sets the default traits for the users in the same SDK call to get features. > This ensures the traits are present for all users and also the SDK calls are contained. Fixes #25159 #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [x] Manual - [x] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-09 18:43:25 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/featureflags/* @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/UserIdentifierService.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/UserIdentifierServiceImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/UserIdentifierServiceCE.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/UserIdentifierServiceCEImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/UserIdentifierServiceCEImplTest.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/CacheableFeatureFlagHelper.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/CacheableFeatureFlagHelperImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/CacheableFeatureFlagHelperCE.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/CacheableFeatureFlagHelperCEImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/FeatureFlagServiceCE.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/FeatureFlagServiceCEImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/FeatureFlagService.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/FeatureFlagServiceImpl.java @nilanshbansal
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/services/FeatureFlagServiceTest.java @nilanshbansal
chore: Adding UI builders code paths to codeowners (#25003) > Pull Request Template > > Use this template to quickly create a well written pull request. Delete all quotes before creating the pull request. > ## Description Adding UI builders code paths to codeowners. > > #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-07-03 08:00:15 +00:00
# UI Builders Pod
app/client/generators/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/actions/autoHeightActions.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/actions/autoLayoutActions.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/actions/canvasSelectionActions.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/actions/reflowActions.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/actions/widgetSelectionActions.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/autoHeight/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/autoHeightOverlay/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/designSystems/appsmith/PositionedContainer.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/DraggableComponent.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/ResizableComponent.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/ResizableUtils.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/ResizeStyledComponents.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/WidgetNameComponent/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/normalizers/CanvasWidgetsNormalizer.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/pages/Editor/Canvas.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/pages/Editor/CanvasLayoutConversion/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/pages/Editor/PropertyPane/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/pages/Editor/WidgetsMultiSelectBox.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/pages/common/CanvasArenas/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/reducers/entityReducers/autoHeightReducers/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/reducers/entityReducers/canvasWidgetsReducer.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/reducers/entityReducers/widgetConfigReducer.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/reflow/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/resizable/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/AutoLayoutUpdateSagas.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/CanvasSagas/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/ReplaySaga.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/SnapshotSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetAdditionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetBlueprintSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetDeletionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetOperationSagas.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetOperationUtils.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetSelectUtils.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/WidgetSelectionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/autoHeightSagas/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/sagas/layoutConversionSagas.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/selectors/autoHeightSelectors.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/selectors/autoLayoutSelectors.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/selectors/canvasSelectors.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/selectors/widgetSelectors.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/DSLConversions/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/autoHeight/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/autoLayout/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/hooks/autoHeightUIHooks.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useAllowEditorDragToSelect.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useClickToSelectWidget.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useDynamicAppLayout.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/hooks/usePositionedContainerZIndex.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useReflow.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/utils/hooks/useWidgetSelection.ts @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/widgets/BaseWidget.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/widgets/CanvasResizer.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/widgets/CanvasWidget.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/widgets/ContainerWidget/* @appsmithorg/ui-builders
app/client/src/widgets/MetaHOC.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
chore: Add git pod to CODEOWNERS file (#25042)
2023-07-04 05:02:53 +00:00
app/client/src/widgets/withWidgetProps.tsx @appsmithorg/ui-builders
# Git Pod
app/server/appsmith-git/* @AnaghHegde
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/ce/ImportExportApplicationServiceCEImpl.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/ce/ImportExportApplicationServiceCE.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/GitServiceCEImpl.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/GitServiceCE.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitCloudServicesUtils.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitDeployKeyGenerator.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitFileUtils.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
ci: Update Codeowners with data platform paths (#26217)
2023-08-11 05:30:08 +00:00
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitUtils.java @AnaghHegde @nayan-rafiq
# Data Platform
app/client/src/actions/datasourceActions.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/api/ActionAPI.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/ce/components/DSDataFilter/index.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/ce/constants/ReduxActionConstants.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/ce/sagas/ApplicationSagas.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/ce/selectors/environmentSelectors.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/ce/utils/Environments/index.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/components/BottomBar/index.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/form/fields/EmbeddedDatasourcePathField.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/components/formControls/utils.test.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/components/formControls/utils.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/entities/Datasource/index.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/entities/FeatureFlags.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/navigation/FocusEntity.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/* @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/DataSourceEditor/* @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/IntegrationEditor/DatasourceCard.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/IntegrationEditor/IntegrationsHomeScreen.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/IntegrationEditor/NewApi.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/EditorJSONtoForm.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/SaaSEditor/DatasourceCard.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/SaaSEditor/DatasourceForm.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/Editor/gitSync/ReconnectDatasourceModal.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/pages/common/datasourceAuth/index.tsx @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/reducers/entityReducers/datasourceReducer.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/sagas/ActionExecution/PluginActionSaga.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/sagas/DatasourcesSagas.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/sagas/QueryPaneSagas.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
app/client/src/transformers/RestAPIDatasourceFormTransformer.ts @ayushpahwa @ChandanBalajiBP
# Followed Globstar paths in combination with wildcard paths. Reference https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/codeowners/reference.html#globstar-paths
# Data Platform server - Interfaces
app/server/appsmith-interfaces/src/main/java/com/appsmith/external/**/Action* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-interfaces/src/main/java/com/appsmith/external/**/Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-interfaces/src/main/java/com/appsmith/external/**/OAuth2* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
# Data Platform server - Controllers
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/controllers/**/Action* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/controllers/**/Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
# Data Platform server - Domains
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/domains/**/Action* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/domains/**/Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
# Data Platform server - DTOs
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/dtos/**/Action* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/dtos/**/Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
# Data Platform server - Repositories
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/repositories/**/*Action* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/repositories/**/*Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
# Data Platform server - Services
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/**/*Action* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/**/*Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/**/*Authentication* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
# Data Platform server - Solutions
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/**/*Action* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/**/*Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/**/*Authentication* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/**/*Environment* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
# Data Platform server - Misc
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/**/Datasource* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/exceptions/AppsmithError* @nidhi-nair @sondermanish @tkappsmith
chore: Adding CODEOWNERS file for Admin settings client-side files (#26413) ## Description Adding CODEOWNERS file for Admin settings client-side files #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
2023-08-17 10:17:38 +00:00
# Team Managers pod
chore: Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file (#26643) ## Description Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-08-25 06:27:10 +00:00
app/client/src/ce/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/src/ee/**/* @ankitakinger
chore: Improve code splitting of FE components (#26659) ## Description Improve code splitting of FE components to avoid minimal changes needed on EE when CE is modified. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes [#24184](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/issues/24184) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [x] Jest - [x] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-08-28 15:37:32 +00:00
app/client/src/ce/entities/FeatureFlag.ts @hetunandu
app/client/src/ee/entities/FeatureFlag.ts @hetunandu
app/client/src/ce/constants/messages*
app/client/src/ee/constants/messages*
app/client/src/ce/utils/analyticsUtilTypes.ts
app/client/src/ee/utils/analyticsUtilTypes.ts
chore: Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file (#26643) ## Description Updating file paths in CODEOWNERS file #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) #### Type of change - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing #### How Has This Been Tested? - [x] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-08-25 06:27:10 +00:00
app/client/src/pages/Settings/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/Enterprise/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/EE/Enterprise/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/AdminSettings/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Google/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Github/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/FormLogin/**/* @ankitakinger
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Auditlogs/**/* @ankitakinger
chore: added myself as owner to be notified for any change (#26917) Added myself as owner to be notified ant changes in evaluation flow #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes # (issue number) > if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers about this first > > #### Media > A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video > > #### Type of change > Please delete options that are not relevant. - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) - This change requires a documentation update > > > ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
2023-09-04 09:01:07 +00:00
#FE pod
app/client/src/actions/evaluationActions.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/entities/DataTree/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/entities/DependencyMap/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/entities/workers/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/entities/DataTree* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/entities/workers/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/EvaluationsSaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/EvalWorkerActionSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/LintingSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/PostEvaluationSags.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/PostLintingSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/workers/**/* @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/sagas/JSLibrarySaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/ActionExecution/ActionExecutionSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/ActionExecution/ActionExecutionSagas.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ce/JSFunctionExecutionSaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
app/client/src/ee/JSFunctionExecutionSaga.ts @ApekshaBhosale
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink